Regeneron buys 23andMe for $256m after bankruptcy
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals has bought the genetic testing company 23andMe, a company once valued at $6bn, for $256m through a bankruptcy auction.
Regeneron said in a statement on Monday that it aims to bolster its capabilities in genomics-driven drug discovery by using customer DNA profiles, collected via its popular direct-to-consumer saliva testing kits.
It added it would prioritise the ethical use of customers' DNA data.
However, the transaction has put the spotlight back on data privacy issues, especially in light of 23andMe's recent challenges. Founded in 2006, 23andMe has collected the genetic information of roughly 15 million people.
The genomics firm, once a trailblazer in ancestry DNA testing, has faced dwindling demand for its core services and reputational damage from a 2023 data breach that exposed sensitive genetic and personal information of millions of users.
The hack and subsequent bankruptcy filing have drawn scrutiny from lawmakers who warned that millions of customers' genetic data could be sold to unscrupulous buyers.
After the company's bankruptcy filing in March, several congressional committees and federal agencies, including the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee and the Federal Trade Commission, penned letters voicing concerns that the company's data could end up in the hands of malicious parties.
The Subcommittee on Oversight and Accountability in the House of Representatives launched an investigation into the matter.
Acknowledging the heightened scrutiny, Regeneron said it will uphold 23andMe's existing privacy policies and comply with all applicable data protection laws.
The drugmaker also committed to working transparently with a court-appointed independent overseer who will assess the implications of the deal for consumer privacy and is expected to deliver a report to the court by June 10.
The court is scheduled to consider approval of the transaction on June 17.
Investments in genomics 'make good strategic sense' for Regeneron but might take a decade or more to see a return, Bernstein analyst William Pickering told the news agency Reuters.
'Given Regeneron's track record, we also believe 23andMe customers are in good hands from a privacy perspective,' Pickering added.
As part of the agreement, Regeneron will acquire all units of 23andMe except the company's on-demand telehealth service Lemonaid Health, which is being shuttered.
After the transaction, expected to be completed in the third quarter, 23andMe will operate as a wholly owned unit of Regeneron.
Despite the news of the purchase, Regeneron's stock was down 0.6 percent from the market open on Wall Street as of 12pm in New York (16:00 GMT) although it had gone up 2.86 percent over the previous five days.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Al Jazeera
US-China trade talks: Is a thaw on the cards after Trump-Xi call?
Top US and Chinese officials are meeting in London in a bid to defuse trade tensions over rare earth minerals and advanced technology after a phone call between Presidents Donald Trump and Xi Jinping last week. The two sides are aiming in Monday's talks to build on a preliminary trade deal struck in Geneva in May, which briefly lowered the temperature between Washington and Beijing and offered relief for investors battered by months of Trump's global trade war. Since then, the agreement to mutually suspend most of the 100 percent-plus tariffs for 90 days has been followed by barbs and accusations from both sides. But after reaching a tentative understanding with Xi on resuming the flow of critical minerals, Trump said on Thursday that he expected Monday's meeting to go 'very well'. The US delegation in London is headed by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. The Chinese contingent will be led by Vice Premier He Lifeng. The venue of the meeting has not been disclosed. Monday's meeting comes four days after Trump and Xi spoke by phone, their first direct interaction since Trump's January 20 inauguration. After the more than hourlong call on Thursday, Trump said the conversation was focused on trade and had resulted in a 'very positive conclusion' for both countries. In the first readout of the call, Trump posted on his social media site, Truth Social: 'I just concluded a very good phone call with President Xi, of China, discussing some of the intricacies of our recently made, and agreed to, Trade Deal.' 'There should no longer be any questions respecting the complexity of Rare Earth products. Our respective teams will be meeting shortly at a location to be determined. During the conversation, President Xi graciously invited the First Lady and me to visit China, and I reciprocated,' he added. For his part, Xi was quoted by Chinese state TV as saying after the call that the two countries should strive for a win-win outcome and dialogue and cooperation are the only right choice for both. In recent weeks, both sides have accused the other of breaching their deal made in Geneva and aimed at dramatically reducing tariffs – an agreement Trump touted as a 'total reset' after he announced tariffs on all US trading partners on April 2. The tentative truce struck on May 11 in Geneva brought US tariffs on Chinese products down from 145 to 30 percent while Beijing slashed levies on US imports from 125 to 10 percent. The agreement gave both sides a three-month deadline to try to reach a more lasting deal. Renewed tensions between the US and China began just one day after the May 12 announcement of the Geneva agreement to temporarily lower tariffs. The US Department of Commerce issued guidance saying the use of Ascend artificial intelligence chips from Huawei, a leading Chinese tech company, could violate US export controls. The agency warned companies 'anywhere in the world' against using AI chips made by Huawei, claiming they illegally contained, or were made with, US technology. Beijing publicly criticised Washington's move to limit access to American technology, accusing the US of trying to stymie China's ability to develop cutting-edge AI chips. On May 15, Chinese Ministry of Commerce spokesperson He Yongqian accused the US of 'abusing export control measures', adding that China would take steps to defend its business interests. Lutnick wasn't in Geneva last month, but he is a lead negotiator in Monday's talks in London. His Commerce Department oversees export controls for the US, and some analysts believe his participation is an indication of how central the issue has become for both sides. In response to Trump's April 2 tariff announcement, Beijing suspended exports to all countries of six heavy rare earth metals and associated magnets on April 4. The move upended global supply chains central to automakers, aerospace manufacturers and military contractors. China produces 90 percent of the world's rare earth minerals, which are essential components in permanent magnets – used in a swath of high-tech applications. Without mentioning rare earths specifically, Trump took to social media last month to attack China's trade restrictions. 'The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US,' Trump posted on Truth Social on May 30. After Xi and Trump's phone call last week, however, the Chinese government hinted that it is addressing US concerns, which have also been echoed by some European companies. On Saturday, China's Commerce Ministry said it had approved some rare earth exports, without specifying which countries were involved. It issued a statement saying it had granted some approvals and 'will continue to strengthen the approval of applications that comply with regulations'. On Monday, the rare earth suppliers of three big US automakers – General Motors, Ford and Stellantis – got clearance from Beijing for a handful of export licences. Washington wants access to as many rare earths as quickly as possible, Kevin Hassett, head of the National Economic Council at the White House, said on the CBS TV network's Face the Nation programme on Sunday. 'We want the rare earths, the magnets that are crucial for cellphones and everything else to flow just as they did before the beginning of April, and we don't want any technical details slowing that down,' Hassett said. Student visas don't normally figure in trade talks, but a recent US announcement that it would begin revoking the visas of Chinese students has emerged as another flashpoint between Washington and Beijing. On May 28, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the Trump administration would begin to 'aggressively' revoke the visas of Chinese university students. He also said the US would revise visa criteria to enhance scrutiny of all future visa applications from China and Hong Kong. China is the second largest country of origin for international students in the US after India. More than 270,000 Chinese students studied in the US in the 2023-2024 academic year. Beijing's Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Mao Ning criticised Washington's decision to revoke the visas, saying it 'damaged' the rights of Chinese students. Other concerns continue to strain the bilateral relationship from the illicit fentanyl trade to the status of democratically governed Taiwan and US complaints about China's state-dominated economic model. Still, Trump's geopolitical bluster goes well beyond China. While promising to reshape relationships with all US trading partners, Trump so far has reached only one new trade agreement – with the United Kingdom. Trump's reduction of US tariffs on Chinese goods runs out in August unless he decides to extend it. If deals aren't reached, the White House said Trump plans to restore tariff rates to the levels he first announced in April.
Al Jazeera
a day ago
- Al Jazeera
Democrats wooing Musk after the Trump breakup is US plutocracy at its best
It's official: United States President Donald Trump and the world's richest person, Elon Musk, have broken up. At the end of last month, Musk departed from his post as the head of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), where he oversaw the mass firing of federal employees and dismantling of various government agencies – all the while benefitting from his own companies' lucrative contracts with the government. Anyway, US 'democracy' has never met a conflict of interest it didn't like. Musk's service at the White House initially appeared to end on an amicable note as Trump praised him for the 'colossal change' he had achieved 'in the old ways of doing business in Washington'. The former head of DOGE in turn thanked the president for the opportunity. But soon after his departure, Musk publicly criticised the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act', a tax and spending bill that Trump is currently obsessed with passing, slamming it as a 'disgusting abomination'. There ensued predictably dramatic social media exchanges between the two right-wing billionaires with Trump pronouncing Musk 'so depressed and so heartbroken' after leaving the White House and offering the additional coherent analysis: ' It's sort of Trump derangement syndrome. We have it with others, too. They leave, and they wake up in the morning, and the glamour's gone. The whole world is different, and they become hostile.' Musk has repeatedly taken credit for Trump's 2024 election victory on account of the gobs of money he donated to the president's campaign and those of other Republican candidates. Now that the relationship is over, Trump has wasted no time in warning Musk that he'll face 'very serious consequences' if he chooses to fund Democratic campaigns in the future. But some Democratic ears, at least, have perked up at the possibility of getting the planet's richest person back on their side – which he abandoned in favour of Trump after having extended support to Democratic former Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden. The political switcheroo was hardly extreme. At the end of the day, ideology matters little when you're just in the business of buying power. California Congressman Ro Khanna, for example, recently opined that Democrats should 'be in a dialogue' with Musk in light of their shared opposition to Trump's big beautiful bill. As per Khanna's view, 'we should ultimately be trying to convince [Musk] that the Democratic Party has more of the values that he agrees with.' He went on to list a few of these alleged values: 'A commitment to science funding, a commitment to clean technology, a commitment to seeing international students like him.' Never mind that Musk's main 'value' is a commitment to controlling as much of the earth – not to mention the whole solar system – as he possibly can for the benefit of himself and himself alone. Beyond his mass firing activities while head of DOGE, a brief review of Musk's entrepreneurial track record reveals a total lack of the 'values' that Democrats purport to espouse. Over recent years, reports have abounded of sexual harassment and acute racism at Musk's Tesla car factories. In October 2021, a federal jury in San Francisco ordered Tesla to pay $137m to a Black former employee who claimed he was told to 'go back to Africa' among other abuses suffered at his workplace. Along with violating federal labour laws, Musk as chief executive of Tesla threatened workers over the prospect of unionisation. When the COVID-19 pandemic hit in 2020, he violated local regulations to keep his factories up and running, underscoring a general contempt for human life that, again, should not be a 'value' that anyone aspires to. To be sure, not all Democrats are on board with the proposal to woo Musk back into the Democratic camp – but he may be getting a growing cheering squad. In addition to Khanna's advocacy on his behalf, New York Democratic Congressman Ritchie Torres seems prepared to give Musk his vote as well: 'I'm a believer in redemption, and he is telling the truth about the [big beautiful] legislation.' Anthony Scaramucci, Trump's former White House director of communications, has, meanwhile, suggested that Democrats could 'bring Elon Musk back into the fold as a prodigal son' by foregoing more left-wing policies – as if there's anything truly left-wing about the Democratic Party in the first place. Newsweek's write-up of Scaramucci's comments observed that 'It would be a coup for Democrats if they could court the influence of the world's richest man once more.' It would not, obviously, be a coup for democracy, which is supposed to be rule by the people and not by money. And yet a longstanding bipartisan commitment to plutocracy means the US has never been in danger of true democracy. Instead, billions upon billions of dollars are spent to sustain an electoral charade and ensure that capital remains concentrated in the hands of the few – while Americans continue to literally die of poverty. Now it remains to be seen whether the Trump-Musk breakup will drive Democrats into Musk's arms. But either way, the country's plutocratic values remain rock solid – and that is nothing less than a 'disgusting abomination'. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.
Al Jazeera
2 days ago
- Al Jazeera
What's behind the Trump-Musk break-up?
The big break-up: The president of the United States, Donald Trump, has parted ways with the richest man in the world, billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk. Once their friendship reaped rewards for both: Musk donated around hundreds of millions of dollars to Trump's re-election campaign and the president created a role for Musk in his government. But political, or fiscal, differences soured the relationship, and what was once a mutually beneficial alliance deteriorated into an exchange of insults on social media. So, did Elon Musk's position undermine US democracy? And do Donald Trump's friendships and interests influence US policy? Presenter: Elizabeth Puranam Guests: Niall Stanage – Political analyst and White House columnist for The Hill newspaper Dan Ives – Technology analyst and managing director of Wedbush Securities Faiz Siddiqui – Author of, Hubris Maximus: The Shattering of Elon Musk
