logo
How Bryan Kohberger could evade the death penalty in murders of Idaho students

How Bryan Kohberger could evade the death penalty in murders of Idaho students

New York Post27-06-2025
Idaho quadruple murder suspect Bryan Kohberger might avoid the death penalty if convicted because of leaked evidence, a former prosecutor suggested.
Kohberger is accused of killing Madison Mogen, 21, Ethan Chapin, 20, Kaylee Goncalves, 21, and Xana Kernodle, 20.
Advertisement
On May 9, a television episode featured leaked information relating to the case, which Kohberger's attorney has argued will taint the jury pool.
Included in NBC's 'Dateline' special on the University of Idaho murders was surveillance video from a neighboring house, which caught a car similar to Kohberger's driving in the King Road area several times in the hours and minutes before the four college students were killed.
The episode also featured alleged evidence from a nearby FBI cellphone tower, which claimed to show that Kohberger's phone pinged nearly a dozen times near a tower providing coverage to an area within 100 feet of 1122 King Road, where the students were killed.
The phone allegedly pinged near the tower on multiple occasions between July 2022 and mid-August 2022.
Advertisement
4 Suspect Bryan Kohberger might avoid the death penalty if convicted of murder because of leaked evidence, a former prosecutor suggested.
Getty Images
4 Kohberger is accused of killing Madison Mogen (top left), Kaylee Goncalves (bottom left), Ethan Chapin (center), and Xana Kernodle (right).
Former Assistant U.S. Attorney Neama Rahmani told Fox News Digital that the leak has the potential to remove the death penalty as a punishment.
'The media leak could help Bryan Kohberger on appeal or potentially take the death penalty off the table. If the leak results in prejudicial pretrial publicity that taints the jury pool, especially if the leak was of inadmissible evidence, that's a constitutional violation,' Rahmani said.
Advertisement
Rahmani brought up the Lori Vallow Daybell case, where the judge ruled that prosecutors couldn't seek the death penalty after they didn't comply with discovery rules.
Vallow Daybell was found guilty after prosecutors alleged that she worked with Alex Cox, her brother, to murder her fourth husband, Charles Vallow, to receive money from a $1 million life insurance policy.
Here's the latest coverage on the brutal killings of four college friends:
'The other basis for appeal or to strike the death penalty would be prosecutorial misconduct or a violation of a judicial order.
Advertisement
In a recent high-profile Idaho capital case, Lori Vallow Daybell, the court ruled that prosecutors could no longer seek the death penalty because they failed to comply with their discovery obligations,' Rahmani said.
On May 15, Judge Steven Hippler said a violation of the gag order was 'likely' committed by someone involved in the case.
He ordered the prosecution and Kohberger's defense team to preserve all communications and data relating to the case, including law enforcement officers who worked on the case.
4 Judge Steven Hippler ordered the prosecution and Kohberger's defense team to preserve all communications and data relating to the case, as a violation of the gag order was 'likely' committed by someone involved in the case.
TNS
Hippler said the following pieces of evidence were revealed during the episode:
Surveillance footage of 'Suspect Vehicle One'
AT&T records for Kohberger
Content of Kohberger's cellphone
Photographs and information associated with Kohberger's Amazon account.
'Such violations not only undermine the rule of law, potentially by persons charged with upholding it, but also significantly impede the ability to seat an impartial jury and will likely substantially increase the cost to be borne by the taxpayers of Latah County to prosecute this case by extending the time it will take to seat a jury and potentially requiring lengthy period of juror sequestration,' Hippler wrote.
Kohberger's lawyer, Anne Taylor, asked Hippler to delay the trial because the jury pool could be tainted by information aired during the 'Dateline' episode, in addition to other reasons.
Advertisement
4 1122 King Road, where the students were killed.
TNS
Prosecutors argued in a court filing that the airing of information relating to the case should not be a reason to delay August's trial start date.
'Like the court in the Vallow-Daybell trial, this Court is well-equipped to select a jury, to handle ongoing media coverage, and to conduct a fair trial in the Ada County courthouse,' prosecutors wrote.
Timeline of Nov. 13, 2022:
4 a.m.: Suspect arrives at house
Between 4 and 4:17: Time of murders
4:19: Roommate calls three victims; no one answers
4:22 to 4:24: Surviving roommates text each other from inside house
4:27: Roommate calls victims again; no one answers
4:32: Roommate texts Goncalves, 'Pls answer'
10:23: Surviving roommate texts victims; no one answers
11:39: Roommate calls her father
12 p.m.: 911 call placed from roommate's phone.
Advertisement
An amended scheduling order filed in Idaho's Fourth Judicial District Court on Thursday indicated that the trial will be pushed back one week.
Jury selection will begin on Aug. 4, but opening statements are now expected on Aug. 18, one week later than the previously anticipated start date on Aug. 11.
A court spokesperson said the updated timeline was not the result of any attempt by the defense to delay the proceedings, but rather an internal scheduling adjustment by the court.
Fox News Digital reached out to Kohberger's lawyer, prosecutors and NBC for comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bryan Kohberger's Idaho murder scene unveiled through detailed 3D replica after death penalty struck
Bryan Kohberger's Idaho murder scene unveiled through detailed 3D replica after death penalty struck

Fox News

time44 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Bryan Kohberger's Idaho murder scene unveiled through detailed 3D replica after death penalty struck

Officials in Idaho released a 3D model of the house where Bryan Kohberger killed four University of Idaho students following his guilty plea. Kohberger pleaded guilty on July 2 to the murders of Ethan Chapin, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Kaylee Goncalves, in a deal which took the death penalty off the table. The four University of Idaho students were found dead on Nov. 13, 2022 at their house in Moscow, Idaho, located near campus. In exchange for the death penalty being taken off the table, Kohberger will serve four consecutive life sentences without the possibility of parole for the four counts of first degree murder and one count of felony burglary. The Latah County Prosecutors Office on Friday released images of a 3D model of 1122 King Road in Moscow, Idaho, where the murders took place. The King Road house was torn down in December 2023, but prosecutors planned on using the 3D replica during the now-canceled murder trial. During a June hearing, Thompson described the 3D house as a "dollhouse," but later said that word was inappropriate and then referred to it as a "model house." Images released by the prosecutor's office show a 3D model version of 1122 King Road, showing the exterior and interior of the house. The model replica includes rooms inside the house, but isn't furnished. According to the Idaho Statesman, the model house was approved by Hippler for use during trial, despite objections from Kohberger's defense team. However, Hippler approved the model house only for demonstrative purposes, so it couldn't be used as evidence. Following Kohberger's sentencing on July 23, Judge Steven Hippler lifted the gag order previously imposed on anyone involved with the quadruple murder case, which allowed for the release of investigative documents. Police documents released after Hippler released the gag order revealed that Goncalves and Mogen were both found together side by side. The police report said both women were "covered by a pink blanket which was covered in blood." "It was obvious an intense struggled had occurred," police wrote in another report, describing the crime scene. Authorities noted that they saw "what appeared to be defensive knife wounds on Xana's hands," adding that a tan leather knife sheath was also found.

Bryan Kohberger versus George Santos: Whom should we imprison?
Bryan Kohberger versus George Santos: Whom should we imprison?

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Bryan Kohberger versus George Santos: Whom should we imprison?

An Idaho court just sentenced Bryan Kohberger to four consecutive life terms without the possibility of parole for murdering four University of Idaho students in 2022. He will serve his time in the state's only maximum-security prison. In the world of American prisons, IMSI, as it is called, is relatively new, having opened in 1989. The oldest operating maximum security prison in the U.S. is the New Jersey State Prison, which dates back to 1798. In 1817, New York opened the Auburn Correctional Institution — the first prison to house inmates in individual cells. Famous for the Auburn System, which focused on stripping inmates of their 'sense of self,' the prison had a strict silence policy and made them wear striped uniforms. Although the mechanisms have changed, prisons throughout the U.S., including Idaho's, still don't want the incarcerated individuals to retain their individuality. Coincidentally, on the same day Kohberger was sentenced, former Representative George Santos reported to the Federal Correctional Institution Fairton in Fairton, N.J. He will be there for up to eighty-seven months, having entered a guilty plea to charges of wire fraud and aggravated identity theft. Fairton is a medium security prison that houses 800 inmates. Criminals sent to medium-security federal prisons include people 'convicted of federal drug offenses, white-collar crimes, sexual offenses, and others. As such, there are no specific medium-security prison crimes.' Nearly one-third of the federal prison population is held in medium security facilities like the one where Santos will serve time. Sentencing people like Kohberger or Santos to prison is so much a part of American life that few question whether that mode of punishment still serves us well, more than three hundred years after it came on the scene. That is a very long time to be doing the same thing to punish offenders. Perhaps we should be asking whether there isn't a better way. For both Kohberger and Santos, punishment is measured in increments of time and deprivation of liberty. For violent offenders like Kohberger, longer sentences are the norm. And imprisonment, whatever else it does, removes them from society and in so doing reduces the harm they can do. For non-violent offenders like Santos, the loss of liberty is usually for less time. But imprisonment is a dramatic rupture from the conditions of his previous, 'respectable' life. It stigmatizes him and is a form of status degradation. But time is a slippery thing. People experience time in different ways. For younger people, time tends to move more slowly than it does for older people. It tends to move faster when people do the same things day after day. That is why longer sentences may not have the punitive bite that some think they have because, over time, inmates habituate themselves to their incarceration. This suggests that two people receiving the same punishment might experience it with vastly different levels of distress. As law professor Adam Kolber argues, it is therefore 'a mistake to believe that' both more sensitive and less sensitive offenders 'receive punishments proportional to their desert,' even if they receive exactly the same punishments. Imprisonment is also a very costly endeavor. The median yearly expenditure is almost $65,000 per prisoner, with wide variations — Massachusetts spends more than $300,000 per prisoner per year and Arkansas just under $23,000. Multiply those numbers by 10, 20, 30, or more years, and you get a sense of the financial costs of imprisonment. One estimate puts the cost at $64 billion just among state governments. And the returns on this investment have not been terrific. The Sentencing Project argues that long prison terms 'are counterproductive for public safety as they result in incarceration of individuals long past the time that they have 'aged out' of the high crime years' between the late teens and early 20s. This may shift resources to housing older and less dangerous inmates instead of 'more promising crime reduction initiatives.' Over the last two decades, New Jersey, Alaska, New York, Vermont, Connecticut, California, and Michigan have reduced the number of people in their prisons by more than twenty percent. According to the Sentencing Project, 'these reductions have come about without adverse effects on public safety.' Moreover, this may be a good time to rethink the place of imprisonment in our system of criminal punishment, since incarceration rates are dropping almost everywhere. This is the result of a dramatic decline in crime rates that started three decades ago. Now, instead of building new prisons, like Idaho did 1989, states are having to shutter some of their facilities. Locking up Kohberger may still make sense even if the U.S. scales back on a long-outdated method of punishment. Santos, however, maybe not so much. Going forward, when the government wishes to incarcerate someone, it should carry the burden of proving that it is necessary and that there is no alternative effective punishment. That burden would, as it should, spur new things about why and how we punish as we do and about ways to do it that those who were there at the birth of the penitentiary could not have imagined.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store