logo
‘Save what we can': Economic uncertainty, Trump rhetoric hits US travel

‘Save what we can': Economic uncertainty, Trump rhetoric hits US travel

Al Jazeeraa day ago

New York, US: Miguel Olave lives in a quiet suburb outside Wichita, Kansas, called Derby. Every year, along with his wife Alexis, Olave takes his four boys on a vacation somewhere around the United States, like Disney World or New York. This year, however, the family's annual tradition is on pause.
'We kind of decided a few weeks ago that we just weren't going to be doing a trip this summer because of all the unknowns,' Olave told Al Jazeera.
Olave said one of the reasons for the cuts in travel is the sheer cost of goods his family needs on a daily basis. Any extra income is no longer going towards indulgences like travel but towards the increasingly expensive grocery bill.
'Typically … by the 15th of every month, we're hitting around $350 to $400 in grocery expenses. This month, we're nearing $600,' Olave said.
As per data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), while grocery prices have come down by 0.1 percent, the biggest drop in nearly five years, they are still 2 percent higher than at this time last year.
Amid uncertainty about how long the job market will hold steady for him, Olave, who works in marketing, feels it is best to save the money coming in rather than spend it on travel.
'We think it's just wise to, you know, buckle down and save what we can,' Olave said.
He is far from alone. With consumer confidence hitting a 13-year low, otherwise reliable travellers like Olave are not taking to the skies.
A survey of travel advisers by Travel Weekly, a travel industry publication, found that 57 percent of travel planners saw a decline in business, and 63 percent of advisers cited economic uncertainty as one of the top three reasons for travel hesitancy.
'It's very clear that consumers are waiting to make decisions, including for the summer,' Southwest Airlines CEO Robert Jordan said at the Bernstein Annual Strategic Decisions Conference in late May.
That trend is echoed in a Bank of America report, which shows that consumers are holding off on spending on lodging and flights. According to Flighthub, an online travel agency, bookings have declined by 10 percent compared with this time last year.
Travel booking site Expedia, in its first-quarter earnings report, showed that booking growth has stalled in the US, citing weaker domestic demand, a contrast to trends in the rest of the world.
'US demand was soft, driven by declining consumer sentiment,' said Ariane Gorin, CEO of Expedia, during an earnings call.
As a result of lower demand, flight ticket prices have tumbled. The BLS's most recent Consumer Price Index report, released on Wednesday, showed airline prices decreased by 2.7 percent in May following a 2.8 percent decline in April, a continuation of a trend from March's report, which showed a 5.3 percent decrease.
Even for those still opting to travel, according to a survey by MMGY, a tourism marketing agency, 24 percent are looking for cheaper modes of transport, and 22 percent are looking for shorter stays, all of which will help cut costs.
The flow of tourists to the US is also stemming, but more so because of rhetoric by US government officials and policies surrounding immigration and trans-rights than economic concerns.
Blaming it on the Trump administration's 'globally controversial and globally divisive … rhetoric and policy', Adam Sacks, the president of Tourism Economics, a division of Oxford Economics, an economic forecasting firm, said, 'If you start to go through a catalogue of issues, you've got the condescending rhetoric toward Canada as a 51st state, the posturing of taking over Greenland, even if by military force, the turning away from historic alliances, the perceived softening toward Russia, and then the trade war itself, which is combative, just by its very nature, and it becomes us versus them.'
'That really affected the perception. It affected the brand of the country and sentiment toward the country.'
According to the US Travel Association, international travel to the country declined by 14 percent overall in March. If this trend continues for the rest of this year, it could cost the US travel industry $21bn.
The most significant drop has been from Canada, as overnight land travel from the northern neighbour fell by 26 percent this March. Data from Statistics Canada shows a 35.2 percent drop in car return trips to the US in April compared with the same time last year. It was also the fourth month of year-over-year declines.
'Everywhere we look, we do see continued signs of a pullback in travel to the US,' Sacks added.
The Trump administration's immigration policies have also raised alarms among international travellers, fuelled by troubling stories of detention and deportation.
Jasmine Mooney, a Canadian actress, was held by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for 12 days when she went to the San Ysidro centre at the Mexico-US border to apply for her visa. German teenagers Maria Lepere and Charlotte Pohl were deported upon arrival in Hawaii for vacation, reportedly because they did not have a hotel reservation. And a French scientist was denied entry en route to a research conference near Houston after US officials found messages on his phone critical of the president.
US Vice President JD Vance also joked during a news conference on the upcoming FIFA World Cup, which the US is set to co-host in 2026, about deporting visitors for that event who overstayed their welcome.
One case that has spooked some foreign travellers is that of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland resident who was deported and sent to a notorious mega-prison in El Salvador.
Initially, the administration claimed his deportation was an administrative error. Department of Justice records show no criminal convictions against him. However, officials later reversed course, asserting that he was a member of the international criminal gang MS-13, an accusation the US president tried to substantiate using a digitally altered image of Garcia's knuckles.
Another case that may have frightened travellers is that of Juan Francisco Mendez, the Massachusetts man who was detained by ICE in a case of mistaken identity.
A Mexican national who frequently visits the US for work and was on a trip to New York in April told Al Jazeera on condition of anonymity that it was his last trip for a while, citing stories like these as deterrents.
'I don't want to be walking down the street on the way to a business meeting, being mistaken for someone else and not being able to prove myself otherwise,' the traveller said.
This comes as the White House doubles down on its hardline immigration stance. Stephen Miller, White House deputy chief of staff for policy, known for his anti-immigration views, has said the Trump administration is considering suspending habeas corpus, the legal right that protects people from unlawful detention.
Although Miller claimed the move would target undocumented migrants, eliminating the legal framework could bar people from seeing a judge, challenging evidence or defending themselves, and could ultimately impact anyone on US soil.
Miller has justified the proposal by claiming that there is a migrant 'invasion'. However, undocumented migration to the US has actually been steadily declining for more than a year since March 2024, long before Trump took office.
'This administration's actions just really have injected a new level of apprehension for people visiting the United States, and definitely, sort of, led to more caution,' Noor Zafar, a senior staff lawyer for the Immigrants Rights Project at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), told Al Jazeera.
'We've been advising people, especially those who are noncitizens, to make sure that they consult with a lawyer before they travel, or to at least have the number of a lawyer on hand for when they are at the airport and seeking to re-enter, just because there is just a heightened unpredictability about what's going to happen.'
Looking ahead, Oxford Economics forecasts that visits from Canada to the US could fall by as much as 20.2 percent this year. Overall, it projects a 9.4 percent decrease in international visitors in 2025, a stark contrast to December's forecast, which predicted an 8.8 percent increase.
Online communities of travellers have been vocal about avoiding the US, opting instead for destinations in Europe and Canada. Al Jazeera reached out to several of the posters, none of whom responded to interview requests.
Confirming the trend, Airbnb's chief financial officer, Ellie Mertz, said in an investor call that Canadian travellers were visiting the US less while spending more in Europe, Latin America, and Asia.
Hotel bookings are also falling sharply. HotelPlanner, a hotel booking platform, showed a 61 percent drop in US hotel bookings from international travellers in April, compared with the same period last year. The biggest declines came from the Canadian and British markets, 52 percent and 33 percent, respectively.
Air France-KLM has lowered prices on economy-class transatlantic flights. Air Canada's CEO, Mike Rousseau, noted a 'low teens' percentage drop in bookings to the US over the next six months during the company's recent earnings call. Both Air Canada and Air France-KLM declined to provide further comment.
'We think it's going to be pervasive and severe in the months to come,' Sacks said, explaining the decline in inbound travel.
Even the traditional allies, including the United Kingdom and Germany, have issued travel warnings related to visits to the US, citing policies that have created a more hostile atmosphere for foreign travellers.
Passengers are already noticing emptier flights.
'I don't know if I've ever seen a flight that empty,' said Garen Kazanc, a Los Angeles resident who recently travelled home from Rome.
Kazanc, a frequent flyer, said his family members who live in different countries across Europe are now reluctant to travel to the US due to safety concerns.
'It's kind of traumatic to see people getting kidnapped off the streets like that, especially when you're a noncitizen. If the country's not following the basic rules of its highest law, which is the constitution, you kind of get sceptical as a tourist to come visit the United States,' he said.
Zafar, the ACLU lawyer, added: 'There is a general level of fear about how much the ground has shifted in terms of what the government is going to try to do.'
The White House did not respond to Al Jazeera's request for comment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why China's rare earth exports are a key issue in trade tensions with US
Why China's rare earth exports are a key issue in trade tensions with US

Al Jazeera

time14 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Why China's rare earth exports are a key issue in trade tensions with US

China's export of rare earth elements is central to the trade deal struck this week with the United States. Beijing has a virtual monopoly on the supply of the critical minerals, which are used to make everything from cars to drones and wind turbines. Earlier this year, Beijing leveraged its dominance of the sector to hit back at US President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs, placing export controls on seven rare earths and related products. The restrictions created a headache for global manufacturers, particularly automakers, who rely on the materials. After talks in Geneva in May, the US and China announced a 90-day pause on their escalating tit-for-tat tariffs, during which time US levies would be reduced from 145 percent to 30 percent and Chinese duties from 125 percent to 10 percent. The truce had appeared to be in jeopardy in recent weeks after Washington accused Beijing of not moving fast enough to ease its restrictions on rare earths exports. After two days of marathon talks in London, the two sides on Wednesday announced a 'framework' to get trade back on track. Trump said the deal would see rare earth minerals 'supplied, up front,' though many details of the agreement are still unclear. Rare earths are a group of 17 elements that are essential to numerous manufacturing industries. The auto industry has become particularly reliant on rare-earth magnets for steering systems, engines, brakes and many other parts. China has long dominated the mining and processing of rare earth minerals, as well as the production of related components like rare earth magnets. It mines about 70 percent of the world's rare earths and processes approximately 90 percent of the supply. China also maintains near-total control over the supply of heavy rare earths, including dysprosium and terbium. China's hold over the industry had been a concern for the US and other countries for some time, but their alarm grew after Beijing imposed export controls in April. The restrictions affected supplies of samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium, and yttrium, and required companies shipping materials and finished products overseas to obtain export licences. The restrictions followed a similar move by China in February, when it placed export controls on tungsten, bismuth and three other 'niche metals'. While news of a deal on rare earths signals a potential reprieve for manufacturers, the details of its implementation remain largely unclear. Chinese customs data shows the sale of rare earths to the US dropped 37 percent in April, while the sale of rare earth magnets fell 58 percent for the US and 51 percent worldwide, according to Bloomberg. Global rare earth exports recovered 23 percent in May, following talks between US and Chinese officials in Geneva, but they are still down overall from a year earlier. The greatest alarm has been felt by carmakers and auto parts manufacturers in the US and Europe, who reported bottlenecks after working their way through inventories of rare earth magnets. 'The automobile industry is now using words like panic. This isn't something that the auto industry is just talking about and trying to make a big stir. This is serious right now, and they're talking about shutting down production lines,' Mark Smith, a mining and mineral processing expert and the CEO of the US-based NioCorp Developments, told Al Jazeera. Even with news of a breakthrough, Western companies are still worried about their future access to rare earths and magnets and how their dependence on China's supply chain could be leveraged against them. The Financial Times reported on Thursday that China's Ministry of Commerce has been demanding 'sensitive business information to secure rare earths and magnets' from Western companies in China, including production details and customer lists. Trump shared some details of the agreement on his social media platform, Truth Social, where he also addressed concerns about rare earths and rare earth magnets. 'We are getting a total of 55% tariffs, China is getting 10%. The relationship is excellent,' Trump said, using a figure for US duties that includes levies introduced during his first term. 'Full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China. Likewise, we will provide to China what was agreed to, including Chinese students using our colleges and universities (which has always been good with me),' Trump said. Ahead of the negotiations in London, China's Ministry of Commerce had said it approved an unspecified number of export licences for rare earths, and it was willing to 'further strengthen communication and dialogue on export controls with relevant countries'. However, an op-ed published by state news outlet Xinhua this week said rare earth export controls were not 'short-term bargaining tools' or 'tactical countermeasures' but a necessary measure because rare earths can be used for both civilian and military purposes. NioCorp Developments' Smith said Beijing is unlikely to quickly give up such powerful leverage over the US entirely. 'There's going to be a whole bunch of words, but I really think China is going to hold the US hostage on this issue, because why not?' he said. 'They've worked really hard to get into the position that they're in. They have 100 percent control over the heavy rare earth production in the world. Why not use that?' Deborah Elms, the head of trade policy at the Hinrich Foundation in Singapore, said it was hard to predict how rare earths would be treated in negotiations, which would need to balance other US concerns like China's role in exporting the deadly opioid fentanyl to the US. Beijing, for its part, will want guarantees that it can access advanced critical US technology to make advanced semiconductors, she said.

Trump launches website for $5m ‘gold card' granting US residency
Trump launches website for $5m ‘gold card' granting US residency

Al Jazeera

time18 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Trump launches website for $5m ‘gold card' granting US residency

United States President Donald Trump has said his administration is accepting applications for his so-called 'Trump card', which promises applicants permanent residency for $5m. Trump made the announcement on Wednesday as he unveiled a new website for prospective applicants to register their interest. Visitors to are encouraged to submit their name, region, and email address, and specify whether they are applying as an indvidual or a business, in order 'to be notified the moment access opens.' 'Thousands have been calling and asking how they can sign up to ride a beautiful road in gaining access to the Greatest Country and Market anywhere in the World,' Trump said in a post on Truth Social. 'It's called THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THE WAITING LIST IS NOW OPEN.' Trump first proposed the residency visa in February, saying his administration would offer wealthy applicants a 'gold card' that grants residency and work rights as well as a path to citizenship. 'They'll be wealthy, and they'll be successful, and they'll be spending a lot of money, and paying a lot of taxes and employing a lot of people,' Trump said at the time. In April, Trump displayed a sample visa – a gold-coloured card bearing his visage – to reporters on board Air Force One. Trump administration officials have suggested that the card will replace the EB-5 immigrant investor visa program, which grants permanent residency to immigrants who invest at least $1.05m in the US, or $800,000 in designated economically distressed areas. It is unclear what criteria applicants may have to meet apart from the $5m price tag, though the Trump administration has indicated there will be a vetting process. Under current immigration rules, lawful permanent residents can apply for naturalisation after five years provided they have a basic grasp of English and are deemed to be of 'good moral character.'

What do we know about the US-China trade deal?
What do we know about the US-China trade deal?

Al Jazeera

timea day ago

  • Al Jazeera

What do we know about the US-China trade deal?

The White House has said a trade deal with China is done and is awaiting the signatures of United States President Donald Trump and his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping. The White House said on Wednesday that the president is currently reviewing the details. Trump announced the deal after days of trade talks between US and Chinese delegations in London, which followed an earlier round of negotiations in Geneva, Switzerland. 'We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus and the call between the two presidents,' US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told reporters during the announcement. The deal includes a provision in which China will supply the US with rare earth elements vital to major US companies, particularly in the auto, semiconductor, and smartphone manufacturing sectors. Trump said that minerals would be supplied upfront, but it is unclear what that entails. China has disproportionate control over the rare earth market. It produces 60 percent of the world's rare earth minerals and processes nearly 90 percent of them. That has been a longstanding concern of the US, including during the administration of former President Joe Biden. In February 2024, then US Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm said the US was 'very concerned' about the nation's reliance on China for its supply of critical minerals in an interview with CNBC. Those concerns have been amplified in Trump's second term, especially after he imposed sweeping tariffs – including a 145 percent tariff on China – and added on export control measures for China's chip industry. In April, China's Ministry of Commerce retaliated by imposing export restrictions on these minerals. Under the latest agreement, the US will impose 55 percent tariffs across the board on Chinese goods, down from 145 percent. In return, Beijing will impose a 10 percent tariff on goods it imports from the US, down from 125 percent. The 55 percent US tariff includes a 10 percent baseline tariff – which is currently in legal limbo after a trade court ruled it illegal, a decision that a higher court has temporarily blocked – as well as 25 percent from tariffs dating to Trump's first term and 20 percent related to alleged fentanyl trafficking. The White House has framed the deal as a win, and the tariffs remain higher than when Trump first took office. Experts continue to argue that tariffs act as a tax on US businesses and consumers will ultimately bear the cost, not China. Retailers, including Walmart, have already said they will need to raise prices because of the tariffs. In an earnings call last month, CEO Doug McMillon said, 'Given the magnitude of the tariffs, even at the reduced levels announced this week, we aren't able to absorb all the pressure given the reality of narrow retail margins.' Walmart sources about 60 percent of its merchandise from China. It's not clear if it will change any of its sourcing plans in the light of the latest deal. The new deal hasn't assuaged the concerns among the small business community. 'For many small businesses that mostly source their parts or products from China, this is a death sentence and will destroy their American dream,' the Main Street Alliance, an advocacy group representing small business interests, said in a publicly released statement in response to the trade deal. Small business owners have also had to implement hiring freezes and pause development due to tariffs on China. Wild Rye, an outdoor apparel brand that previously spoke with Al Jazeera, said this hasn't changed anything. 'It is devastating, 55 percent tariffs are still insane,' Cassie Abel, founder of Wild Rye, told Al Jazeera. She added that because of the previously announced tariffs, anticipatory spending and orders to cater to, it was very challenging for small businesses like hers to find shipping containers to get her existing orders to the US. 'It's really hard to find a container. The chances of getting our product out of China within the 90-day window is basically zero,' Abel said. The deal for a 90 day pause on most tariffs was announced in April and expires July 8. Because the specifics of the trade deal have yet to be made public, it is not clear when the new tariffs will kick in for China. The White House did not respond to Al Jazeera's request for clarification. The deal also includes a concession allowing Chinese students to continue attending US universities, a matter that had not been contested until Trump raised it a few weeks ago. The sudden shift in the US stance on that had left thousands of Chinese students – and the universities they were set to attend or are currently enrolled in – in limbo. Lutnick said that US tariffs on China will not change again and will go into effect as soon as next week, although analysts believe that may be a negotiating tactic. Dan Ives, an analyst at Wedbush Securities, believes that despite Lutnick's claims, this will not be the end of tariff negotiations with China. He expects further industry-specific exemptions in the months ahead, similar to the exception for semiconductor chips. 'The tariffs are high, but I believe this is … a starting point. The framework's established, and I'd expect more deals going forward,' Ives said. Adam S Hersch, senior economist at the Economic Policy Institute, agrees it will lead to more negotiations. 'It seems like the two sides have agreed to postpone facing their deeper disagreements,' Hersch said. Global markets generally responded positively to the news. In London, the FTSE closed up 0.1 percent. The Nikkei in Tokyo closed up 0.6 percent, the Hong Kong Hang Seng Index rose 0.8 percent, and Shanghai markets ended the day up 0.5 percent. In the US, markets remained largely flat, balancing optimism from the trade news with the release of new inflation data. Consumer prices increased by just 0.1 percent, which was lower than expected. Analysts say the figure reflects both subdued inflation and consumers scaling back spending, partly due to the uncertainty surrounding trade policy. The S&P 500 fell 0.3 percent for its first loss in four days. The Dow Jones Industrial Average was virtually unchanged after falling by 1 point yesterday. The tech heavy Nasdaq fell by 0.5 percent.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store