BHP says tariff impact on global economy could be significant
BHP Group said that an escalating trade war could harm the world economy and adaptation was key to sustaining global growth, as it reported a slight decline in iron ore production in the third quarter on Thursday.
The direct impact on BHP of the tariffs unleashed by U.S. President Donald Trump this month was limited, the mining giant said.
Trump has since postponed some of the duties, but has increased levies on China even further. Tariffs apply to steel from China where BHP sells most of its major product, iron ore.
"China's ability to shift toward a consumption-led economy and for trade flows to adapt to the new environment will be key to sustaining the global outlook," CEO Mike Henry said in a statement.
The comments came as the world's biggest listed miner reported a slightly lower third-quarter iron ore output and flagged higher production of copper, which is also subject to a tariff probe by the U.S.
BHP said the dip in quarterly iron ore production was due to cyclones, while it forecast 2025 Chilean copper production in the upper half of its guidance range as part of a ramp-up at its Escondida mine.
The world's largest listed miner was forced to temporarily halt operations at Port Hedland, the world's largest iron ore export hub, after Cyclone Zelia struck Western Australia's Pilbara region in February, following earlier disruptions from Cyclone Sean in January.
Despite the bad weather, BHP hit record nine-month output from its Pilbara operations, where the South Flank and Mining Area C sites benefited from the completed ramp-up of South Flank last year and a 13% boost in mining activity.
Shares of the company rose 0.6% to A$36.2, as of 0027 GMT, largely in line with a 1% jump in the broader mining sub-index .
Copper production rose 10% to 513,200 metric tons in the quarter, bolstered by a 20% jump in volumes at the Escondida mine in Chile due to improved operational performance.
The company said it expects to meet its fiscal 2025 unit cost targets across all operations except at its BMA coal joint venture, where adverse weather and geological issues at the Broadmeadow mine are expected to increase costs.
BHP has been leveraging revenue from its iron ore business, which still generates over half its earnings, to expand copper and potash potash projects, as it positions for growth from the energy transition.
Iron ore production from the global miner's Western Australia operations eased to 67.8 million tons in the quarter ended March 31, from 68.1 million tons a year earlier, in line with Visible Alpha consensus view of 68.03 million tons. (Reporting by Roushni Nair and Roshan Thomas in Bengaluru, Melanie Burton in Sydney; Editing by Maju Samuel, Rashmi Aich and Kate Mayberry)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
38 minutes ago
- Zawya
US stock futures dip on lack of details from China trade talk, CPI in focus
U.S. stock index futures edged lower on Wednesday after U.S.-China trade talks offered little sign of a durable resolution to their longstanding trade tensions, while investors turned their focus to a key inflation reading. The May consumer prices report (CPI) is due at 8:30 a.m. ET, with economists polled by Reuters expecting a 0.2% rise month-over-month and a 2.5% increase on an annual basis, slightly higher compared with April as tariffs potentially raised underlying price pressures. "Markets appear to be shifting their focus - at least temporarily - away from headline-driven tariff risk and back to the macro data that really matters," said Jeff O'Connor, head of market structure at Liquidnet in emailed comments. "Investors are bracing for the first hard evidence of how recent trade policies may be filtering into inflation." Traders are pricing in 44 basis points of rate cuts by year-end, penciling in a 50% chance of a 25 bps cut in September, according to the CMEGroup's FedWatch tool. Policymakers are widely expected to keep rates unchanged next week. U.S. and Chinese officials agreed on a framework to put their trade truce back on track and resolve China's export restrictions on rare earth minerals and magnets, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Tuesday at the conclusion of two days of intense negotiations in London. The negotiations, which are pending reviews from President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, were aimed at mitigating tit-for-tat tariffs between the two superpowers that have roiled global markets for much of the year. But the talks did little to lift sentiment among investors, who had priced the deal in to some extent. The U.S. stock market has rallied in recent weeks, recovering from a slump in April sparked by Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs. The S&P 500 remains about 1.7% below all-time highs touched in February, while the Nasdaq is 2.3% below its record peaks reached in December. At 06:01 a.m. ET, Dow E-minis were down 88 points, or 0.21%, S&P 500 E-minis were down 12.5 points, or 0.21%, and Nasdaq 100 E-minis were down 44.25 points, or 0.2%. Among stocks, Tesla advanced 1.8% premarket after CEO Elon Musk also said he regrets some of the posts he made last week about Trump, opening the way to a healing of an abrupt rift that has roiled its shares. Software development platform provider GitLab fell 13% after it reported quarterly results. Shares of videogame retailer GameStop fell 4.7% after it reported a decline in first-quarter revenue. (Reporting by Kanchana Chakravarty in Bengaluru)
Zawya
an hour ago
- Zawya
States would struggle to administer food stamp benefits under Republican tax bill
U.S. states will not be able to fully administer food stamp benefits for millions of the nation's poor if a proposal in the Republican tax bill forcing them to shoulder billions of dollars in new costs is signed into law, according to state officials, local government associations and policy experts. More than 41 million people receive benefits from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, the nation's largest food aid program, which cost about $100 billion in 2024. The tax bill passed on May 22 by the U.S. House of Representatives and backed by President Donald Trump would shift some $22 billion in administrative and benefit costs to state and local governments, according to a Reuters analysis. Supporters of the move say it will promote accountability and reduce waste in the program. But states fear it will backfire. "No state is going to be able to simply absorb that," Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear, a Democrat, told Reuters. Officials from North Carolina, Oregon and Michigan also said their states did not have the resources to easily take on the spending requirements in the proposal, which is now before the Senate. Some states could be forced to shrink SNAP eligibility or to leave the program altogether, according to letters sent in May to Congressional and agriculture committee leadership from state and county legislatures and health officials. "Shifting the financial burden of SNAP onto states is fiscally unsustainable and risks harming the very individuals and families the program is designed to support," said one letter from the National Conference of State Legislatures. Other letters were sent by the National Association of Counties, National Association of County Human Services Administrators and the American Public Human Services Association. A USDA spokesperson said that Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins supports Trump's agenda and that the agency will continue to provide technical assistance to states. Republicans have long supported reduced spending on SNAP, arguing that the program creates a dependence on federal support and should be more narrowly targeted to the most vulnerable. Reuters could not reach a representative from the Republican Governors Association or from Texas, Florida or Georgia, the Republican-led states facing the highest SNAP costs. STATES WOULD STRUGGLE The House bill would require states for the first time to pay for a portion of SNAP benefits beginning in 2028, with their payment share from 5% to 25% tied to the state's error rate, a USDA measure of how accurately states determine eligibility and benefit levels. Nationwide, that would amount to more than $20 billion in spending, according to a Reuters analysis of data from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The bill would also require states to immediately pay 75% of the cost of administering the SNAP program, up from their existing 50% obligation, adding another $2 billion to the sum, according to USDA data. The states facing the most new spending would be California ($3.7 billion), New York ($2.1 billion), Florida ($1.7 billion) and Texas ($1.2 billion). The state spending requirements would push 1.3 million people off of SNAP in an average month, because some states would modify eligibility requirements or stop administering SNAP, according to a May 22 letter from the Congressional Budget Office to House and Senate agriculture committee leadership. Michigan does not have the ability to support $850 million in new SNAP spending and may need to restrict eligibility or reduce benefits if the House bill passes, said Elizabeth Hertel, director of the state Department of Health and Human Services. Oregon would struggle to absorb more than $477 million and the state is planning for what they would do if forced to take on the spending, said Claire Seguin, director of the division of the Oregon Department of Human Services that administers SNAP. North Carolina is already budget constrained and "there isn't really a way to backfill" more than $650 million in new SNAP spending, said Department of Health and Human Services secretary Dev Sangvai, who did not provide details on what steps the state would take if the provision passes. New York also cannot absorb its projected costs, Barbara Guinn, Commissioner of the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, told Senators during a June 4 forum on the SNAP proposal. Because most states must balance their budgets and cannot accrue debt to offset new spending like the federal government can, shifting SNAP spending to states risks drawing down resources from other public programs like Medicaid, said Eric Mitchell, president of the Alliance to End Hunger. The bill would also expand work requirements for some SNAP recipients and restrict states' ability to waive those requirements when unemployment ticks up, which together would push another 3.2 million people off of SNAP in an average month, according to the CBO. (Reporting by Leah Douglas in Washington; Editing by Alistair Bell)
The National
an hour ago
- The National
What does the London framework mean for US-China trade?
Having extended a truce between the world's biggest economies, officials will go back to Donald Trump and Xi Jinping for their approval in easing export restrictions
