Calls for 'lifeline' bus cap to remain in place
Calls are being made for a "lifeline" cap on bus fares to remain, as the government prepares to announce its spending review.Tim Farron, MP for Westmorland and Lonsdale in Cumbria, asked transport minister Heidi Alexander to commit to keeping the £3 cap to ensure people could "actually afford to get to work".The minister said any plans for bus fares would be announced on Wednesday, but she was "fully aware" of the importance of an affordable bus network.Kyle Nesbitt, 40, who lives in Kendal and works at Grasmere Gingerbread, said he noticed his bus to work had been much busier since the cap was introduced.
The sales and merchandising manager said: "You definitely see more people on the buses now than you used to before the price cap came into play."It's quite a remote place to work in, Grasmere."It's not that far in mileage, but just in terms of day-to-day travel, anything that makes it as easy as possible and isn't causing a financial strain is something that should be welcomed."Farron told the transport minister that, before the price cap came in, the bus journey from Kendal to Ambleside was the second highest in the country.He said with many people on low income working in Cumbria, high bus fares meant they could spend up to a quarter of their salaries on transport.
'Ease congestion'
Mr Nesbitt said if the bus cap was to be removed his bus journey to work would be unaffordable."Going back to what it used to be - about £7 a journey or £50 a week for a pass - I just don't think I'd be able to sustain that long term," he said."Salaries do vary, but at least [the bus] is a lifeline that people can use to actually get here. "It's a job - you've got to take the job where you can get it."The Conservative government first introduced a cap on bus fares in 2023, meaning people would never pay more than £2 per single journey.When Labour came to power last year the new government chose to continue to fund it for 2025, capped at £3.
Farron, a LibDem MP, said he would like to see the cap lowered to £2 again, to make transport "even more accessible."He said: "By making the bus fare cap permanent, we can help people with the cost of living, ease congestion on our busy roads, support struggling local businesses, and reduce our carbon emissions."Alexander said the £3 cap currently only applied to one in six journeys because people who used buses regularly to go to work used weekly or monthly passes, rather than buying single tickets.She added: "I am fully aware of how important it is that people have an affordable bus network, that they have access to buses."That is something that I have been discussing a lot over recent weeks with the chancellor and we will be making making our announcement in due course."Government plans on the bus fare cap are expected to be announced on Wednesday.
Follow BBC Cumbria on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
5 hours ago
- BBC News
Calls for 'lifeline' bus cap to remain in place
Calls are being made for a "lifeline" cap on bus fares to remain, as the government prepares to announce its spending Farron, MP for Westmorland and Lonsdale in Cumbria, asked transport minister Heidi Alexander to commit to keeping the £3 cap to ensure people could "actually afford to get to work".The minister said any plans for bus fares would be announced on Wednesday, but she was "fully aware" of the importance of an affordable bus Nesbitt, 40, who lives in Kendal and works at Grasmere Gingerbread, said he noticed his bus to work had been much busier since the cap was introduced. The sales and merchandising manager said: "You definitely see more people on the buses now than you used to before the price cap came into play."It's quite a remote place to work in, Grasmere."It's not that far in mileage, but just in terms of day-to-day travel, anything that makes it as easy as possible and isn't causing a financial strain is something that should be welcomed."Farron told the transport minister that, before the price cap came in, the bus journey from Kendal to Ambleside was the second highest in the said with many people on low income working in Cumbria, high bus fares meant they could spend up to a quarter of their salaries on transport. 'Ease congestion' Mr Nesbitt said if the bus cap was to be removed his bus journey to work would be unaffordable."Going back to what it used to be - about £7 a journey or £50 a week for a pass - I just don't think I'd be able to sustain that long term," he said."Salaries do vary, but at least [the bus] is a lifeline that people can use to actually get here. "It's a job - you've got to take the job where you can get it."The Conservative government first introduced a cap on bus fares in 2023, meaning people would never pay more than £2 per single Labour came to power last year the new government chose to continue to fund it for 2025, capped at £3. Farron, a LibDem MP, said he would like to see the cap lowered to £2 again, to make transport "even more accessible."He said: "By making the bus fare cap permanent, we can help people with the cost of living, ease congestion on our busy roads, support struggling local businesses, and reduce our carbon emissions."Alexander said the £3 cap currently only applied to one in six journeys because people who used buses regularly to go to work used weekly or monthly passes, rather than buying single added: "I am fully aware of how important it is that people have an affordable bus network, that they have access to buses."That is something that I have been discussing a lot over recent weeks with the chancellor and we will be making making our announcement in due course."Government plans on the bus fare cap are expected to be announced on Wednesday. Follow BBC Cumbria on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
BBC News
a day ago
- BBC News
East West Rail plan 'reclassified', denying Wales funding
Plans for a £6.6bn Oxford-Cambridge rail line were previously classified as an England-only project, a politician has claimed. Wales would benefit from millions of pounds of consequential funding from the project if this was the week however, the Treasury announced it would be classified as an England and Wales project, meaning Wales would not receive any extra funding, but documents show that the project was originally classified as Treasury said it was a "publishing error" in a 2020 document and the project has and always was an England and Wales Cymru MP, Ben Lake said the explanation was "completely implausible". On Tuesday, the UK government told BBC News the East-West project was being financed through its "rail network enhancements pipeline", which it said was also funding schemes in the MP for Ceredigion Preseli, accused the UK government of reclassifying the project and "moving the goalposts".Funding is allocated for Wales through the Barnett formula, so if the UK government spends on a project in England, then a formula is used to calculate how much money Wales gets to spend as a academic Guto Ifan, from Cardiff University's Wales Governance Centre, said Wales had in fact already received approximately £1.1m of consequential funding from the Oxford-Cambridge said: "This is not a correction of a typographical error, it is a reclassification of the project and a material change in the formula being used to calculate changes to the Welsh government's block grant."This change, without transparent rationale or consultation, would again underline the arbitrary nature of how the Barnett formula is applied to Wales with respect to rail infrastructure." In a statement, the Treasury said: "This was a publishing error which will be amended when an update is published at the Spending Review."The line has also been deemed to be an England and Wales project, so Wales gets no extra cash, which would have been the case if it was England-only due to the way in which Wales receives some meant that while Scotland and Northern Ireland received extra cash from the UK government to make up for the spending, Wales did took over from the Conservatives in Westminster last year, prompting politicians in the Labour-run Welsh government to ask their UK counterparts to reclassify HS2 - without success. Ben Lake told BBC Radio Wales' Sunday Supplement: "How is it that they can quite easily now, at the stroke of a pen, reclassify a project when Wales loses out from doing so, where, just in January this year, they claimed that in the context of HS2, it was impossible for them to fix the injustice of the classification that they inherited from the Conservatives?"When it comes to East-West rail they've found it very easy to reclassify it, but sadly, in moving the goalposts as they've done, Wales has actually lost out rather than gained." In First Minister's Questions on Tuesday, Eluned Morgan defended the classification of the project as England and Wales, telling Plaid Cymru's Rhun ap Iorwerth that he needed a "lesson on how the Welsh devolution settlement works"."Rail infrastructure is not devolved to Wales. You might want it devolved, but that is the situation it is in at the moment."What we have is a situation where there is a pipeline of projects for England and Wales. Are we getting our fair share? Absolutely not."She said she hoped for some acknowledgement of that via Wednesday's forthcoming spending review, adding that the railway line in question was "very different to HS2".The Welsh government has been asked to comment.
Reuters
3 days ago
- Reuters
US declares Biden fuel economy rules exceeded legal authority
June 6 (Reuters) - The U.S. Transportation Department on Friday declared that fuel economy rules issued under then President Joe Biden exceeded the government's legal authority by including electric vehicles in setting the rules, automaker officials said Monday. The department made the declaration as it published a final "Resetting the Corporate Average Fuel Economy Program" rule. Removing EVs from the calculations for credits and the regulatory mandates will likely result in lower overall fuel economy requirements. A future separate rule from the administration of President Donald Trump will revise the specific fuel economy requirements.
