logo
Alligator Alcatraz: American history from the dark side

Alligator Alcatraz: American history from the dark side

Yahoo10 hours ago
Nearly everything that has gone badly, deeply, terribly wrong in America's present — if you're reading this, you probably don't need a list — can be found in America's past. Your favorite truism about the power of history may apply here; mine comes courtesy of Salon contributor Mike Lofgren: 'Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat famous quotations.'
I don't mean that we are trapped in an inflexible pattern of endlessly repeating historical cycles, as in the more esoteric propositions of Vico and Nietzsche. ('Time is a flat circle,' as some lowlife says in the first season of 'True Detective,' moments before getting murdered by cops.) But too many of us, including a large proportion of liberals who ought to know better, are indeed trapped in the delusional one-way narrative of progress known as American exceptionalism, leading us to announce in horrified tones, with every new outrage of the Trump administration, that this is 'not who we are.'
So it is with the Florida concentration camp for migrant detainees known as 'Alligator Alcatraz,' which was at first a gleeful MAGAsphere nickname and is now what this jury-rigged assemblage of cages under tents is actually called. To describe this evil little zone of exclusion as sadistic, despicable and insulting, or as a symptom of incipient or actual fascism, is accurate enough. But it's most definitely who 'we' are in 2025. If we claim that such a thing is 'un-American,' then we're the ones who haven't paid attention to history — and as profoundly ignorant about everything as Donald Trump and his supporters may be, they know that much.
Just as America's penchant for religious mania and moral panic goes clear back to the Puritan settlers and the small-town schism of the Salem witch trials, the punitive, paranoid spirit behind Alligator Alcatraz — the desire to divide those who 'belong' to the imagined national community from those who do not — has deep roots in this nation's history. At the same time, the concentration camp is a modern global phenomenon with its own ironic history, which long precedes the Nazi death camps. It was a product of the industrial age, colonialism and newly racialized ideas of citizenship. If anything, Alligator Alcatraz is a classic example of the form, right down to its ugliness and cheapness, not to mention its explicit aim as a showcase for humiliation, suffering and dehumanization, but not quite for deliberate murder.
The delusional narrative of progress mentioned above, in which democracy keeps on expanding, human rights gradually extend to everyone everywhere, and America draws ever closer to forging the 'more perfect union' promised by the Constitution, is understandably alluring, and almost irresistible. For many of us who grew up in the tumultuous decades between the civil rights movement and the Patriot Act, it served as a kind of civic religion: The 'arc of the moral universe' was bending in our direction, and all that.
But that was always a subjective perception of history, not a universal law. It was widely shared by educated middle-class people infused with Enlightenment values, although not by all of them. It was true, of course, that the dizzying historical and technological changes of the 20th century had brought dramatic social progress. But it was a grievous historical error to assume that the gains made through passionate and painful struggle by racial justice movements, feminism, LGBTQ+ Pride, environmental crusaders and so on were natural, inevitable and universally accepted, or that no one beyond a handful of left-behind troglodytes seriously wanted to reverse them.
Alligator Alcatraz, like nearly everything else about the second Trump regime, is a deliberate, overt mockery of the liberal narrative of progress. It's a manifestation of 'owning the libs' in physical, tangible and almost literal form. (So far, MAGA's secret police have not specifically targeted the regime's domestic opponents, but the threats get more explicit every day.) Terrorizing, incarcerating and deporting immigrants is an important regime goal in its own terms, of course, but the real target of terrorism — state terrorism included — is always the broader public. Liberal outrage, to some significant degree, is the point, as are a mounting sense of powerlessness and increasing anxiety about the rule of law and the constitutional order.
In that sense, Alligator Alcatraz is also a postmodern phenomenon — a hamfisted ironic commentary on the failure of liberal democracy, and on how easy it was to undermine — as well as a site for the actual torment of actual human beings. As Andrea Pitzer, the author of 'One Long Night: A Global History of Concentration Camps,' observes in an MSNBC commentary, American history offers many pre-echoes of the Trumpian anti-immigrant crusade: Centuries of genocide and forcible removal against Native people 'set the stage for abuse of those not counted as citizens,' and slavery laws enabled human trafficking and created categories of human beings with no legal rights.
Those historical crimes paved the way for a more recent example, the infamous concentration camps of the 1940s in which 120,000 Japanese Americans, most of them native-born U.S. citizens, were interned for years after being dispossessed of their homes, their livelihoods and most of their property. I grew up in the San Francisco Bay Area, among many neighbors and classmates whose parents and grandparents had survived those camps, and I don't remember the subject ever being mentioned. I'm not sure I knew internment had happened, or understood its scale, before I reached adulthood.
The overt racism and grotesque unfairness of Japanese-American internment eventually provoked some degree of societal reckoning, if only years later. Historians have recently begun to pay attention to the less well-known internment of German Americans a few decades earlier, during World War I. Conditions in those camps were not especially harsh, and only a few thousand U.S. citizens were incarcerated. But anti-German propaganda campaigns, along with outlandish claims that hundreds of thousands of disloyal German Americans might rise up in revolt, left a lasting impact.
German culture and the German language were virtually erased from American society almost overnight — sauerkraut was rebranded as 'Liberty cabbage,' seriously — and as historian Matthew Stibbe writes, the 'enemy alien hysteria' of the war years fed right into the Red Scare immediately afterward:
[Q]uestioning the loyalty of individual citizens and non-citizens from particular ethnic backgrounds became standard practice for American agencies involved in domestic security after 1918 and the association of German- as well as Russian-born émigrés with left-wing subversion continued through to the late 1940s and beyond.
There's no mistaking the bizarre historical irony at work here: German immigrants and their children faced systematic persecution and discrimination in the U.S. barely 15 years before Hitler took power in the Fatherland — and the long-tail effects included a decades-long crusade against socialists, anarchists and labor activists. If you want to go even deeper into WTF, consider this: Historian Caroline Elkins argues that the first systematic use of concentration camps against a civilian population came during the Boer War around 1900, when British authorities rounded up and interned thousands of Dutch-speaking settlers in South Africa — in other words, the people known to us today as Afrikaners.
written by Amanda Marcotte, now also a weekly show on YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts.
Exactly how those events rebounded in later history is a complicated question, not a straightforward equation of cause and effect. Every self-defined human community winds up with a sense of historical grievance along the way, whether or not it makes sense to outsiders. That's one way of understanding where we are today, with a startlingly high proportion of white Americans — most of them descended from immigrants who faced hardship or persecution at some point — having forged a group identity of permanent resentment, pursuing an incoherent campaign of retribution against those they believe have cheated them, lied to them or tried to replace them.
Alligator Alcatraz is the symbol of their crusade, and it could hardly be more American. It channels this country's long history of paranoia, xenophobia and systematic exclusion through the grotesque 20th-century innovation of the concentration camp, all of that repackaged as an aggressively stupid meme complete with AI-slop images, Etsy insta-merch and an almost lifelike salesbot in Kristi Noem.
Most important of all, it inverts the liberal narrative of history, in which the misdeeds of the past offer us important lessons, mistakes to be confronted, repented and transcended on the path to something better. The intended lesson of Alligator Alcatraz is that there are no lessons in the past: There are no mistakes to correct, nothing to apologize for and nothing better to reach toward. There is only power and domination, and they should be celebrated. Plenty of Americans have believed that all along.
The post Alligator Alcatraz: American history from the dark side appeared first on Salon.com.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US, Brazil Try to Seal Tariff Deal Before Trump's Deadline: Uol
US, Brazil Try to Seal Tariff Deal Before Trump's Deadline: Uol

Bloomberg

time28 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

US, Brazil Try to Seal Tariff Deal Before Trump's Deadline: Uol

Representatives from Brazil and the US held a video conference on Friday to discuss a new tariff deal before President Donald Trump's deadline on Wednesday, local media outlet Uol reported. Talks will continue in the following days, Uol said, citing people from Brazil's foreign ministry that it didn't identify. The Trump administration has signaled reciprocal tariffs will revert on July 9 to their higher April 2 levels for countries that fail to secure an accord aimed at reducing US trade imbalances.

U.S. to apply increased pressure on trade deals, warns higher tariffs could roll out Aug. 1
U.S. to apply increased pressure on trade deals, warns higher tariffs could roll out Aug. 1

CBS News

time29 minutes ago

  • CBS News

U.S. to apply increased pressure on trade deals, warns higher tariffs could roll out Aug. 1

The White House is set to put pressure on the U.S.'s trading partners this week to sign new tariff deals, with the hope that they will be finalized before a Wednesday deadline. The Trump administration is expected to send dozens of letters to countries that have not made a trade deal, warning them that higher tariffs could kick in Aug. 1, White House National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Sunday. "Our smaller trading partners could become much bigger trading partners," Hassett said on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan." "And that's, I think, one of the reasons why countries are racing to set deals up with us ahead of the deadline." As many as 15 letters will be going out beginning Monday, President Trump confirmed to reporters before heading back to the White House from his New Jersey club on Sunday. Some will go out on Tuesday and Wednesday, he said, adding that "some deals have been made." Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick also told reporters Sunday that higher tariffs could kick in Aug. 1 for countries that don't make a deal by Wednesday. Questions remain about which countries will be notified, whether anything will change in the days ahead and whether Mr. Trump will once more push off imposing the rates. In an interview with CNN on Sunday, Bessent said about 100 letters will be sent to small countries "where we don't have very much trade" and where tariffs are already at the baseline of 10%. The treasury secretary also said that the administration is primarily focused on nations with the largest trade deficit with the U.S. "There are 18 important trading relationships that account for 95% of our deficit, and those are the ones we're concentrating on," Bessent said. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent rejected the idea that Aug. 1 was a new deadline and declined to say what might happen Wednesday. "We'll see," Bessent said on CNN's State of the Union. "I'm not going to give away the playbook." Mr. Trump and his top trade advisers say he could extend the time for dealmaking but they insist the administration is applying maximum pressure on other nations. Hassett said that Trump would decide when it was time to give up on negotiations. Stephen Miran, the chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, likewise said countries negotiating in good faith and making concessions could "sort of, get the date rolled." The steeper tariffs that Trump announced April 2 threatened to overhaul the global economy and lead to broader trade wars. A week later, after the financial markets had panicked, his administration suspended for 90 days most of the higher taxes on imports just as they were to take effect, but he kept the 10% baseline in place while raising the tariff rate on goods imported from China. Chinese goods are now subject to 30% across-the-board tariffs. With the freeze on sweeping U.S. tariffs set to expire Wednesday, July 9, the White House has touted new trade agreements with countries in recent weeks, like China, the U.K. and Vietnam. But there are still questions heading into the week with other deals yet to be announced. Bessent said the U.S. was "close to several deals," and predicted several big announcements over the next few days. He gave no details. "I think we're going to see a lot of deals very quickly," Bessent said. Given the complexity of trade deals, some experts think the U.S. is likely to extend the tariff pause for some nations. "It can take a lot more time [than 90 days] to truly iron these things out," Clark Packard, a trade policy expert and research fellow at the Cato Institute, a nonpartisan public policy think tank, told CBS News' MoneyWatch. Mr. Trump last week announced a deal with Vietnam. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Trump said the U.S. would levy 20% tariffs on goods imported to the U.S. from Vietnam, and a 40% tariff on "any transshipping." The president said Vietnam would "'OPEN THEIR MARKET TO THE UNITED STATES,' meaning that, we will be able to sell our product into Vietnam at ZERO Tariff." That was a decline from the 46% tax on Vietnamese imports he proposed in April — one of his so-called "reciprocal tariffs" targeting dozens of countries with which the U.S. runs a trade deficit. Asked if he expected to reach deals with the European Union or India, Trump said Friday that "letters are better for us" because there are so many countries involved. "We have India coming up and with Vietnam, we did it, but much easier to send a letter saying, 'Listen, we know we have a certain deficit, or in some cases a surplus, but not too many. And this is what you're going to have to pay if you want to do business in the United States." Canada, however, will not be one of the countries receiving letters, Trump's ambassador, Pete Hoekstra, said Friday after trade talks between the two countries recently resumed. "Canada is one of our biggest trading partners," Hoekstra told CTV News in an interview in Ottawa. "We're going to have a deal that's articulated." Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has said he wants a new deal in place by July 21 or Canada will increase trade countermeasures. Hoekstra would not commit to a date for a trade agreement and said even with a deal, Canada could still face some tariffs. But "we're not going to send Canada just a letter," he said.

Trump Says Musk Is ‘Off the Rails' With His Third-Party Effort
Trump Says Musk Is ‘Off the Rails' With His Third-Party Effort

New York Times

time32 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Trump Says Musk Is ‘Off the Rails' With His Third-Party Effort

President Trump assailed Elon Musk on Sunday night, describing him as 'off the rails' after Mr. Musk said he was creating a new political party amid an ongoing rift with the president. 'I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails,' essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks,' Mr. Trump wrote on Truth Social on Sunday evening. 'He even wants to start a Third Political Party, despite the fact that they have never succeeded in the United States.' Mr. Musk's effort to create a new political party, called the America Party, is the latest rupture in his relationship with Mr. Trump. Mr. Musk, the world's wealthiest man, spent hundreds of millions of dollars to support Mr. Trump's presidential campaign, and then Mr. Trump rewarded him with a wide-ranging position overseeing drastic cuts to government staffing and contracts. Their close bond crumbled in a public spectacle last month, as Mr. Trump pushed his sprawling domestic policy bill through Congress. Mr. Musk panned the legislation, which is projected to add trillions to the federal debt, as a 'disgusting abomination.' He has said he would support primary challengers against any Republican who voted for the legislation, which passed with almost unanimous Republican support, but he has given few details about his new political party. 'Backing a candidate for president is not out of the question, but the focus for the next 12 months is on the House and the Senate,' Mr. Musk wrote on X on Sunday. Mr. Trump has also threatened to cut billions of dollars in federal contracts and tax subsidies for Mr. Musk's companies. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store