Single UK Special Forces officer rejected 1,585 Afghan resettlement applications
LONDON: A court has been told a UK Special Forces officer personally rejected 1,585 applications from Afghans for resettlement in Britain.
The applications were all from people with credible links to UKSF personnel, the Ministry of Defense told the court, amid an ongoing investigation into alleged war crimes by the Special Air Service in Afghanistan.
The BBC revealed last week that the individual in question may have rejected applications from people with eye-witness testimony relating to the allegations.
Numerous former Afghan special forces soldiers, known as Triples due to their regiment numbers, served alongside UK forces until the fall of Afghanistan to the Taliban in 2021.
Thousands of them and their relatives have subsequently struggled to obtain permission to travel to the UK.
The public inquiry into the conduct of UKSF soldiers in Afghanistan, meanwhile, lacks the power to compel former Triples soldiers to testify unless they are in the UK.
In October 2022 Natalie Moore, the head of the Ministry of Defense's Afghan resettlement team, voiced concern that UKSF involved in applications for resettlement were giving the 'appearance of an unpublished mass rejection policy.'
In January last year, former Veterans Minister Johnny Mercer told senior government officials there was a 'significant conflict of interest that should be obvious to all' in the processing of resettlement applications by UKSF personnel.
'Decision-making power,' Mercer claimed, over 'potential witnesses to the inquiry,' was 'deeply inappropriate.'
Mercer also noted that a number of former Triples soldiers had been killed by the Taliban after being left to wait in Afghanistan, including one whose application was rejected having 'previously confronted UKSF leadership about EJKs (extrajudicial killings) in Afghanistan.'
The MoD initially denied UKSF personnel had a veto over the applications of former Triples soldiers, who having been armed, trained and funded by the UK, were deemed at risk of reprisals if left in Afghanistan after the withdrawal of coalition forces.
However, more than 2,000 applications deemed credible by caseworkers have been rejected by the UKSF. The MoD subsequently announced a review of the applications over fears the process was not 'robust.'
An additional 2,500 rejected applications were placed under review this week by the government. So far, more than 600 of the 1,585 rejections attributed to the single UKSF officer have been overturned.
The revelations about the UKSF member who rejected the 1,585 applications were made at a judicial review hearing brought by former Triples soldiers over the conflict of interest in resettlement decision-making, which also heard the MoD had launched two investigations into UKSF practices.
One investigation, known as Operation X, said that it 'did not obtain any evidence of hidden motives on the part of the UKSF liaison officer.'
It added it found 'no evidence of automatic/instant/mass rejections,' but failed to provide evidence in its conclusion, instead suggesting the decisions were made as a result of 'slack and unprofessional verification processes' by the UKSF officer and 'lax procedures followed by the officer in not following up on all lines of enquiry before issuing rejections.'
Tom de la Mare KC, representing the Afghan Triple soldier who brought the case, accused the MoD of failing to disclose evidence of blanket application rejections, and of 'providing misleading responses to requests for information,' the BBC said.
Cathryn McGahey KC, acting for the MoD, said 'there might have been a better way of doing (the applications process), but that doesn't make it unlawful.'
Daniel Carey, partner at law firm DPG, acting for the former Triples soldier, told the BBC: 'My client spent years asking the MoD to rectify the blanket refusals of Triples personnel and has seen many killed and harmed by the Taliban in that time.
'He is pleased that the MoD have agreed to inform everyone of the decisions in their cases and to tell the persons affected whether their cases are under review or not, but it should not have required litigation to achieve basic fairness.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
Starmer condemns Israel's ‘appalling' actions in Gaza
LONDON: Israel's actions in Gaza are 'appalling and intolerable' the UK Prime Minister Keir Starter said on Wednesday amid growing international pressure to stop the slaughter of Palestinians. Aid agencies and governments around the world have all condemned the killing of dozens of Palestinians this week as they tried to access food distribution sites in the decimated territory. It follows growing opposition in Europe to Israel's military campaign, with the UK, France, Germany and Italy becoming increasingly critical of Benjamin Netanyahu's government. 'Israel's recent action is appalling, and in my view counterproductive and intolerable, and we have strongly opposed the expansion of military operations and settler violence and the blocking of humanitarian aid,' Starmer told MPs. He said the UK and its allies were considering sanctions against Israel and that his government had already suspended talks on a free trade agreement. That step was announced after the UK, France, and Canada issued a joint statement last month threatening "concrete actions' against Israel if it did not halt its military operation in Gaza and allow humanitarian aid into the territory. France and Saudi Arabia are organizing a UN conference this month about a two-state solution for Palestine and Israel. France has already said it is considering recognizing the Palestinian state during the conference. Starmer did not answer whether the UK would follow suit and recognize a Palestinian when asked in parliament Wednesday. However, Foreign Office minister Hamish Falconer told MPs that the government was reconsidering its position on Palestinian statehood, The Guardian reported. Falconer said he was "appalled" by the killings of Palestinians this week as they gathered to approach a new aid distribution hub. "We call for an immediate and independent investigation into these events for the perpetrators to be held to account,' he said. Dozens of MPs from both the main political parties have signed letters in recent months calling for Palestine to be recognized. Starmer is facing fierce criticism from within his own Labour Party to take a tougher line on Israel. Labour MP Paula Barker said history "will not be kind" to his government unless action is taken. 'What more evidence do we need to call this exactly what it is? A deliberate policy of annexation and genocide," she said.
Arab News
4 hours ago
- Arab News
Growing numbers of people worldwide unhappy with Israeli state and Netanyahu, survey finds
CHICAGO: The results of a survey published this week by the Pew Research Center in Washington reveal a significant increase in the proportions of people in the US, UK and other nations, mostly in the West, who hold unfavorable views on the Israeli state and its prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu. Researchers polled 32,000 people in 24 countries. Previous surveys had been carried out in 11 of them, 13 were being surveyed for the first time. Maria Smerkovich, a research associate with Pew, told Arab News on Wednesday that the results showed conclusively that public attitudes toward Israel and the country's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, were increasingly negative, especially in America, traditionally one of the strongest advocates for Israel, and in the UK. 'The median is 62 percent have unfavorable views of the country of Israel, compared with a 29 percent median that have favorable views,' she said of the overall results. 'In about 20 of these countries, half of the population or more have unfavorable views of the country. We find that younger people and people on the left are more likely to have negative views of the country. 'In the US, views on Israel have turned more negative. The last time we asked about the favorability of Israel in the US was in 2022, before the current war (in Gaza). And at that time, a slight majority had favorable views of Israel. A smaller share had unfavorable views of Israel. 'Now (since the start of the conflict in Gaza) we've seen the tide turn, where just over half have unfavorable views of Israel and 45 percent have favorable views. So that's a leap in terms of unfavorability; it's a jump from 42 percent to 53 percent in just three years.' She continued: 'In about 10 other countries, the last time we asked about favorability of Israel was in 2013. And we have seen, in most of the countries, we have seen views turn more negative. For example in the UK in 2013, unfavorability was at 44 percent. Today, it's at 61 percent. So that's quite a jump. 'Israel's unfavorability has increased in seven countries of the 10 where we have trends,' she said adding that the proportions of unfavorable views had remained 'about the same since 2013' in France, Germany and Greece. In addition to the 'striking' increase in unfavorable views in the UK, Smerkovich said: 'In Indonesia, it's gone up from 71 percent to 80 percent. In Turkey, from 85 percent to 93 percent. In Nigeria, 25 percent to 32 percent.' In the other 13 countries with no previous survey results, majorities also held strongly unfavorable views of both Israel and Netanyahu. The survey reveals 'majorities across all 24 countries show a lack of confidence that Netanyahu will 'do the right thing,'' Smerkovich said. Many people the US 'have no confidence in Netanyahu,' she added, and there 'has been an increase in the share that say they have no confidence in him … about a 10 percent jump, whereas the share that say they do have confidence in him has stayed fairly stable.' This pattern is repeated in other countries, she said, where 'we have seen an increase in no confidence in Netanyahu. But the share that say they do have confidence in him hasn't really changed much in the US.' The Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan 'fact tank' that says it aims to inform the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts opinion polls, demographic research, content analysis and other data-driven social science research and does not adopt any positions on policies.
Al Arabiya
4 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Putin ‘strongly' vowed to respond to Ukraine's drone attack on Russian bombers: Trump
US President Donald Trump said he spoke to Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin Wednesday about Ukraine and Iran, warning that the Kremlin leader had 'very strongly' pledged to respond to Kyiv's stunning drone attack on Russian bombers. Trump said that there was no 'immediate peace' on the horizon in Ukraine – which Russia invaded in 2022 – following what he described as a one hour and 15 minute call with the Russian president. On Iran, Trump said that Putin had offered to 'participate' in talks on Tehran's nuclear program, as Trump accused the Islamic Republic of 'slowwalking' its response to Washington's offer of a deal. The call came three days after Ukraine conducted a massive, daring drone attack against Russian military airbases, saying it had destroyed several Russian nuclear-capable bombers worth billions of dollars. Trump said that he and Putin had 'discussed the attack on Russia's docked airplanes, by Ukraine and also various other attacks that have been taking place by both sides.' 'It was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate Peace. President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields,' Trump said in his post. Trump did not say whether he had warned Putin off any such retaliation against Ukraine, which Washington has supported to the tune of billions of dollars in its fight against Russia. 'Definitive answer' The Republican has repeatedly alarmed Kyiv and Western allies by appearing to side with Putin over the war, and had a blazing Oval Office row with visiting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. But Trump has also showed growing frustration with Putin as Russia has so far derailed the US president's efforts to honor a campaign pledge to end the war within 24 hours – even if he never explained how this could be achieved. The call between Trump and Putin did however show that Washington and Moscow may be eying cooperation on another key global issue – Iran. Trump said he believed they were both 'in agreement' that Iran could not have a nuclear weapon, and that time was running out for Tehran to respond to US offers of a deal. 'President Putin suggested that he will participate in the discussions with Iran and that he could, perhaps, be helpful in getting this brought to a rapid conclusion,' Trump said. The US president added: 'It is my opinion that Iran has been slowwalking their decision on this very important matter, and we will need a definitive answer in a very short period of time!' Putin told his Iranian counterpart Masoud Pezeshkian that Moscow was ready to help advance talks on a nuclear deal, the Kremlin said on Tuesday. But Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei said earlier Wednesday that Washington's proposal was against Tehran's national interest, amid sharp differences over whether Tehran can continue to enrich uranium.
