Australia, New Zealand monitoring 3 Chinese warships off Australia
The Australian government revealed a week ago that the warships had traveled through Southeast Asia and the Coral Sea and were approaching northeast Australia.
Defense Minister Richard Marles said Thursday that the Chinese ships — the naval frigate Hengyang, cruiser Zunyi and replenishment vessel Weishanhu — were 'off the east coast of Australia.'
Defense officials did not respond to a request for comment on a Financial Times report that the task group from China's military, the People's Liberation Army, was 150 nautical miles east of Sydney.
'There is no doubt that this is, not unprecedented, but an unusual event,' Marles told Sky News television.
Marles said Australian navy ships and air force planes were monitoring the Chinese ships' movements through international waters that are in Australia's exclusive economic zone, the area beyond its territorial waters where a nation has exclusive economic rights.
'They're entitled to be where they are; Australia is also entitled to be prudent, and we are monitoring very closely what the activities of the task group are,' Marles told reporters.
'What we will do whenever this mission is over on the part of the Chinese task group is engage in a full assessment of what the Chinese were seeking to achieve in respect of this mission,' he added.
In Beijing, China's foreign ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun was asked at a media briefing Wednesday about the Chinese warships' location and replied he was not aware of the situation. The Chinese Embassy in Australia did not immediately respond to a request for comment Thursday.
Marles said Australia had engaged with its nearest neighbor Papua New Guinea over its response because the Chinese had traveled around the South Pacific island nation's coast on their way to Australia's exclusive economic zone.
Australia was also 'working very closely' with New Zealand, which is separated from the Australian east coast by the Tasman Sea, he said.
New Zealand's military was also monitoring the Chinese ships by sea and air 'in coordination with Australia,' New Zealand Defense Minister Judith Collins said in a statement.
'We have not been informed by the Chinese government why this task group has been deployed into our region, and we have not been informed what its future plans are,' she added. 'We will continue to monitor these vessels.'
Jennifer Parker, an expert associate of Australia's National Security College and a former Australian naval officer, said Chinese warships rarely traveled so far south along the nation's east coast.
'This is part of a broader power projection from the PLA-Navy and we should expect to see more of this in the Pacific and in the Indian Ocean,' Parker said.
The Chinese deployment comes as the head of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command Adm. Samuel Paparo visits Australia this week.
Parker said the timing was likely coincidental given the Chinese deployment would have been planned well in advance and the United States doesn't release information about their senior officers' travel until close to the visit.
'Without knowing exactly where the ships are going, the point of this deployment, I think, is to demonstrate to Australia that they have the capability to come down and operate in our maritime domain,' Parker said.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese told a news conference he was not worried by reports of Chinese warships off Sydney.
'The Chinese naval ships are complying with international law, but as we do, we are monitoring the situation and observing what is going on, as you would expect,' Albanese said.
Three Chinese warships visited Sydney Harbor in 2019. But their voyage had been approved by the Australian government.
Australia's diplomatic and trade relations with China have improved in recent years, but relations between the two militaries are dangerous.
Australia protested what it described as an unsafe interaction last week over the South China Sea where a Chinese fighter is accused of releasing flares that endangered an Australian military surveillance plane.
Guo, the Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson, accused the Australian aircraft of 'deliberately' intruding into airspace over the disputed Paracel Islands, which China claims.
Associated Press writer Charlotte Graham-McLay in Wellington, New Zealand, contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Richest Australian Rinehart Joins Push Against Costs of Net Zero
Mining tycoon Gina Rinehart, Australia's richest person, has urged the country to ditch its pursuit of net zero emissions, insisting the costs of climate action will devastate sectors from healthcare to logistics and defense. The billionaire, who has frequently criticized climate science and green policies, adds to a strengthening global pushback against efforts to slash greenhouse gas pollution, a movement that's been emboldened by President Donald Trump's moves to curb activity in the US.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
India and China: US Tariffs Turn Rivals Toward Friendship in Major Geopolitical Shift
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi arrived in New Delhi on Monday for a two-day visit viewed by many as the first indication of a thaw in relations between two rivals. The last such meeting took place in 2020 after a border clash heightened tensions between China and India, which have long been locked in a state of controlled hostility. More from Sourcing Journal No Hint of a Slowdown at Arc'teryx Parent Amer Sports Despite Tariff Impacts India Suspends Duties on Raw Cotton Imports, Benefitting US Exporters EU Tech Regulation Could Be Holding Up Final Trade Agreement With U.S. Moving forward in the wake of extraordinarily high U.S. tariffs of 50 percent on India, the two largest economies in Asia are looking for synergy and a positive outlook to navigate the turbulence in global trade. Neither side is pretending past tensions are moot, even though it is clear that geopolitics in South Asia stands at an important crossroads. After their meeting on Monday, India's foreign minister S. Jaishankar said it was time to 'move ahead from a difficult period in our ties,' while Wang Yi indicated it was time to 'move beyond being adversaries, to being partners.' Both sides agreed that 'stability had now been restored at the borders,' although analysts warned that years of mistrust could not 'so easily be swept aside by business interests.' Wang Yi's meeting on Tuesday with Prime Minister Narendra Modi at his official residence further underlined the effort. After the meeting, Modi tweeted: 'Glad to meet foreign minister Wang Yi. Stable, predictable, constructive ties between India and China will contribute significantly to regional as well as global peace and prosperity.' He added, 'I look forward to our next meeting in Tianjin on the sidelines of the SCO Summit,' referring to his accepted visit to the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit on Aug. 31 and Sept. 1. Pushed further together by what is being seen as a rupture in friendship with President Donald Trump through the punishing 50 percent tariff on Indian goods (the highest in the region), Modi is recalibrating India's strategy. The tariff began with a 25 percent duty for India, compared to 20 percent for Bangladesh, Vietnam and Sri Lanka, along with 19 percent for Pakistan, Cambodia and Indonesia. The additional 25 percent was slapped on India for its imports of Russian crude oil, bringing the total to 50 percent are set to take effect on Aug. 27. India has held firm in its objections to the tariffs, with the Ministry of External Affairs calling the targeting of India 'unjustified and unreasonable.' The overtures to China are viewed as a part of the fallout between the U.S. and India. Premal Udani, former chairman of the Apparel Export Promotion Council (AEPC) and managing director of Kaytee Corp Pvt Ltd, described the situation as an 'existential crisis for the apparel and textile industry.' He told Sourcing Journal that many U.S. buyers had paused shipments and put new orders on hold. 'The industry cannot take this kind of impact. Current effective duties are already at around 40 percent and will climb to 65 percent next week,' he said. Hopes that a U.S. delegation visit this week might advance bilateral trade talks appear dim, with reports suggesting the visit has been put on hold. 'There were two things happening at the same time. There was talk of a Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA), and the delegation was coming for that—it wasn't to negotiate on tariffs. Realistically, none of us expected much headway in the BTA until these contentious issues were resolved. We were not holding our breath,' Udani explained. According to a recent report by the Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), nearly 70 percent of Indian exports to the U.S. will face 50 percent tariffs under the new tariff regime. 'While this represents just 1.56 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP) and 7.38 percent of total exports—far from catastrophic for a $3.9 trillion economy—the impact is concentrated in labor-intensive and high-value sectors such as textiles, apparel, gems, jewelry, auto parts, and agricultural products like shrimp. These sectors not only anchor India's merchandise exports to the U.S. but also directly affect employment and the livelihoods of millions. The U.S. alone accounted for approximately 29 percent of India's textile and apparel exports last financial year, valued at about $10.3 billion,' the report noted. Manufacturers have been faced with some dire conversations with the brands and retailers these past weeks. In Tirupur, which accounts for 68 percent of India's knitwear exports, manufacturers have paused shipments and voiced deep uncertainty. U.S. buyers account for nearly one-quarter of exports from Tirupur, and Tamil Nadu officials warned that the entire state—which sends 31 percent of its $52.18 billion exports to the U.S.—faces urgent threats to livelihoods. The Tirupur Exporters and Manufacturers Association (TEAMA) said that 3 million jobs and 20,000 factories are 'at immediate risk' due to the extra 25 percent to 50 percent tariff. The association has appealed to Prime Minister Modi for relief measures, including high-level diplomatic talks, loan-repayment moratoriums, collateral-free working capital loans, and the temporary suspension of the goods and service tax, income tax and other levies for affected exporters. Sanjay Jain, chair of the Indian Chamber of Commerce National Textiles Committee and managing director of TT Ltd, echoed the depth of the crisis throughout the textile and apparel sectors. 'It's a bad situation—buyers are putting orders on hold, and even ready goods are being asked not to dispatch. Exporters are having to give steep discounts just to move shipments or secure new orders. It's a total loss for exporters,' he said. Jain urged urgent action, warning that summer orders were already being placed and India could not afford to lose market share to other countries. 'The U.S. is the single largest buyer of home textiles and apparel in the world—we cannot ignore it. Now it is about the survival of the small and medium companies and skilled labor. The government must act boldly and support the industry in finding new pastures.' His suggestions included quickly reducing raw material costs, removing import duties on cotton and textile raw materials, and offering a 10 percent U.S.-focused incentive for products facing the 50 percent tariff. Other manufacturers told Sourcing Journal that a 'comparative paralysis has set in.' 'While there's no point in hand-wringing over the so-called friendship with the U.S. and casting blame, all eyes are on our government to see how they protect this badly hit, labor-intensive industry. It's hard to see how the government can cover the 30 percent tariff gap monetarily. We need a multi-pronged strategy,' said a Tirupur based manufacturer, requesting anonymity. Prime Minister Modi's Independence Day speech on Aug. 15, in which he promised relief for the industry through tax reforms before the festival of Diwali in November, signals movement toward India holding its own. Additionally, on Monday, the Finance Ministry announced the elimination of the 11 percent duty on cotton imports until Sept. 30, a step welcomed by manufacturers and a move that also eases access for U.S. cotton into India. Hansa Sharma, founder of the eco-friendly sustainable fashion brand Hansa, described how the situation was transforming the entire supply chain in a post: 'This is a reminder that trade policies don't just change numbers on a balance sheet—they reshape entire supply chains. As a manufacturer, we see first-hand how tariffs tilt the playing field, making adaptability and efficiency more critical than ever. While challenges are real, they also push us to rethink sourcing, diversify markets, and lean into innovation. In the end, resilience becomes the true currency of global trade.' A northern India manufacturer, described it as a 'huge ripple effect.' 'In India it is creating a de facto embargo for exports to the U.S., but the impact is much bigger than that. The tariffs are not only straining local supply chains but also reshaping the geopolitics of sourcing in South Asia,' he said, adding that manufacturers were already considering building factories in other countries, although that would result in a loss of employment in India. Despite the palpable tension, not all are swamped in gloom. Many manufacturers endorsed Jaishankar's point to Wang Yi that 'differences must not become disputes, nor competition conflict,' and that the same point could well be applied to the business of sourcing. While the tentative Chinese connections were not immediately seen as bridges to building business, Udani said that they were overall a 'very positive step forward.' 'They need our raw materials and we need a lot of their goods as well. If it works out it's a win-win situation for 25 percent of humanity,' he said. As for the upcoming deadline for additional U.S. tariffs that is causing disruptions across the supply chain, it's still being seen as a possible window to change. 'We're still cautiously optimistic,' said Udani. 'As Russia-U.S. talks are on, and Ukraine-U.S. talks are on, this issue of tariffs for crude oil imports from Russia may well be swept aside for India.' He pointed to China's last-minute extension on tariffs as an encouraging precedent, while acknowledging that 'given the impulsive and uncertain way tariffs are being distributed, it could quite go the opposite way, too.' 'So, Aug. 27 is the date to watch,' he said, referring to the deadline for the second 25 percent in tariff measures to take effect. His optimism went further: 'I wish other countries well, but in the end, India has great strength in its verticality in the sector. It's only a matter of time, and hopefully we will get a chance to get there.' Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
White House joins TikTok after delaying enforcement of sale-or-ban law
The White House launched a TikTok account on Tuesday amid uncertainty about the app's future, as another deadline approaches for its parent company, Bytedance, to sell to a US buyer or be banned in the United States. President Donald Trump has repeatedly extended the deadline of a sale-or-ban law passed under former President Joe Biden's administration, with the new deadline less than a month away on September 17. The latest delay in June kept the app accessible for its 170 million American users, despite the legislation that passed last year with bipartisan support over concerns that TikTok's Chinese ownership poses a US national security risk. And it came as both the United States and China sought leverage in tense trade talks. TikTok's ultimate fate in the US remains unclear, but the official White House account is a signal the app could be here to stay. The first post on the official White House TikTok account features video of Trump as he says, 'Every day, I wake up determined to deliver a better life for the people all across this nation. I am your voice.' The post's caption reads, 'America we are BACK! What's up TikTok?' As of 8 p.m. on Tuesday, shortly after launching, the account had garnered more than 20,000 followers. This is the administration's first official TikTok account. Both Trump and Biden launched accounts during the 2024 presidential campaign, drawing scrutiny as the leaders had previously raised national security concerns with the app. TikTok doesn't operate in China, but the Chinese government enjoys significant leverage over businesses under its jurisdiction. The US government has said it's worried China could use its national security laws to access the significant amount of personal information that TikTok, like most social media applications, collects from its US users. The TikTok sale-or-ban law went into effect on January 19 after Biden signed it last year. TikTok briefly took itself offline, sparking outcry from creators, but quickly came back after Trump signed an order delaying the ban's enforcement by 75 days in one of the first acts of his second term. The president's June delay marked his third extension of the ban.
