Patient not drug tested hours before second killing, father alleges
Photo:
RNZ
A mental health patient was not drug tested on the day he committed his second killing because the staffer believed he was "acting cagey", his father alleges.
The man was subject to a compulsory treatment order at the time, which meant that drug screening occurred on a voluntary basis.
But if he failed the test, the clinician would then need to assess whether the patient should be re-called to hospital.
RNZ earlier revealed the man - who was made a special patient under the Mental Health Act after his first killing - was recently found not guilty of murder by reason of insanity for a second time after killing someone he believed was possessed.
RNZ is unable to publish details regarding either killings due to an appeal against name suppression that is due to be heard by the Court of Appeal.
RNZ has obtained a copy of a letter from the man's father to the presiding judge.
Do you know more? Email
sam.sherwood@rnz.co.nz
The man's father alleged that on the day he killed for a second time, he was supposed to be drug tested.
"He turned up for the appointment but was not tested because the staff member said that he was acting cagey and she didn't want to make him feel like he was being picked on.
"This is a so-called health professional who observed unusual behaviour from a person with severe mental health issues and they didn't do anything about it. She didn't test him and basically allowed him to leave. A few hours later [he killed again]."
The man said his son told him he had to go have a drug test "so he was expecting it, but nothing came of it".
The man's second killing "could and should have been prevented," the father says.
"How can someone who has previously killed another person be able to remain free when the warning signs are right there for all to see?"
In the weeks leading up to the second killing, the man's mental health was "rapidly declining", a judge earlier said. He was admitted to a mental health facility following an altercation with a relative.
About a week later he was released. He was having relationship problems and was using cannabis.
Five days after he was released from the mental health facility, he stabbed someone to death.
In his letter, he said his son had mental health issues "for most of his life".
"I have attended countless appointments and meetings relating to [him] and his treatment, and I have full knowledge of the process, his medication and it's effectiveness, the downsides and how he has responded over the years.
"I have met his doctors and psychiatrists and have a good understanding of the mental health system, what services are provided and some of it's failings."
He discussed his son's admission to a mental health facility before the second killing when his mental health "deteriorated".
He said the staff should not have released his son.
The second killing was "predictable if anyone bothered to look at the warning signs and do something about it," he said.
"Predictable in the sense that [he] was on a downward spiral. Maybe not predictable with the exact date and time, but the warning signs were there for the health professionals to see. To use their judgement and training and to actually do something about what they saw instead of just letting it go because it gets too hard for them."
He said the health system was "not aggressive enough to make decisions".
"For more than 5 years I visited [him] every night in one of their institutions, so I know full well what goes on inside the walls. There are more questions than answers. The health system had [him] in their custody and released him. A health professional saw [him] on the day he killed [again], described him as being cagey, did not do the blood test and let him go without doing anything. How? Who is accountable? How can someone who has previously killed another person be able to remain free when the warning signs are right there for all to see?"
RNZ put the allegations regarding the drug test to both Health New Zealand and the Ministry of Health.
Health New Zealand (HNZ) said an external review of the care the patient received leading up to their alleged offending is in progress. They did not comment on the allegations.
In most situations screening for substance use occurred on a voluntary basis and could include individuals subject to detention under the Mental Health Act on Compulsory Treatment Orders, an HNZ spokesperson said.
"However, screening is very much part of an individual treatment/care plan where interventions may be put in place in the event of a positive result or refusal to be tested."
Director of Mental Health Dr John Crawshaw said in a statement that in circumstances like these an independent review is triggered to investigate the incident and make recommendations for changes to services and for those recommendations to be acted on.
A review was still underway.
"The claim of reported drug use and delays in drug testing would be most appropriately investigated by the independent review commissioned by Health New Zealand."
In relation to drug testing, a Ministry of Health spokesperson said screening for substance use occurred on a voluntary basis and can include individuals subject to detention under the Mental Health Act on Compulsory Treatment Orders.
"Screening is very much part of an individual treatment/care plan where interventions may be put in place in the event of a positive result or refusal to be tested.
"For further background, it also depends on whether the person is on an inpatient order or a community treatment order. If the testing is part of a condition of leave on an inpatient order it can result in the leave being cancelled. If the person is on a community treatment order, the responsible clinician would then need to assess whether there is enough concern to direct the patient to be treated as an inpatient. It's important to note that this applies to people under ordinary Mental Health Act orders and there is a separate process for special patients."
Mental Health Minister Matt Doocey said any serious incident, particularly one where someone was killed was a "cause of very serious concern".
"That is why it is important that reviews are triggered and recommendations for changes to services are acted on. My focus is on ensuring agencies involved are putting in place the necessary changes to help prevent these incidents occurring again.
"There is an external review underway, and it would be my expectation that this review will cover the care this person received leading up to the incident."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
36 minutes ago
- 1News
Kiwi describes being inside Melbourne synagogue as it was set on fire
A New Zealander inside a Melbourne synagogue subject to an alleged arson attack on Friday says it is a worrying escalation from "hate speech into violence". Flammable liquid was poured over a door and set alight on Friday. About 20 people were in the East Melbourne Synagogue at the time of the attack. Counter terrorism police have arrested a 34-year-old man. Also in Melbourne, on the same night, about 20 masked protesters harassed diners at an Israeli-owned restaurant. Three cars were also set on fire outside a Melbourne business. One of those inside the Melbourne synagogue on Friday evening was New Zealander Murray Meltzer. ADVERTISEMENT He told RNZ's Morning Report it was a "very tranquil" service before the attack. "Congregants meet there every week on a Friday around sunset for the Shabbat services, and regularly a handful of us meet for dinner afterwards — that's what was happening on Friday night." Shortly before 8pm, soon after dinner began, the synagogue's bell began ringing "repeatedly, which is unusual". "One of the children, around age 13, was playing at the front of the building," Meltzer said. They glanced at the CCTV monitor — which Meltzer called an "unfortunate sign of the times [with] concern about rising anti-Semitism" — and ran towards the back. "By then there was smoke starting to creep under the front entrance and find its way into the central synagogue sanctuary area, and as a result of that, we obviously ran to the front initially to try and put out the fire. Everyone else was at the back of the building. "And by then we had a couple of passersby that had spotted the flames developing at the front of the building called the fire brigade, which is located fairly close by, so fortunately, the fire brigade was there very quickly, thank goodness." ADVERTISEMENT An unknown man entered the grounds of the synagogue on Albert Street in East Melbourne at 8pm yesterday. (Source: Google Maps) The gravity of what had happened — not just at the synagogue, but elsewhere — "hit home the next day" when people showed up for the Saturday morning service and there was a "large press crowd there". There has been a rise in the number of anti-Jewish and Islamophobic incidents in Australia since the outbreak of the Israel-Gaza war in 2023. In December last year, another synagogue in Melbourne was set alight. Australia in early 2024 banned Nazi salutes and the public display of symbols associated with designated terror groups like Islamic State and Hamas. Last week it cancelled American rapper Kanye West's visa after he released a song Heil Hitler, praising the genocidal Nazi Party leader. A synagogue in Sydney earlier this year was graffitied with swastikas, while in December anti-Islamic graffiti appeared in the city's west. The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including deadly Texas floods, Australian woman attacked by a lion, and Elon Musk's new political party. (Source: 1News) ADVERTISEMENT Meltzer said whoever lit the latest fire in Melbourne would have known there were people inside as all the lights were on. "It's shifted the sort of activity we've seen in recent times from, from just a bit of hate speech and people's right to protest and stand up and say what their views are — just sort of, kind of shifted it quite dramatically. It's been left to fester and develop, and I guess the speech has moved from just a bit of hate speech into violence. "And that's a real, that's a real, that's a real concern for us as a community." Australian Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke condemned the attack as an "attack on Australia". (Source: Nine) 'Attack on Australia' Meltzer praised politicians from both sides of the Australian political divide for condemning the incidents. The Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he viewed the incidents with "utmost gravity," and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said they "have no place in our country". ADVERTISEMENT "Australians have every right to be able to conduct their faith, to engage with each other in peace and harmony. That is the Australia that we cherish." Australian Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke, speaking from the scene on Sunday, called it an "attack on Australia". "There's been some reporting that no one was physically injured — that doesn't mean no one was harmed. The community here was harmed. The Jewish community in Australia was harmed, and we were harmed as a nation."
RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
Rereamanu Ronaki-Wihapi named as murderer who twice ran down Taku Manu Paul in Te Puke
By Ric Stevens, Open Justice reporter of Rereamanu Ronaki-Wihapi was found guilty of murder for the death of his mother's partner, Taku Manu Paul, on Boxing Day 2022. Photo: NZ Herald / Belinda Feek A teenager who ran down his mother's partner with a car and killed him can now be named as Rereamanu Ronaki-Wihapi. Ronaki-Wihapi is serving a 17-year prison sentence for murdering Taku Manu Paul, with no prospect of parole for seven years. He was just 17 at the time and sitting next to his mother Ephron Ronaki, who was Paul's partner and arguing with him on the phone about missing Christmas money. Ronaki-Wihapi was sentenced in October last year but can only now be named and identified as Ronaki's son, after the release of a Court of Appeal decision. The ruling turned down his lawyer's attempt to win him permanent name suppression and quashed one of his two convictions. Ronaki-Wihapi and his mother went looking for Paul on Boxing Day 2022 because she believed her partner had taken $500, which had been a Christmas present to her. The teenager was driving because Ronaki was very drunk. They spotted Paul on a Te Puke street and, with his mother initially egging him on, Ronaki-Wihapi ran into Paul, then turned around and deliberately drove over him as he lay on the ground. In an unusual result which was due to a charging error, Ronaki-Wihapi received two different convictions for culpable homicide - one for murder and one for manslaughter - in relation to the same victim. The Court of Appeal has now quashed the manslaughter count, saying the two convictions cannot stand together. Ronaki-Wipahi, now 20, had no criminal history before the night he killed Paul. However, court documents say that he had a history of post-traumatic stress disorder and depression. At trial, his defence counsel, Ron Mansfield KC, said he had been "a traumatised teen put in a situation of extreme stress". The trial was told that Ronaki told her son to "hit him, do it now, run him over" when they spotted Paul. The teenager hit Paul with the car twice, the first time on the left side with such force that Paul was thrown on to the windscreen before landing on the road. With chaos breaking out among the people in the vehicle, Ronaki-Wihapi then did a U-turn and aimed the Nissan Teana directly at Paul as he was lying on the road, driving over his chest, and away from the scene at speed. Ronaki-Wihapi said he was "in the moment" when he lined up on the prone man's head "and just boosted it", as his mother reached across and grabbed the steering wheel in an unsuccessful attempt to alter his course. Pathologists could not say for sure which of the two strikes, which could have been as little as 13 seconds apart, killed Paul. The whole incident, including the two impacts, was over within a minute and 14 seconds. Ronaki-Wihapi was charged with murder separately for each impact. At a jury trial, he was found not guilty of murder but guilty of manslaughter for the first hit, and guilty of murder for the second strike. He was sentenced to 17 years' imprisonment with no parole for seven years on the murder charge, and a lesser concurrent sentence for manslaughter. His mother was sent to prison for four years and three months after being convicted of manslaughter for her part in Paul's death. She was also convicted of attempting to pervert the course of justice by claiming she had been the driver. Mansfield appealed Ronaki-Wihapi's murder conviction to the Court of Appeal, along with the High Court's refusal to grant his young client permanent name suppression. Before hearing the matter, the Court of Appeal advised him that it believed Ronaki-Wihapi could not be convicted twice of a culpable homicide relating to the same victim. Ephron Ronaki (centre) was sentenced to four years and three months for manslaughter of her part in the death of her partner, Taku Manu Paul. Photo: NZ Herald / Belinda Feek In its decision, it held that Ronaki-Wihapi should have either faced a single charge to cover both impacts, or two charges laid in the alternative. "The short point is that there was a charging error in this case," the Court of Appeal justices said. "Mr Ronaki-Wihapi should not have faced two cumulative charges of murder for the death of Mr Paul. "He should either have faced a single charge, particularised in a way that alleged that it was satisfied either by the first impact or alternatively by the second impact, or two charges of murder advanced in the alternative," the appeal court decision said. "The verdicts of manslaughter and murder cannot stand together." The appeal court determined that as the jury found Paul was still alive at the moment of the second impact, the manslaughter conviction should not stand in relation to the first hit. The murder conviction, which related to the second impact, was upheld. The Court of Appeal decision also said the threshold that an offender would suffer "extreme hardship" if his identity was published was not met in relation to name suppression. There was no presumption in favour of suppression outside the Youth Court, youth was not a particularly relevant factor in this case, and any effect on Ronaki-Wihapi's future employment prospects would be a consequence of the conviction, not the publication of his name. There was also a high public interest in identifying those convicted of murder, the Court of Appeal said. * This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald .
RNZ News
7 hours ago
- RNZ News
Massey University aviation student Marc Dmello accused of sharing child abuse videos from campus
By Jeremy Wilkinson, Open Justice reporter of Marc Dmello is an aspiring pilot and was studying a Bachelor of Aviation before transferring to Aviation Management. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone A Massey University student and aspiring pilot has been accused of sharing videos on social media of children being sexually abused. Until now, aviation student Marc Dmello, 20, hasn't been able to be named. While he was on the Palmerston North campus, Dmello is accused of using five separate accounts on an overseas-based platform to send the videos to other site users. The website detected the activity and filed reports with the National Centre for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), a non-governmental organisation based in the United States, which forwarded the reports to the New Zealand Customs Service. Customs then identified that the alleged offending had occurred at Massey University in Palmerston North. A warrant was executed in December last year at Dmello's home, and a forensic examination of his laptop and mobile phone was conducted. Dmello is now facing five representative charges of exporting an objectionable publication and five representative charges of distributing objectionable publications. He unsuccessfully sought name suppression during a hearing in the Palmerston North District Court but appealed that decision to the High Court. The High Court dismissed his appeal on 5 June and the appeal period for that ruling has now expired, meaning that NZME can now name him. According to Justice Karen Grau's ruling, Dmello is an aspiring pilot and was studying a Bachelor of Aviation before transferring to Aviation Management. The ruling notes that due to family circumstances back in India he began drinking more than usual and missed classes, which caused him to fail three papers. If he failed more papers he would not be able to continue studying which would have breached his visa conditions, so he transferred courses which he described as a "longer, but cheaper and easier route to gain an education in the field of aviation". Dmello likened his situation to medical students who study an undergraduate degree in science in an attempt to gain postgraduate admission to medical school. He said this route would set him back eight years and disadvantage him professionally, as he said that airlines prefer to hire younger pilots. Dmello fought to keep his name suppressed to avoid employment issues when he finished his studies. After his arrest, he was remanded in custody as his flatmates refused to have him near their children due to the allegations. While he has elected trial by jury, the charges remain as allegations, which Dmello emphasised in his submissions to the court seeking suppression. He said the way his flatmates reacted was of significant concern. "This is exactly the attitude I expect employers will have if they find out about these allegations," he told the court. As part of his submissions, Dmello said he believed that if his name was published, it was "almost certain" he would never be hired by an airline. Defence lawyer Josh Harvey argued commercial airlines will not hire Dmello if there are public articles naming him, even if he's acquitted of those charges at trial. Harvey provided evidence from the New Zealand Airline Pilots Association, the country's largest pilot union, that said if Dmello lost name suppression, it would effectively render him unemployable. However, Justice Grau said Dmello was still in a very early stage of his training and any effect on his career was too speculative to meet the test for continued name suppression. "Should Mr Dmello be successful in obtaining his qualification as a pilot, he will be subject to a "fit and proper person" test," Justice Grau said. "Notwithstanding the evidence provided, I am unable to accept that, if Mr Dmello was eventually acquitted, a potential employer would inevitably go beyond that test and take into account publication of these allegations, at least without seeking comment." In her judgment, Justice Grau said that by the time Dmello graduated, he would be 28 years old, and the allegations - if they did not proceed to a conviction - would not necessarily prevent him from becoming a pilot as long as he met all of the other requirements. * This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald .
