Indonesia's rights groups urge parliament not to pass military law
Rights groups in Indonesia on Wednesday urged parliament to reject contentious revisions of military laws, saying they would take the archipelago back to an era of military domination and create legal uncertainty.
Indonesia's parliament is set to pass the law on Thursday in a plenary council after the house committee overseeing military approved the changes, which will allow armed forces personnel to hold more civilian posts.
Rights groups and student organizations called for protests outside the parliament on Thursday.
Rights group Legal Aid Institute said the revision would pull Indonesia back 30 years to an era where the late strongman Suharto used the military to dominate civilian affairs and crush dissent in the world's most populous Muslim-majority country.
'The revision is a legislative crime that threatens Indonesians and the future of democracy,' said Arif Maulana, deputy chair of the institute.
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto, a former special forces commander and Suharto's former son-in-law, has expanded the armed forces' role since taking office in October.
The government defends the bill saying it incorporated concerns and watered it down by stipulating that military officers must first resign before being placed in most civilian roles.
A lawmaker from the opposition Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle, Nico Siahaan, said the government added more agencies where active soldiers could be appointed, including the state secretariat, Attorney General's Office, as well as the counter-terrorism and narcotics agencies.
Active soldiers in the Attorney General Office would affect transparency of legal processes involving military personnel, Arif said, adding that there was a risk of armed forces using violence in civilian roles.
Allowing the military to be more involved in civilian affairs could also lead to abuse of power, human rights violations, and impunity, said Usman Hamid of Amnesty International Indonesia.
Budi Djiwandono, the deputy chief of committee overseeing the military law bill, said the government would ensure that it upholds civil supremacy.
Djiwandono, who is also Prabowo's nephew, added that no active military personnel would be placed in state-owned companies, dismissing concerns they would be involved in business.
The opposition party urged all parties to monitor the implementation of the law to ensure no further expansion of military roles, Siahaan said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Saudi Gazette
6 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
Trump signs ban on travel to US by nationals from 12 countries
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump signed a proclamation Wednesday evening to ban travel from several countries to the US, citing security risks. The ban will fully restrict entry of nationals from 12 countries: Afghanistan; Myanmar, also known as Burma; Chad; Republic of the Congo; Equatorial Guinea; Eritrea; Haiti; Iran; Libya; Somalia; Sudan; and Yemen. People from seven countries will have partial restrictions: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. The proclamation includes exceptions for lawful permanent residents, existing visa holders, certain visa categories and individuals whose entry serves US national interests. The president made the final call on signing the proclamation after the antisemitic attack in Boulder, Colorado, according to a White House official. He was considering it beforehand, but Sunday's assault put it into motion faster. 'President Trump is fulfilling his promise to protect Americans from dangerous foreign actors that want to come to our country and cause us harm,' White House deputy press secretary Abigail Jackson wrote on X. 'These commonsense restrictions are country-specific and include places that lack proper vetting, exhibit high visa overstay rates, or fail to share identity and threat information,' she wrote. Trump said in a video posted Wednesday that new countries could be added to the travel ban as 'threats emerge around the world.' 'The list is subject to revision based on whether material improvements are made. And likewise new countries can be added as threats emerge around the world, but we will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm and nothing will stop us from keeping America safe,' the president said. The proclamation takes effect at 12:01 a.m. on June 9, according to the White House. Wednesday's proclamation comes less than five months after the president was inaugurated. On his first day in office, he issued an executive order directing cabinet members, including the secretary of state, to compile a list of countries 'for which vetting and screening information is so deficient as to warrant a partial or full suspension on the admission of nationals from those countries.' In his first term, Trump barred travelers from seven majority-Muslim nations from coming to the US, a policy that saw court challenges before President Joe Biden repealed it when he took office in 2021. The barring of nationals from Afghanistan could impact Afghans who worked alongside the US during its two decades of war there. Tens of thousands of Afghans have already been caught in limbo due to other Trump administration executive orders suspending the US refugee admissions program and the suspension of foreign aid funding for flights of Afghan Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) holders. Shawn Vandiver, the founder of #AfghanEvac, a leading US coalition of resettlement and veterans' groups, said the travel ban 'disproportionately affects families and individuals seeking lawful entry into the US.' The proclamation 'is a strategic move, not a response to an immediate threat,' Vandiver said in a statement. The ban also sparked criticism from the governments of impacted countries. Venezuela's Minister of Interior, Justice and Peace said on Wednesday that being in the US 'is a big risk for anyone, not just Venezuelans.' 'If you're really that foolish, then go to the United States,' Diosdado Cabello said on government TV, Reuters news agency reported. Oxfam, meanwhile, warned that the proclamation 'marks a chilling return to policies of fear, discrimination, and division.' The ban will deny entry to the US for individuals and families fleeing war and persecution, 'forcing them to remain in dangerous conditions,' Abby Maxman, Oxfam America's President and CEO, said in a statement. — CNN
Saudi Gazette
21-05-2025
- Saudi Gazette
Bail for Indian professor arrested for comments on India-Pakistan conflict
NEW DELHI — India's top court has granted interim bail to an Indian professor who was arrested over his remarks about the recent military hostilities between India and Pakistan. Ali Khan Mahmudabad, an associate professor at Ashoka University, was arrested from his home in Delhi on Sunday. He has been accused of endangering national sovereignty and promoting enmity between groups, based on a complaint filed by a youth member of the governing Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). He denies the allegations. On Wednesday, the Supreme Court ordered Mahmudabad's release but refused to put a hold on the investigation against him. "Having regard to the two online posts that have led to the FIR [complaint], we are satisfied that no case of staying the investigation is made out," the court said, adding that a three-member special investigation team will further look into the case. The judges have also barred Mahmudabad from writing any online article or making speeches online related to the posts that are being investigated. Shortly after the verdict, Ashoka University released a statement saying it was "heartened" by the court's decision to grant Mahmudabad bail. "It has provided great comfort to his family and all of us at Ashoka University," it said. Mahmudabad's arrest had sparked criticism from academics and rights groups, who called the allegations "baseless" and the arrest a form of "censorship". The case stems from two public social media posts written by Mahmudabad, in which he talked about India's military action against Pakistan. Earlier this month, tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbors reached an unprecedented high after India launched air strikes against Pakistan in response to a deadly attack in the tourist town of Pahalgam in Indian-administered Kashmir that killed 26 people. Delhi accused Islamabad of supporting militant groups involved in the killings, a charge Pakistan denied. This was followed by four days of military escalations, which ended with a ceasefire brokered by the US. "There are those who are mindlessly advocating for war," the 42-year-old professor wrote in one post on 8 May, "but they have never seen one, let alone lived in or visited a conflict zone". In the same post, he expressed support for India's response while warning of the brutality inherent in any war. He also highlighted the significance of two women officers -- one of whom is Muslim -- presenting the operation's details during daily media briefings. "I am very happy to see so many right-wing commentators applauding Colonel Sofiya Qureshi," he wrote, but "they should also demand that the victims of mob lynching, arbitrary demolitions [of houses], others who are victims of the BJP's hate mongering be protected as Indian citizens". Several rights groups have pointed out that there has been a rise in violence and hate speech against Muslims in India in the past decade. Two police complaints have been filed against the professor based on the interpretation of his online remarks. The first complaint was filed by a BJP youth activist Yogesh (he uses only one name), on Saturday, on the basis of which Mahmudabad was arrested, his lawyer Mohammad Nizam Pasha said. While the second complaint was filed by Renu Bhatia, the head of Haryana's State Commission for Women on Sunday. The women's commission first issued a notice to the professor on 12 May, alleging that Mahmudabad's social media posts had "disparaged" the two women defense officers and "undermined their role" in the armed forces. In response, Mahmudabad sent a written reply to the commission's notice and his lawyers also appeared before the commission on 14 May, but it refused to hear the lawyers, Pasha said. In his written response, which he shared on social media, the academic said that his remarks had been "misunderstood" and that, contrary to the allegations, his post had actually praised the decision to have two women officers lead the military briefings. "There is nothing remotely misogynistic about my comments that could be construed as anti-women," he said. Several academics, activists, opposition politicians and civil society members have spoken against Mahmudabad's arrest. Mahmudabad is a teacher of political science and his known for his works on religion, with a focus on Indian Muslim history. He comes from an aristocratic family from Uttar Pradesh state and is a member of the regional Samajwadi Party. After his arrest, Samajwadi Party leader Akhilesh Yadav posted a couplet on X, which included an indirect reference to the professor being arrested for telling the truth. President of the main opposition Congress party, Mallikarjun Kharge, said the arrest of the professor shows how the BJP is "fearful" of any opinion disliked by them. — BBC
Arab News
20-05-2025
- Arab News
Indian boycotts grow of Turkish coffee, chocolates and fashion
MUMBAI: Small Indian grocery shops and major online fashion retailers are boycotting Turkish products ranging from chocolates, coffee, jams and cosmetics to clothing amid growing anger at Turkiye's support for Pakistan in a confrontation with India. Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan expressed public solidarity with Pakistan, another majority-Muslim country, after India conducted military strikes in response to a militant attack in Indian-administered Kashmir. Cross-border fighting continued for four days before a ceasefire was declared., On Monday, the All India Consumer Products Distributors Federation (AICPDF), which supplies 13 million mom-and-pop grocery stores, said it was launching an 'indefinite and total boycott' of all Turkish-origin goods, which would affect chocolates, wafers, jams, biscuits and skincare products. Indian fashion websites owned by Walmart-backed Flipkart and billionaire Mukesh Ambani's Reliance have removed numerous Turkish apparel brands, according to three sources and a review of their websites Flipkart's fashion website Myntra removed listings of Turkish brands including Trendyol, known for women's clothing, street and casual wear brand LC Waikiki and jeans producer Mavi, said one source with direct knowledge. Myntra removed the brands 'in the national interest' without Walmart's involvement, a second source with direct knowledge said. Reliance's fashion website AJIO also removed Turkish brands, including Trendyol, Koton, LC Waikiki from its app, and many of those listings were shown as out of stock on Monday. A source cited 'national sentiments' as a reason. Flipkart, Reliance Retail and the Turkish brands Trendyol, LC Waikiki, Koton and Mavi did not respond to requests for comment. India has not ordered companies to boycott Turkiye, and India's annual $2.7 billion in goods imports from Turkiye are dominated by mineral fuels and precious metals. But a consumer boycott could still be significant. AICPDF said its ban would affect around 20 billion rupees ($234 million) of food products. Apparel imports were worth $81 million last year, according to the Trading Economics reference website. Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu, chief minister of Himachal Pradesh, one of India's biggest apple-growing states, said on Monday he would ask for a ban on apple imports from Turkiye, which were worth around $60 million last year. Moreover, last week Flipkart said it was suspending flight, hotel and holiday package bookings to Turkiye 'in solidarity with India's national interest and sovereignty.' Indians have been canceling holidays to Turkiye and New Delhi has canceled the security clearance of the Turkish-based aviation ground handling firm Celebi. Reuters reported on Friday that Air India was lobbying Indian officials to disallow rival IndiGo's leasing tie-up with Turkish Airlines, citing business impact as well as security concerns sparked by Ankara's support for Pakistan.
