Paul Coulson offered $250m to walk away from Ardagh amid crunch debt talks
Paul Coulson
has been offered $250 million (€218 million) by bondholders in
Ardagh Group
to walk away from the packaging empire he built over the past 25 years, as debt restructuring talks enter a crunch phase.
The offer would see Mr Coulson cede control of the glass and metal containers giant, which has about $12.5 billion of borrowings, and abandon previous notions of retaining control of its prized Ardagh Metal Packaging (AMP) arm, the sources said.
The proposal is one of a number of potential debt solutions under discussion in parallel with the company, a source said. All involve substantially addressing about $2.5 billion of bonds that fall due in August 2026 and would involve the injection of new money into the business, the source added.
Bloomberg first reported the offer for Mr Coulson to hand over entire control of Ardagh Group to certain bondholders, indicating it is the most likely outcome even as a number of alternatives remain in play.
READ MORE
Under the proposal, unsecured creditors would take a majority stake in the group after the overhaul, Bloomberg reported. Secured creditors would have their debt reinstated at par, and receive a double-digit coupon, it said.
A spokesman for Ardagh Group declined to comment on the current state of talks.
[
Ardagh talks with creditor group break down over improving cans unit
Opens in new window
]
The development comes weeks after Ardagh Group walked away from talks with unsecured bondholders, who were being asked by the group to write off much of the $2.32 billion they are owed in exchange for taking full ownership of the glass containers part of the business.
Mr Coulson had envisaged Ardagh Group spinning its shares the valuable AMP division into a new company (NewCo) that would be 80 per cent owned by Mr Coulson and other existing Ardagh Group shareholders. He proposed that unsecured creditors would only receive 20 per cent of the division. Ardagh Group currently owns 76 per cent of New York-listed AMP.
Bobby Healy on why Manna drone delivery could be the 'biggest technology company in the world for its space'
Listen |
67:08
Ardagh Group, which Mr Coulson built into one of the world's largest packaging companies through a series of debt-fuelled acquisitions, said more than a year ago that it was considering options to lower its $12.5 billion debt pile. The burden had become increasingly unsustainable in recent years amid weaker-than-expected earnings.
Talks with the senior unsecured creditors became more complicated when Ardagh Group said in April that the beverage cans unit had turned a corner', helped by a rebound in activity across the energy drinks, sparkling water and health and wellness categories.
[
Ardagh enlists restructuring experts to board as it looks to cut €12bn debt
Opens in new window
]
AMP reported its revenues grew by 11 per cent year-on-year in the first quarter to $1.27 billion and upgraded its full-year earnings forecast.
However, Ardagh Group's legacy glass business saw its revenues drop 6.7 per cent to $961 million during the quarter as this arm of the group continued to struggle.
Meanwhile, holders of some $1.8 billion of risky bonds issued by a holding company above the operating Ardagh Group are expected to lose almost all of what they are owed. These bonds are currently trading at about 4 per cent of their original value.
Mr Coulson controls Ardagh Group through an 18.8 per cent direct stake in its ultimate parent company and a 52.4 per cent interest in a vehicle called Yeoman Capital, which owns 33.9 per cent of the group. He effectively owns 36.6 per cent of the equity in a business that traces its roots to the Irish Glass Bottle Company, founded in Dublin in 1932.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
3 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
EU and US lock in trade deal, US official sees car tariff relief in weeks
The US and the European Union have today locked in a framework trade deal reached last month that includes a 15% US tariff on most EU imports, including cars, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors and lumber. In a three and a half page joint statement, the two sides listed the commitments made, including the EU's pledge to eliminate tariffs on all US industrial goods and to provide preferential market access for a wide range of US seafood and agricultural goods. Washington will take steps to reduce the current 27.5% US tariffs on cars and car parts, a huge burden for European carmakers, once Brussels introduces the legislation needed to enact promised tariff cuts on US goods, it said. US President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced the deal on July 27 at Trump's luxury golf course in Turnberry in Scotland after an hour-long meeting that followed months of negotiations. The two leaders met again this week as part of negotiations aimed at ending Russia's war in Ukraine, with both lauding their trade framework deal as an historic accomplishment. The joint statement said the deal could be expanded over time to cover additional areas and further improve market access. A senior administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to speak publicly, said European carmakers could see relief from the current US tariffs within "hopefully weeks." "As soon as they're able to introduce that legislation - and I don't mean pass it and fully implement it, but really introduce it - then we will be in a position to provide that relief. And I will say that both sides are very interested in moving quickly," they said. The joint statement was "a play to hold each other accountable" and ensure that both sides carried out the pledges announced last month, the official said. "We are trying to sequence with the European Union to make sure that they feel sufficient pressure to obtain the mandate they need to begin the legislative process for reducing their tariffs, as they've promised," the official said. "We're confident that they'll do that. It's just good for all parties to make sure that everyone's on the same page and taking actions around the same time." The statement said US tariff relief on autos and auto parts would kick in on the first day of the month in which the EU introduced the legislation, offering the prospect of retroactive relief for carmakers. It was not immediately clear when Brussels would start the legislative process. The joint statement noted that the US agreed to apply only Most Favored Nation tariffs from September 1 on EU aircraft and parts, generic pharmaceuticals and ingredients, chemical precursors and unavailable natural resources, including cork. It reiterated the EU's intention to procure $750 billion in US liquefied natural gas (LNG), oil and nuclear energy products, plus an additional $40 billion of US-made artificial intelligence chips. It also repeated the intention for EU companies to invest an additional $600 billion across US strategic sectors up to 2028. Both sides committed to address "unjustified digital trade barriers," the statement said, and the EU agreed not to adopt network usage fees. They also agreed to negotiate rules of origin to ensure that the agreement's benefits accrued predominantly to both trading partners. In addition, they said they would consider cooperation to ring-fence their respective steel and aluminum markets from overcapacity, while ensuring secure supply chains between each other, including through tariff quotas.
Irish Times
31 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Employment in Irish labour market surpasses 2.8m for first time
The number of people employed in the State has eclipsed 2.8 million for the first time, new figures show. The latest Labour Force Survey (LFS) indicated employment rose by 63,900 (or 2.3 per cent) to 2.82 million in the second quarter of 2025. This is equivalent to the entire population of the Republic in 1961. Despite slowing global demand and increased trade uncertainty linked to US tariffs, the Irish labour market continues to perform strongly with ongoing demand for workers being met by increased levels of immigration and participation. READ MORE The CSO said the labour force (the total number of people aged 15-89 years who were either employed or unemployed) stood at 2.95 million in the second quarter, up by 2.5 per cent (73,500) on the same period last year. [ Jump in unemployment dismissed as 'statistical noise' by Davy Opens in new window ] The agency said changes in the labour force are typically influenced by shifts in the size of the working-age population, also known as the demographic effect. In recent years, this has been driven by immigration, which it said contributed to an increase of 49,200 in the labour force in the year to the second quarter. Another driver was increased participation (by both men and women), which rose to 66.4 per cent, up from 66 per cent, contributing to a positive participation effect of 24,300. The estimated total number of hours worked per week in the second quarter increased by 1.6 million hours to stand at 88.9 million. The data comes in the wake of separate report last week which indicated workers here were on average working two hours less a week than before pandemic. According to the LFS, the sector that saw the largest year-on-year growth in employment was construction, which rose by 29,600 or 18 per cent. The largest decrease in employment was in the information and communication sector, which fell by 7,700 people (-4.1 per cent). The CSO said there were 140,800 people classified as unemployed in the second quarter which gave rise to an unemployment rate of 4.8 per cent, up from 4.6 per cent for the same period last year. The survey indicated that an estimated 582,000 or 20.7 per cent of those in employment worked part-time, and 153,600 or 26.4 per cent of those in part-time employment were classified as underemployed, meaning 'they would like to work more hours for more pay'.
Irish Times
31 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Where does Ireland really rank in the international rich list?
Influential international magazine the Economist produces a 'rich list' of countries each year – a league table of how income levels in different countries compare. This year Ireland was excluded, as the authors said its data was 'polluted by tax arbitrage'. This is, of course, correct. Gross domestic product (GDP) is the general measure of comparison used for such studies, and Ireland's data is completely messed up by the tax planning activities of the multinationals, which generally use intellectual property assets to declare as much profit as they can here. This is – generally - legal, but it hugely inflates Irish GDP and makes us look richer than we are. So where do we actually rank in terms of incomes compared to other countries? 1. The GDP dilemma The Economist – along with most other bodies including EU agency Eurostat, the IMF and private forecasters – take GDP as the basis for their calculation and divide it by the population to get a measure of income per head. A calculation is then generally made to adjust for different price levels in various countries. These GDP per capita figures – published by Eurostat – show Ireland in second place to Luxembourg in the EU and at about third place in the world, with Singapore also ahead. (Small territories such as Macau and Monaco also feature high up on some lists.) In cash terms, EU GDP per capita was estimated at €33,550 in 2024, while Irish GDP per capita was put at €88,600. This is before adjustment for different price levels, used in the international comparisons. READ MORE [ Ireland not a 'truly rich' country, according to The Economist Opens in new window ] This is plainly not a reflection of the actual income levels here compared to other countries. In fact, with GDP per capita here more than twice the EU average, even after adjusting for different price levels, the figures here are off the charts and best ignored. 2. Making the adjustment So how can we do better? Well, the Central Statistics Office (CSO), in consultation with other experts, developed a measure called modified gross national income (GNI) a few years ago. This factors out the impact of a few things – the intellectual property factor, aircraft leasing activity and the impact of companies which redomicile their headquarters here. If we do a rough calculation and use this figure for Ireland and GDP per head for elsewhere (in most countries there would not be much difference), then Ireland falls down the list. We move from second place, with a figure 211 per cent of the EU average, to fourth, with a figure about 24 per cent above the EU average, having been overtaken by the Netherlands and Denmark. Interestingly, when former Central Bank governor Patrick Honohan made a similar calculation in his landmark piece on the issue in 2021 – relating to 2019 data – Ireland was in eighth place (This article broadly follows the path which he set in terms of looking at this issue). The figures suggest some relative improvement in the intervening years, when economic growth here has exceeded that elsewhere in the EU, even if using statistics other than GDP. However, given the approximate nature of such calculations, it is worth noting that the four other countries that were just ahead of us in 2019 – Germany, Austria, Netherlands and Sweden – are now, on this measure, just behind us, bunched with GDP per capita between 13 and 16 per cent above the average. Does this still overstate Ireland's position? Possibly yes, as we will see below. And it is difficult to see Ireland as better-off on average than traditionally high-income states such as Germany and Sweden. It is also worth noting that what we are looking at are average figures which make no allowance for the spread of income. We know, for example, that Ireland has a group of high-income earners working for the multinational sector and for professional service firms largely reliant on that sector. This will pull up the average here. The Economist also excluded Luxembourg because of the high number of workers who travel to work in highly paid financial sector jobs there each day from surrounding states. All countries have their peculiarities, but some are more peculiar than others. 3. What we consume Another commonly used measure is to look at what people consume. As well as consumer spending – for which figures are regularly reported in Ireland – comparisons use figures which estimate the amount of money spent by the State in directly supporting households, through measures such as welfare or providing education and childcare. This is known as 'actual individual consumption', or AIC. Eurostat calculates (see map) that Ireland's AIC per capita is about the EU average - 99 per cent, to be precise. This has risen from 94 per cent since 2019. Again, this is adjusting for different price levels in different countries. Illustrating how the basis of comparison can affect the outcome in this area, the Dutch national statistics office has done its own calculation of AIC across the EU, which puts Ireland in fifth place. In cash terms it estimates the AIC here at €30,900 versus the EU average of €26,200, having made its own adjustment for different price levels. It is not clear why its result is different; the generally used figures are those from Eurostat, which were published in June. A point worth noting is the high level of savings in Irish households here, which depresses consumption figures a bit – and thus moves us down the league – but may help to support consumption in future. Over-consumption is also possible. Before the financial crash in 2008, Irish AIC surged well above the EU norm. But this was built on unsustainable borrowing and spending, fuelled by State spending based on what turned out to be transient tax revenues. 4. The conclusions What do we make of all this? A few points are clear. One is that Ireland's GDP data has become progressively more detached from reality as of the middle of the last decade. The first real indication of this was the 'Leprechaun economics' saga of 2015, when Irish GDP was adjusted upwards by more than 26 per cent, catching the attention of US economist Paul Krugman. There was another surge upwards in 2022. Ireland's 'real' economy has grown for sure, but the GDP figures have overstated this consistently. And so the actual level of GDP has got further and further detached from reality. It is now more than 40 per cent higher than modified GNI, according to the latest CSO estimates. This messes up international comparisons, affects our contributions to the EU budget and brings some unwelcome international attention here. Second, when we make adjustments, Ireland moves closer to reality, but exactly where we stand remains open to some debate. In common-sense terms, Ireland does not feel better-off than some of the higher-ranking EU countries such as Germany, Austria and Sweden. Perhaps we are in line with or just behind these countries, but ahead of Southern Europe? If we took a midpoint between the modified GNI per head and the AIC, that is where we would be left. Third, on any criteria, Ireland has made progress over the longer term and has made some relative gains since 2019. This is not to gainsay the problems, of course. The average figures make no allowance, for example, for intergenerational inequality or the problems of younger people getting on to the housing ladder. But on any of the averages measure Ireland's relative position has improved over the last five years. And finally, income is only one measure of national wellbeing. There are a lot of other factors which affect standards of living. One is wealth – the amount of property, investments and cash in the bank held by households. Others are the efficiency with which services are delivered to the public, the environment in which they live and even the weather. There are hosts of other indices which attempt to measure some of these factors – but while national income is hard to compare across countries, doing the same with wellbeing is next to impossible.
