
Two-wheeler electrification can help repay IMF, other loans
Pakistan is home to more than 27 million two-wheelers, making it the world's fifth-largest market for motorcycles, behind India, China, Indonesia and Vietnam. When we include three-wheelers, these vehicles comprise the backbone of urban and rural transport.
They are disproportionately responsible for air pollution, emitting approximately 335% more hydrocarbon than cars and accounting for 65-70% of vehicular smog in major cities. This environmental cost has wide economic and health implications.
In this scenario, electrifying two and three-wheelers makes sense because of the following factors: Ease of adoption: Electric vehicle (EV) conversions cost approximately Rs50,000-150,000 and charging can be done via standard household electricity outlets.
Inclusive mobility: Introducing electric three-wheelers enhances access for female and elderly drivers, offering a safer and culturally acceptable alternative to motorcycles. Fast returns: Monthly fuel costs of around Rs4,000 drop to about Rs1,000 with EVs — a net saving of Rs3,000. That speed of savings means even if an e-bike costs double a petrol bike, payback can occur in well under two years when factoring in the resale value or zero-interest financing options.
Quantifying benefits: ROI, smog relief, and economic gains
Take, for example, a petrol bike priced at Rs150,000 versus an e-bike at Rs300,000 — an incremental cost of Rs150,000. At savings of Rs3,000 per month, payback comes in 50 months; subsidies or favorable financing can reduce that to two to three years.
Cleaner air reduces healthcare spending. The World Bank estimates air pollution costs Pakistan over $22 billion annually, or around 6% of GDP. Smog impairs cognitive performance, suppresses productivity, and burdens medical services. Improved air quality also raises agricultural output. Daxin Dong et al. (Environment International, 2023) found that cleaner air directly boosts agricultural total factor productivity and greenness indices.
If only 30% of two-wheelers — about 8.1 million — transition to EVs over five years, projected savings are Rs291.6 billion ($1 billion) annually and Rs1.46 trillion ($5 billion) in five years. (Monthly saving per rider: Rs3,000; annual national saving: 8.1m x 3,000 x 12 = Rs291.6 billion). These savings could fully retire a standard-type IMF standby loan. Push the ambition to 60% conversion — roughly 16.2 million EVs — annual savings double to about $2 billion. Over five years, that's $10 billion, a sum sufficient to repay bilateral loans from partners like Saudi Arabia, the UAE or China, enhancing the sovereign financial autonomy.
Global best practices & industrial strategy
Yadea, the world's largest electric two-wheeler manufacturer, is investing $150 million in an Indonesian plant with a capacity of three million units, exemplifying how emerging economies can transform into EV producers. China's e?bike "trade-in" programmes have accelerated fleet turnover and supported local manufacturing.
In Pakistan, local EV-linked brands — Vlektra, Jolta, Road King, and Honda's Benly — are emerging. Strategic partnerships or joint ventures with Chinese original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) for battery and vehicle assembly can position Pakistan as a two-wheeler EV export hub. References from a Harvard study on emerging market EV adoption suggest that two-wheel electrification offers multiple times more welfare per dollar spent than subsidies for electric passenger cars.
Strategic policy interventions
The government should aim for 60% EV penetration in five years via a revolving fund combining subsidies and zero-interest loans (eg, total Rs300 billion).
Other proposals include introducing electric three-wheelers for safer, inclusive mobility to reduce accidents and expand access; launching a "Cash for Clunkers" style scheme for polluting bikes to accelerate fleet renewal and stimulate local assembly; leveraging idle power generation — 10,000 MW — to support off-peak EV charging, improve grid utilisation and reduce capacity costs; quantifying health and agricultural dividends of cleaner air in the national development plan; using social support delivery platforms like BISP/Ehsaas to efficiently distribute financing benefits to lower-income riders; and establishing clear metrics to monitor fuel import reduction, healthcare savings, agricultural yield improvements, and foreign exchange reserve enhancement.
Concluding thought: building legacy for sustainability
Pakistan's macroeconomic turnaround offers rare space for a transformational policy. An integrated e?mobility revolution could deliver multiple payoffs: energy sovereignty, cleaner environments, improved public health, agricultural productivity, and fiscal independence.
With 60% EV adoption, sufficient savings emerge to retire bilateral loans from Saudi Arabia, the UAE, or China, substantively altering the nation's debt trajectory. We must plan becoming an economically sovereign state to pursue geopolitical strategy without foreign influence or support.
Meeting this must be a mission shared by the government (civil and military), private sector and civil society. Through policy innovation, EV Pakistan can move to more than 5% annual growth — not by chance, but by design. One day soon, the hum of e-bikes may herald a new Pakistan: resilient, equitable, and electrified.
The writer is an independent economic analyst
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Gold price per tola drops Rs3,600 in Pakistan
Gold prices in Pakistan decreased on Monday in line with their loss in the international market. In the local market, gold price per tola reached Rs358,800 after a decline of Rs3,600 during the day. As per the rates shared by the All-Pakistan Gems and Jewellers Sarafa Association (APGJSA), 10-gram gold was sold at Rs307,613 after it lost Rs3,086. On Saturday, gold price per tola reached Rs362,400 after a decline of Rs300 during the day. The international rate of gold also saw a decrease today. The rate was at $3,361 per ounce (with a premium of $20), a loss of $36, as per APGJSA. Meanwhile, silver price per tola decreased by Rs51 to reach Rs4,013.


Express Tribune
8 hours ago
- Express Tribune
EV scooters for minority, women workers
The Workers Welfare Board Sindh (WWBS) has announced a series of welfare initiatives for industrial workers from minority communities and women, including the provision of electric bikes, as part of Maarka-e-Haq and Independence Day celebrations. Sindh Labour Secretary Rafiq Qureshi said to strengthen the institution's financial credibility, WWBS will invest Rs3 billion in SECP-approved Shariah-compliant Sukuk Bonds. The move aims to generate funds to expand facilities for workers.


Business Recorder
9 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Fiscal trap: is it time to end the cycle of endless consolidation?
In the context of Pakistan, conduct of macroeconomic policy rests on two broad pillars: an increasingly independent monetary policy and a persistently constrained fiscal policy. Over the past two decades, the SBP has gradually acquired operational and legal autonomy, helping it to steer monetary policy with a degree of institutional discipline. By contrast, fiscal policy remains hostage to entrenched political bargains, rigid structural arrangements, and an ever-expanding government footprint that now threatens to push the upper taxation and public debt limits of what the economy — and its citizens — can bear. At the heart of this dilemma is Pakistan's mounting dependence on predatory taxation and borrowings for federal deficit financing. Limited access to external capital markets — largely due to weak external credit ratings and recurrent balance of payments crises — has forced successive governments to lean heavily on domestic borrowing. But with local banks already saturated with government paper, the room for even higher domestic borrowings has shrunk dramatically. The result is an endless cycle of fiscal consolidation — tightening budgets year after year, squeezing the after-tax profitability of businesses and disposable income of households, that ultimately results in suppression of investments and growth recovery. The FY26 federal budget, shaped under the latest IMF-supported EFF arrangement, starkly illustrates how deeply this pattern is now entrenched. Headline numbers may suggest progress: the government pledges to shrink the overall deficit from 5.6 percent to 3.9 percent of GDP, while nudging the primary surplus up slightly to 2.4 percent. Yet beneath these surface figures lies a troubling reality: nearly all the adjustment burden falls on over-ambitious revenue targets and suppressed primary spending, not on a genuine structural rebalancing of fiscal architecture. The revenue side alone tells the story. Tax collections are budgeted to grow by nearly 19 percent in FY26, which is on the back of 29 percent growth in actual tax collection in FY25. If history is any guide, continued mobilization of additional predatory taxation will prove exceedingly difficult to achieve without intensifying the pressure on an already burdened formal sector. As per the IMF's First EFF Report (published in May 2025), the baseline medium-term macroeconomic framework projects real growth to increase modestly from 3.6 percent in FY26 to 4.1 percent in FY27, and then stabilizing around 4.5 percent through FY30. Despite official claims regarding the implementation of structural reforms, projected baseline growth remains constrained by the persistent imperative to avert balance of payments crises. The tenuous nature of the current fiscal consolidation strategy is underscored by the EFF baseline macroeconomic projections. Specifically, the growth rate of tax revenues is projected to decline progressively, from 17 percent in FY26 to 12 percent in FY27, 10 percent in FY28, and stabilizing at approximately 11 percent in both FY29 and FY30—corresponding to an estimated 12 percent of GDP. Concurrently, primary expenditure (excluding debt servicing) is projected to increase from 10 percent of GDP in FY26 to 12 percent in FY27, peak at 13 percent in FY28, and revert to 11 percent in FY29 and FY30—equivalent to roughly 14 percent of GDP. Predictably, under this fiscal framework, debt servicing obligations are projected to gradually decline from 8 percent of GDP in FY25 to 5 percent by FY30. Nevertheless, the First EFF Report classifies the overall risk of sovereign stress as 'high' in both the short and medium term, while the long-term risk is assessed as 'moderate,' despite the projected stabilization of debt servicing within the baseline scenario. This 'high' sovereign stress is mainly due to elevated gross external financing needs, low fiscal and forex buffers. One cannot understand Pakistan's fiscal trap without examining the legacy of the 7th National Finance Commission (NFC) Award of 2010. This constitutional arrangement mandates that 57.5 percent of federal tax revenues be transferred to the provinces—a well-intentioned federalist constitutional design to devolve functional responsibility and spending. In theory, this should have allowed the federal government to shrink its own footprint. In practice, however, the federal government has only grown larger. Federal expenditures have risen at an average annual rate exceeding 14 percent since 2010, leaving a gaping hole between net federal revenues and ever-growing debt servicing costs. Each fiscal year now begins with a stark arithmetic: once transfers to the provinces are made, the federal government must borrow—domestically and at increasingly high cost—just to cover current expenditures, let alone development spending. Half of all federal spending now goes to service debt. The cycle sustains itself through more borrowing, higher taxes, and a steady erosion of fiscal credibility. To bridge this gap, the ongoing EFF programme stitched a National Fiscal Pact (NFP), committing provinces to run surpluses. But these provincial surpluses are retained and reinvested locally, not flowing back as revenues to narrow the federal deficit. For FY26 budget, this leaves the federal government with an estimated standalone deficit of over PKR 6.5 trillion—even as the consolidated national deficit appears moderate on paper. The EFF baseline projections suggest that headline debt-to-GDP ratios to decline from 78 percent to 64 percent by FY30, assuming tight adherence to primary surplus targets. But such headline improvements disguise the deeper malaise: the ratio of public debt to tax revenue will remain among the highest in comparable economies, and the underlying fiscal asymmetry between federal obligations and available net revenues will persist. What, then, is the alternative? Incremental tinkering—shaving a few percentage points off expenditure here, tweaking taxes there—has failed to break the cycle for over a decade. A more credible pathway would start with an interim recalibration of the NFC Award. By treating debt servicing and defence spending as first charges on federal revenue, and adjusting the vertical revenue share in the centre's favour, the structural imbalance can be narrowed over the medium term. Equally critical is the question of domestic debt restructuring. Both provincial budgets and well-capitalised domestic banks can absorb carefully managed adjustment costs of debt restructuring. Such domestic debt restructuring must be underpinned by robust legal safeguards and vigilant oversight to protect financial sector stability. The goal of domestic debt restructuring must be to free up fiscal space and then to lower the tax burden on businesses and improve disposable incomes that will help to revive private investment. But these measures alone would not suffice without durable institutional guardrails. Pakistan needs a fiscal charter that binds governments to prudent borrowing and spending ratios, closes avenues for regressive and predatory taxation, and enforces broadening of tax base and mandatory tax compliance. A permanent parliamentary fiscal oversight mechanism could further strengthen accountability, ensuring that borrowing decisions and contingent liabilities are subject to transparent scrutiny. None of this will be politically easy. Rebalancing the NFC Award is a deeply sensitive undertaking in a federation where provincial autonomy is jealously guarded. Domestic debt restructuring invites resistance from powerful stakeholders. Yet the stakes could hardly be clearer: without structural recalibration, Pakistan's fiscal policy will remain shackled to a perpetual cycle of consolidation that neither restores' macroeconomic stability nor unlocks the country's latent growth potential. The broader aim must be to free fiscal policy from its reactive, debt-driven posture and enable it to function alongside monetary policy as a genuine countercyclical tool. In the absence of this, macroeconomic stability will remain elusive, private investment will remain stifled, and the promise of inclusive growth will remain perpetually deferred. The depressing social and economic outturns during FY23-FY25 should serve as a wake-up call, the next FY27 budget must not be yet another missed opportunity. The time for halfway measures is long gone. Pakistan's political leadership must decide whether they wish to continue administering the same palliative year after year—or whether they are finally prepared to confront the structural roots of the fiscal trap that has held the economy back for far too long. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025