What you, the reader, have to say about the world at large: Letters to the Editor
Rise up young people for you are our future
In a post-match interview after the test match triumph national cricket captain Temba Bavuma remarked that he is more than a black cricketer.
To be recognised as more than a black cricketer is special.
Temba Bavuma you are enough.
Temba Bavuma you are beyond peoples imaginations and inferiority complexes.
Temba Bavuma you are a special human being.
The national youth commission act of 1996 defines young people in South Africa between the ages of 14 and 35.
The youth of 1976 had to struggle and sacrifice for their rights and privileges. We honour their legacy, tenacity and vision. The right and dignity to learn in any language should forever be a platform for destiny and not a platform of destruction.
History portrays the 1976 youth protesting for equality and freedom.
As a young person Temba Bavuma had to similarly protest through his cricket ability for the God given right to shine. Despite the trappings and limitations bestowed upon him directly and indirectly by society and the racial legacy of apartheid, Bavuma stood tall with hope arising evermore.
The truth, however, is that their are many Temba Bavuma's still fighting, protesting quietly waiting, working, dreaming for their moment.
Let us not be the barriers that limits the potential of young people who are more than ready to shine under the African sun. History cannot repeat itself.
The youth of 1976 fought for better.
The youth of 1976 died so that freedom can not only be imagined but lived.
Let us not be the gatekeepers of people's dreams and ideals, let us give young people especially an opportunity to rise up beyond our fears. The future and best of South Africa is here and lives amongst us.
Young people we acknowledge you, we recognise you, we see you.
Young people you are our champions. Rise up and be counted. Hope is rising! | Steven John Bam Southfield
All talk and no action makes him a dull man
Last Tuesday, the president unveiled a grand plan to rescue South Africa: A national dialogue with all role players to discuss the country's crisis and find solutions.
A convention kicks off on August 15, led by 31 eminent figures from across society. It won't end there – the process will continue beyond the opening event. While some welcomed the Indaba, others were sceptical.
The EFF dismissed it as another elite gathering. Analyst Siyabonga Ntombela called it more lip service – just talk to cover up the failings of a corrupt, inept, government.
South Africa has been full of talk for decades – commissions, inquiries, conferences, committees. What came of the R1-billion Zondo Commission? Were any big fish jailed? Thousands of hours wasted in meetings. Now this 'dialogue' is budgeted at R700 million. After endless speeches and banquets, delegates will retreat to their mansions and chauffeurs – while the poor freeze in shacks. Will this change their lives? You're dreaming. Ramaphosa knows full well what's wrong – anyone on the street can tell him: ANC politics.
He already has the tools to govern. What has his bloated GNU cabinet achieved? Ministers enjoy banquets and joy rides on the taxpayer's back – R202m in travel and accommodation since July. Deputy President Paul Mashatile alone spent millions on trips with his wife. The government may be ineffective, but it excels at making millionaires: 55 000 state employees have hit that mark. It echoes the royalty before the French Revolution.
Ramaphosa lacks the courage, will and determination to fix the mess. The dialogue is a deflection. Forced into coalition, he now wants to look inclusive. But this is just another ploy – all talk, no action. | T Markandan Kloof
Disappearance by design or death?
It is my firm belief that Markus Jooste, former CEO of Steinhoff, never committed suicide.
The alleged gunshot death on March 21, 2024 – just a day before his arrest warrant – was likely a calculated vanishing act, aided by corrupt police and complicit politicians.
Recent revelations reported by the Daily News support this view: no post-mortem, no morgue number, and no evidence of the weapon used. Jooste, fined R475 million by the FSCA for looting state pension funds, simply disappeared.
This echoes the mysterious death of Gavin Watson, CEO of Bosasa, who allegedly died in a car crash in 2019. His demise was steeped in doubt – a private pathologist even suggested he died before the accident. Jacob Zuma, speaking at the funeral, hinted at assassination. Watson was deeply entangled in state capture, securing R12 billion in tenders and funding ANC campaigns.
Another example: Thabo Bester, the convicted murderer and rapist, who faked his own death in a prison fire and fled the country in 2022. He was later recaptured in Tanzania.
And Brett Kebble, the mining magnate fatally shot in 2005 – seven bullets, but an 'assisted suicide.' Investigations revealed he orchestrated his own killing to escape financial collapse and criminal exposure.
A disturbing pattern emerges: powerful, politically connected figures facing justice, who conveniently die, or vanish, under suspicious circumstances. These men lived by greed, corruption, and the pursuit of influence.
As a nation, we must commit to the truth. For now, speculation thrives and fuels a growing public mistrust. Whether these were genuine deaths or choreographed disappearances, the signs are clear: South Africa's elite may be escaping justice – again. | Kevin Govender Umhlatuzana
Israel doesn't give two hoots about peace
Israel's unprovoked military assault on Iran, a sovereign country, violates international law and is a shameless act of imperialist violence that needs to be unequivocally condemned.
African countries, Asian countries and Middle Eastern countries need to take a lesson from apartheid Israel's 'self-defence' and 'pre-emptive strike'.
Most Western countries, including Israel, are not interested in negotiations and peaceful co-existence. Why will the US support a strike on Iran and at the same time coerce Iran to the negotiating table.
China, North Korea, Russia are viewed as major hurdles to the goals of US imperialists around the globe, especially in the Middle East and its Arabian Gulf. The vast amount of oil and gas resources in that region and the important waterway for global trade is of significant geopolitical interest to the imperialist countries.
Hence, Iran, a key ally to both Russia and China, needs to be tamed in order for America and its imperialist allies to achieve their objectives.
It is time that the ordinary people in the Middle East to rise up against their regimes and bring about a life of dignity for all. The occupation of Palestine must end, the genocide in Gaza and these imperialists wars must be stopped.
While the world is focused on Iran, the criminal and inhuman conditions of the lived realities in Gaza must not be forgotten. | MOHAMED SAEED Pietermaritzburg
If DA is pro LGBTQ, why support them?
In a recent letter by a DA MPL, his cries for support of this controversial initiative hints at how desperately the LGBTQ community wants to be seen as a normal facet of society, when, in reality, it's a very unusual group of people trying to act normal.
Personally, I cannot accept it when, during these LGBTQ rallies, all sorts of sexual acts are performed and unusual behaviour of humans are tolerated for the sake of sympathising with these groups of people.
One has to remember that our children are always watching, learning and taking it in and processing it as normal, when, in most homes, they are taught that there are only two genders. If anything, these highly offensive, in-your-face rallies cause more harm than raise awareness of so-called 'diversity and inclusion'.
We have to be so careful what we put on display for our youth to witness and take away from such experiences. I won't encourage anyone who believes in biblical values to attend the June 28 march.
That we are a predominantly Christian nation, should make us wonder if the DA still deserves our support, given it's ties with the LGBTQ agenda, as well as it's involvement with the World Economic Forum.
How can we, as believers of Jesus the Christ, accept these atrocities? I call it an atrocity because the impact it is having on our youngsters is devastating and it only creates confusion and opens doors to unusual human behaviour.
Regarding the DA's tolerance of Klaus Schwab's Orwellian tendencies and totalitarian tactics, I can only assume that we are in for a completely digitised future where everything we do will be under surveillance and we will literally be put in a digital cage, forfeiting most of our freedoms for an assumed 'more efficient home affairs'.
I'd like to challenge the DA leadership to refocus and realign itself with the values that we as South Africans expect from a government who regard biblical principles very highly, or have we now sacrificed these principles at the altar of 'diversity and inclusion' to garner more support and pretend that we care about everyone and want to please every soul?
Wake up DA. | L Oosthuizen Durban
Keyboard politicos deserve no respect
As we are fast approaching the 2026 Local Government Elections, we will see more people jumping political ships for their own selfish gains.
Most political parties abandon their own hard-working activists and parachute careerists into positions of power, but these overnight keyboard politicians have no people's interests at heart but to advance their own personal interests Parties have attracted opportunists and careerists who would never have had the courage and devotion to principles and values that were required during the worst times.
Though servant leadership requires members of the highest calibre, today's politics attract people who are contemptuous of all notions of patriotism and serving the people, who are driven by a value system characterised by the pursuit of personal wealth at all costs.
They join with great ease that procedures permit with the sole aim of furthering their personal careers and using their access to state power to enrich themselves. Many see their membership as a means to advance their personal ambitions, to attain positions of power and access to resources for their own individual gratification
.We have an inescapable responsibility to attend to these matters frankly and decisively, one of these negative features is the emergence of careerism in politics. | Thulani Dasa Khayelitsha
DAILY NEWS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
9 hours ago
- eNCA
10 EFF supporters killed near Vryheid
DURBAN - Ten EFF supporters have been killed in a bus crash in KwaZulu-Natal. READ: Deadly KZN bus crash claims 12 lives They were travelling from the party's Youth Day rally when their bus collided with a truck near Vryheid. Police are still investigating the cause of the midnight crash.
Daily Maverick
10 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Xenophobia is an attack on democratic life and must be stopped (Part 1)
To voice xenophobic statements and behaviour, as Gayton McKenzie has done, is to spit on the freedom of all South Africans, because freedom is universal. Excluding some means we do not have freedom. (Part one of a two-part series on xenophobia and democracy.) Gayton McKenzie's recent xenophobic statements have evoked some concern among political commentators and sections of the public. He is reported to have said that 'some of you here (have) the audacity to hire foreigners instead of South Africans'; 'I don't care how you used to do it. But for as long as I am the minister, there will be no foreigner that will work in an entity while a South African can do the same thing.'; and 'foreigners' employed by government departments needed to be 'out in three weeks… I said it, I want them out, get them out'. His utterances are not surprising since he has made similar public remarks before, and then, as now, there's been no remark from other members of the Government of National Unity (GNU) or the president himself. McKenzie, the leader of the Patriotic Alliance and Minister of Sport, Arts and Culture in the GNU, repeatedly enters this terrain — without facing consequences. We need to be clear why it is wrong to scapegoat poor people from other countries in the Global South. It's important to understand why we should be concerned as patriots and believers in democracy, not simply to remove McKenzie from the Cabinet and other individual expressions of displeasure. One of the reasons we should be concerned goes to the basis of freedom in South Africa, that the country, in the words of the Freedom Charter a nd the 1996 Constitution, belongs to all who live in it. That was first expressed in the Freedom Charter in 1955, and the charter was completely at odds with the notion of citizenship that came to be applied under apartheid South Africa. Then, all black people — and African people particularly — were denationalised and told, in the case of Africans, that their nationhood would be realised in the Bantustans, demarcated for African occupation and 'self-determination'. In post-apartheid South Africa, the emphasis on active and free citizens has itself contributed to denationalisation in that there is — in this discourse — no place allotted for people who have full rights as foreign nationals to participate in the South African body politic without being citizens. It was surprisingly part of the discourse of former UDF leaders when they celebrated the 40th anniversary of the front in 2023. (See here and here). We have to remedy this slippage and ensure the full rights of migrants to be present here, subject to them having relevant papers and not being without these due to the delay of Department of Home Affairs officials. If one says that freedom and liberties are allotted purely to those who have South African citizenship, you are running against the key principles of South African freedom which did not distinguish between the liberties of those who are citizens by virtue of birth in South Africa, and those who acquired rights to freedom in this country through other means. The notion of freedom advanced in South Africa derives from universalism, a desire to bring all people under its banner. This is not to say that there are not any rights allotted purely to citizens, but it is important that we put that in the context of South Africa belonging to all who live in this country. Hurtful attacks Freedom belongs to all, obviously — it is not freedom when some people are excluded. We must find the modalities for working this out in a way that does not repeatedly create hurtful attacks on foreign nationals, as with the poisonous food allegedly emanating from some of the spaza shops run by foreign nationals. When one examines the evidence, it's clear that a lower threshold is applied in making a claim of criminality against people who are foreign nationals. That lack of basic respect must end. It is important that we do not restrict our commentary on Gayton McKenzie's statements to whether or not he should remain a member of the Cabinet. McKenzie might be removed from the Cabinet, although it seems unlikely in the light of the low weight that is placed on xenophobic statements. But the problem of xenophobia remains. It will continue to be a serious question in that there is no clarity as to why or whether xenophobia is wrong, or whether we are confronted by xenophobic incidents in South Africa. It's important that we have people grow up in a country that does not condone any statements that are part of racism, and which does not require that the victim should be a citizen. There are certain values, mainly in regard to apartheid manifestations, but it does not seem to be a recognised moral question in people's minds to see xenophobia as serious wrongdoing. That must be remedied, because to voice xenophobic statements and behaviour is to spit on the freedom of all South Africans because, as mentioned earlier, freedom is universal. Excluding some means we do not have freedom. Naming Consequently, while the remedying of the question of xenophobia can be treated separately, it may be that it will not start to happen until the democratic foundations of the country are restored more generally. Commentary on xenophobia is inhibited by the hypersensitivity of ANC politicians who insist, as many autocrats have done in the past, on demanding that xenophobia is not called by that name. For example, then Police minister Nathi Mthethwa on 15 July 2010 said 'there is no such systematic thing as xenophobia in the country' and that violence against foreign nationals was perpetrated by 'criminal elements'. Just prior to this, the South African Communist Party stated that 'these are not xenophobic attacks… but acts of criminality'. It is simply crime in some cases, but generally there is a simple failure to treat xenophobia as a hate crime or other form of criminality. Feminists such as Adrienne Rich and African-American writers like James Baldwin have recognised the power of naming more generally, the name having a crucial impact on how a struggle or other phenomena are understood. Liberation movements were called terrorists by their opponents, and much of the discourse of the ANC and other liberation movements demanded that they be called by their name, freedom fighters, or alternatively a more neutral term like insurgents or armed militants. The power of naming is important for any attempt to combat xenophobia to succeed, because of statements to the media and other anti-xenophobic agencies by government spokespersons after xenophobic attacks not to call them xenophobia, but instead to call them 'crimes'. Such instructions are made aggressively, one suspects because the publicity is bad. McKenzie's threats against civil society and those fighting xenophobia are threats against our democracy. In a recent interview with The Africa Report, he said 'I will get rid of illegal foreigners. I will close this type of charity because we need patriotic charities in our country. I will close down the charities that are anti-government, that are anti-South African.' When asked if that included the Ahmed Kathrada Foundation, he said: 'I've never heard them speak about the poorest of the poor not having jobs. They must go to hell. I said it. They should go. They are a disgrace to the memory of Ahmed Kathrada.' We need to assert that in actions against xenophobia, we are in fact claiming our rights as heirs to South African freedom, as heirs to constitutionalism, the foundational values of the new democratic South Africa. These are being buried every year, and this very silence that we are now experiencing after the new xenophobic utterances of McKenzie is more important than the name 'Gayton McKenzie'. It has great importance as a claiming of democratic life and values in South Africa. Combating xenophobia in the rest of the world The question of xenophobia and combating it is in this context one of the true claims of fidelity to non-racialism, to tolerance and internationalism in South Africa. Beyond South Africa, both the late Pope Francis and the new Pope Leo XV have aligned themselves with anti-xenophobic forces and preached mutual respect. Pope Leo, from his earliest statements in masses and other occasions has taken up similar themes to Francis. At the same time, as both the Popes came to spread a message of peace and mutual respect, Donald Trump was elected to the US presidency for the second time with xenophobia at the centre of his message, as it had been in his previous presidency. We have had two contrasting examples in the world today at the level of world leaders, that of the Popes and that of Donald Trump. Obviously, there are other lesser figures who are making their marks in either of these directions or somewhere in between. South Africans, whatever their source of ethics, need to carefully consider the commentaries of faith-based organisations and others who have intervened on humanistic grounds. DM
Daily Maverick
10 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Reimagining unity: The imperative of National Dialogue 2.0 in SA's political crisis
It is a common cause that 31 years after the formal demise of apartheid, the promises, great expectations and dreams of democracy are rapidly turning into horrific nightmares for the poor and disadvantaged. At the same time (new and old) elites rule the roost. Socioeconomic and spatial inequalities of the apartheid era widened while the politically connected continued to accumulate wealth and power at the expense of the poor. Crime and corruption escalated exponentially and are inextricably connected to political elites; global mafia operations of every genre magnetically gravitate to our country; and gender-based violence is a pandemic. South Africa has one of the highest unemployment rates in the world (33%), especially among young adults. The poor have inadequate access to essential services like water, electricity, healthcare and basic education. Many of these challenges were aggravated by State Capture. As highlighted by the Zondo Commission, State Capture in South Africa involved the systematic and deliberate subversion of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) for private gain. State Capture eroded good governance practices within SOEs and government departments (including law enforcement and intelligence services), decreasing operational performance and effectiveness. This entailed influencing appointments, procurement procedures, governance, and institutional structures to favour specific individuals and organisations. Key SOEs like Eskom, Transnet, and South African Airways were significantly affected by State Capture, with subsequent multiplier effects on all aspects of South African life, destroying the economy. Hegemonic rule of the ANC All these problems and challenges were aggravated during the hegemonic rule and reign of one political party, the ANC. Not surprisingly, some of its senior members were implicated in the State Capture report. Still, no one has yet been convicted because of the hollowing out of capacity in the National Prosecuting Authority. When he was firmly ensconced on the throne, Jacob Zuma said on more than one occasion that the 'ANC will rule until Jesus returns'. However, there were some obvious indications that the ANC was haemorrhaging — for example, in the 2021 Local Government Elections it received 45.59% of the vote. In the May 2024 General Elections, the ANC lost its parliamentary majority, winning 40.18% of the vote. Ironically, Zuma's newly established uMkhonto Wesizwe (MK) party (while he still claimed to be a disciplined member of the ANC) eroded the support of the ANC, winning 14.58% of the vote. The notion of a National Dialogue entered the public domain against the background of the ANC's declining electoral support. Former president Thabo Mbeki initially proposed a national dialogue in May 2024, calling for 'seismic reflections'. This was endorsed by President Cyril Ramaphosa, who in his inauguration address after the May 2024 national elections, invited 'all parties, civil society, labour, business and other formations to a National Dialogue on the critical challenges facing the nation'. Ramaphosa said: 'By establishing the Government of National Unity, by preparing for a National Dialogue, we have deliberately set ourselves along the path towards a 'co-operation nation'. We would like all of us as South Africans to behave like 'weaver birds'… despite all the challenges, despite our differences, despite all the headwinds.' Political legitimacy There is a view that ruling elites have frequently utilised National Dialogues to obtain or regain political legitimacy. According to the Geneva-based Inclusive Peace and Transition Initiative: 'National Dialogues are typically convened when the fundamental nature or survival of a government in power is questioned. Thus, they usually intend to redefine the relationship between the state, political actors, and society by negotiating a new social contract.' A National Dialogue can be used for peacebuilding and reconciliation to increase confidence and trust among national actors, encourage inclusive engagement, and advance agreement on critical social, political, and economic challenges. The National Dialogue Handbook defines National Dialogues as 'nationally owned political processes aimed at generating consensus among a broad range of national stakeholders in times of deep political crisis, in post-war situations or during far-reaching political transitions'. The goal is for national leaders (political, business, religious, civil society, sports, etc.) across the ideological spectrum to debate, discuss and encourage inclusive engagement and advance agreement on significant social, political, and economic challenges. It is worth noting that the first National Dialogue was the Convention for a Democratic South Africa (Codesa), which took place in Johannesburg in December 1991. It was a critical step in the process of transitioning South Africa from apartheid to a democratic state. Nineteen political organisations participated, including the ruling National Party and the dominant African National Congress (ANC), comprising 228 delegates. Key aspects of Codesa included signing a 'Declaration of Intent' committing to negotiations and creating a new, democratic Constitution. The parties agreed on the principles of a unified, democratic, and non-racial South Africa, with a supreme Constitution and an independent judiciary. Crucial step Codesa established the foundation for negotiations for a democratic South Africa. While there were many disagreements, Codesa was a crucial step in the process of dismantling apartheid and building a new nation. The procedure was sufficiently adaptable to permit the creation of new forums and committees and modifications to existing ones based on political exigencies. As South Africa's transition from apartheid proceeded (with all its twists and turns), a Multi-Party Negotiating Process was established in March 1993, culminating in the adoption of an interim Constitution and preparations for the country's first non-racial elections. Parties with opposing views had to make substantial concessions during this process. Given the protracted conflict and violent past, the comparatively quiet and orderly democratic transition was praised globally as a miracle. Essential outcomes from the first National Dialogue were the Reconstruction and Development Programme and the Constitution. The National Development Plan, which presented a long-term vision and goals for South Africa to achieve by 2030, was released in 2012. All three documents can influence outcomes in the National Dialogue 2.0. There is no need to reinvent the wheel. Almost a year after it was initially proposed, on 10 June 2025, Ramaphosa released the names of the Eminent Persons Group to 'guide and champion the National Dialogue'. The problems in South Africa cannot be solved by National Dialogues alone. For a National Dialogue to be successful, several challenges must be addressed, including political actors' opposition and resistance to change, a lack of support from groups, persistent violence, crime, corruption, instability, and a lack of inclusivity. The National Dialogue 2.0 should not be about saving the ANC. It is about saving our country. All stakeholders must put their shoulders to the wheel, rise above personal, parochial, and party interests, and put South Africa first.
