RFK Jr. is making Republicans anxious again: From the Politics Desk
Welcome to the online version of From the Politics Desk, an evening newsletter that brings you the NBC News Politics team's latest reporting and analysis from the White House, Capitol Hill and the campaign trail.
In today's edition, Allan Smith got his hands on some new polling that shows why some Republicans are starting to fret about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s political impact. Plus, Andrea Mitchell looks at how President Donald Trump has already reshaped foreign policy at the outset of his trip abroad.
Sign up to receive this newsletter in your inbox every weekday here.
— Adam Wollner
Have a question for the NBC News Politics Desk about Trump's foreign trip, the fate of his legislative agenda on Capitol Hill or this year's elections?
Send your questions to politicsnewsletter@nbcuni.com and we may answer them in a future edition of the newsletter.
During the 2024 campaign, Donald Trump said he would allow Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to 'go wild' on health, food and medicine.
But now, three months into Kennedy's tenure as health and human services secretary, some Republicans want Trump to rein him and his 'Make America Healthy Again' agenda in. They're concerned Kennedy's efforts could hurt them in the midterm elections by raising costs for farmers and consumers as voters say prices remain their top concern.
Here's how one Republican strategist working on 2026 races put it: 'It's time to start to give RFK some handcuffs.'
MAGA split: There's a divide between conservatives excited about Trump's deregulatory and tax-cut agenda versus a new right that favors protectionism, tax increases on the rich and price limits on prescription drugs, which Trump unveiled Monday in an executive order.
Kennedy's mission is at the forefront of this split. The Cabinet secretary — who declared 'sugar is poison' — has launched a war against the food industry, moving to phase out synthetic food dyes and artificial food additives and prevent food stamps from being used on soda and candy. As part of his 'MAHA commission' to investigate chronic disease, he pledged to probe any connection with processed foods or pesticides. And Kennedy has gone on a nationwide tour to promote state legislation he sees as critical in getting food companies to negotiate with him.
Concern on Capitol Hill: Some Republican lawmakers on Wednesday expressed concern with Kennedy's efforts at a House hearing. Rep. Chuck Fleischmann, R-Tenn., pushed back against banning synthetic dyes, saying they have 'been deemed safe for many years,' to which Kennedy responded 'good science' has linked them to neurological injury and cancer. At the same hearing, Rep. Mike Simpson, R-Idaho, a former dentist, questioned Kennedy's anti-fluoride push.
New poll: An internal poll conducted last month by the Tyson Group, a GOP-aligned data firm, and Plymouth Union Public Research of 813 likely Republican primary voters found nearly 60% would be less likely to support a candidate for governor or state legislator if they 'sided with RFK jr. on food regulation, knowing it could undermine' Trump 'and make food more expensive.'
But the survey also showed some of Kennedy's and MAHA's strengths with Republicans. Notably, more than 40% of likely Republican primary voters said siding with RFK Jr. even at Trump's expense would make them more likely to vote for a candidate. An Economist/YouGov poll last month found that 42% of U.S. adults view Kennedy favorably — virtually in-line with Trump and higher than Vice President JD Vance and fellow Cabinet secretaries Scott Bessent, Howard Lutnick and Kristi Noem.
Read more from Allan →
More on RFK Jr.: During his appearance before a House committee, Kennedy sidestepped a question about vaccines and whether he would choose to vaccinate his children today against a number of diseases, saying, 'I don't think people should be taking medical advice from me.' Read the full story from Berkeley Lovelace Jr. and Megan Lebowitz.
President Donald Trump's tour of the Persian Gulf this week has proved to be more consequential in reshaping the region's U.S. foreign policy than anyone could have imagined.
When Trump made Saudi Arabia the first stop on his first official foreign trip of his second term, it was thought that he would also visit Israel, as he did in his first term. But Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's opposition to Trump's willingness to hold direct talks with Iran — and Israel's determination to oppose a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip — are at cross-purposes with the president's evolving vision for the region.
The visit also produced a commitment for hundreds of billions of dollars of business investment by the Saudis in the U.S. And the trip came against the backdrop of Trump family's ongoing real estate, crypto and golf business ventures in the region.
What is more surprising this week is Trump's lifting of sanctions on Syria and meeting with Ahmed al-Sharaa, the new leader of the post-Bashar al-Assad Assad regime. The Biden administration, ever cautious, waited until European diplomats had flocked to Damascus before sending a mid-level diplomat to meet with al-Sharaa, a former leader of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, which is linked to both the Islamic State and Al Qaeda.
But Trump was pressed by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and the Saudi de facto ruler, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, to bolster the fledgling Syrian regime, whose country has come under repeated military attack from Israel and internal domestic factions. As Trump said, 'Oh, what I do for the crown prince.'
His lavish arrival in Riyadh — greeted by the crown prince and his limousine escorted by American flag-carrying riders on Arabian horses — was a far cry from the muted reception for then-President Joe Biden in 2022. But Biden had told me during a Democratic presidential primary debate in 2019 he would make Saudi Arabia a 'pariah' state over the killing of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi. In contrast, when the CIA concluded that Khashoggi's death was most likely ordered by the crown prince, Trump repeatedly questioned the intelligence and suggested we might never really know the truth.
This week, Trump has shown both a proclivity for royal welcomes and an ability to pivot toward unexpected diplomatic initiatives with a foreign policy that's both high-wire and deeply personal.
Related read:The Trump franchise is expanding in the Middle East — and so are ethical concerns, by Katherine Doyle💲 Jet price tag: Converting a Qatari-owned 747 jet into a new Air Force One for President Donald Trump would involve installing multiple top-secret systems, cost over $1 billion and take years to complete, three aviation experts told NBC News. Read more →
🌎 NSC shakeup: Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who is now also serving as the national security adviser, is planning to make major changes to the National Security Council, including shrinking the agency and shifting its role from making policy recommendations to carrying out the president's orders. Read more →
📝 'Big, beautiful bill' update: Two key House committees passed portions of the GOP's massive bill for Trump's agenda related to taxes and Medicaid. Read more →
🤔 On second thought: Rep. Shri Thanedar, D-Mich., backed off his effort to force a vote Wednesday on his resolution to impeach Trump following pushback from Democratic leaders. Read more →
⏪ 2028 watch: California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom proposed cutting back on health care benefits for undocumented immigrants, a reversal of his previous promises of universal health care. Read more →
🌽 2028 watch, cont.: Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg took aim at the Trump administration in an Iowa town hall and discussed the Democratic Party's path forward. Read more →
⚖️ SCOTUS watch: The Supreme Court is hearing arguments Thursday over Trump's plan to end birthright citizenship, with a focus on the administration's use of executive power. Read more →
⚖️ Elsewhere in the courts: Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan was indicted by a federal grand jury for allegedly obstructing ICE agents who were looking to detain an undocumented immigrant. Read more →
💰 About those checks: A new lawsuit filed against Elon Musk's America PAC alleges that the group did not follow through on its promise to pay swing-state voters who signed a pro-Trump petition in 2024. Read more →
🗳️ About last night: In the Omaha mayoral election, Democratic-aligned candidateJohn Ewing defeated GOP-aligned Mayor Jean Stothert, who was seeking a fourth term. Read more →That's all From the Politics Desk for now. Today's newsletter was compiled by Adam Wollner and Bridget Bowman.
If you have feedback — likes or dislikes — email us at
And if you're a fan, please share with everyone and anyone. They can sign up . This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
31 minutes ago
- USA Today
Will Trump invoke the Insurrection Act? 'We'll see,' he says
Will Trump invoke the Insurrection Act? 'We'll see,' he says Show Caption Hide Caption Anti-ICE raid demonstrators protest into fourth night Anti-immigration raid protests are continuing into the fourth night as the Pentagon deployed active-duty U.S. Marines. President Donald Trump mulled invoking the Insurrection Act, which would give him more leeway to use the military for domestic purposes, as he deploys troops to Los Angeles in response to protests prompted by ICE raids in the region. "If there's an insurrection, I would certainly invoke it,' Trump said June 10 during an event in the White House. 'We'll see. But I can tell you, last night was terrible. The night before that was terrible." Trump deployed the California National Guard to Los Angeles over the objection of Gov. Gavin Newsom, sparking a lawsuit from the state. Marines were also sent to help the guard after protests erupted over his immigration enforcement efforts. The troops are limited to protecting federal property and law enforcement officers. The Insurrection Act would give Trump authority to use them more broadly. More: 'High-stakes game': Trump-Newsom clash pits two political heavyweights Trump said there were parts of Los Angeles on June 9 where "you could have called it an insurrection. It was terrible." Newsom described Trump's actions as "the acts of a dictator" and accused the president of 'inciting and provoking violence,' 'creating mass chaos,' and 'militarizing cities.' Legal experts say invoking the Insurrection Act is an extreme step. It has been done 30 times in U.S. history. "The invocation of it would be viewed as a pretty dramatic act," said Duke Law Professor H. Jefferson Powell. Powell said the law is "dangerously broad." The last time the Insurrection Act was invoked was in May 1992, by President George H.W. Bush at the request of California's governor, to quell rioting in Los Angeles after four White police officers were acquitted for beating Black motorist Rodney King.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What the 'Big, Beautiful' tax bill means for municipal bonds
JPMorgan raised its forecast for municipal bond sales in 2025 to $560 billion as US lawmakers deliberate over President Trump's "big, beautiful" tax and spending bill in the Senate. Goldman Sachs Asset Management co-head of municipal fixed income Sylvia Yeh weighs in on what policy changes to the US tax code could mean for municipal bond investors, as well as valuation catalysts in comparison to Treasury yields (^TYX, ^TNX, ^FVX). Goldman Sachs manages several municipal bond ETFs (GMUB, GCAL, GMNY, GUMI). To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Catalysts here. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
LA protests far different from '92 Rodney King riots
The images of cars set ablaze, protesters tossing rocks at police and officers firing nonlethal rounds and tear gas at protesters hearkens back to the last time a president sent the National Guard to respond to violence on Los Angeles streets. But the unrest during several days of protests over immigration enforcement is far different in scale from the 1992 riots that followed the acquittal of white police officers who were videotaped beating Black motorist Rodney King. President George H.W. Bush used the Insurrection Act to call in the National Guard after requests from Mayor Tom Bradley and Gov. Pete Wilson. After the current protests began Friday over Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids, President Donald Trump ordered the deployment of 4,100 National Guard troops and 700 Marines despite strident opposition from Mayor Karen Bass and Gov. Gavin Newsom. Trump cited a legal provision to mobilize federal service members when there is 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.' California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed a lawsuit Monday saying Trump had overstepped his authority. Outrage over the verdicts on April 29, 1992 led to nearly a week of widespread violence that was one of the deadliest riots in American history. Hundreds of businesses were looted. Entire blocks of homes and stores were torched. More than 60 people died in shootings and other violence, mostly in South Los Angeles, an area with a heavily Black population at the time. Unlike the 1992 riots, protests have mainly been peaceful and been confined to a roughly five-block stretch of downtown LA, a tiny patch in the sprawling city of nearly 4 million people. No one has died. There's been vandalism and some cars set on fire but no homes or buildings have burned. At least 50 people have been arrested for everything from failing to follow orders to leave to looting, assault on a police officer and attempted murder for tossing a Molotov cocktail. Several officers have had minor injuries and protesters and some journalists have been struck by some of the more than 600 rubber bullets and other 'less-lethal' munitions fired by police. The 1992 uprising took many by surprise, including the Los Angeles Police Department, but the King verdict was a catalyst for racial tensions that had been building in the city for years. In addition to frustration with their treatment by police, some directed their anger at Korean merchants who owned many of the local stores. Black residents felt the owners treated them more like shoplifters than shoppers. As looting and fires spread toward Koreatown, some merchants protected their stores with shotguns and rifles.
