Significant parts of the Constitution were quietly removed from the Congress website
Multiple outlets reported Wednesday Sections 9 and 10, and a large chunk of Section 8, had vanished from the website's annotated version.
Section 8 discusses the powers the Constitution gives Congress and Section 9 discusses the powers it denies to the legislative body. Section 10 discusses the powers the Constitution denies to the states.
Notably, Section 9 mentions the Writ of Habeas Corpus, which protects Americans from unlawful detention.
'The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it,' the Constitution reads.
In May, White House deputy chief of staff for policy Stephen Miller told reporters the Trump administration is 'looking at' suspending the writ of habeas corpus for migrants under claims of an 'invasion.'
The missing text sparked an online frenzy with Reddit users questioning what happened.
'They must think that removing those portions from their own site changes the constitution,' one Reddit user from the military subreddit r/Military wrote Wednesday morning.
One Reddit user suggested: 'Somebody kicked a plug out of a Congress.gov server (edit; not literally, but somebody who was updating congress.gov messed up) or somebody deliberately f***ed up.'
'This isn't a server problem- this is deliberate,' another replied.
The Library of Congress said the missing text was an accident.
'It has been brought to our attention that some sections of Article 1 are missing from the Constitution Annotated...website.
'We've learned that this is due to a coding error. We have been working to correct this and expect it to be resolved soon,' the library wrote on X at around 11 a.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday.
The White House did not give The Independent a comment when asked about the coding error.
No matter the intentions behind the sections' removal, the incident 'raises serious transparency concerns,' MediasTouch News wrote in an article.
The temporary glitch did not affect the validity of the laws removed from the online version of the Constitution.
The Library of Congress posted shortly after 3 p.m. the missing sections had been restored.
'Upkeep of Constitution Annotated and other digital resources is a critical part of the Library's mission, and we appreciate the feedback that alerted us to the error and allowed us to fix it,' the library wrote.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
United Airlines flights across the US hit by ground stop caused by ‘technology issue'
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
UCLA could be next college to knuckle under to Trump over antisemitism claims with $584m on the line
The University of California system will negotiate to restore the more than $300 million in federal research funding the Trump administration suspended last week, the latest step in a closely watched back-and-forth after the White House accused the University of California, Los Angeles of failing to crack down on campus antisemitism. UC president James Milliken said in a statement on Wednesday that leaders would work to protect access to $584 million in suspended and threatened funds, calling the loss of these federal dollars the 'death knell for innovative work that saves lives, grows our economy, and fortifies our national security,' while arguing the Trump administration's cuts 'do nothing to address antisemitism.' Some on campus criticized the move to negotiate with the administration over the allegations. 'We have to fight for what we believe in,' UCLA political science professor Michael Chwe, a board member of the UCLA Faculty Association, told The Wall Street Journal. 'Negotiating with such a malicious, bad-faith actor only legitimizes what they're asking for.' In a July 29 letter to the UC president's office, the Justice Department its ongoing investigation of the UC system had revealed UCLA had been 'deliberately indifferent to a hostile environment for Jewish and Israeli students' during 2024 campus protests over the Israel-Hamas war. The DOJ cited examples of students who said they faced violent harassment or were kept from crossing areas on campus for being Jewish. The letter had given the school until Tuesday to seek voluntary resolution, or UCLA would face a federal lawsuit in early September. The letter did not mention perhaps the single most violent event of those protests, in which a group of masked pro-Israel vigilantes attacked encampment protesters with blunt objects as campus and Los Angeles police stood by for hours, only intervening once many of the assailants had fled. Last month, UCLA announced it had settled a lawsuit over campus antisemitism claims in part by donating over $2 million to campus and community Jewish organizations. The school, like many universities engaged by Trump, reformed campus discipline and anti-hate training in the wake of the 2024 protests. Leaders across the state and country are holding their breath over the UC case, which marks the first time the Trump administration is suspending hundreds of millions of dollars from after a large, non-Ivy public university. Previously, its efforts have concentrated mostly on private Ivy League schools like Columbia and Brown, both of which eventually agreed to multi-million dollar payments and various campus reforms to restore their funding. Harvard, meanwhile, has challenged the administration in court over the suspended funds. .
Daily Mail
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Report: Ex-Trump investigator Robert Mueller allegedly in memory-care unit
Former FBI Director Robert Mueller, the man who led the Russia investigation into President Donald Trump, has reportedly lived in a memory-care facility for years. Muller, 80, served as the sixth director of the FBI from 2001 until 2013 and the special counsel overseeing the federal government's multi-year investigation into Russia's ties to the 2016 Trump campaign. The probe found that neither Trump nor members of his campaign team coordinated with the Russians on their interference. It did not conclude whether Trump obstructed the investigation, citing DOJ policy not to indict sitting presidents. Mueller's investigation dominated years of news coverage, and Trump frequently lashed out at the special counsel and his efforts, repeatedly labeling the effort as a 'witch hunt' and 'Russia hoax.' Now, just a few years after the bombshell report was released, Mueller is spending time in a memory-care unit, sources familiar with the matter told Real Clear Investigations. 'Sources tell me Mueller has been living in a memory-care facility for the past few years,' reporter Paul Sperry wrote on X Tuesday. The news comes as Mueller is scheduled to sit with the House Oversight Committee investigators regarding the FBI's work relating to Jeffrey Epstein next month. 'It was clear this is where things were heading when we questioned him before Congress,' ex-Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., posted on social media. 'Mueller was used by some very vicious people,' Gaetz, now a conservative TV host, continued. 'I'm not sure he really ever knew what was happening in the investigation.' Mueller testified before Congress about his report's findings in the summer of 2019. During that hearing, the former special counsel struggled at times to remember the questions from lawmakers, often asking them to repeat their inquiries. He also appeared flustered at times when trying to remember key portions of his probe. During his testimony, he forgot that Fusion GPS, an opposition research firm, was behind the infamous Steele Dossier — a file that alleged false ties between Trump and the Russians that many presume was the origin of the Trump-Russia allegations. A spokesperson for the House Oversight Committee did not respond to the Daily Mail's request for comment on whether they sent Mueller's subpoena to a memory-care unit. Still, the committee's chairman, James Comer, R-Ky., says he is expecting Mueller to show up and talk. Comer posted on his X on Tuesday that Mueller is scheduled to appear for a transcribed interview with the committee on September 2. Other top Trump and Obama administration officials will also testify in the committee's probe into Epstein. Bill and Hillary Clinton are both scheduled to sit with the committee in October. Former Attorneys General Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, Merrick Garland, and Trump's former DOJ boss Bill Barr are also expected to talk to the lawmakers. It's a spectacular move by Republicans to pressure Trump's Attorney General Pam Bondi to put out more documents related to the disgraced financier while the administration has been embroiled in controversy over 'cover-up' claims. Bondi has been blamed by both Democrats and Republicans for stalling the release of the files. The Trump administration has since hurried to find out more about the Epstein scandal. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche has met with Epstein's accomplice and longtime partner, Ghislaine Maxwell, to speak about what she knows about the late pedophile's crimes. Blanche spent several days in Florida at the detention facility where Maxwell was staying to interview the woman who is currently serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking crimes. She has repeatedly claimed she was treated wrongly during her trial, a claim that will soon be argued before the Supreme Court. Days after her meetings with Blanche, Maxwell was moved to a lower security detention center.
