
Democrat posts ad showing non-white citizens being kidnapped by Republicans
Sport
Voices
Culture
Lifestyle
IndyBest
Deals
Travel
00:35
A Democrat lawmaker posted a disturbing ad depicting a non-white citizen being kidnapped by Republicans, captioned, 'Trump's America.'
California Rep. Eric Swalwell posted the ad, made by Progress Action Fund, to X on Wednesday (18 June). The video shows a white man and a non-white woman talking outside before the woman is suddenly grabbed by masked men meant to resemble ICE agents.
The man demands answers, and is confronted by a lawmaker who says, 'I'm your Republican Congressman. Now that we're in charge, we're rounding up illegals.'
When the man angrily responds that the woman was born in the US, the lawmaker replies, 'I don't care, she looks like one of them.'
The Republican then promises that the woman will have 'lots of company' in the El Salvador prison she's going to.
The ad closes with a purported quote of Donald Trump's from an April 14 visit with El Salvador's President Nayib Bukele: 'The homegrowns are next.'
00:46
00:55
00:59
00:24
12:25
17:05
03:25
07:30
07:35
10:44
07:06
07:42
14:11
12:18
30:24
16:08
17:41
18:22
13:43
12:41
05:35
08:02
06:42
05:23
07:08
05:03
09:53
07:25
07:30
07:54
05:23
05:35
09:47
06:28
06:23
07:35
08:03
11:54
08:21
06:38
07:25
04:31
07:30
03:34
17:05
03:51
04:18
06:26
04:30
03:35
03:45
07:34
02:03
03:22
02:15
02:22
02:21
01:43
01:42
01:45
10:44
03:44
07:42
09:22
06:11
07:50
06:21
02:19
10:42
06:27
07:23
06:35 More Behind The Headlines
12:18
11:50
09:03
13:07
00:43
01:02
00:49
00:34
00:36
00:39
00:57
00:34
00:49
00:33
01:00
00:31
00:54
01:08
01:35
00:47
00:37
00:21
00:41
00:34
00:57
00:32
00:47
01:40
01:01
01:03
00:41
00:23
00:38
00:24
00:19
00:50
03:29
03:07
03:07
03:24
01:36
00:42
01:26
00:32
00:31
02:00
00:40
00:58
04:23
04:26
01:01
01:07
15:55
16:33
16:06
15:01
15:16
01:16
00:36
00:48
01:08 More Saudi Green Initiative
01:12
01:23
01:24
Live
Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in Please refresh your browser to be logged in
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
7 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump's unusual Nvidia deal raises new corporate and national security risks, lawmakers and experts say
Aug 11 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump upended decades of U.S. national security policy, creating an entirely new category of corporate risk, when he made a deal with Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab to give the U.S. government a cut of its sales in exchange for resuming exports of banned AI chips to China. Historically, the U.S. government made decisions to control the export of sensitive technologies on national security grounds. Those decisions were viewed as non-negotiable; if a technology was controlled, companies could not buy their way around those controls, no matter how lucrative the foregone foreign sales. On Monday, Trump raised the prospect of ending that era, saying he would allow Nvidia to sell its H20 chips to China in exchange for the U.S. government receiving a 15% cut of the company's sales of some advanced chips in that country. He made a similar deal with Nvidia's smaller rival AMD (AMD.O), opens new tab. He also told reporters he was open to allowing Nvidia to sell a scaled-down version of its current flagship Blackwell chips to China. Months earlier, his own administration had banned the sale of H20 chips to China, reversing the decision in July as part of what the government said were negotiations on rare earths. The latest move drew condemnation from U.S. lawmakers in both parties who warned that it risked creating a pay-for-play framework for the sale of sensitive technologies to U.S. adversaries, a concern echoed by analysts and legal experts. "Export controls are a frontline defense in protecting our national security, and we should not set a precedent that incentivizes the government to grant licenses to sell China technology that will enhance its AI capabilities," said U.S. Representative John Moolenaar, a Michigan Republican who chairs the House Select Committee on China. Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi of Illinois, the ranking Democrat on the same committee, said that "by putting a price on our security concerns, we signal to China and our allies that American national security principles are negotiable for the right fee." To be sure, the Trump administration has said the national security risks of resuming H20 sales are minimal because the chip was sold widely in China. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick last month described the H20 as Nvidia's "fourth-best chip" in an interview with CNBC. He said it was in U.S. interests for Chinese firms to keep using American technology. But the deal is extremely rare for the U.S. and marks Trump's latest intervention in corporate decision-making, after pressuring executives to invest in American manufacturing and demanding the resignation of Intel's INTC.O CEO, Lip-Bu Tan, over his ties to Chinese companies. It is unclear whether Trump's move is legal. The U.S. Constitution prohibits Congress from levying taxes and duties on articles exported from any state. Trade lawyer Jeremy Iloulian said it is hard to tell if this would be considered an "export tax" or some other form of payment without knowing more about the agreement. "Up until today, there has never been a consideration of how much companies need to pay to receive an export license," Iloulian said. Added Kyle Handley, a professor at the University of California San Diego School of Global Policy and Strategy: "It sure looks like an export tax to me ... they can call it whatever they want. It really looks a lot like the government is skimming a little bit off the top." When asked if Nvidia had agreed to pay 15% of revenue to the U.S., a company spokesperson said, "We follow rules the U.S. government sets for our participation in worldwide markets." "While we haven't shipped H20 to China for months, we hope export control rules will let America compete in China and worldwide," the spokesperson added. A spokesperson for AMD said the U.S. approved its applications to export some AI processors to China but did not directly address the revenue-sharing agreement and said the company's business adheres to all U.S. export controls. 'I think it's fair to say that everything now in this administration seems negotiable in ways that were not the case before," said Sarah Kreps, a professor at the Brooks School of Public Policy at Cornell University. "I don't think this is unique in that this will be the last kind of deal like this that we see.' 'SLIPPERY SLOPE' Equities analysts said the levy could hit margins at chipmakers and set a precedent for Washington to tax critical U.S. exports. "It feels like a slippery slope to us," said Bernstein analysts, who expect the deal to cut gross margins on the China-bound processors by 5 to 15 percentage points, shaving about a point from Nvidia and AMD's overall margins. "Naturally, not only chipmakers but also companies selling other strategic products to China will wonder if the remittance model could apply to their industries," said Hendi Susanto, a portfolio manager at Gabelli, which holds shares in Nvidia. "For sellers of strategic products to China, remittance could be a burden - or a lifeline to preserve market access to huge and growing opportunities in China," Susanto said.


The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
Starmer set to speak to Trump alongside European leaders ahead of Putin meeting
Sir Keir Starmer is set to join a call with European leaders and Donald Trump on Wednesday, ahead of the US president's meeting with Vladimir Putin in Alaska. The Prime Minister warned on Monday that peace 'must be built with Ukraine, not imposed upon it', amid concerns of Kyiv's exclusion from talks between Mr Trump and his Russian counterpart. The two leaders are set to meet this Friday to discuss the future of the Kremlin's invasion, without the presence of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Mr Trump has confirmed. The US president has also signalled he thinks Ukraine might need to cede territory in order to end the conflict, stating there is likely to be 'some land-swapping going on'. Speaking during a lengthy press conference, Mr Trump pledged to 'try to get back' some of Ukraine's 'oceanfront property' from Russia. He said: 'We're going to change the lines, the battle lines. Russia has occupied a big portion of Ukraine. They've occupied some very prime territory. We're going to try and get some of that territory back for Ukraine. 'They have taken largely – in real estate we call it oceanfront property. That's always the most valuable property.' Mr Trump said he would speak to the Ukrainian president following the summit and suggested he could meet Mr Putin at a later date. The call on Wednesday, organised by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, will include Mr Zelensky. In a joint statement earlier this week, the leaders of Britain, France, Italy, Germany, Poland, Finland and the European Commission said: 'Ukraine has the freedom of choice over its own destiny. 'Meaningful negotiations can only take place in the context of a ceasefire or reduction of hostilities. 'The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine. 'We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force.' The Prime Minister and Canada's Mark Carney had also agreed Ukraine's future 'must be one of freedom, sovereignty and self-determination' during a phone call on Monday. A Downing Street spokesperson said: 'They discussed their unwavering support for Ukraine and ongoing work to stop the killing, and end Russia's war of aggression. 'Both leaders underscored that Ukraine's future must be one of freedom, sovereignty and self-determination. 'They welcomed continued international efforts, led by President Trump, to bring peace and agreed that this must be built with Ukraine, not imposed upon it. 'Both leaders agreed they would continue to work closely with President Trump and President Zelensky over the coming days. They agreed to stay in touch.' No 10 had earlier backed Mr Trump's interventions over the war but warned that Mr Putin cannot be trusted 'as far as you can throw him'. Asked whether Sir Keir believes the Russian president could be trusted in negotiations, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said the UK supported both Kyiv and the US president's push for peace, but not Moscow. 'Never trust President Putin as far as you could throw him, but we obviously will support Ukraine,' he said. 'We will obviously support President Trump and European nations as we enter these negotiations. 'But it is exactly why we've been leading this work on the coalition of the willing, because any ceasefire, as I say, cannot just be an opportunity for President Putin to go away, re-arm, restrengthen, and then go again. 'So we're not going to leave it to trust. We're going to ensure that we're prepared such that we achieve a ceasefire.' The US president has suggested that any peace deal was likely to involve 'some swapping of territories', with reports suggesting this could involve Ukraine giving up its Donetsk region. But Mr Zelensky has already rejected any proposal that would compromise Ukraine's territorial integrity, something that is forbidden by Ukraine's constitution. He said Mr Putin wanted to 'exchange a pause in the war, in the killing, for the legalisation of the occupation of our land – he wants to get territorial spoils for the second time'. Mr Zelensky added: 'We will not allow this second attempt to partition Ukraine. 'Knowing Russia, where there is a second, there will be a third.'


The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
Smithsonian revises museum exhibit text of Trump's two impeachments
The Smithsonian Institution has reinstated a museum display about Donald Trump 's two impeachments, but with its language watered down. The description of Trump's second impeachment for inciting insurrection now states it was 'based on his challenge of the 2020 election results and on his speech on January 6,' removing direct quotes from the Senate's articles of impeachment. Text about Trump's first impeachment trial in 2020 was modified to include the word 'alleged' before 'solicitation of foreign interference in the 2020 presidential election.' These alterations follow a period when Trump signed an executive order seeking to purge 'anti-American ideology' from the Smithsonian and attempted to dismiss the head of the National Portrait Gallery. Museum officials stated the changes were part of a routine replacement of temporary material, claiming the original placard did not meet presentation standards, though an inside source reportedly linked it to a content review for political bias.