logo
Tested: Is the 2025 Volvo EX30 the Tesla alternative we were promised?

Tested: Is the 2025 Volvo EX30 the Tesla alternative we were promised?

USA Today2 days ago
Tesla's influence shows up everywhere in the 2025 Volvo EX30. You see it in the speedometer relegated to a corner of the infotainment touchscreen. You see it in the gear selector stalk that doubles as the cruise control switchgear. And you see it in the credit-card-style key that's meant to be a backup to using your phone for unlocking and starting the vehicle. All of this is cost-saving minimalism cleverly passed off as modernism, an art that Tesla — and now Volvo — has nearly perfected in its pursuit of making attainable (and profitable) EVs.
Of all the parallels between the EX30 and a Tesla, the strongest similarity is one that no automaker should imitate: the mile-wide gap between what the automaker originally promised and the car it eventually delivered.
Just two years ago, Volvo introduced the EX30 as the cheap and cheerful cure for too-expensive EVs with a $36,245 starting price and 275 miles of range. Yet the only EX30 you can buy in the U.S. right now and for the foreseeable future costs nearly $10,000 more than that and landed well short of 200 miles in MotorTrend's Road-Trip Range test. Volvo set out to build the $35K EV that Tesla has long teased and appears to have come to the same conclusion: It can't be done. (Chevy has proven otherwise.)
Revisiting vintage automakers: What if AMC Motors had survived? How it could've changed the auto industry
Trading value for performance
It's a shame that the launch turned into a bait and switch because the $46,195 Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance is awesome in its own right. Imagine an electric Volkswagen GTI with 422 hp and 400 lb-ft of torque, and you'll have a pretty good idea of what it's like to drive. Presented with a gap in traffic or an empty roundabout, the EX30 rockets through with an exuberance that matches its Moss Yellow paint.
It is not, however, a rowdy little hooligan of a hatchback as the specs suggest. Exercising characteristic restraint, Volvo delivers all that oomph as a shove rather than a gut punch. The EX30 launches with the faintest scrape of spinning tires, and power builds linearly over the first 20 or so mph. Hitting 60 mph in 3.2 seconds has never felt so civilized. When the EX30 zips past the quarter-mile mark in 11.8 seconds, it does so up against the 112-mph speed limiter that Volvo rolled out across its lineup five years ago in the name of safety.
Similarly, the EX30 steers and turns and tackles bumps capably without ever feeling overtly aggressive. Its 110-foot stop from 60 mph and 0.87 g of cornering grip are decent for a 4,190-pound vehicle on all-season tires but hardly the makings of a four-door sports car. For a Volvo, that's perfect. The EX30 Twin Motor Performance is fun to hustle and pleasant to commute in, making it a great daily driver.
How to make a cheap car feel expensive
The danger of buying the expensive version of a cheap car is that so much of a car is designed and engineered for the lowest-priced model. That's the story of the Ford Maverick. At $33,000, it feels like a value. In a $43,000 model, you can't ignore the flashing and exposed edges on many of the injection-molded plastic parts.
Like the Maverick, the EX30 uses texture and color to turn cheap interior materials into eye candy. Unlike Ford, Volvo has engineered the fit and finish so that those materials also look and — where it matters — feel expensive. The sense of quality is furthered by the cabin's thoughtful and innovative design. The glove box drops from the center of the dash to give the front passenger more kneeroom. Instead of a conventional center console, a bin slides out from below the fixed center armrest with a clever, independently sliding top plate that allows you to allocate the space for cupholders or catchall storage.
As noted at the beginning of this story, it's not hard to find where Volvo has cut cost from the bill of materials. Look at how simple the climate vents are. The front doors have been stripped of nearly all electronics, with the driver and passenger sharing two window switches in the center console to control all four windows. The front speakers all live in a soundbar running across the top of the dash, which unfortunately takes a toll on the audio system's sound quality.
Lamborghini unveils the Temerario GT3: Introducing the successor to Lambo's most decorated race car
What would have been easily justified trade-offs in a $36,245 EX30 are tougher to swallow at our test car's $48,395 sticker price, but the cabin is ultimately an industrial design masterpiece. Funky and original, the EX30 feels like the spiritual successor of the quirky 2008–2013 Volvo C30.
The EX30's petite size reinforces the connection with that decade-old Volvo. The four-door EX30 measures about an inch shorter than the two-door C30 (and 5 inches shorter than the Toyota Corolla hatchback). As a result, the rear seats are only functional if your kids have the anatomy of a Squishmallow, and emptying a full Costco cart into the EX30's 12.4-cubic-foot cargo hold will test your Tetris skills.
Volvo EX30 real-world range and charging
The most consequential cost-cutting measure naturally shows up in what's the most expensive part of any EV, the battery. The EX30's lithium-ion pack stores 64.0 kWh of electricity, less than the late (but soon-to-be-resurrected) Chevrolet Bolt EV. Officially, the Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance is rated for a reasonable 253 miles on a full charge. At a steady 70 mph in the real world, though, we achieved an impractical 180 miles. That 29 percent gap between the window sticker and our measurement (which admittedly only looks at 95 percent of a full charge) makes the EX30 one of the worst performers in the MotorTrend Road-Trip Range test.
Its fast-charging performance is similarly underwhelming. Power peaks at 153 kW and quickly tapers off, delivering enough juice in 15 minutes to cover just 87 miles at 70 mph. Given the EX30's size, limited range and mediocre charging, there are far better options at this price point — pretty much any EV at this price point — for anyone planning on road-tripping their electric vehicle.
Getting techy
Tesla's influence is palpable in the nearly button-free dashboard. The EX30 runs nearly all its major controls through a scaled-down version of the Android Automotive–based infotainment system found in the larger EX90. Thankfully the EX30 hasn't been plagued by the litany of software quality complaints owners have logged against Volvo's new flagship EV, and our reviewers took to the user interface quickly. We like that you can download apps such as Spotify and Waze directly to the 12.3-inch touchscreen and that it offers the familiar comfort of Apple CarPlay and Android Auto for those who aren't ready for such newfangled ideas.
The EX30 comes in two versions, the standard Plus trim and the $1,700 Ultra upgrade that adds a 360-degree camera system, automated parking, ambient cabin lighting, a cabin air filter, LED headlights and Pilot Assist, Volvo's conservative take on Tesla's Full Self-Driving. It can center the EX30 in its lane, slow or accelerate with traffic, and even guide the vehicle through a lane change, but all of this requires the driver to keep their hands on the wheel and eyes on the road. We appreciate a cautious, safety-first approach, but the value of Pilot Assist seems marginal compared to Ford's BlueCruise or GM's Super Cruise. Given its limited capabilities, we'd be inclined to pass on the Ultra trim to try to keep the price in check.
A lesson learned?
The Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance's straight-line speed, polished driving dynamics, and fetching design tug at our emotions, but it's hard not to feel jilted once you climb out of the driver's seat and look at the vehicle in the larger context. Volvo originally pitched the EX30 as a value play that would get more Americans into EVs. Instead, we got a tiny hot rod of a luxury car for a niche buyer.
For now, the work of pushing EVs into the mainstream will have to be carried out by larger, cheaper, longer-range alternatives such as the Tesla Model Y, Hyundai Ioniq 5, Kia EV6, Ford Mustang Mach-E and Chevy Equinox EV. Should Volvo someday figure out how to bring the entry, single-motor EX30 to America (specs for which are included on the U.S. media site), we hope it's learned an important lesson: Wait until you're shipping the cars to the U.S. to announce the price.
Photos by Jim Fets
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I tested Tesla and Waymo's robotaxis in Austin — only one felt ready for the future
I tested Tesla and Waymo's robotaxis in Austin — only one felt ready for the future

Business Insider

time2 hours ago

  • Business Insider

I tested Tesla and Waymo's robotaxis in Austin — only one felt ready for the future

The robotaxi rodeo has arrived in Austin. I was walking down South Congress Avenue in Downtown Austin on a Wednesday afternoon when a fleet of Waymos pulled up at a stoplight, like a little robotaxi posse. This is a fairly new sight. Alphabet's Waymo, which has more than 100 robotaxis in Austin, began offering paid rides through Uber's platform in March, joining several other US cities. Tesla rolled out a pilot launch of its robotaxi in Austin in June. Tesla CEO Elon Musk said in an April earnings call that the service will start with 10 to 20 Model Ys. So far, the service is limited to invite-only and includes a human safety monitor in every car. Musk said in an X post on Sunday that the service will be "open access" by September. I flew to the Texas capital in July to compare the two services head-to-head, examining factors like app experience, pick-up times, drop-off location accuracy, and passenger experience. In May, my colleague Alistair Barr and I pitted Tesla's Full Self-Driving (Supervised) system against Waymo's fully autonomous driver. Musk dismissed that comparison because FSD assumes a human is always ready to take over. This time, I could do a true 1:1 comparison of the companies' robotaxis. My experience with Tesla's Robotaxi shows how far the company has come with its FSD technology since it debuted in 2020. Still, I ran into issues with Tesla's Robotaxi that made me feel it is not yet ready for the masses. A spokesperson for Tesla did not respond to a request for comment. A Waymo spokesperson declined to comment. Here's what happened. The test Tesla's Robotaxi operates with a limited number of cars in Austin — and, more recently, in San Francisco, where human drivers sit behind the wheel. In Austin, Waymo's fleet is managed by Uber. It's part of Waymo's strategy to explore different fleet operators outside its own company. In this case, users hail the robotaxi through the Uber app. Just like in San Francisco, Austin's Waymo fleet consists of retrofitted Jaguar I-PACE SUVs. It has five lidar sensors, six radars, and 29 cameras. Tesla's Robotaxis have eight external cameras. Business Insider's Grace Kay previously reported that the Model Y Robotaxis have some modifications, including self-cleaning cameras and a telecommunications unit that connects with remote operators. The comparison includes multiple rides that I took on July 16 and 17. I took five rides in Tesla's Robotaxi during the early mornings and afternoons. I went on eight Waymo rides over the course of a full day for the test. My time with Tesla's Robotaxi was limited to the availability of my rider companion, Vu Kong, a local Tesla investor who manages a dental group. He received an early Robotaxi invite and graciously took the time out of his workweek to bring me along for a few rides. First up: Waymo One of the observations I've consistently seen from Waymo is that the autonomous driving technology is safe but assertive, whether that's in San Francisco or Los Angeles. In Austin, I saw an even bolder Waymo. One notable moment was when the Waymo was trying to pull out of a parking lot by making a left turn against oncoming cars coming from my left. It was during rush hour, and traffic was packed. A bus to my right had stopped, so oncoming cars to my left had started to form a line. The Waymo decided to squeeze through the space it had and carefully inched forward — almost as if it was telling the other cars, "I'm going to make my left turn, darn it." The Waymos got my pickup and drop-off location exactly right every ride. There are times in San Francisco when a Waymo might pick me up about a block away from where I am. I took multiple Waymo rides from early morning hours to Austin's 5 p.m. peak traffic time. The average price across eight rides was $10.69. The average pick-up time was about seven minutes. In Austin, users must opt in for the autonomous vehicle option in their Uber app. There is no way to specifically request a robotaxi for each ride. Uber will instead pair you with whatever vehicle is on the most time-efficient route — human or robot, according to a Waymo spokesperson. The spokesperson said Uber will likely send a human driver if the best route requires a highway. Waymo is testing on highways in SF, LA, and Phoenix, but public riders don't have access yet, the spokesperson said. I ended up canceling 47 Uber rides in my attempt to hail a Waymo so that I could recreate a route I took in Tesla's Robotaxi from Austin's South Congress area to the Crestview neighborhood up north, about nine miles away. I did not end up connecting with a Waymo for that specific route. Normally, I don't mind human Uber drivers. My main concern is getting from point A to B as quickly, safely, and cheaply as possible. For folks who want a robotaxi or would prefer a ride to themselves, I can see a scenario in the future where people will go straight to Tesla's Robotaxi app instead of Uber — that is, once it's available to the general public and Tesla removes its safety driver. Tesla time Tesla's Robotaxi fleet is made up of the latest Model Y, which I found to be a smooth, comfortable ride. I've hailed Teslas through Uber and Lyft that were driven by humans. During those rides, I almost always got carsick. When riding in Tesla's Robotaxi, I did not get carsick at all (reaffirming a personal theory: Some human drivers don't know how to drive a Tesla). During my rides, the Tesla's autonomous driving system drove at a reasonable speed, maintained a safe distance from other cars and cyclists, and recognized construction zones. Three incidents, though, required us to connect with a remote Tesla support agent — two of which happened on my first ride. The first intervention happened as the Robotaxi was trying to pull out of a parking lot. We were waiting for about a minute when a message popped up on the rear center screen: "Our team has identified an issue and is working to resolve it." A remote "support agent" at Tesla soon connected with us. "It looks like the vehicle isn't making any progress. Is everything OK?" the agent said. After explaining that we appeared to be stuck, the remote agent said they'd help us out. We were soon on our way. The next intervention came about 20 minutes later, after we changed the route mid-journey. As we were heading down Fruth Street, Tesla's Robotaxi began to approach a road clearly marked with two "Do Not Enter" signs. This is where I realized the importance of having a human safety monitor inside every car — and why the monitors appear to be on a strict do-not-talk-to-the-riders policy. Chatting might make the ride feel less awkward, but they're actually performing an important job, which is paying close attention to what's happening on the roads. As the car moved forward, the safety monitor touched a button on the center console screen to stop the ride. We were heading down an empty one-way road. A remote support agent connected again, and the Robotaxi began a three-point turn before slamming the brakes. There were no other notable incidents on that ride. The third intervention came the next day. Kong and I wanted to take the car to the very edge of Tesla's geofence, which establishes the boundaries of the Robotaxi service. When we changed the destination toward the end of our ride, the Tesla started to take us on a new route that briefly put us outside the geofence. A remote support agent called to let us know that they had to reroute the car so that it wouldn't go outside the digital boundaries. I was at least comforted to see how responsive the remote agents were. Tesla's Robotaxi also avoided the highway during my rides. It's unclear if Tesla is avoiding them for public riders for now, just as with Waymo. During my fourth ride to North Austin, Kong, a five-year resident of Texas, noticed that the Robotaxi was taking a longer route to a destination that should've been an 18-minute trip if the car had taken the 35 highway or MoPac Expressway, according to Google Maps. Traffic was light to moderate during the times I took Tesla's Robotaxi. There were no issues with pick-up or drop-off locations. Pick-up times were mostly around 10 minutes, but there was one case where the pick-up time was nearly half an hour. Tesla hasn't specified how many cars it has added since it expanded the coverage area, but during the company's latest earnings call on July 23, Ashok Elluswamy, Tesla's VP of AI software, said it had a "handful" of vehicles on the roads. I didn't have direct access to the Robotaxi app, but based on what I saw from Kong, it appeared easy to use. The app glitched once and showed that a Robotaxi was on the way, even though we had just been dropped off at our destination. Kong told me that the app can be a bit buggy. The verdict As in our May test between Waymo and Tesla FSD (Supervised), Waymo won. While impressive, Tesla's Robotaxi is still a work in progress. I never felt in danger while riding — but it didn't quite feel like the well-oiled service that Waymo delivers. The intervention I experienced when Tesla's Robotaxi started driving down a one-way road showed why a safety monitor is still necessary. They're not passive passengers, but constantly watching for issues. That's not to suggest Waymo is perfect. Even after one hundred million autonomously driven miles, Waymo still makes mistakes. A previous Business Insider analysis of Waymo's progress in California found that between January and March 2025, when it provided more than 1.8 million rides in the Golden State, Waymo saw 7 collisions per 100,000 rides. Still, the company has published data showing a significant safety advantage over the average human driver. Earlier this year, Waymo said it's providing 250,000 paid trips a week. Waymo's achievement didn't happen overnight. Seven years ago, Alphabet launched an early rider program, giving a limited number of vetted riders access to Waymos with safety drivers inside the car. Musk said Tesla's ramp-up will be faster — a thousand robotaxis in Austin by the end of the year. Still, I'm more interested in another milestone: When will they remove the in-car safety monitor?

Three game-changing new Apple CarPlay features expected with iOS 26 update
Three game-changing new Apple CarPlay features expected with iOS 26 update

USA Today

time4 hours ago

  • USA Today

Three game-changing new Apple CarPlay features expected with iOS 26 update

Apple CarPlay is about to get transformative new features. Apple CarPlay completely transforms the driving experience for iPhone owners. CarPlay connectivity allows iPhone users to link their smartphones to vehicle infotainment systems via a wired or wireless connection. The system grants access to useful apps for navigation, music streaming, podcast streaming, and more. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto have received several updates over the years, becoming more integral parts of the modern driving experience for many drivers. Apple's upcoming CarPlay update could be an absolute game-changer because of these new features. Apple CarPlay is debuting new features in September, says Apple blog Popular Apple news site 9to5Mac says that Apple's iOS 26 update has plenty of new features in store for CarPlay. Everything from the appearance to available widgets, apps, and capabilities are getting upgraded. One of the many new features is Apple's Liquid Glass design for backgrounds and wallpapers. This gives CarPlay a fresh new appearance that's more reflective of the iOS 26 update. A style upgrade is just the beginning when it comes to new CarPlay features. Another major new feature is the introduction of widgets to standard CarPlay. Apple users will soon be able to access any widgets from installed apps via their vehicle's infotainment system. This feature makes CarPlay more capable in terms of what it can display and gives drivers the ability to quickly use more iPhone shortcuts from their vehicle's touchscreens. Arguably the most impactful upcoming feature is AirPlay, a feature that will support in-vehicle video for standard CarPlay. This will allow drivers and occupants to enjoy videos via their car's infotainment system when the vehicle is parked. This is a game-changer, as only some brands such as Tesla hosted infotaintment video streaming features prior to iOS 26. Why iOS 26 could be revolutionary for Apple CarPlay One of the greatest benefits of a video streaming feature on CarPlay is an elevated charging experience for EV owners. Once rolled out, non-Tesla EV owners who use CarPlay can watch videos on their infotainment screens while their car is charging, just like Tesla owners. This feature essentially makes infotaiment systems "smarter" regardless of how modern or antiquated their native infotainment systems are. Vehicles are getting more tech-reliant and software-centric, so Apple's decision to upgrade standard CarPlay is rational. CarPlay Ultra takes things to a whole other level, allowing Apple's unique user interface to dominate vehicle displays via infotainment and digital instrumental cluster screens. Standard CarPlay isn't quite as advanced yet, but it's certainly evolving with every iteration and becoming a quintessential part of the modern driving experience for iPhone users. How Apple plans to combat distracted driving with iOS 26 Incorporating video streaming into CarPlay raises some obvious safety concerns. After all, driving around with eyes glued to your favorite show or an engaging new movie could be disastrous. Thankfully, Apple designed the feature to automatically pause video playback once the connected iPhone detects motion, according to PCMag. So, streaming video content will be reserved for drivers and occupants who are safely parked and restricted for those who would attempt to stream and drive. As infotainment systems become increasingly engaging, Apple and Android will have to keep safety in mind as both software developers introduce new features. That said, both Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are having a profound impact on the way drivers interact with their vehicles. The new CarPlay update is expected to roll out in September, according to 9to5Mac.

Robinhood's CEO says he got advice from Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk during the GameStop PR crisis
Robinhood's CEO says he got advice from Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk during the GameStop PR crisis

Business Insider

time4 hours ago

  • Business Insider

Robinhood's CEO says he got advice from Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk during the GameStop PR crisis

Robinhood's CEO has said that Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk helped him when the trading platform faced backlash after the GameStop frenzy. Robinhood was one of the main platforms investors from Reddit forum Wall Street Bets used to fuel a short squeeze on GameStop in January 2021. But the platform suspended buying of the stock and other meme stocks, prompting regulatory scrutiny and a spotlight on Robinhood's ties to Citadel Securities, its largest market-making partner by volume. The scrutiny intensified after Citadel — a separate hedge fund under the same corporate umbrella — invested $2.75 billion to rescue Melvin Capital, which suffered heavy losses from trying to short GameStop. "A bunch of people that probably wouldn't have given me the time of day were offering to get on calls and help me navigate this whole situation," Vlad Tenev told John Collison, cofounder and president of online payment provider Stripe, in an episode of the "Cheeky Pint" podcast on Wednesday. Tenev said Zuckerberg told him he might be able to help, as he also had, in the words of the Robinhood CEO, his "share of PR issues." "We workshopped some stuff," Tenev said, adding that he also connected with Musk through Antonio Gracias, founder, chief executive, and chief investment officer of Chicago-based Valor Equity Partners. He described Musk as "very intense." "He's like, 'You're being an asshole to the people. What you've gotta do is full transparency, 100% put it all out there, play-by-play, full transparency'," Tenev said of his conversation with the Tesla CEO. He added that he texted Musk after the rest of his calls to ask if he wanted to interview him on Clubhouse, the social-media app that blew up around the same time. Tenev recalled thinking: "I've got this crazy idea. How about I just go on the Clubhouse and we lay it all on the line?" During the interview, three days after Robinhood's trade suspension, Musk grilled Tenev for 90 minutes, asking why the fintech firm limited trading. Tenev responded that Robinhood had to comply with regulations. Robinhood, Meta, and Tesla did not respond to requests for comment for Business Insider. Tenev said Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff also helped him, but didn't describe the interaction beyond saying Benioff was "very nice."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store