logo
Committee awaits amendments to proposed liability for social transitioning of transgender minors

Committee awaits amendments to proposed liability for social transitioning of transgender minors

Yahoo19-03-2025
Texas-based counselor Rebecca Smith (left) and Rep. Mary Bentley, R-Perryville, present House Bill 1668 to the House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, March 18, 2025. (Photo by Tess Vrbin/Arkansas Advocate)
An Arkansas lawmaker promised to amend a bill that would create civil liability for Arkansas adults who assist transgender minors' transitions after other lawmakers and members of the public presented a flurry of questions and concerns Tuesday.
Rep. Mary Bentley, R-Perryville, told the House Judiciary Committee that House Bill 1668, the Vulnerable Youth Protection Act, would deter 'social experiments that are really destroying the lives' of children who do not identify with their gender assigned at birth.
The bill would hold liable 'any person who knowingly causes' a minor's social transition or 'the castration, sterilization, or mutilation of a minor' for 'any personal injuries or harm' resulting from the actions. It would create a 20-year statute of limitations for civil action, and complainants would be able to recover financial damages.
Arkansas was one of the first states to pass a law banning gender-affirming medical treatments for transgender minors. The Save Adolescents From Experimentation (SAFE) Act of 2021, which Bentley co-sponsored, is under appeal in federal court after families of transgender minors sued and obtained a permanent injunction.
Federal judge strikes down Arkansas ban on gender-affirming health care for transgender youth
More than two dozen other states have passed similar laws since 2021, but no state has enacted a law banning social transitioning, which HB 1668 defines as 'any act by which a minor adopts or espouses a gender identity that differs from the minor's biological sex as determined by the sex organs, chromosomes, and endogenous profiles of the minor, including without limitation changes in clothing, pronouns, hairstyle, and name.'
Rep. Jeremiah Moore, R-Clarendon, said this definition was too broad.
'If a parent takes their daughter to a barbershop… and [the barber] gives that haircut per the child and the parent's wishes, and that haircut is not a 'girl's haircut,' this language seems to be holding him potentially liable for the next 20 years of his barber career,' Moore said.
Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin's office believes the bill is not yet legally sound, senior assistant attorney general Justin Brascher told the committee.
No members of the public came to speak in favor of the bill, while 20 signed up to speak against it and nine received a chance to speak. Some of the nine, including Caitlin Tannehill Oxford, said they have heard concerns from hairdressers about the legislation.
'If my son and I agree that he can get a piercing, that could also be defined as mutilation and I could be held liable,' said Oxford, president of the Washington County Democrats. 'My daughter does not dress girly. She loves jeans, not dresses. Would that hold me liable to legal action for allowing her to wear what she likes? By the way, my children are not trans. However, I have many friends and family who are, and I'm here today to support them.'
Bentley said she will amend the bill to 'work on some of the definitions and make it clearer.'
Transgender teen shares experience with gender-affirming care in trial against Arkansas law
She and Rebecca Smith, a licensed professional counselor from southeast Texas, both claimed a majority of minors with 'gender confusion' eventually return to identifying as their 'birth sex.' Medical professionals who testified for the plaintiffs in the trial against the SAFE Act said regret over gender transition is rare, including for people who transition as minors. They also said Arkansas children do not receive gender-affirming breast or genital surgeries.
Smith called HB 1668 'a crucial safeguard against practices that alienate children from their families and disrupt healthy development.'
'This legislation seeks to deter the harmful effects of gender-affirming interventions by providing victims with a path for recourse and ensuring they have the time and opportunity to seek justice once they recognize the self-hatred that has been instilled in them and are ready to reclaim their true identity,' Smith said.
Some of the bill's opponents said transitioning does not alienate children from their families.
'Hatred and bigotry alienate children from their families… and legislation like this encourages that,' Arkansas Tech University student Jordyn Barnett said.
HB 1668 includes the statement: 'A person shall not be held liable under this section for speech or conduct protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.'
Committee members of both parties and members of the public said the rest of the bill contradicts that statement. An amendment adopted by the committee added the word 'knowingly' to the legislation, and Bentley said this should alleviate concerns about the broadness of the bill.
Evelyn Rios Stafford disagreed. She is a Washington County Justice of the Peace and Arkansas' first and only openly transgender elected official.
'Sometimes I get approached by parents who have kids that are in college, sometimes in high school, and they'll introduce me to their kid and say… 'I'd like to introduce you to my trans son, John Doe,' and I say, 'John Doe, it's great to meet you,'' Rios Stafford said. '…Under this bill, that would put me under a civil cause of action for the next 20 years for having that positive interaction with an accepting parent of a 17-year-old.'
First Amendment concerns are among the reasons Griffin's office is not willing to defend the law in court as it is written, even with Tuesday's amendments, Brascher said. He added that Griffin's office is 'sympathetic to the intent' of HB 1668, as evidenced by its continued defense of the SAFE Act.
Bentley said HB 1668 'perfectly lines up with' the blocked law. In 2023, she sponsored the Protecting Minors from Medical Malpractice Act, which allowed private enforcement of the SAFE Act by creating civil liability for doctors who provide gender-affirming healthcare to transgender minors. The bill initially had a 30-year statute of limitations before it was amended down to 15 years.
Simon Garbett, a transgender 18-year-old from Little Rock, spoke against the 2023 law and returned to the House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday to speak against HB 1668. He maintained that he is 'not a social experiment' and that the idea that gender-affirming healthcare sterilizes trans youth 'is a complete lie.'
'Please have empathy for people who are different from you,' Garbett said. 'We're not hurting you, so stop hurting us.'
Bill allowing malpractice suits for transgender minors' health care goes to Sanders' desk
Bentley is also the lead sponsor of House Bill 1669, which passed the House last week. The bill would prohibit 'discrimination' in foster care or adoption cases if parents whose deeply held religious beliefs do not affirm transgender minors' identities.
In 2023, Bentley co-sponsored two more laws related to transgender youth. One forbade public and charter school students from using bathrooms and locker rooms that do not match their gender assigned at birth. The other, the Given Name Act, requires public school teachers and college professors to use the pronouns and names students were assigned at birth unless parents specifically allow them to do otherwise.
Rep. Nicole Clowney, D-Fayetteville, asked Bentley on Tuesday if teachers would be liable for civil action under HB 1668 if they adhere to 'the wishes of that parent united with their child, not alienated from them' if the parent has given the permission outlined in the Given Name Act.
'That is correct,' Bentley said. 'I think that we're just saying that social transitioning is excessively harmful to children.'
Marie Mainard O'Connell, a mother of a transgender teen from Little Rock, said she shared Clowney's concerns.
'[This bill] supposes that parents are not supportive, and in point of fact, I work with a community and dozens of families for whom this bill will make their work as supportive families harder,' said O'Connell, who is a Presbyterian pastor.
'Gutted' Arkansas bill no longer targets drag performers or LGBTQ community, activists say
Another 2023 law Bentley sponsored initially would have banned drag shows from being held within a certain distance of schools, parks and other places children frequent, but the Alliance Defending Freedom helped the sponsors amend the legislation so it would hold up in court. The ADF is a conservative, faith-based advocacy group that has opposed LGBTQ+ rights efforts.
The ADF weighed in on the Given Name Act in 2023, and Bentley said Tuesday that she consulted with the organization while working on HB 1668.
Rep. Wayne Long, R-Bradford, was the Given Name Act's primary sponsor and said it would prevent 'compelled speech'; Rios Stafford said Tuesday that HB 1668 would actually create compelled speech.
Rep. Ashley Hudson, D-Little Rock, pointed out that HB 1668 does not say there will be no civil liability if a child does not socially transition or later detransitions. Bentley said the absence of a cause of action in those cases is 'common sense.'
'If they stay with their normal gender, there's been no hurt or harm that's been done, so there'd be no lawsuit to file,' Bentley said.
Judiciary Committee chairwoman Rep. Carol Dalby, R-Texarkana, said she will schedule a special order of business for HB 1668 after Bentley files the amendments. The committee did not have enough time to hear all 20 speakers against the bill Tuesday, but Dalby said those who did not get to speak will be preemptively placed on the public comment list for the next hearing on the bill.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democrats release plan to boost party's California's House seats in fight for Congress
Democrats release plan to boost party's California's House seats in fight for Congress

NBC News

time10 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Democrats release plan to boost party's California's House seats in fight for Congress

LOS ANGELES — In a display of cutthroat yet calculated politics, Democrats unveiled a proposal Friday that could give California's dominant political party an additional five U.S. House seats in a bid to win the fight to control Congress next year. The plan calls for an unusually timed reshaping of House district lines to greatly strengthen the Democratic advantage in the state ahead of midterm elections, when Republicans will be defending the party's fragile House majority. It amounts to a counterpunch to Texas, where the GOP is trying to add five seats to its House delegation at the urging of President Donald Trump as he tries to avoid losing control of Congress and, with it, prospects for his conservative agenda in the later part of his term. If approved by voters in a November election, the California blueprint could nearly erase Republican House members in the nation's most populous state. The Democratic plan is intended to win the party 48 of its 52 U.S. House seats, up from 43 currently. The proposal was released by the campaign arm of House Democrats, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. Democrats in the state Legislature will hold hearings and plan to vote on the new maps next week. 'This is about more than drawing lines on a map. It's about drawing a line in the sand to stop Texas and Trump from rigging the election,' state Senate Democratic leader Mike McGuire said in a statement. New districts have boundaries to boost Democratic edge While a general notion behind drawing districts is to unite what's called communities of interest — neighborhoods and cities that share similar concerns or demographic traits — the proposed remapping would create a jigsaw of oddly shaped districts to maximize Democratic clout. The 1st Congressional District is currently anchored in the state's conservative far northeast corner and is represented by Republican Rep. Doug LaMalfa, a Trump supporter. The district has a nearly 18-point GOP registration edge. Under the proposal Democrats would end up with a 10-point registration advantage in the district after drastic reshaping to include parts of heavily Democratic Sonoma County near the Pacific Coast. In a post on the social platform X, LaMalfa called the proposal 'absolutely ridiculous.' In the battleground 41st District east of Los Angeles, represented by long-serving Republican Rep. Ken Calvert, Democratic and Republican registration is currently split about evenly. But in the redrawn district, Democratic registration would jump to 46%, with GOP registration falling to 26%. Other Republicans whose districts would see major changes intended to favor Democrats include Reps. Kevin Kiley in Northern California, David Valadao in the Central Valley farm belt and Darrell Issa in San Diego County. Also, embattled Democratic incumbents would see their districts padded with additional left-leaning voters. Texas remains at stalemate in push for more GOP seats The release of the plan came the same day that Texas Republicans began a second special session to approve new congressional maps sought by Trump. The GOP's first special session in Texas ended without approving new political maps, thwarted by Democrats who staged a nearly two-week walkout that meant not enough lawmakers were present to pass any legislation. Gov. Greg Abbott then quickly called a second session that started without the necessary quorum to conduct business. Newsom promises fight with Trump Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom said Thursday that his state will hold a Nov. 4 special referendum on the redrawn districts. 'We can't stand back and watch this democracy disappear district by district all across the country,' Newsom said. The announcement marked the first time any state beyond Texas officially waded into Trump's fight, though several governors and legislative leaders from both parties have threatened such moves. Rep. Richard Hudson of North Carolina, who heads the House GOP campaign arm, said Newsom, a potential 2028 presidential candidate, is 'shredding California's Constitution and disenfranchising voters.' 'Californians oppose Newsom's stunt because they won't let a self-serving politician rig the system to further his career,' said Hudson, who heads the National Republican Congressional Committee. The looming question: How will voters react? A big risk for Democrats is whether voters will be open to setting aside district boundaries crafted by an independent commission for ones shaped for partisan advantage. Some people already have said they would sue over the effort. Republican former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, a longtime opponent of partisan redistricting, signaled that he will not side with Democrats even after talking to Newsom. He posted a photo of himself Friday at the gym wearing a T-shirt that said, 'Terminate gerrymandering,' with a reference to an obscenity and politicians. 'I'm getting ready for the gerrymandering battle,' Schwarzenegger said. What's next in Texas? Absent lawmakers have said they will return to Austin once California Democrats take more formal steps on their own redistricting plan. Trump is trying to avoid a repeat of the 2018 midterms, when the GOP yielded control during his first presidency to a Democratic majority that stymied his agenda and twice impeached him. The nation's two most populous states have been at the forefront of the resulting battle, which has reached into multiple courtrooms and statehouses controlled by both parties. Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows chided colleagues who left Austin, accusing them of 'following Gov. Newsom's lead instead of the will of Texans.' The speaker said, however, that he has 'been told' to expect a quorum Monday. 'Let's be ready to work,' Burrows said, ticking through a litany of issues without mentioning the president or redistricting. The fight goes national Trump has urged other Republican-run states to redraw maps, even dispatching Vice President JD Vance to Indiana to pressure officials there. In Missouri, according to a document obtained by The Associated Press, the state Senate received a $46,000 invoice to activate six redistricting software licenses and provide training for up to 10 staff members. Newsom encouraged other Democratic-led states to 'stand up — not just California.' House control could come down to a few seats in 2026 On a national level, the partisan makeup of existing district lines puts Democrats within three seats of a majority. Of the 435 total seats, only several dozen districts are competitive. So even slight changes in a few states could affect which party wins control. New maps are typically drawn once a decade after the census — the last being in 2020. Many states, including Texas, give legislators the power to draw maps. California is among those that empowers independent commissions with the task. If approved, a new California map would take effect only if a Republican state does its own redistricting. It would remain through the 2030 elections. After that, Democrats say, they would return mapmaking power to the independent commission voters approved in 2008.

Democrats unveil maps of California's redistricting proposal
Democrats unveil maps of California's redistricting proposal

CBS News

time10 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Democrats unveil maps of California's redistricting proposal

Democrats unveiled a proposal Friday that could give California's dominant political party an additional five U.S. House seats in a bid to win the fight to control Congress next year. The plan calls for an unusually timed reshaping of House district lines to greatly strengthen the Democratic advantage in the state ahead of midterm elections, when Republicans will be defending the party's fragile House majority. It amounts to a counterpunch to the Texas Republicans' plan to take five Democratically held seats and redraw them to favor the GOP at the urging of President Trump as he tries to avoid losing control of Congress and, with it, prospects for his conservative agenda in the later part of his term. The California effort seeks to take five of the state's nine GOP districts and make them more favorable to Democrats. Just like in Texas, however, it is by no means a guarantee that Democrats would win all five of these seats if a new California map becomes law. Making the shift would likely require an amendment to California's state Constitution. Overhauling the current map that is in law would need to be passed by a two-thirds vote in both the state Assembly and state Senate, and then be approved by California voters in an election. California lawmakers are scheduled to return to Sacramento on Aug. 18 amid the redistricting talk. The California State Legislature will have a short time span to move forward. If approved by voters in a special election this November, the California blueprint could nearly erase Republican House members in the nation's most populous state. The Democratic plan is intended to win the party 48 of its 52 U.S. House seats, up from 43 currently. The proposal was released by the campaign arm of House Democrats, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. Democrats in the state Legislature will hold hearings and plan to vote on the new maps next week. "This is about more than drawing lines on a map. It's about drawing a line in the sand to stop Texas and Trump from rigging the election," state Senate Democratic leader Mike McGuire said in a statement. While a general notion behind drawing districts is to unite what's called communities of interest — neighborhoods and cities that share similar concerns or demographic traits — the proposed remapping would create a jigsaw of oddly shaped districts to maximize Democratic clout. The 1st Congressional District is currently anchored in the state's conservative far northeast corner and is represented by Republican Rep. Doug LaMalfa, a Trump supporter. The district has a nearly 18-point GOP registration edge. Under the proposal, Democrats would end up with a 10-point registration advantage in the district after drastic reshaping to include parts of heavily Democratic Sonoma County near the Pacific Coast. In a post on the social platform X, LaMalfa called the proposal "absolutely ridiculous." LaMalfa's first congressional district would include parts of Santa Rosa under the proposed maps, an area that is in Democratic Rep. Mike Thompson's district. In the battleground 41st District east of Los Angeles, represented by long-serving Republican Rep. Ken Calvert, Democratic and Republican registration is currently split about evenly. But in the redrawn district, Democratic registration would jump to 46%, with GOP registration falling to 26%. Other Republicans whose districts would see major changes intended to favor Democrats include Rep. Kevin Kiley in Northern California, Rep. Ken Calvert in Riverside County, Rep. David Valadao in the Central Valley farm belt and Rep. Darrell Issa in San Diego County. Also, embattled Democratic incumbents would see their districts padded with additional left-leaning voters. "Well, obviously, Newsom's entire goal was to revert to the era of drawing lines based upon partisan political factors, as politicians draw their lines," Kiley told CBS Sacramento earlier Friday. Kiley's current district covers suburbs, small towns and mountain communities from the Sacramento region to the Eastern California border. The release of the plan came the same day that Texas Republicans began a second special session to approve new congressional maps sought by Trump. The GOP's first special session in Texas ended without approving new political maps, thwarted by Democrats who staged a nearly two-week walkout that meant not enough lawmakers were present to pass any legislation. Gov. Greg Abbott then quickly called a second session that started without the necessary quorum to conduct business. Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom said Thursday that his state will hold a Nov. 4 special referendum on the redrawn districts. "We can't stand back and watch this democracy disappear district by district all across the country," Newsom said. The announcement marked the first time any state beyond Texas officially waded into Trump's fight, though several governors and legislative leaders from both parties have threatened such moves. Rep. Richard Hudson of North Carolina, who heads the House GOP campaign arm, said Newsom, a potential 2028 presidential candidate, is "shredding California's Constitution and disenfranchising voters." "Californians oppose Newsom's stunt because they won't let a self-serving politician rig the system to further his career," said Hudson, who heads the National Republican Congressional Committee. Under current law, California has an independent redistricting commission that was approved by voters earlier this century. Newsom has emphasized that the ballot effort would not get rid of the commission, though it would essentially suspend it. If the measure passes, the commission would then resume being able to write maps after the 2030 census. A big risk for Democrats is whether voters will be open to setting aside district boundaries crafted by the independent commission for ones shaped for partisan advantage. Some people already have said they would sue over the effort. Republican former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, a longtime opponent of partisan redistricting, signaled that he will not side with Democrats even after talking to Newsom. He posted a photo of himself Friday at the gym wearing a T-shirt that said, "Terminate gerrymandering," with a reference to an obscenity and politicians. "I'm getting ready for the gerrymandering battle," Schwarzenegger said. On a national level, the partisan makeup of existing district lines puts Democrats within three seats of a majority. Of the 435 total seats, only several dozen districts are competitive. So even slight changes in a few states could affect which party wins control. New maps are typically drawn once a decade after the census — the last being in 2020. Many states, including Texas, give legislators the power to draw maps. California is among those that empowers independent commissions with the task. If approved, a new California map would take effect only if a Republican state does its own redistricting. It would remain through the 2030 elections. After that, Democrats say, they would return mapmaking power to the independent commission voters approved in Woodall and Nidia Cavazos contributed to this report.

Obama praises Texas Democrats amid redistricting furor
Obama praises Texas Democrats amid redistricting furor

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Obama praises Texas Democrats amid redistricting furor

Former President Barack Obama met Thursday with Texas House Democrats to praise them for leaving the state to stop a GOP-backed redistricting effort. Obama also pointed to the response by California — which launched its own redistricting retaliation on Thursday — as a result of the Texas Democrats' own protest, which he views as a temporary offset. He told them he prefers congressional maps to be drawn by independent commissions rather than politicians, but recognized the need for a Democratic response. 'He acknowledged what Texas is doing is wrong, and you have to be able to stand up in this moment,' state Rep. Ann Johnson, who attended the meeting, told POLITICO. 'He was very clear: If we are all playing to our higher angels as politicians, we should want the people determining our lines,' she said. 'We should be brave enough to let the voters pick our lines and compete on fair ideas. And that's what he wants. That's what all of us want.' Obama was joined on call by former Attorney General Eric Holder, chair of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee. The meeting comes as Obama will headline a fundraiser for the NDRC next week in Martha's Vineyard in response to Republicans' redistricting efforts. The meeting was first reported by ABC. The group of Texas Democrats have been in Illinois for nearly two weeks to deny Republicans the ability to pass a new map carving out five more seats at the request of President Donald Trump. The final day of the special session, ordered by Gov. Greg Abbott, is Friday. Democrats indicated on Thursday they are willing to return home if the session ends on Friday, and if California Democrats introduce their own map adding more seats in retaliation. That process is already in motion in California: Gov. Gavin Newsom formally launched his campaign for a new House map on Thursday. During the 30-minute call, Obama heard directly from Texas Democratic Reps. Barbara Gervin-Hawkins and Rep. Christian Manuel, and he praised the lawmakers for standing up to the attacks they've faced since decamping earlier this month, including bomb threats and lawsuits.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store