A Revolut user encounters ‘evasive' customer service after €1,850 fraud
Vodafone
Ireland to report poor wifi and was promised a call back from a technician.
The following day the call she was expecting came – or so she thought – but what happened next has left her traumatised and substantially poorer.
The caller referenced the wifi issue 'and said she was eligible for a refund,' her son writes. 'She was sent a text link and asked to click it to 'verify' the refund.'
She did as she was asked to do by the person claiming to be from Vodafone but after following the link and inputting some key details her banking app was compromised, her
Revolut
account remotely accessed and €1,850 sent to a sterling account in the UK.
READ MORE
'She immediately reported it to Revolut, Vodafone, and An Garda Síochána, submitting screenshots of all the suspicious activity, a signed statement and the full context of the scam,' her son writes.
He tells us that she was asked by Revolut 'to upload this same dossier five times [and] Revolut never called her, despite promising to'.
He describes Revolut's support system as 'opaque and evasive, consisting of scripted replies and AI loops, with no clear case management or human escalation'.
He says that when he asked 'a basic admin question – what documents are needed to file a fraud report in Ireland – they refused to answer, citing GDPR, even though I never asked about her account,' he says.
[
'Sorry you lost the money': Couple loses thousands of euro of wedding savings in Revolut 'ordeal'
Opens in new window
]
He also says Vodafone has 'not yet explained how someone knew about the wifi complaint and used that to engineer the scam'.
Our reader points out that the funds 'were sent to another Revolut account, raising questions about their fraud controls and whether the funds were frozen.
'At this point, we just want honest answers and a fair process. My mum has done everything asked of her, but she's getting nowhere – and it feels like the system is built to exhaust people into giving up.'
He says that 'everything is handled by bots with repeated requests for the same info, vague timelines, and generic cut-and-paste responses. Even now, weeks later, she still hasn't received a proper update, and it's genuinely shaken her confidence in using digital banking at all. It's an insane system and the fact you can't talk to a human is ludicrous.'
He says that when Revolut wanted his business account, 'the office would receive regular phone calls and emails from reps looking for the business. How could they not provide the same support to existing clients? Has Revolut quietly built a wall between customers and accountability?'
There are two troubling strands to this scam.
Did the criminals know she had contacted Vodafone and were able to time their first contact with her to coincide with the exact time she was expecting a call from that company?
And why are the systems that Revolut have in place so opaque and why has it proved to be impossible for this family to speak to a human being or even get a sense that Revolut is addressing this issue with the seriousness that it deserves?
First we contacted Vodafone and shared the details of this scam with them. The company checked its systems and said that there was no evidence of a data breach on its side and a spokesman could not definitively say how it was that our reader – or at least their mother – would receive a call purporting to be from Vodafone less than 24 hours after she had contacted the company.
It could be simple coincidence. Scammers make many, many such calls everyday and they must sometimes get lucky.
We also contacted Revolut.
In a statement the company said it was sorry for this person's experience 'and any instance where our customers are targeted by ruthless and sophisticated criminals. Revolut takes fraud, and the industry-wide risk of customers being coerced by organised criminals, incredibly seriously. Each potential fraud case concerning a Revolut customer is carefully investigated and assessed independently of other cases.'
The statement stresses that it has 'a fervent focus on improving the customer experience at Revolut, and the protection of our customers' money is paramount to that. We provide customer support 24/7 in-app via chat because it is the most secure method to communicate with customers, and helps to ensure that they can be certain they are connected with a member of our team.
'Any reported fraud automatically triggers human intervention from our customer service team, ensuring a user's case is handled by skilled live agents with expertise in financial crime.'
It said that in recent months it had introduced in-app calls 'to give users a secure way to engage with our customer service team over the phone and help them to expose phone call scams.'
Revolut said that last year it had prevented more than €700 million in potential fraud against customers by implementing in-app calls, real-time AI fraud-detection systems, transaction limits, in-app warnings and delayed payments for suspicious transactions, biometric authentication requirements, and providing educational resources to help consumers remain informed about potential risks.
'Revolut's financial crime prevention team now represents almost a third of our global workforce and, alongside many other payments firms, we deploy a number of different interventions that are solely designed to 'break the spell' of scammers and fraudsters,' it said.
'Whilst Revolut is unable to comment on the specifics of these interventions, so as to not provide any insight that could help ruthless criminals socially engineer their victims and bypass these, we are constantly innovating and testing a range of eye-catching warnings.
'While we are fully determined to protect our customers as best we can through our fraud prevention technologies, and go to every length to ensure scams are avoided, there is no denying that fraud is an industry-wide issue that needs to be tackled at source, particularly by the telecoms companies and social media apps that are enabling this. Banks and financial institutions should be the last line of defence, not the only line of defence.'
The story does have a happier-than-expected outcome. Initially the company wrote to her and outlined its processes and the steps it had taken to prevent any suspicious transactions taking place before determining that it was not at fault and as such no money would be refunded.
A day later we heard back from our reader again. 'You won't believe this. We went from that email yesterday to my mother getting her cash paid back today.'
In a letter the company sent to her a representative said that 'upon further investigation of your case, we have identified a mistake in how it was previously handled. Subsequently, we have reclassified the situation as an account-takeover fraud and organised a full reimbursement of €1891.50 along with €150 as a compensation for the stress caused by the whole situation. The payment was sent directly to your Revolut account.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Letters to the Editor, July 10th: On smaller apartments, the cost of crying and blackberries
Sir, –While I applaud the Minister for Housing's hope that apartment prices will 'likely' fall by €50,000-€100,000 in 'some' cases due to the newly allowed reduction in apartment sizes, the reality is that new lower limits will only allow developers to make more money fitting more apartments per floor into the same footprint of building. If the initiative is required due to current size limits preventing projects from proceeding on project viability grounds, pricing should not actually drop at all. Either previously unviable projects will now go ahead, or unit prices will drop, but you certainly won't get both The Minister should note that once out, this genie will be impossible to put back in the bottle, and he has just set the standard for future housing stock in Ireland and how we will live for decades to come. READ MORE I think 67m2 for a two-bedroom apartment is tiny. You will have nowhere to put a pram, a couple of suitcases, (critical these days) have a desk to work from home on or let alone perhaps have something like a piano. And this way of living will now become the norm. My favourite bit is that the Government seems not to have undertaken any research on the degree to which these size limits have worked overseas. Yes, I understand the pressures the Government is under to improve the supply of housing, but I believe this move will benefit the developers at the expense of how future generations will have to live. – Yours, etc, NEIL POWER, Sydney, Australia. Sir, – The new apartment design guidelines and the existing urban design guidelines for apartment heights barely mention fire safety. The new guidelines expressly provide that the number of lift and stair cores should be 'balanced' by reference to the cost of providing them and the need to comply with building regulations. The 2022 legislation in the UK, introduced following the deaths of 72 people in the Grenfell disaster, radically changed the regulation of the design, construction and occupation of buildings, particularly high-rise and apartment buildings. For example, a second staircase will be required in high-rise residential buildings from 2026, and safety in high-rise residential buildings will be actively promoted and enforced by extensive legal requirements. This followed a root and branch review in the UK of building regulations and building control, which were found to be not fit for purpose after the Grenfell fire. In Ireland, no such review has been carried out despite the similarities between Irish and UK law. It is not clear how building regulations requirements have been considered in the preparation of the new guidelines, which prompts the question: is the Government now prioritising 'viability' over a visible commitment to safer buildings, and ignoring lessons from elsewhere? DR DEIRDRE NÍ FHLOINN, Goatstown, Dublin 14. Sir, – Our Minister for Housing 'takes decisive action' to deal with the housing crisis (which has been developing on Fine Gael/Fianna Fáil's watch for decades). He plans to cut design standards to shrink apartments, allow fewer windows, make mono blocks of bedsits, have less ventilation, reduce community facilities and worse. He claims that this will reduce prices – of course it won't. It seems that the developers' lobby has directly written these pitiful new 'standards'. Can I suggest a radical solution to the Minister: export our young people (as they won't be able to afford anywhere to live), strip them of voting rights (as when abroad, they can't vote), and then continue to bury his head in the sand (as the demographic disaster unfolds). – Yours, etc, TOM CONROY, Rathgar, Dublin 6. Sir, – On June 27th, Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers suggested that cost should take priority over aesthetics in future State infrastructure projects. Today, Minister for Housing James Browne is proposing to reduce the minimum size of studio apartments to 32 sq m. I wonder how either of these gentlemen would react were they obliged to live in a 32sqm concrete box with only one window and limited outdoor space? Not too happily, I imagine. – Yours etc, MUIREANN HOURIHANE, Sandymount, Dublin. Sir, – In a recent column Senator Michael McDowell yet again decries the 16-year-old decision by the 2009 government to abolish bedsits. (' Folly of abolishing bedsits only to promote co-living is now becoming clear ,' July 2nd). He claims 'as many as 15,000 bedsits disappeared around that time.' There does not appear to be any evidence for this assertion. Let's not be romantic about these cramped, often damp dwellings of the past. A bedsit usually took the form of a small one-room flat in a large, converted property with shared sanitary – and sometimes shared cooking – facilities in another part of the residence. They were often of a poor standard, badly insulated, with questionable fire safety and with limited to no living space, storage, privacy, or peace. These bedsits certainly cannot be compared to house share scenarios – as the author does – where a small group of tenants share a family kitchen, living room and bathroom in a single residential unit, with multiple rooms. It is worth remembering that the 2009 government provided a four-year lead-in period before the bedsit ban was to take effect, and it was made at a time when we had an oversupply of private rental housing and decreasing rents. While some landlords did not take this time to upgrade their properties to meet the required standards, there was a sufficient supply of rental housing for 'bedsit' tenants to relocate to at the time. The key reason for the change was to improve living conditions for tenants. It is also worth noting that the government in which Senator McDowell served as a minister, between 2002 and 2007, when the economy was booming, failed to increase social housing supply in any significant way, eking out an average of about 6,400 units a year. This is despite the recommendation by the National Economic and Social Council, at the time, that the State deliver over 9,000 units a year between 2005 and 2012. This was within the then government's gift, until at least 2007, but they chose not to pursue this recommendation. A greater folly. Not only this, but the then government also oversaw the sale of approximately 1,400 council houses each year under the tenant purchase scheme, effectively reducing State availability of social housing to a mere 5,000 units a year, a little over half of what was required. The folly of failing to invest in social housing at the time when Senator McDowell was in government casts a much greater shadow over Ireland's current dire housing situation than the decision to remove substandard housing from the market. – Yours, etc, JOHN-MARK MCCAFFERTY, Chief executive, Threshold, Dublin. Is this a record? Sir, – On July 5th, I picked seven fully ripe wild blackberries. Is this a record? – Yours, etc, TIM BRACKEN. Cork. Teacher shortages Sir, – Yet again, the teacher supply crisis makes headlines in your newspaper (' Teaching 'supply crisis' leaves 1,847 posts unfilled, ', July 7th). This issue has persisted for well over a decade. As far back as 2012, an international review panel noted it was 'surprised and concerned that the issue of teacher supply and demand has not been addressed in Ireland as it has been elsewhere '...one impact of the absence of reliable data on both supply and demand for teachers has been the increasing reliance on 'out-of-field' teachers at post-primary level.' How long must the public wait for the Government to acknowledge the catastrophic impact of the teacher supply crisis and to take meaningful action to address it? – Yours, etc, DR BRIAN FLEMING, PROF JUDITH HARFORD, School of Education, UCD, Dublin. The presidency Sir, – I thought I should let your readers know that I will also not be seeking a nomination to run for the presidency. – Yours, etc, PETER GAUGHAN, Monkstown, Co Dublin. The cost of crying Sir, – Rachel Reeves crying in the House of Commons cost me €54. Kathy Sheridan's piece about politicians crying in public and how the markets react negatively, whilst voters are generally supportive or indifferent to a crying politician (' The state of the world calls for more weeping, not less ', July 9th), resonates with me. Sterling fell dramatically after Ms Reeves's Commons appearance. As a permanent resident in the Republic, my British company pension is the same sterling amount each month but what I actually receive in euros varies according to the whims of the currency markets. Ms Reeves spooked them and I suffered. If Ms Reeves could contrive to make a robust Commons appearance just before my next pension payment I would be delighted. – Yours, etc, KENNETH HARPER, Co Donegal. Injecting some sense into Botox Sir, – Can we bring a little common sense to the 'Botox' discussion (Letters, July 8th)? The 'median lethal dose' of toxin Brian O'Brien refers to (1x nanogram/kg) would require the injection of over 200 (1 treatment) vials of Botox for a female of average weight. Precisely why I choose a nurse to administer my Botox! Nurses inject daily, more than any other healthcare professional. A small syringe of morphine incorrectly drawn up, would be more likely to cause death than 200 vials of Botox. – – Yours, etc, Ciarán Farrell, Rathfarnham, Dublin 16. Anti-Semitism arguments Sir, – Some of your recent correspondents (Letters, July 9th) appear to have missed the core argument of Fintan O'Toole's article on Ireland's history of opposing anti-Semitism. (' Ireland has a proud history of opposing anti-Semitism ,' July 8th) The piece was not a denial that anti-Semitism exists in Ireland, but rather a powerful reminder that Irish solidarity with Jewish people has historically been grounded in a belief in universal rights and opposition to all forms of oppression. That tradition, as O'Toole made clear through the examples of Daniel O'Connell and Michael Davitt, does not pit opposition to oppression of Jewish people against concern for Palestinians. It is rooted in the understanding that justice is indivisible and that the suffering of one people does not justify the silencing of another. Protesting about the suffering of people in Gaza is not evidence of anti-Semitism. On the contrary, it is a continuation of the same ethical tradition that once compelled Irish figures to speak out against pogroms in Tsarist Russia. It is also unfortunate that The Irish Times saw fit to place other letters criticising the Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu and US foreign policy under the heading 'Anti-Semitism and Ireland.' Such framing reinforces the very conflation the article sought to challenge: the idea that criticism of Israel, no matter how grounded in human rights concerns, must somehow be suspect. – Yours, etc, SÉAMUS WHITE, Stoneybatter, Dublin. Sir, – James Wilson points out in his critique of Fintan O'Toole's article that last year a man was 'allegedly' set upon by anti-Semitic thugs because he was of the Jewish faith. This same level of allegation has been used repeatedly by the Israeli army to bomb hospitals, refugee camps, apartment buildings and more, because they were 'allegedly' being used by Hamas. I would like to take this opportunity to point out to Mr Wilson, and all the other correspondents who have attacked us Irish as anti-Semitic, that we really don't care what religion you may or may not subscribe to, but we are very much opposed to the killing of 57,000-plus Palestinians, regardless of what allegations are made. – Yours, etc, Dómhnaill Banks, Rathgar, Dublin 6. Sir, – Could anyone please furnish an instance where anyone has criticised Israel without being accused of being anti-Semitic? – Yours, etc, JOHN CRONIN, Terenure, Dublin 6W. Galway film fleadh and An Gaeilge Sir, – There is a revival of sorts in recent years in the Irish language which is very welcome. We have seen the success of films like An Cailín Ciúin which can stand on their own irrespective of what language is used in the film. This year the Galway Film Fleadh, now under way, is showing 11 films as Gaeilge, double last year's number. This points to a very healthy state of Irish language productions. The band Kneecap is popularising An Ghaeilge especially with young people. This is a far cry from the attitude of my fellow classmates to the language when we studied Peig nearly 50 years ago in secondary school. This year for the first time the Galway International Arts Festival have Gaeilge ambassadors volunteering at events to encourage people to use their cúpla focal irrespective of their fluency in the language. There will be a pop up Gaeltacht each day in the festival garden in Eyre Square between 1pm and 2pm. The use of An Ghaeilge is becoming more mainstream. It may be small steps,but people's attitudes to the language are changing. We have a long way to go before we experience the kind of revival that the Welsh language has undergone in Wales but as the seanfhocal says 'De réin a chéile a thógtar na caisleáin'. – Yours, etc, TOMMY RODDY, Galway. Praise the Lord Sir, –The Irish Times wouldn't be the same without the Dáil Sketch by Miriam Lord. Her light-hearted reporting on the sometimes dull proceedings in the Dáil is always a pleasure to read. She is a treasure and a lady as well as a Lord. – Yours, etc, TONY CORCORAN, Rathfarnham, Dublin 14. Climate change? Sir, – I note that a regular contributor to this letters page, (name supplied) has migrated to the Irish Independent letters page this morning. Is this an effect of climate change? – Yours, etc, BEN Mc CABE, Ranelagh, Dublin 6.
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Vacant property in central Dublin
Sir, – What is it about the Irish tax code (or the broader set of incentives faced by property owners in Ireland, Dublin especially) that makes it more lucrative to leave properties derelict, often for many years, rather than develop them for retail or, better yet, housing? On a recent visit to Dublin, I was struck by the number of derelict buildings on almost every street in the city centre. On the same trip I visited Madrid, and in an evening ramble around central Madrid I failed to see a single derelict site. Is there not some low hanging fruit here that could be picked to quickly address the housing problem in Dublin? – Yours, etc. READ MORE MARK A WYNNE, Dallas, Texas.
Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
NORAID: Irish America and the IRA review: Few are as committed to the spilling of blood in Ireland as those who never set foot here
The makers of NORAID: Irish America and the IRA , RTÉ 's flashy new two-part documentary about the Provisionals' support base in North America, say they want to 'tell a story that is misunderstood or not known at all'. But of course, anyone who was alive during the Troubles will remember only too well how elements within Irish America helped fund the IRA's campaign and, in so doing, contributed to the bombings of civilians, the kneecappings, the murder of Gardaí and the sectarian campaign against Protestant farmers along the border. How shocking to think this part of history might be in danger of slipping between the cracks of popular recollection. The film (RTÉ One. 9.35pm) doesn't quite paint Noraid – a contraction of 'Irish Northern Aid Committee' – as misunderstood heroes. However, it might have gone further in making explicit what they were supporting. That is, the slaughter of pensioners on Remembrance Sunday, the kidnapping and murder of businessmen, industrial-scale bank robbery. That isn't to absolve the British state of its sins in the North , its backing of loyalist death squads or the stain of colonialism, as dark as not-quite-dried blood. But the documentary does not convey, or even really acknowledge, the horror the overwhelming majority of people in Ireland felt at the time towards the Provos. And that is relevant to the story, as it also explains the widespread revulsion towards Noraid. If anything, the first of two episodes leans ever so subtly towards the Che Guevara version of history – never mind the body count; look at the cool poster we got out of it. READ MORE Hipster touches abound as the producers play up the New York element of the story. The Beastie Boys feature on the soundtrack, and the title cards are modelled on old cop shows. These are flourishes that do not always sit well with the grim subject matter. Still, there are flashes of humour, too – such as when activists recall arranging for senior members of the republican movement in Belfast to be interviewed by one of America's most widely-read journals, Playboy. Meanwhile, taxi driver John McDonagh remembers booking an ad in Times Square supporting the IRA – it finished with the initials 'UTP'. This spelt 'Up the Provos', though the company that took the booking thought it meant 'Up the Pope'. 'They never asked me what type of charity,' McDonagh says. 'I said I wanted to send season's greetings to the Irish people. They never asked what type of Irish people. I didn't offer what type.' If the film doesn't take a strong enough stand on the Provos, it does give a voice to senior Noraid figures and allows them to communicate their views uncritically. It introduces Martin Galvin, a lawyer and leading figure in Noraid. He was banned from entering Northern Ireland but went anyway in 1984. In the riot that followed his appearance at a rally in West Belfast, British security forces shot dead a protester with a rubber bullet. Galvin obviously wasn't to blame for the bloody excesses of the British security establishment. However, the violence would not have broken out had he not been there. 'We support Irish freedom ... the only way the British are going to leave Ireland is for the fight to be successful,' Galvin says – seemingly cleaving to the old republican shibboleth as seeing the British as an entirely external force and ignoring the inconvenient presence of a million unionists. Still, it is revealing to learn that Galvin and other Noraid members are far removed from the misty-eyed Irish-American stereotype. Noraid was largely based in New York, and its members have the hard-bitten qualities of characters from a Scorsese movie. That said, modern Sinn Féin's hipster-Marxist axis won't be thrilled to learn that Noraid expunged any hint of socialism from imported copies of An Phoblacht because that sort of thing would not have gone down well with Irish Americans. Nor do the producers address the uncomfortable fact that Irish America – so keen on the physical force of republicanism – would go on to become a power base for Donald Trump and, thus of 21st century Neo-Fascist. Interviewed today, Galvin is unapologetic and still retains some of the firebrand qualities that are a feature of his archive appearances. The documentary is also careful to point out that while Noraid organised fundraisers for Sinn Féin, it never supplied arms to the Provos. The task of smuggling guns across the Atlantic fell to organised criminals. That story will be told in part two and will touch on the role of Whitey Bulger (as later played on screen by Johnny Depp). But part one provides a fascinating portrait of a crucial element of the struggles – of true believers from across the sea who seemed to fancy themselves more Irish than those in the 26 counties who didn't much care about the Constitutional status of the North, only that people stopped dying. 'What I've found is the diaspora make a serious attempt to understand the Irish culture, whereas a lot of people that are actually from the island of Ireland have never made an attempt to understand the diaspora culture,' says Chris Byrne, a former New York cop and republican sympathiser. It is a reminder few are as committed to the spilling of blood in Ireland as those who never set foot here.
