logo
Paul Coulson offered $250m to walk away from Ardagh amid crunch debt talks

Paul Coulson offered $250m to walk away from Ardagh amid crunch debt talks

Irish Times6 hours ago

Businessman
Paul Coulson
has been offered $250 million (€218 million) by bondholders in
Ardagh Group
to walk away from the packaging empire he built over the past 25 years, as debt restructuring talks enter a crunch phase.
The offer would see Mr Coulson cede control of the glass and metal containers giant, which has about $12.5 billion of borrowings, and abandon previous notions of retaining control of its prized Ardagh Metal Packaging (AMP) arm, the sources said.
The proposal is one of a number of potential debt solutions under discussion in parallel with the company, a source said. All involve substantially addressing about $2.5 billion of bonds that fall due in August 2026 and would involve the injection of new money into the business, the source added.
Bloomberg first reported the offer for Mr Coulson to hand over entire control of Ardagh Group to certain bondholders, indicating it is the most likely outcome even as a number of alternatives remain in play.
READ MORE
Under the proposal, unsecured creditors would take a majority stake in the group after the overhaul, Bloomberg reported. Secured creditors would have their debt reinstated at par, and receive a double-digit coupon, it said.
A spokesman for Ardagh Group declined to comment on the current state of talks.
[
Ardagh talks with creditor group break down over improving cans unit
Opens in new window
]
The development comes weeks after Ardagh Group walked away from talks with unsecured bondholders, who were being asked by the group to write off much of the $2.32 billion they are owed in exchange for taking full ownership of the glass containers part of the business.
Mr Coulson had envisaged Ardagh Group spinning its shares the valuable AMP division into a new company (NewCo) that would be 80 per cent owned by Mr Coulson and other existing Ardagh Group shareholders. He proposed that unsecured creditors would only receive 20 per cent of the division. Ardagh Group currently owns 76 per cent of New York-listed AMP.
Bobby Healy on why Manna drone delivery could be the 'biggest technology company in the world for its space'
Listen |
67:08
Ardagh Group, which Mr Coulson built into one of the world's largest packaging companies through a series of debt-fuelled acquisitions, said more than a year ago that it was considering options to lower its $12.5 billion debt pile. The burden had become increasingly unsustainable in recent years amid weaker-than-expected earnings.
Talks with the senior unsecured creditors became more complicated when Ardagh Group said in April that the beverage cans unit had turned a corner', helped by a rebound in activity across the energy drinks, sparkling water and health and wellness categories.
[
Ardagh enlists restructuring experts to board as it looks to cut €12bn debt
Opens in new window
]
AMP reported its revenues grew by 11 per cent year-on-year in the first quarter to $1.27 billion and upgraded its full-year earnings forecast.
However, Ardagh Group's legacy glass business saw its revenues drop 6.7 per cent to $961 million during the quarter as this arm of the group continued to struggle.
Meanwhile, holders of some $1.8 billion of risky bonds issued by a holding company above the operating Ardagh Group are expected to lose almost all of what they are owed. These bonds are currently trading at about 4 per cent of their original value.
Mr Coulson controls Ardagh Group through an 18.8 per cent direct stake in its ultimate parent company and a 52.4 per cent interest in a vehicle called Yeoman Capital, which owns 33.9 per cent of the group. He effectively owns 36.6 per cent of the equity in a business that traces its roots to the Irish Glass Bottle Company, founded in Dublin in 1932.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Homeowners can ‘save more than €3,500 a year' with energy-efficient technology
Homeowners can ‘save more than €3,500 a year' with energy-efficient technology

Irish Times

time32 minutes ago

  • Irish Times

Homeowners can ‘save more than €3,500 a year' with energy-efficient technology

Homeowners using energy-efficient technologies such as solar panels, heat pumps and electric-vehicle home chargers can save more than €3,500 a year, a report says. As well as reporting big savings, people who have taken the most energy-efficient approach to their homes say they get additional benefits including enhanced levels of comfort, according to Electric Ireland's sustainability index. Despite the benefits, however, a significant portion of the population feel unable to invest in such technologies due to the upfront costs and a lack of clear guidance. A total of 13 per cent of those who took part in the survey said they had solar panels installed; 11 per cent owned heat pumps and 7 per cent had EV chargers. READ MORE Respondents said there were clear cost benefits to these new technologies. Householders generating energy through solar panels reported perceived savings averaging €91 a month on energy bills. Those with heat pumps said they saved an average of €77 monthly. EV owners reported average savings of €128 a month on fuel costs. The cumulative monthly savings for people with all three technologies comes in at €296 monthly or €3,552 over a year. While financial savings were listed as the leading benefits, some respondents also spoke of additional benefits: 60 per cent of heat pump owners said their homes were more comfortable as a result and 46 per cent said convenience was another benefit. Despite benefits of such technology, the Electric Ireland sustainability index shows that willingness to make the switch to more energy-efficient technologies remains low beyond the early adopters. For those who have yet to make any home energy-efficiency upgrades, few have active plans to do so. Just 22 per cent are considering solar panels with only 12 per cent considering heat pumps or EV chargers. The most commonly cited barrier is cost, with nearly 60 per cent saying the upfront cost was a key deterrent. 'What Electric Ireland's new sustainability index reveals is that the long-term benefits of more energy-efficient technologies are clear – but the upfront costs can be challenging' Electric Ireland's Noeline Gibbons said. She said the average cost of a solar PV system was €8,000 to €10,000 and when SEAI grants were included most households saw a return on investment within four to six years. 'We are acutely aware that many families and individuals want to start the energy transition, but struggle with upfront costs and a lack of information,' she said. Beyond cost concerns, others reported that the process of accessing grants felt like too much hassle or said they were unsure if the investment would pay off in the long term. Ms Gibbons said a lack of information and the ease of sticking to current habits were also noted by some as factors holding people back. Awareness of available grants was limited with less than 40 per cent familiar with government support schemes. 'Our sustainability index show that many consumers who are considering switching to more sustainable energy lifestyles simply don't know where to begin – and the range of options can feel complex and daunting so there is a clear need for simple accessible information,' Ms Gibbons said. The sustainability index was conducted by Red C Research between April 2nd and April 10th, with a nationally representative survey of 1,026 adults.

Magnier case: Row breaks out in court over claims gallery members tried to communicate with witness
Magnier case: Row breaks out in court over claims gallery members tried to communicate with witness

Irish Times

timean hour ago

  • Irish Times

Magnier case: Row breaks out in court over claims gallery members tried to communicate with witness

An argument broke out during a hearing in the High Court case taken by bloodstock billionaire John Magnier over a failed property deal for a Co Tipperary estate. On Thursday, the defence claimed a member, or members, of the public gallery were attempting to communicate with a witness under cross-examination by nodding to him on certain answers. The case centres on Mr Magnier's claim that a US-based construction magnate, Maurice Regan, the preferred buyer, engaged in a 'full-frontal assault' on Mr Magnier's claimed deal to buy the 751-acre estate. Coolmore Stud founder Mr Magnier claims Barne Estate reneged on the alleged deal, preferring to sell at the higher price of €22.25 million to Mr Regan, founder of New York building firm JT Magen. READ MORE The Magniers say the deal was struck at Mr Magnier's Coolmore home on August 22nd, 2023. They also claim an exclusivity agreement in effect from August 31st to September 30th stipulated the estate would not permit its representatives to solicit or encourage any expression of interest, inquiry or offer on the property from anyone other than Mr Magnier. Barne Estate has been held for the benefit of Richard Thomson-Moore and others by a Jersey trust. The Magnier side has sued the Barne Estate, Mr Thomson-Moore and three companies of IQEQ (Jersey) Ltd group, seeking to enforce the purported deal, which they say had been 'unequivocally' agreed. Barne says there was never any such agreement as they needed the consent of the trustees to finalise any agreement and they subsequently preferred to sell to Mr Regan. Mr Regan is not a party to the case. The nodding in court claim was made on Thursday by Martin Hayden SC, for Barne Estate, while his colleague Niall F Buckley SC, was conducting the cross-examination of a financial manager at Coolmore, Tim Gleeson. Mr Gleeson was giving evidence on communications timelines, statements and meetings surrounding the failed deal. Mr Hayden apologised for interrupting the cross-examination and claimed that he had been informed by a note from his legal team that a member or members of the gallery had been nodding at the witness. Mr Hayden gestured towards the Magnier side and told Mr Justice Max Barrett that he was asking individuals 'on the Coolmore side to stop making head gestures' in relation to questions asked of Mr Gleeson. 'It has happened on four occasions now in relation to particular questions asked and head gestures are being made by certain individuals in the gallery,' said Mr Hayden. Mr Gleeson said he did not see any gestures and that he was following documents from the witness box and facing the judge when answering questions over his witness statement. Paul Gallagher SC, for the Coolmore side, said he did not accept the assertion made by Mr Hayden. About 10 minutes later, Mr Hayden rose again to tell the judge 'it is occurring again'. 'They are giving indications of what the answers should be – that's unacceptable'. Mr Gallagher said it was 'an outrageous statement to make – it's not true'. 'I know Mr Gallagher is all-powerful but I don't think he has eyes in the back of his head, I'm not sure he can see what is going on,' said Mr Hayden. Mr Justice Barrett asked all present to refrain from any nodding upon hearing responses given by the witness. Moments later, Mr Gallagher said a member of the defence's legal team was now staring at the gallery where the Coolmore side were sitting at the rear of the court, which he considered 'highly inappropriate'. Mr Hayden said it was appropriate the defence made sure the claimed behaviour did not happen again. Jerome Casey, a senior member of staff at Coolmore who fronts property deals for Mr Magnier, told Caren Geoghegan SC, for the Magniers, 'we are honourable people' who would not go back on an agreed deal. Mr Casey said the exclusivity agreement was put in place because contracts for the estate had not been issued immediately to Coolmore by the vendors' solicitors and that by late August he was made aware that Mr Regan was 'not happy' about the purported sale of the land to the Magniers. Mr Hayden asked Mr Casey if the main reason for the exclusivity agreement was Mr Regan's interest and was told 'very much so'. The case continues before Mr Justice Barrett.

Ireland is most expensive country in EU after Denmark as prices continue to soar
Ireland is most expensive country in EU after Denmark as prices continue to soar

Irish Independent

time3 hours ago

  • Irish Independent

Ireland is most expensive country in EU after Denmark as prices continue to soar

Prices here are 38pc above the EU average – we are behind only Denmark when it comes to high costs. In 2015, prices in Ireland were 28pc above the average, but since then Ireland has been getting increasingly more expensive. The findings, from the statistics agency Eurostat, will put a new focus on the Government's decision not to pay out universal cost-of-living packages in the next budget. Eurostat found that when it comes to alcohol and tobacco, prices here are the most expensive in the EU – more than double the average. Daragh Cassidy, of price comparison site said this is due to taxation and, more recently, minimum unit pricing on alcohol. When it comes to alcohol, prices here are the second-highest in the EU. Finland has the dearest. Food and non-alcoholic drink prices here are the third-highest in the EU at almost 15pc above the EU average. We are behind only Luxembourg and Denmark when it comes to what we pay for food. However, this is an improvement on recent years, as these prices were more than 21pc above average in 2020. Ireland's restaurant and hotel prices are the second-highest in the EU – Denmark's are dearest – at 29pc above the average. Communications costs are almost 40pc above average. Ireland is the third-most-expensive country for electricity, gas and fuel, with prices 17pc above the average. However, clothing prices in Ireland are 1pc below the EU average and cheaper than in Lithuania, Latvia and Poland. Mr Cassidy said Ireland will never be a cheap place to live Non-EU countries Iceland, Norway and Switzerland were also included in the research and generally have prices higher than those in Ireland. Mr Cassidy said we have known for a while that Ireland is an expensive country and these figures from Eurostat confirm that. 'There are several reasons why prices here are so high,' he said. 'These include our higher wages, a lack of competition in certain sectors, high taxation on certain goods such as tobacco, alcohol and fuel, and lower government subsidies in certain areas such as public transport and childcare compared to our European neighbours.' He said businesses are also faced with high insurance and energy costs, which then get passed on to consumers. Mr Cassidy said Ireland will never be a cheap place to live. 'And it's worth noting that many of the world's most expensive countries, such as Switzerland, Iceland and Denmark, also have some of the highest standards of living in the world,' he added. He said wages in Ireland, while high by international standards, generally do not match the salaries in those countries. At the same time, taxpayers in more expensive countries tend to get back more from their governments in terms of better and more affordable healthcare, childcare and public transport, though there have been improvements made here in recent years. Mr Cassidy called for the Government to lower the standard rate of Vat, which at 23pc is one of the highest in the world.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store