logo
Trio of trade deals ‘restored identity' of UK, PM says as trade plan unveiled

Trio of trade deals ‘restored identity' of UK, PM says as trade plan unveiled

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has said the trio of recent UK trade deals has 'restored our identity' in a 'volatile world', as the Government laid out its new plan to better protect firms from rising threats to global trade.
Since Donald Trump's tariff announcements in April, the UK has reached new agreements with the US, India and the EU.
Sir Keir said the deals showed 'that even in this volatile world, Britain is proudly, unashamedly, defiantly even, open for business, and today's trade strategy builds on that'.
The Government's Trade Strategy aims to boost opportunities for UK businesses, particularly in the service sector, to export internationally, and vows to protect domestic firms from global threats to free trade.
It comes at a time of heightened uncertainty following Donald Trump's tariff announcements in April, which have hiked charges on most US imports in a bid to boost home-grown production and support US businesses.
In the paper, ministers pledge to 'confront the threat that protectionism poses to the UK by significantly upgrading our trade defence toolkit'.
This includes clamping down on unfair trading practices, such as the 'dumping' of goods at low costs in foreign markets, which is believed to disadvantage domestic businesses.
In the wake of the tariff announcements, some British retailers raised concerns that Chinese products were being rerouted from the US and deposited on UK and European online marketplaces like Shein and Amazon.
Meanwhile, the strategy outlines measures to make it easier for UK firms to export, including reducing barriers to trading overseas and improving access to finance.
Sir Keir suggested he would pursue a series of small deals rather than solely focusing on major trade agreements with countries.
'But perhaps most importantly, in this uncertain and challenging world, we will also give ourselves new powers on trade defence,' he said.
'To make sure that if your businesses are threatened by practices like dumping, that we have the right powers to defend you.'
Business and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said: 'The UK is an open trading nation but we must reconcile this with a new geopolitical reality and work in our own national interest.
'Our Trade Strategy will sharpen our trade defence so we can ensure British businesses are protected from harm, while also relentlessly pursuing every opportunity to sell to more markets under better terms than before.'
In the plan, the Government pledged to introduce new laws to expand its power to respond to unfair trade practices, guarding under-threat sectors such as steel.
Mr Reynolds said that a 'central problem is a lot of global overcapacity, mainly coming from China, and some associated countries' in relation to steel production.
'If we want a steel industry in any Western European economy we've got to take appropriate measures to defend that,' he said.
'We obviously have a relatively smaller steel industry… I'm doing some work on that to make sure it doesn't get any smaller.'
The Government has said it wants to hear from steel producers and businesses across the supply chain about how future trade measures and safeguards should be shaped.
Mr Reynolds stressed that leaders would 'not sit by idly while cheap imports threaten to undercut UK industry'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Green Party peer says she will vote against proscribing Palestine Action
Green Party peer says she will vote against proscribing Palestine Action

South Wales Argus

time32 minutes ago

  • South Wales Argus

Green Party peer says she will vote against proscribing Palestine Action

During a talk at Glastonbury Festival's Speakers Forum with Palestine Action activist Francesca Nadin, Baroness Jenny Jones said people inside the Lords had told her she 'should not be sharing a platform' with the group, but she added she was 'proud' to be with them. It comes after Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said she would proscribe Palestine Action and would lay an order before Parliament in the coming days to make membership and support for them illegal, after a number of the group's members vandalised two planes at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire. Following the talk, Baroness Jones told the PA news agency: 'I've worked on policing issues, civil liberties and protests for more than 25 years, and I know very clearly, very well, that what the Government is doing to Palestine Action is not a legal act. Baroness Jones made the comments during a talk at Glastonbury Festival (Yui Mok/PA) 'They are not a terrorist organisation and, to be honest, if the Government proscribes them, there's going to be an outcry. 'Presumably, the legislation will come to the House of Lords, and I will definitely vote against it. 'It is bizarre, because it almost looks as if the Government is frightened of protest. I mean, that's something that I've seen with the Conservative government, but now with the Labour Government, we're seeing it as well. 'They actually don't like opposition of any sort, and that's not democracy, and what they are planning to do is not democratic.' The 75-year-old said the group, along with fellow activist organisation Youth Demand, 'represent an energy and a future that quite honestly is beyond me at the moment', adding she was 'furious' with the Government during the talk. She told PA: 'If some of us in the House of Lords vote against proscribing Palestine Action, will that make us liable for prosecution in some way or another? 'They've got a huge number of supporters, 250,000 at least, and I'm sure this particular action by the Government will give them even more supporters. 'The Government is going to find it very difficult to suppress the protest.' Baroness Jones spoke as Irish rap trio Kneecap, who have seen one of their members charged with a terror offence, prepare to perform on the West Holts Stage at 4pm on Saturday. Before the festival, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said it would not be 'appropriate' for them to perform their slot at Worthy Farm. Rapper Liam Og O hAnnaidh was charged for allegedly displaying a flag in support of proscribed terrorist organisation Hezbollah at a gig in London in November last year. Last week, the 27-year-old, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara, was cheered by hundreds of supporters as he arrived with bandmates Naoise O Caireallain and JJ O Dochartaigh at Westminster Magistrates' Court in 'Free Mo Chara' T-shirts. He was released on unconditional bail until his next hearing at the same court on August 20. On Thursday evening, the rap trio posted a film to social media, titled Stop The Genocide, which includes testimonies from a Palestinian activist and plastic surgeon on the war in Gaza.

Delaying welfare reform is better than bad welfare reform, prime minister
Delaying welfare reform is better than bad welfare reform, prime minister

The Independent

time44 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Delaying welfare reform is better than bad welfare reform, prime minister

One of the more unexpected aspects of the prime minister's performance in recent months is that he seems to find much more success in negotiating with the likes of tricky characters such as Donald Trump and Emmanuel Macron than he does with his own backbenchers. Many of them, he must reflect, owe their seats in the House of Commons to his Herculean efforts to make the Labour Party electable again after the debacle in 2019. There was nothing preordained about the landslide last July, even if the Conservatives did all they could, inadvertently, to ease Labour back into power after a 14-year wait. That so many Labour MPs now seem to yearn for the kind of policies Jeremy Corbyn fought and lost on can only be a cause for dismay for Sir Keir Starmer and his closest advisers. In its century and a quarter existence, Sir Keir is only the third leader of his party to have ever won an overall majority. Attlee, Wilson, Blair, Starmer; this is an instructively small club. Politics is indeed an ungrateful business. At this juncture, the prime minister might be well advised to reach for Occam's razor, whereby the simplest explanation is often the best. The range of political options, policy adjustments and permutations of possible parliamentary outcomes as the vote on the welfare bill approaches is dizzyingly complex. The chances of success are vanishingly thin. There is simply insufficient time to recast the reforms in such a way that would preserve the best intentions of policy, deliver the savings needed by the Treasury, and secure the support of an increasingly febrile parliamentary party. The good news for Sir Keir and his colleagues is that, when treated as an objective policy challenge, the path ahead is more straightforward. The obvious mistake made by ministers since they took office is that reform of social security also became an exercise in 'tough', performative politics, and a crude if not panicky way for the Treasury to cut public spending. The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill was rushed to meet unrealistic fiscal deadlines set by the chancellor, Rachel Reeves (as with some of her other policies), and, for want of a better word, botched. With such a hurried timetable for such a sensitive set of changes affecting vulnerable people, it is little wonder that Liz Kendall, the work and pensions secretary, was unable to win the arguments. A pause is essential, and inevitable. What is to be done? Just as the 'reasoned amendment' put forward by more than 120 Labour MPs suggests, the first thing the government must do is complete the essential work that should have been done before bringing the bill to parliament. That means the consultations with groups representing people with disabilities must be properly completed and taken into account. We already know that, on the government's own estimations, some 250,000 people will be pushed into poverty, and that seems very much at odds with the declared intentions of the changes – to improve the living standards of people with disabilities by getting them into the good jobs so many of them want. Will the reforms do that? We do not know. MPs, and the public, are waiting for the Office for Budget Responsibility to publish its impact assessment on the employment prospects of those affected, with the improved job-finding support and the 'right to try' safeguards in place, alongside the alterations in the criteria for personal independence payments (PIP). If, as the Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden attests, more than 1,000 people a day go on to PIP, why is that so high? Why have economic inactivity rates not recovered to pre-Covid levels? Conjecture, surmise and speculation are a poor basis for policy. This might also therefore be a moment for an overhaul of the points-based system for assessing people's needs. The mathematical nature of such tests feels insensitive and deeply impersonal, and may take insufficient account of individual circumstances. There should be a better, more dignified, more holistic way of working out need than 'scoring' a person according, for example, on whether they can wash their whole body themselves (zero points), need 'supervision' (two points), assistance for lower body (two points), upper body (four points) or whole body (eight points). There should also be an objective review of how far mental health is being 'over-diagnosed' and affecting the numbers claiming benefits. Some, such as Nigel Farage and the health secretary, Wes Streeting, opine that that is the case – but there seems inadequate data to draw a firm conclusion. It would also help the credibility of the reforms if the government had organised time-limited but full pilot schemes under the new arrangements in one or two regions of the country. Under the DWP's Pathways to Work programme, there have been such trials and work coaches and specialist one-to-one help have proved successful – but there's no evidence or research to back the argument that the proposed reforms to benefit eligibility will indeed produce better outcomes. That is why the Labour MPs are left unpersuaded. Britain is a parliamentary democracy. Backbench MPs are not AI-driven automatons whose only role is to unconditionally back the party leadership. When they are asked to do so, an appeal to loyalty and the horrors of the opposition ('Prime Minister Farage') are perfectly legitimate. But members of parliament are also entitled to have evidence-based, well-developed policy before they are asked to approve it. The public is also right to expect that, and parliament has an obligation to respect the needs and vulnerabilities of those subjected to fairly sudden changes in their personal finances – in this case, people with extremely varied disabilities. If there is to be a Commons vote on welfare reform next week, then the bill would need to be gutted, taking out the contentious, under-researched provisions on eligibility, and leaving only the useful and proven new schemes that are likely to help people into work, where it is available. It's a rare opportunity to get social security reform right – and for it to command the wide public support needed as spending on an ageing population increases the cost. Delaying welfare reform is better than bad welfare reform.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store