logo
Ireland's economic ties with US pose notable risks, European Commission warns

Ireland's economic ties with US pose notable risks, European Commission warns

Business Mayor19-05-2025

Ireland's 'deep economic ties' with the US 'pose notable downward risks' for the economy, the European Commission has warned.
In its Spring economic forecasts, the European Union's (EU) executive arm said it expected the Irish economy to grow by 2.2 per cent (in modified domestic demand terms) this year and by 2.3 per cent in 2026 with 'steady employment' and real wage growth driving consumption.
'However, Ireland's openness and high trade and investment links to the US leaves it vulnerable to further protectionist policies,' it said.
'While the current US tariff exemptions – notably on pharmaceuticals – cover a large majority of Ireland's goods exports to the US, the introduction of new tariffs, along with broader US policy changes to disincentivise investment and activity in Ireland present significant downside risks to Ireland's economy,' it said.
The Commission forecasts assume that US tariffs remain at 10 per cent, with higher duties on some products and exemptions on others.
Industry sources have warned that the State could lose up to a quarter of its pharmaceutical manufacturing capacity if US President Donald Trump pushes ahead with plans to cut prices for prescription drugs by urging pharma companies to raise their prices in Europe.
[ Ireland must steel itself for a trade war with the US ]
The European Commission highlighted this as a key risk to Ireland's fiscal outlook.
'A weaker performance or a downsizing of the multinational-dominated sectors would significantly affect tax revenues,' it said.
'The outlook for corporate income tax revenues is particularly uncertain, given their concentration among a relatively small number of large multinational companies and a large portion estimated to be windfall, ie beyond what is explained by underlying domestic economic activity,' it said. Read More Lucky Generals funds training for working class ad talent
The commission forecast the Irish Government would continue to run a healthy budget surplus this year albeit with revenue growth slowing 'amid heightened levels of consumer and business uncertainty'.
Even before the impact of tariffs, corporation tax is expected to be €2 billion lower than previously forecast, at €29 billion, due to declining profitability at multinationals, the Department of Finance said earlier this month.
On the wider euro zone economy, the commission cut its headline growth forecast, citing 'weakening global trade outlook and higher trade policy uncertainty'.
[ For Ireland, the choice between the US and China is easy ]
It said it expected the 20-state single currency area's economy to grow at a rate of 0.9 per cent in 2025 – down from a previous forecast of 1.3 per cent.
'The ongoing disinflationary process, which began at the end of 2022, is expected to advance steadily,' it said.
'After easing to 2.4 per cent in 2024, Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices (HICP) inflation in the euro area is projected to reach the European Central Bank's (ECB) target of 2 per cent already in 2025, falling further in 2026,' it said.
However, it warned risks to the outlook were tilted to the downside. 'Further fragmentation of global trade could mitigate gross domestic product (GDP) growth and reignite inflationary pressures,' it said.
'On the upside, further de-escalation of EU-US trade tensions or faster expansion of the EU's trade with other countries, including through new free trade agreements, could sustain EU growth. Increased defence spending could also contribute positively,' it said. Read More Altada 'imploding' as employees take stand against takeover bid
As Russia's war in Ukraine grinds on, Germany's new chancellor Freidrich Merz has vowed to transform the nation's armed forces into Europe's strongest conventional army to help counter the rising threat from Russia.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Column: Court says Trump tariffs are presidential overreach
Column: Court says Trump tariffs are presidential overreach

Chicago Tribune

time27 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Column: Court says Trump tariffs are presidential overreach

The Trump administration's arbitrary moves to restructure the international trade environment to accommodate White House whims have suddenly run into reality, specifically established laws. This confrontation is still in the early stages, but it does not bode well for President Donald Trump and his ardent protectionist associates. On May 28, the U.S. Court of International Trade went back to basics in a decision featuring the reminder that, under the Constitution, Congress has the authority to regulate trade. This fundamental power is not overridden by the ability of the president to address trade challenges in an emergency. 'The court does not pass upon the wisdom or likely effectiveness of the President's use of tariffs as leverage,' a three-judge panel said in the decision to issue a permanent injunction on the blanket tariff orders issued by Trump since January. 'That use is impermissible not because it is unwise or ineffective, but because [federal law] does not allow it.' The ruling came in response to two lawsuits. One was filed by the Liberty Justice Center, a nonpartisan organization, on behalf of five small U.S. companies that import goods from countries targeted by Trump's tariffs. The other was filed by a dozen state governments within the U.S. Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield, a Democrat, is coordinating the states' efforts against the administration. He has declared the tariffs to be economically devastating, reckless and unlawful. Small businesses seeking relief include an importer of wine and other alcoholic beverages based in New York and a maker of educational kits and musical instruments located in Virginia. President Trump has been basing his unilateral tariff authority on the International Economic Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA), passed by Congress and signed into law by President Jimmy Carter near the end of December 1977. The law authorizes the president to declare 'an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States,' with the proviso that such threats must originate, 'in whole or substantial part outside the United States,' and requires the president to provide updates to Congress every six months. An incentive for this legislation was a desire in Congress to clarify and restrict presidential actions justified under the 1917 Trading With the Enemy Act, a law which reflected the emergency leading to U.S. entry into World War I as a formal declared combatant. The immediate incentive for our nation to enter that war was the declaration by Germany of unrestricted submarine warfare. The 1917 law had been used to justify a variety of presidential initiatives, not all related to foreign policy and international developments. Declared national emergencies then still technically in effect included the 1933 banking crisis related to the hoarding of cash and gold, the 1950 Korean War crisis, a 1970 emergency related to a strike by postal workers and a 1971 emergency related to the deteriorating fiscal condition of the federal government. Key powers granted include the ability to block transactions and take control of the assets of the parties involved in the threats. This section was used by the Trump administration to justify the new tariffs. IEEPA was passed during a time of congressional assertiveness. Another important factor, no doubt, was President Carter's fixation on clear, orderly administration, which he carried to extremes. The severe national crises, traumas and wars described above contrast with today's long-term growth and prosperity, and blessed absence of direct involvement in war. The judicial veto of presidential overreach shows our system is working.

SCOOP: House GOP circles wagons on Trump tax-and-spend bill as Senate seeks changes
SCOOP: House GOP circles wagons on Trump tax-and-spend bill as Senate seeks changes

Fox News

time27 minutes ago

  • Fox News

SCOOP: House GOP circles wagons on Trump tax-and-spend bill as Senate seeks changes

The House GOP is quietly mounting a pressure campaign on the Senate to accept its version of President Donald Trump's "one big, beautiful bill" even as lawmakers in the upper chamber signal they'll be making changes. Tensions are simmering between Republicans in the two chambers as they work to pass a massive tax, immigration and energy bill via the budget reconciliation process. The House Budget Committee held a staff-level communications briefing on Monday, two sources told Fox News Digital, the same day the Senate returned from the Memorial Day week recess to begin consideration of the massive bill. Senate Republicans have vowed to tweak the House's offering to varying degrees, with some wanting to tackle even deeper spending cuts and others wanting to soften the blows to Medicaid and green energy subsidies. While lawmakers in the upper chamber are still working out the kinks of their approach, they agree the bill will be different. Both sources interpreted the meeting as a way to get ahead of Senate Republicans' criticism of certain aspects of the bill. Documents viewed by Fox News Digital that were handed to House Republican aides show specific talking points about the bill's taxpayer savings, Medicaid provisions and green energy subsidy rollbacks, among other topics. The document pushed back on the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimate that the bill would add more than $2 trillion to the deficit over a decade. "The cost of the bill ($4.12 trillion) is surpassed by the savings ($4.29 trillion) associated with mandatory spending reforms ($1.7 trillion) and economic growth ($2.6 trillion)," the document said. It suggested House Republicans assume 2.6% economic growth over 10 years rather than the CBO's unprecedentedly low 1.8%. "House Budget is desperately circling the wagons with staff and members to make sure they do not forget the fight is not over on messaging why their bill is better than their Senate rivals," one House GOP aide told Fox News Digital. "They got jammed with the Senate version in the blueprint round and are using every tool at their disposal to make sure it doesn't happen again." A senior House GOP aide also told Fox News Digital, "The Senate should heed President Trump's wishes to get [the bill] to his desk before July 4th." The House passed its version of the legislation late last month after a marathon all-night session full of debate and Democrat procedural motions to delay. The mammoth bill is aimed at permanently extending Trump's 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act while also including new tax relief for senior citizens and eliminating taxes on tipped and overtime wages. It would also send new funding to the U.S.-Mexico border and to enhance Immigrations and Customs Enforcement while rolling back a significant portion of the green energy subsidies from the Biden administration's Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). To save money and cut down on what Republicans see as waste, fraud and abuse of government safety nets, the bill would introduce Medicaid work requirements for certain able-bodied recipients beginning in December 2026. It would penalize states that allowed illegal immigrants into the Affordable Care Act-expanded Medicaid population while rewarding states that did not. Both the IRA subsidies and Medicaid reforms are emerging as pain points for the Senate GOP's three-seat majority. The document obtained by Fox News Digital appears to target specific senators' concerns. For example, one portion of the Q&A specifically said, "No," the bill does not put rural hospitals at risk. "The bill reinvests funds to reopen rural emergency hospitals and ensure cost-effective care access," the messaging guidance said. On the rescinded IRA funds, it said, "The bill targets unused or duplicative funds from programs such as the Neighborhood Access and Equity Grants and sustainable jet fuel. These projects aligned more with ideological goals than infrastructure priorities." Another note mentioned the electric vehicle (EV) credit rollback, arguing it would "ensure all vehicles contribute to the Highway Trust Fund." "EVs cause more wear and tear due to their higher weight but pay no fuel taxes. The bill imposes modest user fees starting no later than the end of FY 2026 and terminates in FY 2035, indexed to inflation," it said. But it's not clear that senators with those concerns will heed the House's arguments right now. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., told reporters Tuesday, "It's going to hurt rural hospitals in my state." Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., acknowledged to reporters on Tuesday that while there was discontent over "individual pieces" of the bill, Republicans must agree on something that will pass the chamber. "Failure is not an option. We've got to get to 51, so we'll figure out the path forward to do that over the next couple of weeks," Thune said. Other senators, meanwhile, have argued they want to make deeper cuts than what the House came up with. "The House bill, they're not even scratching the surface. It's not even the tip of the iceberg in terms of what we need to do to return to a reasonable, pre-pandemic-level spending," Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., said on Fox Business last week. When reached for comment, the House Budget Committee referred Fox News Digital to recent comments by Chair Jodey Arrington, R-Texas. "Some senators will say we went too far on entitlement reform and health care and welfare, and then you'll have ... [f]olks like [Sens.] Rick Scott, Ron Johnson, who are dear friends of mine, all well-intentioned, will say we don't cut enough spending," Arrington said on Fox News last week. "Well, the fact is, you can only cut as much as you can get the vote to pass it out of your chamber. And we cut almost $1.7 trillion in spending, which is the largest spending cuts in American history by twofold." "There's always room for improvement, and I welcome that, especially on the fiscal reform side, but we've got to get the votes."

US auto sales rate plunges in May after pre-tariff rush fades
US auto sales rate plunges in May after pre-tariff rush fades

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US auto sales rate plunges in May after pre-tariff rush fades

(Reuters) - The U.S. light vehicle sales rate slumped in May by the most in about five years following a rush by auto shoppers during the previous two months to beat anticipated price hikes stoked by President Donald Trump's tariffs on imported automobiles. Wards Intelligence on Tuesday reported the seasonally adjusted annual rate of light vehicle sales plunged to 15.65 million units last month from a revised 17.25 million in April and 17.83 million in March. May's drop in the SAAR of about 1.6 million was the largest since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in April 2020. (Reporting By Dan Burns) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store