'How Much Worse Could It Get?' Gazans Fear Full Occupation
Rumours that the Israeli government might decide on a full occupation of the Palestinian territory spread from Israel to war-torn Gaza before any official announcement, sowing fear and despair.
Like nearly all Gazans, Hamada has been displaced several times by the war, and ended up in Deir el-Balah in central Gaza, where the Israeli military carried out operations last month for the first time in the war.
"We've lived through many wars before, but nothing like this one. This war is long and exhausting, from one displacement to another. We are worn out," the woman told AFP.
Like her, Ahmad Salem, 45, wonders how things can get worse in a territory that already faces chronic food shortages, mass displacement and daily air strikes.
"We already live each day in anxiety and fear of the unknown. Talk of an expansion of Israeli ground operations means more destruction and more death," Salem told AFP.
"There is no safe space in Gaza. If Israel expands its ground operations again, we'll be the first victims," he said from a camp west of Gaza City where he had found shelter.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was to chair a meeting of his security cabinet later on Thursday to seek approval to expand military operations in Gaza, including in densely populated areas.
"We read and hear everything in the news... and none of it is in our favour," said 40-year-old Sanaa Abdullah from Gaza City.
"Israel doesn't want to stop. The bombardment continues, the number of martyrs and wounded keeps rising, famine and malnutrition are getting worse, and people are dying of hunger", she said.
"What more could possibly happen to us?"
Precisely 22 months into the devastating war sparked by Hamas's October 2023 attack, Gaza is on the verge of "generalised famine", the United Nations has said.
Its 2.4 million residents are fully dependent on humanitarian aid, and live under the daily threat of air strikes.
The Israeli army announced in mid-July that it controlled 75 percent of Gaza, including a broad strip the whole length of the Israeli border and three main military corridors that cut across the territory from east to west.
The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) says that more than 87 percent of the Gaza Strip is under unrevoked evacuation orders or designated as an Israeli military zone.
The remaining areas are the most densely populated. The city of Khan Yunis in the south, Gaza City in the north, and Deir el-Balah and its adjacent refugee camps in the centre.
"Now they speak of plans to expand their operations as if we are not even human, just animals or numbers," Abdullah laments.
"A new ground invasion means new displacement, new fear and we won't even find a place to hide", she told AFP.
"What will happen if they start another ground operation? Only God is with us."
A widening of the war "would risk catastrophic consequences for millions of Palestinians and could further endanger the lives of the remaining hostages in Gaza", senior UN official Miroslav Jenca told the Security Council on Tuesday.
The October 2023 attack that sparked the war resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, the majority of them civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures.
Israel's retaliatory offensive has killed at least 61,258 people in Gaza, mostly civilians, according to figures from the Gaza health ministry which the United Nations considers reliable. Palestinians recover what they can from the debris of an Israeli strike on the makeshift camp in Mawasi. AFP Arab and European militaries airdrop aid over bombed out buildings in central Gaza. AFP Infographic with a map of the Gaza Strip showing the parts of the territory under unrevoked evacuation orders or within Israeli militarised zones as of August 6, 2025, according to UN/OCHA AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
13 minutes ago
- DW
Germany suspends arms exports to Israel for use in Gaza – DW – 08/08/2025
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz cited Israel's plan to take over Gaza City as a reason for the decision, marking a major policy change. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said on Friday that Berlin would not approve German weapons exports to Israel for use in the Gaza Strip "until further notice." The announcement marks a major change of course for Germany, which has been one of Israel's staunchest international allies. It came as Israel's Security Cabinet approved a plan to take over Gaza City, with the government saying it was a necessary move to destroy Hamas and free the remaining hostages held in the Gaza Strip. Israel's decision has prompted international condemnation and opposition from hostage families, who say the plan endangers their loved ones. Merz reiterated that "Israel has the right to defend itself against Hamas terrorism." "The release of the hostages and determined negotiations for a ceasefire are our top priority," he said in a statement. However, "the even tougher military action by the Israeli army in the Gaza Strip" that was approved by the Israeli Security Cabinet "makes it increasingly difficult to see how these goals can be achieved," he added. With the planned expansion of Israel's offensive in Gaza, the Israeli government "bears even greater responsibility" for providing aid to civilians in the Palestinian territory, Merz said. He called for comprehensive access for UN organizations and other non-governmental institutions. Merz also said that "the German government urges the Israeli government not to take any further steps toward annexing the West Bank."
DW
an hour ago
- DW
German voters want Friedrich Merz to put pressure on Israel – DW – 08/08/2025
The monthly Deutschlandtrend poll shows little voter confidence in Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Voters want more pressure on Israel, and worry about the impact of US tariffs on the German economy. Chancellor Friedrich Merz of the center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU) has been in office for almost 100 days. This is the time to take stock of the new government's overall performance. Back in May, Merz stated in an interview that he could no longer understand what goals Israel was pursuing in the Gaza Strip. Most recently, the chancellor unequivocally called on Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu to alleviate the suffering of the approximately two million people living in the narrow coastal strip on the Mediterranean. Unlike France, the UK, and Canada, however, Germany is still hesitant to recognize a Palestinian state. On Friday, the German government imposed a partial export ban on military equipment to Israel. Germany will "not approve any exports of military equipment that could be used in the Gaza Strip until further notice," Chancellor Friedrich Merz said. Do people in Germany think this is the right course of action? According to the latest poll, a clear majority believes that the chancellor should increase pressure on Israel. However, the fate of the hostages still being held captive by the Islamist terrorist group Hamas remains the main concern. Both Merz and his predecessor, Olaf Scholz of the center-left Social Democratic Party(SPD) which is currently Merz's junior coalition partner, had always emphasized that they believed Germany still had a special responsibility for Israel's existence. But among voters surveyed this week, only 31% still think so. For the latest edition of public broadcaster "Deutschlandtrend," the opinion research institute infratest-dimap surveyed 1,321 eligible voters between August 4 and 6 of this year. Friedrich Merz has been focusing primarily on foreign policy: He visited US President Donald Trump at the White House, showed Ukraine support in its defense against Russian aggression, and called on Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu to show restraint in the Gaza Strip. Domestic policy has been focusing on the fight againstirregular immigration. The pension, nursing care and health systems are in desperate need of reform. However, the latest survey shows a lack of confidence in the government's ability to take the necessary measures to make these areas future-proof. The results of the general election on February 23 saw a rise of the far right. This trend has continued: Twenty-four percent of respondents now say they would vote for the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party. The conservative CDU/CSU bloc remains in the lead with 27%. The three other parties represented in the Bundestag, the SPD, the Greens, and the Left Party, see their numbers unchanged. Friedrich Merz has seen his popularity ratings decline. In February, before the election, voters expected Merz to effectively combat irregular immigration. Now, they are not so confident. Four out of ten respondents believe that Merz is up to the job — only his own party's supporters are truly satisfied. Over the next few years, €500 billion ($581 bn) are to be made available for new railways, roads, and better schools, with at least the same amount again for upgrading the Bundeswehr. This is a clear departure from the Conservatives' campaign promise not to take out any new loans. Only 26% of those surveyed now believe that Merz is someone who can be trusted. That is three percent less than in February. US President Donald Trump continues his sometimes drastic tariff policies. He has imposed a 15% tariff on most goods from the European Union, and 50% on steel and aluminium. The US, in turn, is exempt from tariffs on exports to the EU. This agreement with EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen is highly controversial. Germans remain concerned about economic stability. A clear majority of respondents to the latest poll are concerned or even very concerned that the US tariffs will further hurt the German economy. However, the number of people expressing concern has gone down – this is seen as a consequence of Trump's fluctuating you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter, Berlin Briefing.
Int'l Business Times
2 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Oil Industry Presence Surges At UN Plastic Talks: NGOs
Environmental NGOs are raising concerns about the growing presence of petrochemical industry lobbyists at talks to forge a global treaty to combat plastic pollution. More than 180 countries are meeting at the United Nations in Geneva in a bid to thrash out a landmark agreement aimed at tackling the scourge of plastic pollution -- looking at the full life-cycle of plastic, from production to pollution. The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) said it had counted 234 publicly disclosed fossil fuel and chemical industry lobbyists registered to attend the 10-day negotiations, which run until August 14. Industry lobbyists "should not be able to attend these negotiations," CIEL's Rachel Radvany told AFP. They have "direct conflicts of interest with the goal of the treaty." "Their interest is in maintaining plastic production -- and the industry is set to triple by 2060," she said. Dubbed INC5.2, the talks resume the fifth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee to develop a legally binding international treaty on plastic pollution, continuing negotiations that stalled last year in South Korea. CIEL, a Washington- and Geneva-based non-governmental organisation which provides legal support to developing countries, scrutinises the lists of accredited participants provided by the UN. It counted 104 fossil fuel and chemical industry lobbyists at the INC2 session in Paris in 2022; 143 at INC3 in Nairobi in 2023, and 196 at INC4 in Ottawa in April 2024. There were 220 at the supposedly final INC5.1 in Busan in South Korea in November 2024, which failed to seal a deal. The International Council of Chemical Associations (ICCA) confirmed they had 136 delegates at the talks representing the plastic, petrochemical and chemical manufacturing industries. "While we are significantly outnumbered by the more than 1,500 NGO participants, we recognise and value the UN's commitment to broad stakeholder participation as vital to achieving our shared goal of ending plastic pollution," ICCA spokesman Matthew Kastner told AFP. "Our delegates are here to listen to governments so we can understand the unique challenges they face and bring solutions." Radvany recalled that for the World Health Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, adopted in 2003, tobacco industry representatives were not allowed in during the negotiations. Green groups and have also long protested the heavy presence of oil, gas and coal lobbyists at annual UN climate talks. The burning of of fossil fuels is by far the main driver of global warming. Beyond the 234 industry lobbyists CIEL has pinpointed in Geneva, INC5.2 has 3,700 registered participants and the NGO believes there are likely many more lobbyists operating more covertly within country delegations. Some countries have delegates with titles like "third chemical engineer", which are not included in CIEL's count. Their study also does not include representatives from plastic-consuming sectors such as the food and cosmetics industries, which are also heavily represented at the negotiations. Another NGO, the International Pollutants Elimination Network (IPEN), denounced the limited seating for observers in the rooms where the technical details of the treaty are thrashed out, saying the chairs were "flooded by industry lobbyists" -- effectively preventing civil society from participating. Greenpeace staged a protest on Thursday at the UN's main entrance gate, scaling up to the roof to unveil banners reading "Big oil polluting inside" and "Plastics treaty not for sale". "Each round of negotiations brings more oil and gas lobbyists into the room. Fossil fuel and petrochemical giants are polluting the negotiations from the inside, and we're calling on the UN to kick them out," said Greenpeace delegation chief Graham Forbes. "Corporate polluters that created this problem must not be allowed to stop the world from solving it." Global plastics production could almost triple between 2019 and 2060 AFP Delegates gather for UN talks on securing a treaty on plastic pollution AFP
