HELOC rates are falling again. Here's what to consider now.
We may receive commissions from some links to products on this page. Promotions are subject to availability and retailer terms.
HELOC interest rates are declining again, new data released this week shows.
Getty Images
After some minor increases earlier in May, interest rates on home equity lines of credit (HELOCs) reversed course and declined again this week, according to new Bankrate data. Now, at an average rate of 8.14%, rates dropped by six basis points, allowing HELOCs to maintain their position as one of the cheapest ways to borrow money right now. They're less expensive than home equity loans, which remained flat this week at an average rate of 8.24% and materially cheaper than personal loans (over 12% currently) and credit cards (around 21%). And with the average home equity amount around $313,000 right now, there's likely plenty of money to utilize while still maintaining a healthy equity buffer in the home.
Still, borrowing from your home equity isn't risk-free, and with a HELOC, which has a variable rate, some volatility should be priced in to avoid surprises. But with rates here low again, many would benefit from using this specific borrowing product. It just helps to know some timely considerations before securing the line of credit. Below, we'll detail what to consider right now.
Start by seeing how low a HELOC rate you'd be eligible for here.
What to consider with HELOC rates falling again
Here are three items to consider with HELOC rates falling back toward 8% again:
Rates here could rise or fall unexpectedly
Earlier in 2025, it felt like HELOC rates would never stop declining. They hit an 18-month low. Then a two-year low and then another, new two-year low. But that drop stopped in recent weeks and rates here actually rose a bit since. And that's something that will impact borrowers even after the HELOC is secured, as variable rates will change monthly, perhaps in an unexpected way.
So don't let a lower rate lull you into a false sense of complacency. Rates here could continue to fall … or they could rise again. Be prepared for either. That said, overall, HELOC rates are down by around two full percentage points since September 2024, so the larger trend is still a positive one for borrowers.
Compare HELOC rates and offers here to see which is most affordable.
Long-term affordability will need to be closely calculated
Do you know how much you want to borrow with a HELOC? Because of these recent rate changes and because you'll need to make repayments no matter how dramatically the rate changes over time, it's important to calculate long-term affordability closely.
For example, if you want to borrow with a $50,000 HELOC, don't just do the math tied to today's average rates. Calculate repayments against higher rates in the future and, potentially, lower ones as well. This will give you a better idea of long-term affordability, which is critical when your home is the funding source to avoid the risk of foreclosure.
You could refinance into a home equity loan
Want to take advantage of today's low HELOC rates but are nervous about your ability to make repayments should rates spike again? Then consider the HELOC now, and keep in mind that you could refinance it into a home equity loan (with a fixed interest rate) in the future.
Just be sure to clarify with your HELOC lender before getting started, as eligibility criteria and requirements can vary from lender to lender. And understand that that may require you to forego a lower HELOC rate for a slightly higher home equity loan rate. Still, at that point, the exchange may be worthwhile if paying a changing HELOC rate each month becomes too stressful (and expensive).
The bottom line
With HELOC interest rates on the decline again, homeowners contemplating the use of this product may be ready to get started. By keeping these three timely considerations in mind, however, they'll be able to make a more informed decision, positioning themselves for home equity borrowing success both in today's rate climate and, theoretically, over the extended repayment period of a decade or more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Governor says cuts to federal funding for upgrading unemployment systems ‘undermine' workers
The Trump administration is terminating $400 million in funds meant for states nationwide to modernize their unemployment systems. (Getty Images) Gov. Phil Murphy criticized the federal government for terminating programs aimed at modernizing the unemployment insurance system, which suffered under the stress of hundreds of thousands of claimants applying for jobless benefits at the height of the pandemic. 'At a time of increased uncertainty about the U.S. economy, the last thing the federal government should be doing is taking away resources from states' unemployment insurance systems,' Murphy said in a statement Monday. 'These cuts undermine American workers.' The Trump administration is terminating $400 million in funds for states across the country to modernize their unemployment systems, money that was authorized in the 2021 American Rescue Plan Act passed under the Biden administration. The Murphy administration did not comment on whether any money would be returned to the federal government, or whether the change in funding would cause any disruptions to systems in the process of being upgraded. The state Department of Labor did not respond to a request for comment. New Jersey received nearly $25 million for its upgrades. The grant money was expected to be accessible for tech upgrades through 2028. Murphy said in his statement that the state has used those funds to 'improve the efficiency of our state's unemployment insurance application to ensure that all eligible workers can access the benefits to which they are entitled.' According to Axios, the U.S. Department of Labor notified Congress last week that these grants were being terminated, suggesting that the funds were wasted on equity projects. However, 'equity' in this case refers to efforts to make the system easier for people to use and access, not as a reference to diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, which the Trump administration has vowed to dismantle. A record-breaking 1.1 million claims were filed in New Jersey during the first two months of the pandemic, pushing the state's antiquated unemployment system past the limits of what it could handle. People saw their claims frozen, received their benefits months after they applied — if they received them at all — and were often told to reach out to call centers for specialists, only to be greeted with busy signals or messages to call back another time. The unemployment system in New Jersey saw major overhauls following the pandemic — and its first substantial update in over a decade — as a result of a federal program with the U.S. Department of Labor. The unemployment application that rolled out in 2024 can be used on mobile devices, is available in multiple languages, can be saved if the applicant needs to return to it later, and includes revised questions to make it easier to understand. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Thousands in WA at risk of losing food benefits under GOP bill in Congress
(Getty Images) Tens of thousands of low-income Washingtonians could lose federal food assistance if Republicans move ahead with plans in a bill the U.S. House passed last month. That's according to estimates from the state and researchers at a left-leaning think tank. The cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, also known as food stamps, stem from a tax cut and spending package Republicans call their 'big, beautiful bill.' This legislation passed the U.S. House on May 22 and still needs approval from the Senate before it can reach President Donald Trump's desk. If more stringent work requirements in the bill take effect, about 79,000 people in Washington would be at risk of losing their benefits entirely, and 149,000 would be at risk of losing some SNAP benefits, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a liberal think tank. The majority of those people live in eastern Washington or the Olympic Peninsula. The state's Department of Social and Health Services estimates more than 900,000 people in Washington could see benefits reduced or eliminated if the bill is approved as written. 'The expanded work requirements provision alone would risk more than 198,000 Washingtonians losing access to critical food benefits statewide,' said Adolfo Capestany, a spokesperson for the department. Around 10% of the state's population receives SNAP benefits according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The majority of people affected by the cuts would be children, older adults, and people with disabilities. 'The bill would decrease the average monthly SNAP benefit for households by $55.95, from $331.58 per month to $275.63,' said Capestany. What's proposed in the Republican bill is the largest cut in the program's history, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Nationwide, the program would see a $300 billion, or roughly 30%, reduction. Since SNAP was introduced, the federal government has fully funded the cost of the food benefits, while states are responsible for screening for eligibility and issuing benefits. States have paid roughly half the cost of administering the program. The bill would require additional work requirement screening and would try to shift more costs to states. Studies have shown that work requirements do not boost employment, but do pose challenges for people trying to access benefits. At minimum under the Republican proposal, states would be required to pay 5% of SNAP benefits starting in 2028. States that exceed certain thresholds in making errors distributing SNAP payments would have to pay more. 'Washington would be required to backfill hundreds of millions of dollars in reduced federal funding annually,' Capestany said. State error rates vary from year to year, which could create challenges in the state's annual budget process. The addition of the work requirement would increase states' administrative burden and increase the risk of errors, according to the report. Capestany noted that the SNAP cuts Republicans are considering would trickle down to the economy and could decrease the amount flowing to Washington businesses, like grocers and retailers, by an estimated $360 million a year.
News24
17 minutes ago
- News24
Tongaat appoints Vision CEO to the helm amid ‘imminent' asset transfer
Be among those who shape the future with knowledge. Uncover exclusive stories that captivate your mind and heart with our FREE 14-day subscription trial. Dive into a world of inspiration, learning, and empowerment. You can only trial once.
