John Swinney will NOT back assisted dying bill when MSPs vote on the legislation on Tuesday
The First Minister said he will oppose the bill when it is voted on by MSPs for the first time on Tuesday.
Announcing his decision to journalists in the Scottish Parliament, he also cited concerns about the impact on people who feel they are a 'burden' on their families and the State, as well as the impact on the relationship patients have with doctors and the risk that the legislation may end up being extended further in the future.
He also spoke emotionally about his wife Elizabeth Quigley, who has multiple sclerosis, and said he couldn't contemplate having a discussion with her about the issue.
Mr Swinney said: 'I have come to the conclusion that I cannot support the bill and will be voting against it on Tuesday.
'There are three fundamental reasons why I have come to that conclusion. Firstly, I am concerned that passage of this legislation will fundamentally alter the relationship between patients and clinicians.
'In my view there is a real danger of undermining the role that we all believe is effectively performed by medical professionals of protecting and enhancing human life.
'If any possibility or indeed obligation is applied to medical professionals to advise patients about assisted dying I judge that the relationship between doctor and patient would be changed in an irrevocable and detrimental fashion.
'Secondly, I am concerned that those who are vulnerable in our society and those who may consider themselves a burden to their families or to the State may feel undue pressure to end their life prematurely.
'I am very careful of the views of many individuals and organisations on this point and I can see no means of avoiding such a situation emerging in relation to the bill.
'Thirdly, as much as I recognise the efforts to tightly define the bill, if a decision is taken to pass this legislation then I am not sufficiently confident that there will be no further developments through the judicial process that could see the provisions of the bill extended to take in other broader circumstances that would extend the intentions of parliament, and I would not wish to enable such undesirable situation to develop.'
MSPs will have a free vote when Liberal Democrat Liam McArthur's proposals are voted on at stage one on Tuesday and Mr Swinney insisted he did not want to influence anyone's vote but felt people were keen to hear his views as First Minister.
Mr Swinney said his Christian faith was part of his judgement when considering the issue, which he previously voted against twice, but said the consideration he gave this time was 'incredibly difficult'.
When asked if he had discussed the issue with his wife, a BBC journalist, Mr Swinney said: 'I couldn't contemplate having the conversation about the question of assisted dying with my wife knowing the health challenges that she faces and the fact that, as you all know, she has terminal illness. I could not contemplate that conversation.'
Mr McArthur said: 'Given John Swinney's position on this issue in the past, I have always been aware that I was unlikely to win his support.
'Nevertheless, I would like to thank him for his considered approach, the time he has taken to discuss the issue with me and his recognition that in this vote he does not speak for his party but solely on a personal basis.
'He will know that this is an issue on which an overwhelming majority of people of Scotland believe a change in the law is required.
'Public polling is consistent across age range, disability status, geographic area and religious belief: Scots want a change in the law to allow terminally ill people the choice of an assisted death.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
JK Rowling blasts Sturgeon memoirs as a 'shameless denial of reality and hard facts' in scathing review
They have long been locked in a bitter war of words over the gender debate. Now author JK Rowling has penned a scathing review of Nicola Sturgeon 's hotly anticipated memoirs on the day it was officially launched. The Harry Potter author, who famously wore a t-shirt labelling the former first minister a 'destroyer of women's rights', posted the expletive-riddled assessment of 'Frankly' on her website last night. Ms Rowling tore into the former First Minister's 'stubborn' attachment to her controversial gender reform legislation, her inability to face up to her failures in office and 'Trumpian' accounts of political events. The women's right campaigner wrote: 'She remains stubbornly wedded to her belief that it is possible to let some men into women's spaces on the men's say so, without letting any man who fancies it come inside. 'She denies there are any risks to a policy of gender self-identification. She can't imagine any male predator capitalising on such policies, in spite of the fact that it has, demonstrably, happened many times. 'She is flat out Trumpian in her shameless denial of reality and hard facts.' 'While Sturgeon is focused on making sure no hurty sexist words penetrate hers, she's entirely dismissive of the harms done in actual physical spaces, where she expected nurse Sandie Peggie to deal with a heavy menstrual flood in front of a cosplaying man, and vulnerable female prisoners to accept being incarcerated with trans-identified male sex offenders. 'The First Minister, with her police protection, her carefully monitored official residence and her chauffeured car just couldn't see what these bigots were making a fuss about.' The best-selling author said it was only when the double rapist Isla Bryson burst into the news that the FM was lost of words. Ms Rowling said: 'The First Minister, whose composure and articulacy under fire had, for years, been her most potent political asset, made herself look – and forgive me for employing a PR term here – a complete f******. 'Of course, the blame for her looking like a complete f****** lies with others. Nobody had warned her about Bryson, you see.' 'If you're prepared to accept the foundational falsehood that some men are women, you'll inevitably find yourself panicking like a pheasant caught in headlights one day.' Ms Rowling also addressed claims Sturgeon made in her book about the vile abuse the politician had received. The best-selling author said: 'Eleven years ago, when she and I found ourselves on opposite sides of a different public debate, I didn't hold her accountable for all the threats I received from nationalists, nor for the porn her supporters circulated, with my face pasted onto a naked actress's body. 'As the gender wars have raged, I have not accused her of emboldening the kind of 'activist' whose threats against me have twice necessitated police action.' 'Notwithstanding all the ruminating on sexism and misogyny Sturgeon does in Frankly, always as it affects her personally, she is unshakeable in her belief that if men put on dresses and call themselves women they can only be doing so with innocent motives. 'Sturgeon hasn't been remotely humbled by the Supreme Court ruling that proved her government was forcing a misinterpretation of the UK-wide Equality Act on Scotland, one that robbed women of many single sex spaces and of their very existence as a definable class with rights protected in law.' And Ms Rowling, who reveals that her doctor husband once ran a methadone clinic for drug addicts, hit out at what the ex FM fails to even mention in the memoir. Ms Rowling said: 'The mysteriously vanished government WhatsApp messages from the pandemic, the tanking educational outcomes, the CalMac Ferry disaster, the disappearance of a half a million pounds of her own supporters' money that was supposedly ringfenced for a new independence referendum: you'll search in vain for candid accounts of these in Frankly; indeed, most aren't mentioned at all. 'Perhaps the most disgraceful omission – and I'll admit to a personal interest here, because I'm married to a doctor who used to run a methadone clinic, so saw the national scandal up close – is the fact that Scotland continues to lead the whole of Europe in drug deaths.' And she compares the MSP to Bella Swan in the Twilight books by Stephenie Meyer. Ms Rowling wrote: 'The heroine of Twilight, a shy, awkward, bookish girl, moves to a small, rainswept town called Forks to live with her single father. 'In doing so, she unknowingly takes her first step towards a staggeringly unlikely future nobody could have predicted. 'The heroine of Frankly is also a shy, awkward, bookish girl who lives in a small, rainswept town. 'About to turn seventeen, she approaches a bungalow in Dreghorn, knocks on the door of the SNP candidate for her constituency, and asks if she can help with canvassing.' 'Nicola Sturgeon, unlike the eventually undead Bella Swan, isn't a Good Vampire at all. She's caused real, lasting harm by presiding over and encouraging a culture in which women have been silenced, shamed, persecuted and placed in situations that are degrading and unsafe, all for not subscribing to her own luxury beliefs.'
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Ian Blackford rules out replacing Kate Forbes in key seat
Ian Blackford has ruled himself out of the Holyrood contest for the seat being vacated by the deputy first minister Kate Forbes. However, the former SNP Westminster leader has not closed the door on a future comeback, stating he believes he can still 'serve my party and my country'. Blackford, 64, had been approached by local SNP activists and senior party figures to seek the nomination for the Skye, Lochaber & Badenoch constituency, a move that would have returned him to an area he previously represented at Westminster. In a statement, he confirmed that after 'careful consideration' he had decided against putting his name forward for the 2026 election. • Kate Forbes exit leaves question: who can replace John Swinney? The announcement brings an end to speculation that began last week when Forbes, 34, revealed she would not be seeking re-election. The deputy first minister cited a desire to have more children as her reason for stepping down, telling constituents in a video message that it was 'time for something new for me, and somebody new for you'. Blackford's decision to step away from the contest will open the field to other candidates. The Highlands constituency, which Forbes won with a majority of more than 15,000 votes, is considered a stronghold for the party. However, the Liberal Democrats are expected to mount a strong challenge. • All eyes on John Swinney as Kate Forbes's departure leaves big questions Blackford, a former investment banker and fund manager, left the House of Commons before last July's general election, where the new seat of Inverness, Skye & West Ross-shire was subsequently won by the Liberal Democrats' Angus MacDonald. Blackford had held the area since 2015, when he the former Liberal Democrat leader Charles Kennedy. Despite his decision not to stand for Holyrood, Blackford's statement left the door ajar for a return to politics. 'I do believe that I am still of an age that I can serve my party and my country,' he said. He added that he viewed the 'journey to independence as being very much unfinished business' and that he wanted to contribute to the debate on the 'economics of independence'. He concluded: 'Working with others, I do want to participate in that debate on our future and perhaps, in the time ahead, there may be future opportunities to return to frontline politics.' A close confidant of the former first minister Nicola Sturgeon, Blackford was unseated as Westminster leader by Stephen Flynn in late 2022. He has been pursuing business interests since leaving parliament.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
STEPHEN DAISLEY: All the selfies in the world can't hide Sturgeon's lack of substance
Nicola Sturgeon is a creature of Scotland's elites, and those elites are going out of their way to promote her memoirs. The latest boost came via an Edinburgh Book Festival chit chat with Kirsty Wark. Wark has a talent for dismantling an interviewee's credibility by repeating their own words back to them in a flat tone of Sahara-dry scepticism. It's a subtle technique that can be devastating when deployed against a dissembling minister or public official. And while she honed her interrogative gifts on Sturgeon once or twice during their hour-long exchange, it wasn't Sturgeon she wanted in front of her but Alex Salmond, a former nemesis of both women. Recounting how Salmond had brought Sturgeon on board as a candidate in 1992, contending that 'he needed you to change the proposition of the SNP; you were the chosen one', Wark ventured that there was 'almost a thread of coercive control from Alex Salmond in this book'. Wowzers. Where did that come from? Sturgeon said she wouldn't use that term, telling the audience that Salmond helped her build up her confidence. Still, she had plenty else to say about him, including her assertion that 'Alec didn't want to see the SNP succeed without him'. She certainly put his fears to rest. Wark pressed her on the failure to eliminate the attainment gap, as promised. Sturgeon put this down to 'a lack of appreciation' on her part of the role played by poverty. This was a telling admission and called for more probing than it received. While Sturgeon was no doubt attempting to shift the blame to Westminster austerity, she revealed herself as the sort of first minister who would make a landmark policy pledge without doing sufficient research to grasp that poverty was the principal driver of the poverty-related attainment gap. We knew Sturgeon governed in headlines, but she appears not to have read beyond them. Wark began to rhyme off some of the many failings in Scottish education when a baby cried out in the audience. 'It'll be all right. When you come around,' she said, softly. Sturgeon dug her heels in, insisting the educational benefits of the Scottish Child Payment would be seen in another ten years. Thus did 'judge me on my record' become 'judge me on my long-term predictions'. We are witnessing a cynical media campaign to invent a legacy for a middling politician who spent nearly two decades at or near the very top of government and has almost nothing to show for it. What exactly did she do to merit a written account of her political life? Asked by Wark to list her achievements, she managed the baby box and the Scottish Child Payment. That's barely enough for a book jacket, let alone a book. Then again, she did manage to pen a memoir despite her well-documented memory problems. That's no small feat. She evidently objects to this line of enquiry, since she reminded Wark that she 'had to fight eight elections' during her time in Bute House. While it's unfortunate that her political career was interrupted so often by democracy, Sturgeon has yet to say what she'd have done if the ballot box had been cleared from her path. I suspect the answer is: not much. Policy is hard, much harder than politics. All the selfies in the world won't change a single stubborn outcome. Sturgeon wasn't hindered on policy by unfortunately timed elections. She was inconsequential because she is insubstantial. An insight into her mindset came when the topic turned to trans rights. We heard, once again, that 'this whole issue has been hijacked and weaponised by people who are transphobic and homophobic and racist'. Sturgeon shared some of the repugnant posts about her on social media from gender-critical feminists, including mockery of her miscarriage and hopes that she is raped in a public toilet. Despicable stuff, and when Wark suggested these were the extremes, she shot back: 'I don't think that is just at the extreme.' Sturgeon offered no evidence for this assessment, then went on to dismiss the suggestion that trans rights were incompatible with women's rights, saying: 'You don't tar the entire group with the bad people.' The two statements were no more than a few minutes apart, and yet she appeared blissfully unaware of their obvious contradiction. It wasn't the elections that were holding her back.
