Brazilian Judge Places Ex-president Bolsonaro Under House Arrest
Bolsonaro, an ally of US President Donald Trump, is on trial at the Supreme Court for allegedly plotting to cling onto power after losing 2022 elections to President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.
Last month, he was ordered to wear an ankle bracelet and barred from using social media after being accused of trying to disrupt the trial with fiery speeches shared online by his sons and allies.
Under the ban, third parties are barred from sharing his public remarks.
On Sunday, allies of Bolsonaro, 70, defied the court order by broadcasting a live call between the former army captain and his son at a solidarity rally in Rio de Janeiro, one of several held across Brazil.
Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes reacted furiously, declaring Monday that the judiciary would not allow a defendant to "treat it like a fool" because of his "political and economic power."
Criticizing Bolsonaro's "repeated failure" to comply with the court's restrictions, he ordered him placed under house arrest at his home in the capital Brasilia.
He also barred the country's former leader (2019-2022) from receiving visitors, apart from his lawyers, and from using any mobile phones.
The new measures were expected to be met with fury in Washington.
Last week, Trump already imposed massive tariffs on Brazil and sanctioned Moraes for what he termed his "witch hunt" against Bolsonaro.
Trump's pressure campaign, including 50-percent tariffs on a raft of Brazilian goods, including coffee, has endeared him to Bolsonaro's conservative base.
At Sunday's rallies, some demonstrators waved US flags or held signs reading "Thank you Trump."
Bolsonaro himself did not attend the rallies, having been ordered by the Supreme Court to stay home at night and at weekends throughout the trial.
He faces a heavy prison sentence in the trial, which is expected to be concluded in the coming weeks.
The crusading Moraes has become a figure of hate on the Brazilian and American right for taking the fight to the far right.
He has repeatedly clashed with Bolsonaro as well as X owner Elon Musk, whom he accuses of failing to fight disinformation. Supporters of Brazilian ex-president Jair Bolsonaro rally against the government AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
26 minutes ago
- Int'l Business Times
Trump Signals Tariffs On Pharma, Chips As Trade War Widens
US President Donald Trump signaled Tuesday that fresh tariffs on imported pharmaceuticals and semiconductors could be unveiled as soon as the coming week, as he presses on in efforts to reshape global trade. Trump's latest comments, in an interview on CNBC, come days before a separate set of tariff hikes takes effect on dozens of economies later this week. The sweeping tariff plans have sparked a flurry of activity as governments seek to avert the worst of his threats -- with Switzerland's leaders heading to Washington on Tuesday in a last-minute push to avoid punitive duties. But he appears set to widen his trade wars further. The US president told CNBC that upcoming tariffs on imported pharmaceuticals could reach 250 percent, while adding that he plans for new duties on foreign semiconductors soon. "We'll be putting (an) initially small tariff on pharmaceuticals, but in one year, one-and-a-half years, maximum, it's going to go to 150 percent," Trump said. "And then it's going to go to 250 percent because we want pharmaceuticals made in our country." Trump also said that Washington will be announcing tariffs "within the next week or so." He added: "We're going to be announcing on semiconductors and chips." Trump has taken aim at products from different countries with varying tariff rates after imposing a 10-percent levy on almost all trading partners in April -- with excluded products targeted by sector. While Swiss leaders are seeking to stave off a US tariff hike to 39 percent come Thursday -- which excludes sectors like pharma -- Trump's plans for a steep pharma levy will likely be a point of contention in any talks. Pharmaceuticals represented 60 percent of Swiss goods exports to the United States last year. Besides probing pharmaceuticals and chips imports, Trump has already imposed steep duties of 50 percent on imports of steel and aluminum, alongside lower levels on autos and parts. In the same CNBC interview, Trump said he expects to raise the US tariff on Indian imports "very substantially over the next 24 hours" due to the country's purchases of Russian oil. This is a key revenue source for Moscow's military offensive on Ukraine. His pressure on India comes after signaling fresh sanctions on Moscow if it did not make progress by Friday towards a peace deal with Kyiv, more than three years since Russia's invasion. Moscow is anticipating talks this week with the US leader's special envoy Steve Witkoff, and the Kremlin has criticized Trump's threat of raising tariffs on Indian goods. Weak employment data last week pointed to challenges for the US economy as companies take a cautious approach in hiring and investment while grappling with Trump's radical -- and rapidly changing -- tariffs policy. The tariffs are a demonstration of raw economic power that Trump sees as putting US exporters in a stronger position while encouraging domestic manufacturing by keeping out foreign imports. But the approach has raised fears of inflation and other economic fallout in the world's biggest economy.
DW
2 hours ago
- DW
How can US-India ties recover from Trump's tariff threats? – DW – 08/05/2025
Donald Trump is using tariffs to pressure India to stop buying oil from Russia and Iran, as trade deal talks have stalled. With India holding firm, what is next for the traditionally friendly bilateral relationship? US President Donald Trump's pressure on India to halt its oil imports from Russia and comply with sanctions on Iran has strained ties between Washington and New Delhi, who have enjoyed a healthy strategic partnership for decades. With trade talks still stalled after several rounds of negotiations, Trump has imposed a 25% tariff on Indian exports to the US which took effect on August 1, and on Monday threatened to "substantially" increase it. India has hit back, saying the tariffs are "unjustified and unreasonable" and that it would take "all necessary measures" to safeguard its "national interests and economic security." After calling India a "friend" last week, Trump hardened his tone on Monday, saying New Delhi authorities "don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine" and are helping fund Russia's war effort in Ukraine through their purchases of Russian oil. The tougher rhetoric is a marked shift in relations between India and the US. Ties have deteriorated in recent months, despite the display of personal warmth and symbolic friendship when Prime Minister Narendra Modi met with President Trump earlier this year in Washington. Commodore Uday Bhaskar, a security and strategic affairs expert, believes that despite Trump's "intimidatory" approach, India "does not seek a confrontation." "However, the US has chosen to weaponize trade tariffs in a unilateral and abrasive manner. That is intimidation. And yes ... trust in Washington is low and the disappointment is high," Bhaskar told DW. Amitabh Mattoo, dean of the School of International Studies at Delhi's Jawaharlal Nehru University, said that India will not be bullied by "tariffs, tantrums, or threats." "Our ties with Russia and Iran reflect sovereign decisions, not defiance. We are not in the business of appeasement, nor of provocation. Strategic autonomy means engaging on our terms which is clear-eyed, confident, and calm. Let us not confuse noise for strategy," Mattoo told DW. The downturn between Washington and New Delhi has coincided with Trump pursuing closer ties with India's neighbor, Pakistan. The two nuclear-armed rivals recently fought a four-day conflict, which Trump said ended thanks to US mediation — a claim Modi rejected. The US and Pakistan signed a deal last month that will see Washington develop the South Asian nation's oil reserves in exchange for lower tariffs on its exports to the US. India is now the biggest buyer of Russian crude oil by volume, according to data from Finland-based think tank the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air. Approximately 35%-40% of Indian oil imports come from Russia, up from just 3% in 2021, the year before Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. While the West has looked to cut ties with Moscow, India has not joined Western sanctions against Russia. Senior Indian officials and the Ministry of External Affairs have repeatedly stated that India's "steady and time-tested partnership" with Russia is not negotiable and will not be subject to outside pressure. Trump has also justified the tariffs by pointing to India's ongoing trade with Iran, which has also been hit by Western sanctions over Tehran's nuclear ambitions. Shanthie Mariet D'Souza, president of Mantraya, an independent research forum, said American policy "appears to be an expression of [Trump's] frustration to solve the Ukraine war and to pressure Iran." "It also clashes directly with India's policy of strategic autonomy," she told DW. D'Souza also cast doubt on whether Trump's aggressive approach will help resolve the situation, stressing that he risks alienating a willing and trustworthy partner in India. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video D'Souza said India will have to resort to diplomacy to navigate the crisis. In the coming weeks, she said New Delhi will have to analyze whether continuing to buy cheap Russian crude oil is in line with its long-term strategic objectives. "Over the past decade, India's strategic ties with the US have grown stronger, at the expense of its relations with Russia and Iran. Making a complete U-turn may no longer be a viable idea," D'Souza added. Ajay Bisaria, a former diplomat who just returned from the US, said Trump is trying to reshape the world order by deploying two blunt instruments — tariffs and sanctions — with India facing the threat of both. Despite the downturn and harsh rhetoric, Bisaria told DW that "India should play the long game, keep calm, and negotiate. The Trump phenomenon needs to be managed, not countered at every step." India "must prioritize its national interest" with regard to Russian energy imports, Bisaria said, while also conveying to Washington that it "values its partnership" with the US — as long as the White House tones down its increasingly confrontational rhetoric and respects "India's red lines." He pointed to an upcoming visit by a US delegation later this month as a target for a trade deal to be agreed. "Trump should be cordially welcomed to sign the deal later in the year," Bisaria said. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
DW
3 hours ago
- DW
UN warns of food insecurity in northern Nigeria – DW – 08/05/2025
Jihadist violence has displaced rural communities from Nigeria's northern agricultural heartland. Now, aid agencies warn that funding cuts and abandoned farmlands threaten food security in Nigeria. The United Nations (UN) has described a looming hunger crisis in northern Nigeria as "unprecedented," with analysts estimating that at least 5 million children are already suffering from acute malnutrition. This is despite northern Nigeria traditionally being the nation's agricultural heartland, producing maize, millet, and sorghum. In northeastern Nigeria alone, which includes Borno State, over one million people are believed to be facing hunger. Margot van der Velden, Western Africa Regional Director for the World Food Programme (WFP), said nearly 31 million Nigerians face acute food insecurity and need life-saving food, just as funds for West and Central Africa are shrinking. Many aid programs in West Africa face closure following the Trump administration's dismantling of USAID. The WFP warned its emergency food aid program would stop by July 31 due to "critical funding shortfalls" and that its food and nutrition stocks "have been completely exhausted." By late July, the WFP's appeal for over $130 million (€113 million) to sustain operations in Nigeria for 2025 was only 21% funded. "It is a matter of emergency for the government to see what it can do urgently to provide relief so that there is no outbreak of conflict which will be counter-productive to the progress made in the past," Dauda Muhammad, a humanitarian coordinator in northeastern Nigeria, told DW. Dauda adds that reduced funding, along with few job opportunities and soaring prices, would bring about food insecurity that could undo years of work that tried to diminish the influence of armed jihadist groups, such as Boko Haram, in northern Nigeria. However, Samuel Malik, a senior researcher at Good Governance Africa, a pan-African think-tank, told DW that the root cause of the problem lies elsewhere. "The hunger crisis currently crippling northern Nigeria is fundamentally a consequence of poor governance and protracted insecurity, rather than the result of aid cuts." He says that although "plays a vital role in alleviating the most severe manifestations of Nigeria's food insecurity, it was never designed to be comprehensive or a long time." Villagers have been forced to flee unsafe rural areas to places like the Ramin Kura displacement camp in Sokoto, northwestern Nigeria. 40-year-old Umaimah Abubakar from Ranganda village told DW she moved there after bandits killed her husband and rustled all her in-laws' animals. "Whenever we heard they were approaching, we would run and hide," she said, adding that the community has tried to protect itself by recruiting vigilantes. "Everyone is suffering because there's no food. We couldn't farm this year. Sometimes, when we manage to plant, the bandits attack before the harvest. Other times, after you've harvested and stored your crops, they come and burn everything." She says she earns a little money by washing plates to buy food for her children. "Those who didn't farm will surely go hungry. No farming means no food, especially for villagers like us," Abubakar told DW, "Many now resort to begging or doing odd jobs. We used to plant millet, guinea corn, maize, and sesame." Gurnowa, located in Borno State, which borders the Lake Chad region of Cameroon, Niger and Chad has been hit by a massive exodus. Situated 5 km (3 miles) from the military fortified town of Monguno, Gurnowa has been deserted for years following jihadist attacks. Residents have sought shelter in sprawling, makeshift camps under military protection in Monguno, 140 km north of the regional capital Maiduguri. The camps accommodate tens of thousands of internally displaced people, who fled their homes to escape the violence, which, according to the UN, has already killed over 40,000 people and displaced more than two million from their homes in the last 16 years. "What is driving the crisis more persistently is the Nigerian state's failure to provide security and deliver basic governance to its rural populations," analyst Samuel Malik tells DW. "In the absence of safety, displaced persons are unable or unwilling to return to their farmlands, thus cutting off from their primary means of livelihood. And in this context, hunger is not simply the byproduct of war, but also of systemic neglect." But Gurnowa is just one instance. While Boko Haram militants threaten the northeast, banditry and farmer-herder clashes plague the northwest and north-central regions of Africa's most populous nation. Rural economies are producing less, with crop farmers unable to carry out their livelihoods, and remain unable to feed Nigeria or communities in neighboring Niger. In addition to less food, the price of staples has shot up, creating more financial stress. Borno State Governor Babagana Umara Zulum recently renewed calls for the displaced to return to their farms in time for the rainy season to grow food. Local governments say internally displaced peoples' camps are no longer sustainable, but aid agencies still worry about the risk of jihadist violence. "We are in a difficult situation, especially with hunger and lack of food," a displaced person from Borno State told DW. "Some of us refugees claim they are better off by joining the Boko Haram terrorist group," he added. DW found more instances of young men in Borno State saying they remained jobless and hungry, despite government promises to reward them for leaving jihadist groups. Local governments, however, are wary of appearing to support ex-jihadists over the victims of their violence. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Back at Sokoto's Ramin Kura displacement camp, 19-year-old Sha'afa Usman told DW what happened when her community tried to plant. "We tried to plant on our farms, but people would get kidnapped while working. Now, the only way to go to the farm is with security escorts or vigilantes," the mother-of-three said, adding that her husband was kidnapped from Turba village and is still in captivity. According to Malik, farming still occurs in jihadist-controlled areas, with rural Nigerians being charged to access their fields. Violent consequences await those who cannot pay. "Agricultural activities have become restructured under coercive arrangements dictated by non-state actors," Malik says, adding that survival often depends on entering into exploitative arrangements with armed groups. "In many cases the bandits demand farming and protection levies, while also compelling the people to serve as forced labor on farmlands that were either seized from the villagers or carved out of previously uncultivated forest." Jihadist groups can create some subsistence farming to sustain themselves, which is bolstered through raiding and income generated through ransoms and other illegal streams. "Anyone who goes to the farm risks being kidnapped. Most villagers no longer go because they can't afford ransom," Sha'afa Usman told DW.
