Council deputy survives vote over ‘unacceptable' comments
Expanding on his reasons for the call, Cllr Murphy – in his submission - said: 'Councillor Miller on April 28 at a Cabinet meeting moved an amendment with regards to Welsh Education Strategic Plan (WESP) to request officers collect data from parents of children electing a Welsh medium education when the Schools Admission Code does not provide for the collection of such data.
'At this meeting Cllr Miller commented with regards to parental choice for Ysgol Caer Elen: '…all of them that I know who send their children to Caer Ellen honestly couldn't give a toss whether it was Welsh or English'.
'Comments such as this in 2025 are unacceptable and serve to create a perception of bias when it comes to the delivery of Welsh medium education, something that generations have striven for, namely equality and fairness.
'For a Deputy Leader of Council to make such comments and then refuse to retract when he has had ample opportunity to do so makes his position untenable both as Deputy Leader and Cabinet Member.
The matter was reported to the Welsh Language Commissioner and was called in to the May Schools O&S Scrutiny Committee, ultimately returning to a May 21 meeting of the Cabinet, members agreeing to now collect data on all languages and additional information.
'Throughout the recent debate on WESP, Cllr Miller has ignored the views and advice of the Schools O&S Committee, Senior Officers, the Welsh Language Commissioner and even Mr Mark Drakeford his own Minister for the Welsh Language,' Cllr Murphy added.
Responding at the special meeting, Cllr Miller repeated previously made comments, saying there had never been an intention to collect the information through a formal schools process.
He reiterated the 'couldn't give a toss' comment was one made by a mother in his ward which he had repeated, apologising if he had caused upset.
He added: 'I believe Cllr Murphy should be deeply ashamed of his actions, he is trying to create division in the county of Pembrokeshire where no division exists,' adding: 'To suggest that either I personally or the administration is anti-Welsh is simply not true.'
Conservative Group Leader Cllr Di Clements said she was 'not really sure why we are all here,' adding: 'The deputy leader showed poor judgement in his use of inappropriate language to put forward a recommendation to evidence base decisions on why and where parents choose to send their children to school, it was rightly highlighted and called in.'
'The recommendation was changed to reflect those concerns and all present cabinet members agreed. The subject should now be closed.'
She went on to say: 'This is nothing more than petty political point scoring which we want no part of,' adding the costs of the special meeting was some £2,000 for cash-strapped Pembrokeshire.
Fellow Conservative Cllr Aled Thomas, the Conservative group business manager and County Council Welsh Language Champion said that 'today's meeting has done nothing but drive a wedge between Welsh and English speakers in the county.'
He said Cllr Murphy has only spoken Welsh in the chamber for 26 seconds in the previous two years, adding: 'If the IPG leader was serious about promoting the Welsh language - he would practice what he preaches year-round and not just when it's politically convenient.'
Another who criticising the notice was Cllr Jordan Ryan, saying it was 'a disgrace' and members should be working for the people of Pembrokeshire rather than taking part in a 'political game'.
Council leader Cllr Jon Harvey said the call was 'creating division where none exists and political opportunism at its worst.'
He said the amended form of Cllr Miller's proposal just sought a deeper understanding of parental choice, adding: 'This notice of motion and the reasoning behind it to my mind raises some bigger issues here; are members now not allowed to ask questions or express a view for fear of a vote of no confidence?'
He said the 'anti-Welsh' claim was 'nothing more than opportunism designed to create division where none exists'.
Former leader Cllr David Simpson, who had brought Cllr Miller into his Cabinet as deputy leader, described the call as 'political mischief,' saying previous independent peer reviews of the administration had described Cllr Miller as 'an inspirational member of the team,' Cllr Simpson asking: 'How many of you can say you were inspirational?'
Another former leader Cllr John T Davies called on members to come together to eradicate the historic so-called 'landsker line' language barrier in the county, working towards bilingualism, saying there was a need for Cllr Miller to apologise for any offence and move on.
Yet another former leader, Cllr Jamie Adams said there was a need for 'contrition and conciliation,' and for Cllr Miller to 'hold his hands up' and admit he'd 'got this wrong'.
'Perhaps Cllr Murphy's been attacked for having the tenacity for having this called in; I think there's an impression it was always going to happen to you, Paul [Miller], because there's an impression you know better than everyone else.'
The no confidence call in Cllr Miller was defeated by 28 votes to 16, with 11 abstentions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
7 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Sturgeon's trans ideology ‘hurt Scottish independence drive'
Nicola Sturgeon's attempt to force trans ideology 'down people's throats' has damaged the Scottish independence movement, the author of Trainspotting has claimed. Irvine Welsh, 66, said the former first minister 's embrace of the 'fringe' trans issue undermined the case for independence by pushing away potential supporters. The writer was one of the most high-profile supporters of Scottish independence during the 2014 referendum, describing its outcome as a 'disaster' for the country in an interview a decade on from the vote. Speaking at the release event for Reality is not Enough, a new documentary about his life, Mr Welsh told the Daily Record: 'Something that should be a fringe issue was allowed to leak right into the whole independence debate. Basically, it's nothing to do with it at all. 'The idea of the independence movement was to live as an independent nation and be a model of how things should be. 'To do that you need to pick the issues that can pull people along with you, issues that mean people are going to be to your side. She was out of step with what people feel and believe in the way that social engineers always are.' Ms Sturgeon oversaw the controversial Gender Recognition Reform Bill, which was overwhelmingly passed by Holyrood in December 2022. The legislation would have allowed trans people to change legal gender by simply signing a declaration with no medical diagnosis. But it was ultimately vetoed by the UK Government over concerns it undermined women's safe spaces. Mr Welsh's comments come amid a fresh row over the political legacy of the former SNP leader following the publication of her memoir Frankly. In the book, Ms Sturgeon admitted that she 'should have hit the pause button' on controversial self-ID plans. But, in media interviews promoting the book, she suggested that some of its opponents were transphobic. Mr Welsh also accused the former first minister of forcing her beliefs on the trans issue 'down people's throats'. He said: 'Sturgeon was out of step on what people felt about the trans debate. It was a fringe issue on which she had an obscure and contentious view that she tried to force down people's throats. 'Don't start telling people what a man is and what a woman is when you don't even know yourself.' The writer added: 'I'm against racism and sexism and homophobia and I'm pro-everybody living the life that they want to live, but you should trust people and trust society to get to these conclusions on its own. 'In football terraces you used to have all these idiots doing ape chants when a black player got the ball. If anybody did that now, people would just laugh at them, shout them down or ridicule them. 'That's something that's happened organically because society has grown up and people have moved on. People want to look after each other and want to include each other. As soon as you have an external force saying, 'you will do this' there is a reaction against that. 'Start social engineering and telling people this is what they should be doing and you'll push them right into the arms of Reform and Tommy Robinson and Andrew Tate. These guys are w---ers.'
Metro
3 hours ago
- Metro
Map shows UK councils that could launch legal challenge against asylum hotels
The ground-shaking court decision that closed a hotel housing asylum seekers in Epping has inspired several councils across the country to take a similar route. On Tuesday, the High Court announced an interim injunction to stop the Bell Hotel in the Essex town being used as accommodation for asylum seekers. Epping Forest District Council decided to take the legal path as protests grew outside the facility. The case barely engaged with the tense debate around migration to the UK, instead hinging on mundane English planning law. It now looks like that technique is likely to be replicated in several other areas. Among the councils that have confirmed they are exploring legal routes to closing down asylum hotels are two controlled by Labour: Tamworth and Wirral. A number of others are controlled, like Epping, by the Conservatives. They include Dudley, East Lindsey, Hillingdon, Broxbourne, and Reigate and Banstead. Two more, Staffordshire and West Northamptonshire, are controlled by Reform UK. Hello, I'm Craig Munro and I'm Metro's man in Westminster. Every Wednesday, I write our Alright, Gov? newsletter with insights from behind the scenes in the Houses of Parliament – and how the decisions made there will end up affecting you. In this week's newsletter I wrote about the potential ramifications of the Epping hotel decision and whether or not we should be worried about taxes going up. Click here to sign up Meanwhile, Antrim and Newtownabbey Borough Council in Northern Ireland is investigating the legal planning status of the Chimney Corner Hotel which is being used to house asylum seekers. Councillor Louise Gittins, who chairs of the Local Government Association, said the organisation is 'taking stock' of the injunction to 'understand how best to support our councils'. Kemi Badenoch, leader of the Conservatives, has written to Tory-controlled councils 'encouraging' them to 'take the same steps' as Epping. The Home Office is bracing for more court challenges to emerge, and the possible need for alternative accommodation to be found urgently. Figures released by the government this morning revealed there were just over 32,000 asylum seekers being housed in British hotels at the end of June. They are staying in the temporary accommodation until their asylum claims are processed. If the claims are denied, they can be sent back to their home country, and if the claims are accepted, they are able to stay. In the year leading up to this June, just under half of asylum claims were granted. However, the number of applicants has also reached a new high, with around 111,000 people applying for asylum in the same period – the most in any 12 months since current records began in 2001. The asylum decision backlog and Home Office spending on asylum have both fallen significantly in the past year. Enver Solomon, Chief Executive of the Refugee Council, said the government had managed to bring the asylum system 'back from the brink of collapse', calling it a 'genuine achievement'. He added: 'The increase in asylum decisions means refugees can begin to rebuild their lives sooner, and the use of costly hotels can be ended faster. 'However, this good work is being put at risk by poor-quality decisions – right now nearly half of appeals are successful. 'These mistakes have life-changing consequences for the people we work with, who have fled persecution in countries like Sudan and Afghanistan.' Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said: 'We inherited a broken immigration and asylum system that the previous government left in chaos. 'Since coming to office we have strengthened Britain's visa and immigration controls, cut asylum costs and sharply increased enforcement and returns, as today's figures show.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Building completely destroyed after major fire tears through it in town centre MORE: What I Own: We sold our business and bought our £1,160,000 Essex six-bed MORE: RAF jets alerted to escort plane after 'sonic boom'
Spectator
5 hours ago
- Spectator
Why are white children doing worst at GCSEs?
That's the trouble of trying to measure everything through the metric of race: sooner or later you will arrive at a situation very different from that which you intended. Namely, that in some cases it is white people who appear to be at some kind of disadvantage. At least Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson is not trying to cover up the glaring disparity in GCSE results between ethnic groups. She has admitted that white working-class children are underperforming and suggests that the state has 'failed them'. But she doesn't really go on to ask herself how or why. What is it about being white, for example, that makes pupils underperform in Maths and English? Last year, 63.7 per cent of white pupils achieved a grade 4 pass or above in both subjects, compared with 65.0 per cent of black pupils, 74.8 per cent of Asian pupils and 88.8 per cent of Chinese pupils. If the state has been failing white pupils, Phillipson is unable, or unwilling, to say what she thinks it has been doing, or not doing, in order to suppress their attainment. We are left to ponder this ourselves. Nor, by the way, does she suggest any remedy other than setting up something called a 'Best Start Family Hub' in every local authority area. How these are supposed to improve the chances of white people in particular she doesn't say – I presume she is not going to plaster them with signs on the doors saying 'whites only'. It isn't hard to wonder whether the underperformance of white pupils – which, as Phillipson says, has been clear for many years – has something to do with years of trying to favour other ethnic groups. Governments started off with the assumption that ethnic minorities were at a disadvantage and so poured resources into those communities. In the process they failed to notice that communities without significant numbers of ethnic children were being ignored. We didn't have detailed ethnic statistics on education or anything else back in the 1980s, but the trend towards underperformance of white children likely began with the concentration of inner cities following the urban riots of that decade. As Mrs Thatcher said after the 1987 general election, 'we've got a big job to do in those inner cities'. Life in many of those places was transformed, beginning with the Conservatives and continuing under Labour. Endless efforts were made to promote the interests of ethnic communities, especially black-dominated ones, where the riots of 1981 and 1985 had started. Black role models were promoted, to the point of absurdity in some cases. In virtually every TV drama nowadays the police, or any other organisation, has to be led by a black woman. Then come the adverts – a world in which you would think the black population of Britain was about 95 per cent, rather than 4 per cent. In the midst of all the activity, no one seemed to stop to ask what effect it might have on children who happen to be white. Are they not allowed role models? Do poor communities which are dominated by white people not deserve extra resources too? The result of all this panicking over race and ethnicity is that the poorest, most disadvantaged communities in Britain have shifted from the inner cities to towns at the geographical margins: secondary towns in the Midlands and North, former industrialised areas and coastal towns. Statistically, the most disadvantaged place in England now is Jaywick, a ramshackle suburb to the west of Clacton. It is no accident that this is the parliamentary seat which first voted Ukip and has since returned Nigel Farage to parliament in his new political guise, Reform UK. When black communities rioted in the 1980s, they were showered with resources; when white communities rioted last year in the wake of the Southport murders, the Prime Minister condemned them as 'far right'. It is little wonder that the white working class is beginning to find its political voice. That perhaps explains why Phillipson has chosen to recognise educational underperformance among white pupils. But it would seem to me a better way to promote educational attainment is to stop trying to pigeonhole children into ethnic categories at all. Once you do this, there is always going to appear to be some kind of ethnic disadvantage, with the implication that there is some kind of underhand racism going on. The same would occur if we collected statistics on other human attributes, such as the length of people's earlobes. The sooner we stop collecting these ethnicity statistics and tailor education to individual children's needs, rather than treating them foremost as members of an ethnic group, the happier a country we will be.
