Wife Can Summon Bank Officials to Uncover Husband's Real Income, Rules Delhi High Court
Noting that husbands often hide their actual earnings to evade maintenance obligations, the court set aside the family court order
The Delhi High Court has held that a wife can summon witnesses, including bank officials, to establish her husband's actual financial status.
In a detailed 11-page verdict, Justice Ravinder Dudeja allowed the wife's plea under Section 311 of the CrPC and overturned the family court's earlier decision that had rejected her request.
'Matrimonial litigation, particularly where financial dependency and concealment are alleged, demands a sensitive and pragmatic approach," the judge added.
The judge said the documents and witnesses sought by the petitioner are not collateral or irrelevant but directly impact the determination of maintenance, which is a matter concerning her subsistence.
'The family court ought to have adopted a more purposive interpretation of its enabling powers under Section 311 CrPC., instead of taking a hyper-technical view," the court said.
Noting that husbands often hide their actual earnings to evade maintenance obligations, the court added, 'It is not uncommon that when there are matrimonial differences between the husband and wife, many times husbands tend to suppress their real income and resort to transferring their assets to avoid payment of legitimate dues to their wives."
The petitioner wife and respondent husband got married on February 16, 2012. The wife had alleged that after her marriage, she was subjected to domestic violence by the husband and his family to fulfill dowry demands. It was also alleged that the respondent and his family had locked the matrimonial home and deserted the wife without returning her stree dhan, jewellery, or cash.
The wife had sought to authenticate the Shakti Nagar property document to expose the husband's income. It was alleged that the husband transferred sale proceeds from his Noida property to his mother to conceal assets. It was also claimed that the husband had deliberately concealed his assets, including his appointment as CFO in 2014 and ownership of multiple properties, in an attempt to avoid disclosing his true financial capacity.
On the other hand, the respondent husband argued that the plea seeking to call witnesses was not relevant to the petitioner's case. The husband further contended that the wife had approached the court with unclean hands and cited several instances of delay tactics employed by her during the proceedings. He alleged that the wife filed numerous applications with the intent to derail the maintenance petition.
Taking note of the submissions, the judge said the family court erred in dismissing the petitioner's application under Section 311 CrPC.
'Section 311 CrPC grants wide discretion to the court to summon, recall or re-examine witnesses at any stage of the proceedings. The objective is to ensure that the truth emerges and justice is served. However, at the same time, such power must be exercised with caution, fairness and judicial prudence so that it does not become an instrument of delay or abuse," the court added.
'According to the petitioner, on 05.08.2013, from the sale proceeds of the Noida flat, respondent diverted an amount of Rs. 5.25 lakhs to the Axis bank account of his mother. On the same date, huge cash was also deposited in the bank accounts of the family members of the respondent in their various bank accounts," the court noted.
The high court added that the petitioner wants to demonstrate through such records that the respondent deliberately diverted the sale proceeds of the Noida flat in the name of family members to escape his liability to pay due maintenance.
By seeking to summon the bank statements of his family members, the court noted, the petitioner intended to establish a clear trail of fund diversion from the Noida sale, ultimately leading to the purchase of the Shakti Nagar property in the husband's name.
The court said denying the petitioner an opportunity to prove the same would frustrate the objective of maintenance proceedings.
Accordingly, the HC set aside the family court order and directed it to permit the petitioner wife to summon the witnesses concerned with the relevant record.
Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
delhi high court divorce family court
view comments
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Section 144 in Pakistan's Rawalpindi as PTI plans protest over Imran Khan's arrest
The Rawalpindi district administration has imposed Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) in anticipation of nationwide protests planned by the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) on Tuesday, Geo News reported. Senior Superintendent of Adiala Jail Abdul Ghafoor Anjum sent a letter, seeking additional security to prevent a possible protest by PTI supporters outside the prison.(Reuters File) The country is bracing for a fresh round of protests as the former ruling party has announced it will take to the streets across Pakistan on August 5, marking two years of Khan's incarceration, demanding his release and relief for the inflation-hit masses. The ban, effective from August 4 to August 10, prohibits all types of rallies, sit-ins, demonstrations, protests, and gatherings of more than four people within the district limits, as per Geo News. Senior Superintendent of Adiala Jail Abdul Ghafoor Anjum sent a letter to City Police Officer (CPO), seeking additional security to prevent a possible protest by PTI supporters outside the prison. In his letter, the jail superintendent noted that there are currently 7,700 inmates in the prison, while its capacity is only 2,174. "PTI has planned a protest outside the jail on August 5," the officer said, stressing the need for urgent measures to ensure foolproof security at the facility, where the PTI founder is serving jail terms in multiple cases ranging from treason to terrorism. Additional police personnel, barriers, and surveillance should be deployed outside Rawalpindi jail to avoid any untoward incident, the letter stated. According to Geo News, separate requests were also sent to the Home Department, IG Prisons, and RPO for security, it added. The officer further said that Rawalpindi jail was "very sensitive" due to the presence of political prisoners and terrorists. Additional security should be deployed from Dahgal Checkpost to Gate No. 5 of Adiala Jail, the letter said. PTI has repeatedly called for Khan's release, who has been behind bars for over a year. The deposed prime minister was arrested in Lahore on August 5, 2023, after being sentenced to three years in prison for illegally selling state gifts. The protest call was made by PTI stalwart Asad Qaiser during a press conference on Sunday, jointly addressed by the party's Secretary General Omar Ayub Khan and other leaders in Islamabad. "August 5 marks the day of the PTI founder's arrest; we will stage protests on that day," Qaiser said, referring to the Toshakhana case.
New Indian Express
4 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Wife can summon bank officials to uncover husband's real income: Delhi HC
NEW DELHI: In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has held that a wife has the right to summon witnesses, including bank officials, to establish her husband's actual financial status in a maintenance case. Justice Ravinder Dudeja, in a detailed 11-page judgment, allowed a woman's plea under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), setting aside the family court's earlier order that had denied her this right. 'Matrimonial litigation, particularly where financial dependency and concealment are alleged, demands a sensitive and pragmatic approach,' the court observed. Justice Dudeja emphasized that the evidence and witnesses the wife sought were directly relevant to the determination of maintenance and not collateral or extraneous. He criticised the family court for taking a 'hyper-technical view' and stated that it should have interpreted its powers under Section 311 CrPC in a more purposive manner. The court noted a common pattern in matrimonial disputes, where husbands attempt to hide their actual earnings or transfer assets to evade maintenance obligations. 'It is not uncommon that when there are matrimonial differences, husbands tend to suppress their real income and resort to transferring their assets to avoid payment of legitimate dues to their wives,' the judge remarked. The case involved a couple married on February 16, 2012. The wife alleged that she faced domestic violence and dowry harassment post-marriage and that the husband, along with his family, deserted her, locking the matrimonial home and retaining her stridhan, jewellery, and cash. She sought to summon witnesses to authenticate documents related to a Shakti Nagar property, alleging that the husband had concealed financial information, including the sale of a Noida property and his appointment as a CFO in 2014. In response, the husband argued that the witnesses were not relevant and accused the wife of delaying the proceedings by filing multiple applications. He also claimed that she had approached the court with unclean hands.
Hindustan Times
5 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Ex-SSP, DSP among 5 cops get life term in 32-yr-old fake encounter case
A Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) court on Monday sentenced five retired police officials to rigorous life imprisonment in a 1993 fake encounter of seven youths of a Tarn Taran village and described their conduct 'morally bankrupt and profoundly inhumane'. The court of CBI special judge Baljinder Singh Sra also imposed a fine of ₹3 lakh on each of the convict. Emotional scenes played out in the CBI court on Monday as family members of the seven victims killed in the 1993 Tarn Taran fake encounters broke down upon hearing the long-awaited verdict. (HT) The court had found them guilty of criminal conspiracy, murder and destruction of evidence under relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code on August 1. The case involved abduction, illegal detention, custodial torture and staged killings of seven youths — including three special police officers (SPOs) — from Rani Willa village in Tarn Taran district. The then deputy superintendent of police Bhupinderjit Singh (61), who later retired as SSP, the then assistant sub-inspector Devinder Singh (58), who retired as DSP, the then assistant sub-inspector Gulabarg Singh (72), the then Inspector Suba Singh (83) and the then ASI Raghbir Singh (63) have been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for life. They were sentenced to life imprisonment under Section 302 (murder) of IPC along with a ₹2-lakh fine, three-year rigorous imprisonment under Section 120B (criminal conspiracy) read with Section 201 (disappearance of evidence) with a ₹50,000 fine, and three-year rigorous imprisonment under Section 120B read with Section 218 with an additional ₹50,000 fine. 'The families waited 32 years for this day. Justice has been delayed, but not denied,' said victims' counsel Sarabjeet Singh Verka. Five other accused police officials -- the then Inspector Gurdev Singh, the then sub-inspector Gian Chand, then ASI Jagir Singh and then head constables Mohinder Singh and Aroor Singh passed away during the trial. 'Upon consideration of the rival contentions, this court is of the view that there is no doubt regarding the sheer venality and callousness with which the convicts acted, reflecting an utter disregard for human dignity and life. Their conduct was not only unlawful, it was morally bankrupt and profoundly inhumane,' the court said in its order. 'However, in view of their advanced age and the prolonged agony endured during the course of the trial over many years, this court refrains from awarding the capital punishment,' it said. The court said Dr BR Ambedkar, the chief architect of the Indian Constitution, once said, 'Rights are protected not by laws but by the social and moral conscience of society'. Regrettably, this moral consciousness has yet to be fully absorbed and reflected in the institutions of governance entrusted with the protection of people's rights, said the order. The court said it can very well imagine the plight of their parents and family members who were running from pillar to post since the year 1993 to seek justice. CBI prosecutor Anmol Narang detailed how the victims were abducted falsely implicated in a robbery case. According to the CBI investigation, the chain of events began on June 27, 1993, when a police team led by Sarhali station house officer inspector Gurdev Singh abducted SPO Shinder Singh and others from the residence of contractor Joginder Singh. They were taken to Sarhali police station where they were tortured and falsely implicated in a robbery case. Subsequently, on July 2, 1993, police lodged a fake FIR claiming that Shinder and the others had absconded with government-issued weapons. Ten days later on July 12, a police party led by then DSP Bhupinderjit and inspector Gurdev staged a fake encounter. The police claimed that the victims were killed in crossfire while attempting to recover stolen arms from 'terrorists'. The bodies were cremated as 'unclaimed', despite being identified by ASIs Gulabarg and Davinder. Autopsy revealed signs of severe torture prior to death, and forensic analysis of the seized arms pointed to serious discrepancies, according to the probe. On July 28, 1993, three more abducted individuals — Sukhdev Singh, Sarabjit Singh, and Harvinder Singh — were reportedly killed in a second staged encounter by the Verowal police. According to investigators, fake recoveries and fabricated documents were used to justify these killings as anti-terror operations. The court said both the encounters were conducted under the supervision of then DSP Bhupinderjit Singh and other convicts were part of the police team. The case was handed over to the CBI following a Supreme Court directive on December 12, 1996, in connection with the mass cremation of unidentified bodies in Punjab. A preliminary inquiry began in 1997 and a formal case was registered in 1999 based on the testimony of Narinder Kaur, wife of Shinder Singh. Staged killings: Blot on khaki July 12, 2025: CBI court awards 10-year jail to former Beas SHO Paramjit Singh in a 32-year-old fake encounter case in which two constables — Surmukh Singh and Sukhwinder Singh --- were killed May 31: Three Punjab Police officers convicted in 1993 Kapurthala fake encounter case in which two men were killed. Manjit Singh, the then inspector, gets 8-year jail under separate IPC sections. Gurmej Singh, the then SI, also awarded 8-year sentence while Karamjit Singh, the then ASI gets 3-year jail March 6: A special CBI court sentences former Punjab Police DIG Dilbagh Singh to 7-year RI, and former DSP Gurbachan Singh to life term in a 1993 Tarn Taran fake encounter case involving killing of two civilians Feb 4: Former SHO Gurbhinder Singh and ex-ASI ASI Purshotam Singh get life imprisonment in a 1992 fake encounter in Majitha, Amritsar, where two persons were killed Emotions run high in courtroom Mohali Emotional scenes played out in the CBI court on Monday as family members of the seven victims killed in the 1993 Tarn Taran fake encounters broke down upon hearing the long-awaited verdict. Many of them had been waging a relentless battle for justice over three decades. 'We had been waiting for this moment of justice,' said Gurmeet Kaur, 60, wife of deceased cop Sukhdev Singh while holding a faded photograph of her slain husband. Three of the seven victims—Shinder Singh, Sukhdev Singh, and Desa Singh—were serving as special police officers (SPOs) with Punjab Police when they were abducted, tortured, and murdered by their own colleagues. 'The irony is chilling. They died wearing the same uniform as their killers,' said Sarabjit Singh Verka, counsel for the victims. The kin of victim cops demanded justice beyond the verdict. They appealed to the Punjab government for salary arrears and pensions based on their husbands' service records. Many also sought compassionate appointments for family members, stating that their families had suffered both emotionally and financially in the aftermath of the killings. 'Our fight isn't over. The state must now recognise the pain we've endured, and the future that was snatched from us,' said Balbir Kaur, sister of deceased SPO Desa Singh. The families revealed that in the absence of justice all these years, they had not performed the final rites or 'bhog' ceremonies of their loved ones.
