Latest batch of JFK assassination documents show Kennedy's distrust of the CIA
Known as the Schlesinger Memo, the 15-page document, dated June 10, 1961, was written by JFK's aide Arthur Schlesinger Jr. It warned Kennedy that the CIA was encroaching on his ability to direct foreign policy.
The memo's existence was not a secret, and it was made public earlier, but with large chunks of text blacked out for security reasons.
The entire unredacted memo was one of the thousands of now-declassified documents that the National Archives and Records Administration released Tuesday on orders from President Donald Trump. As of Wednesday afternoon, about 69,000 of the 80,000 documents that Trump promised to release have been posted online.
And if anybody was expecting to find proof in the memo that the CIA conspired with JFK's assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, to kill Kennedy, they will not find it.
The information the government had blacked out had to do with CIA staffing, including the specific number of CIA operatives stationed at the U.S. Embassy in Paris and how they 'sought to monopolize contact with certain French political personalities," as well as the number of CIA sources in countries like Austria and Chile.
Jefferson Morley, a former Washington Post reporter who runs the 'JFK Facts' blog and has been pressing the government for decades to release the records, was undeterred.
'There's a sensational story here that people need to know," Morley said in an MSNBC interview. "This is not a nothing-burger, as people will tell you. There is an amazingly interesting and pregnant story in these JFK files.'
The memo and other documents are more evidence that Kennedy deeply mistrusted the CIA, which had Oswald under surveillance long before Kennedy was killed on Nov. 22, 1963, Morley said.
'We got a memo yesterday about Kennedy's plans to reorganize the CIA, and a lot of that memo had been redacted before,' Morley said. 'We now understand why Kennedy mistrusted the CIA and a mistrust, to be sure, that was returned by CIA officers who did not like his liberal policies.'
Under the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992, all the documents related to the assassination were supposed to have been released by 2017, when Trump was president the first time.
Trump released some documents then, but he also gave the intelligence agencies more time to assess the remaining files.
It was not until December 2022 that President Joe Biden released more than 13,000 records after the Mary Ferrell Foundation, the country's largest nonprofit repository of JFK assassination records, sued the administration to make all of them public.
Morley, who is affiliated with the foundation, said that in all the documents 'we see a new window into the CIA's pre-assassination surveillance of Lee Harvey Oswald.'
The late James Jesus Angleton, one of the founding members of the CIA, had put Oswald under surveillance starting in November 1959 and was 'monitoring his politics, his personal life, his foreign travels, his contacts,' Morley said.
Angleton had a 180-page file 'on Oswald on his desk a week before Kennedy went to Dallas' in November 1963, Morley said, citing government documents that had been released earlier.
'So what this story raises is the question: Was the CIA incredibly, atrociously, incompetent when it comes to Lee Harvey Oswald, or was Angleton actually running an operation involving Oswald?' Morley said. 'We don't have the answer to that question because there's still some relevant records to come out. For example, one file of another CIA officer who was involved in the pre-assassination surveillance of Oswald is still kept secret. This is a great first start.'
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Gabbard goes after Clapper, declassifying emails on Russia hacking report
Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard is going after her predecessor, pointing to a newly released email as part of her argument that there was an attempt by the Obama administration to undermine President Trump with their investigation of Russia's 2016 election interference. A brief email exchange released by Gabbard shows a discussion between then-DNI James Clapper and then-National Security Agency (NSA) Director Mike Rogers in which the NSA director said they needed more time to review information before a coming report to President Obama about Russia's hacking of the Democratic National Committee (DNC). In the exchange, which took place in December 2016 after Trump's victory, Clapper said he understood Rogers's concerns but that the intelligence community didn't have the luxury of time and the draft they were working on would need to be a 'team sport.' It's release comes as Gabbar has declassified a number of records about the 2016 election amid demands on the Trump administration to release files related to deceased financier Jeffrey Epstein. The emails show Rogers reached out to Clapper to relay concerns from his team that they hadn't had enough time to review all the intelligence. 'I know that this activity is on a fast-track and that folks have been working very hard to put together a product that can be provided to the President. However, I wanted to reach out to you directly to let you know of some concerns I have with what I am hearing from my folks,' Rogers wrote. 'Given the expedited nature of this activity, my folks aren't fully comfortable saying that they have had enough time to review all of the intelligence to be absolutely confident in their assessments. 'To be clear, I am not saying that we disagree substantively, but I do want to make sure that, when we are asked in the future whether we can absolutely stand behind the paper, that we don't have any reason to hesitate because of the process. I know that you agree that this is something we need to be 100% comfortable with before we present it to the President – we have one chance to get this right, and it is critical that we do so,' he wrote. Rogers then asked about the extent NSA would be considered a co-author on the product, saying that if so he would like to see the underlying intelligence directly but added that 'if your intent is to create a CIA-only or CIA/FBI-authored product, then I will stand down on these concerns.' Clapper said he did want to ensure consensus among various intelligence agencies but said more time was not an option as the IC was working to deliver a report to Obama less than a month before the Inauguration. 'It is essential that we (CIA/NSATBIODNI) be on the same page and are all supportive of the report-in the highest tradition of 'that's OUR story, and we're stickin to it,'' he wrote, adding that a first draft of the report was circulating for review. 'We will facilitate as much mutual transparency as possible as we complete the report, but, more time is not negotiable. We may have to compromise on our 'normal' modalities, since we must do this on such a compressed schedule. This is one project that has to be a team sport. The documents shared by Gabbard are just two in the exchange, and it's not clear how the conversation continued. Neither Rogers nor a spokesman for Clapper responded to request for comment. But Clapper has blasted previous document sharing by Gabbard, writing in an op-ed with former CIA Director John Brennan that claims they were seeking to undermine Trump are 'patently false' and said the Trump team is seeking to 'rewrite history.' 'There is a remarkable irony about this whole affair. Despite claims by Trump administration officials of a nefarious political conspiracy, we did everything we could at the time to prevent leaks of intelligence reports, including Russia's preference for Mr. Trump, a requirement that President Obama regularly emphasized,' they wrote. 'We knew such reports would be political dynamite. And despite substantial reporting on the matter, we succeeded in preventing such leaks before the election.' Gabbard's take, which was amplified by Trump on Thursday morning in a Truth Social post, is that Clapper's email suggests standards were compromised. 'The decision to compromise standards and violate protocols in the creation of the 2017 manufactured intelligence assessment was deliberate and came from the very top,' Gabbard said in a statement. 'Clapper's own words confirm that complying with the order to manufacture intelligence was a 'team sport.'' Gabbard, who has struggled to maintain her standing in Trump's circle, has recently been praised by Trump in recent weeks for her handling of the 2016 election. 'She's the hottest one in the room right now,' Trump said last month when speaking about the election documents. However, the documents released by Gabbard have not backed her claims. A first set shared by the DNI came as she accused Obama-era leaders of a 'treasonous conspiracy.' But the documents showed Clapper discussing a detail that was never in dispute – that Russia was never able to alter vote tabulations. Gabbard also released a previously classified report from Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee that questioned whether Russia was aiming to help Trump or simply sow chaos in the 2016 election. Most other intelligence products, however, have concluded the goal was to aid Trump.
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
Washington Post columnist Karen Attiah's tense meeting with boss
Karen Attiah's future at The Washington Post is in doubt after a fraught one-on-one meeting with Adam O'Neal, the paper's newly installed opinion editor, according to a report. Sources told the Status newsletter that last month's discussion between Attiah and O'Neal, a former Economist correspondent who has been meeting columnists to say their work does not fit his vision and suggest they consider buyouts, was uncomfortable and did not go well. Attiah, a staunch anti-Trump commentator, had publicly noted prior to the meeting that she remained at the paper amid the latest exodus in which colleagues were taking voluntary packages. 4 Karen Attiah's future at The Washington Post is in doubt after a fraught one-on-one with her boss. Getty Images She wrote on X: 'So… officially, I'm the last Black staff columnist left in the Washington Post's opinion section.' Keith Richburg and Theodore Johnson, both of whom are black, continue as contributing writers. At that time, Attiah was weighing whether to take the newspaper's voluntary departure package or continue working at the publication owned by Jeff Bezos, the Status newsletter reported. During a tense sit-down following her post on X, Attiah chose not to take the buyout. O'Neal had been conducting individual sessions with various columnists, where many heard similar messages suggesting their writing didn't match his plans for the section and that they might want to accept the buyout offer. While O'Neal may have expected Attiah to follow other colleagues who left after receiving similar messages, and Attiah might have hoped for reassurance about her place at the paper, neither outcome occurred, according to the report. Despite rising tensions, Attiah recently published an article for the outlet about gaining muscle through bodybuilding, describing it as a 'deeply feminine act of self-consciousness.' 4 Adam O'Neal, a former correspondent for The Economist, is the newly installed opinion editor at the Washington Post. X / @WashPostComms Inside the opinion shop, O'Neal's standing is unsettled, according to the report. Much of the previous leadership and several marquee voices are gone, and some of those who remain view him skeptically. The New York Post has sought comment from Attiah, O'Neal and the Washington Post. 4 Attiah last month declined to accept a buyout offer, according to a report in the Status newsletter. Instagram/@karenattiah Signs of that editorial turn emerged this week after O'Neal ran an opinion piece by Jay Bhattacharya, an official in the Trump administration, arguing that the Health and Human Services decision to 'wind down its mRNA vaccine development activities' was a 'necessary' step, a stance that drew reader criticism. He also published an op-ed from Jeanine Pirro, the former Fox News host who is now a district attorney, promoting 'the fight to make DC safe and beautiful.' That piece arrived amid President Donald Trump's takeover of Washington, DC's police force. 4 Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos (seen with wife Lauren Sánchez) has overhauled the paper's editorial bent. Getty Images for amfAR A former Washington Post opinion editor told Status that management at the newspaper was 'turning The Post into a mouthpiece for the Trump administration,' and said such pieces would not have cleared under earlier section leaders. Under Bezos, the newsroom that has been repeatedly reshaped over the last two years. In October, the Washington Post broke with tradition by halting presidential endorsements and later announced a significant shift in its opinion strategy emphasizing personal liberties and free markets. The move preceded the exit of opinion editor David Shipley and drew backlash from alumni and readers.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Exclusive-Trump ally Erik Prince plans to keep forces in Haiti for 10 years to fight gangs and collect taxes
By Anna Hirtenstein and Sarah Morland (Reuters) - The prominent Donald Trump supporter and private security executive Erik Prince says he plans to keep his forces in Haiti for 10 years under an arrangement that will eventually give his firm a role in the country's tax-collection system. In an interview with Reuters, Prince said his company, Vectus Global, had reached a 10-year agreement with the Haitian government to fight the country's criminal gangs and set up a tax collection system. After the security situation is stabilized, the firm would be involved in designing and implementing a program to tax goods imported across Haiti's border with the Dominican Republic, he said. He said he expected to wrestle control of major roads and territories from the gangs in about a year. 'One key measure of success for me will be when you can drive from Port-au-Prince to Cap Haitian in a thin-skinned vehicle and not be stopped by gangs,' Prince said in the interview. Prince would not comment about how much the Haitian government would pay Vectus Global, nor how much tax he expects to collect in Haiti. The new president of the transitional council, Laurent Saint-Cyr, who was inaugurated on August 7 as part of a planned rotation of council leaders, did not respond to requests for comment. Haiti's former council president and prime minister also did not respond to requests for comment. Vectus began operating in Haiti in March, deploying mainly drones in coordination with a task force led by the prime minister, but the long-term engagement and the involvement in tax collection have not been previously reported. A person familiar with the company's operations in Haiti told Reuters that Vectus would intensify its fight against the criminal gangs that control large swathes of Haiti in the coming weeks in coordination with the Haitian police, deploying several hundred fighters from the United States, Europe and El Salvador who are trained as snipers and specialists in intelligence and communications, as well as helicopters and boats. Vectus's force includes some French and Creole speakers, the person said. Prince, a former U.S. Navy Seal, founded the Blackwater military security firm in 1997. He sold the company in 2010 after Blackwater employees were convicted of unlawfully killing 14 unarmed civilians while escorting a U.S. embassy convoy in Baghdad's Nisour Square. The men were pardoned by Trump during his first term in the White House. EXPANDING ROLE Since Trump's return to the White House, Prince has advised Ecuador on how to fight criminal gangs and struck a deal with the Democratic Republic of Congo to help secure and tax its mineral wealth. 'It's hard to imagine them operating without the consent of the Trump administration,' said Romain Le Cour Grandmaison, head of the Haiti program at Geneva-based Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime. When asked for comment about Le Cour Grandmaison's assertion, a State Department spokesperson said it has not hired Prince or his company for any work in Haiti. A senior White House official said: "The U.S. government has no involvement with the private military contractor hired by the Haitian government. We are not funding this contract or exercising any oversight.' It's unclear whether Prince's contract would be affected by the change of leadership in Haiti earlier this month. In an August 7 televised address, Saint-Cyr said he welcomed more international support to fight the gangs. 'I am inviting all the international partners to increase their support, send more soldiers, provide more training," he said. "Help us with a more robust international force.' The crisis in Haiti has worsened in recent years, as armed gangs gained territory and attacked hospitals, police stations and prisons, taking control of strategic transport routes and extorting funds from the population. Rights groups accuse the gangs of massacres, rapes, kidnappings and arson. About half the population is food-insecure and over 8,000 people in displacement camps face famine-level hunger. Haiti used to collect half of its tax revenue at the border with the Dominican Republic, but gang control of key transport routes has crippled trade and cut off state income, a report commissioned last year by Haiti's government and several multilateral organizations found. This has undermined the government's ability to respond to the crisis or deliver basic services, the report said. The Dominican Republic is a key source of grains, flour, milk, water and other food staples for Haiti, according to customs data. Haiti also relies on imports from the Dominican Republic for textiles, consumer goods, and medical supplies. Security contractors working in Haiti have faced challenges operating in a country with entrenched links between the gangs, local police and some factions of the government. Earlier this year, a team from American security firm Studebaker Defense abandoned their mission in Haiti after two of their members were abducted, likely due to corrupt police officials, the New York Times reported. Mounir Mahmalat, who serves as a country coordinator of the World Bank's Fragility, Conflict and Violence Group, said that it was virtually impossible to ensure the safe transport of goods or the security of people working in Port-au-Prince. Other security firms working in Haiti have raised questions about how Vectus would hold onto cleared gang territory as well as the wisdom of channelling resources to private security firms instead of the country's own security forces. "Resorting to private military companies cannot be seen as a solution to insecurity in Haiti,' said Gedeon Jean, head of Haiti's Center for Human Rights Analysis and Research. 'The use of private companies has often resulted in human rights violations.' While a private force could help police restore security, Jean warned against large spending on a foreign company while Haiti's own security forces lack funds and equipment.
