logo
6 Cheap Stocks with Great Five-Year Returns

6 Cheap Stocks with Great Five-Year Returns

Yahoo27-01-2025

January 27, 2024 (Maple Hill Syndicate) For years, my mentor, David Dreman (Trades, Portfolio), invested in Westinghouse Electric Co.
The stock was cheap, often selling for about nine times the company's per-share earnings. The stock price marched up nicely, yet the stock stayed cheap, because earnings were rising as fast as the stock price. That's a value investor's dream.
Today, Westinghouse is in the dust bin of history, and Dreman is mostly retired. But I long to find today's version of what I call the Westinghouse Effect.
Here are a few possible candidates. These six stocks are relatively cheap, and have achieved total returns of more than 500% over the five years through January 23.
Core Natural
Core Natural Resources Inc. (NYSE:CNR), a coal company of all things, has returned 951% over the past five years.
Core was formed January 15 of this year by the merger of Consol Energy Inc. and Arch Resources Inc. The 951% figure cited above is for shareholders who originally held Consol. Arch shareholders didn't do badly either: They got between a double and a triple.
The great investor Charlie Munger once said that value investors run the risk of holding a melting ice cube. You can make an argument that coal companies are just that.
My view is different. Although coal is a highly polluting fuel, it is an important one, and probably for the next decade a necessary one.
I like Core's balance sheet. It has more than two dollars in cash for every dollar of debt. Debt is only 13% of the company's net worth. The stock sells for seven times earnings.
Build-a-Bear
Maybe your young kids had a birthday party sometimes at Build-a-Bear, a store where they can choose a stuffed animal, fill it at a stuffing machine, and buy clothes for it too.
Five years ago, Build-a-Bear was in tough shape, and bankruptcy rumors flew. The pandemic had hit the company hard. People stopped going to malls, and all 400 of its stores were closed for a while.
Yet, Build-a-Bear Workshop Inc. (NYSE:BBW) has achieved a five-year return of 817%. It's an example of the wisdom in mutual-fund legend John Templeton's admonition to buy at the point of maximum pain.
Dillard's
Who says department stores are dinosaurs? You can't prove it by Dillard's Inc. (NYSE:DDS). Its shares have provided a 752% return in the past five years, when most department-store stocks have been flat to down.
About a month ago, Fortune magazine ran a feature on the company by Phil Wahba, which pointed out that Dillard's stock has beaten Tesla, Apple and Microsoft over the past four years. He called the chain old fashioned, but noted that service is good and the stores intelligently located.
The company's service territory is the South and Southwest, the faster-growing part of the U.S. I've recommended the stock several times in this column over the years.
Cooper Group
Mr. Cooper Group Inc. (NASDAQ:COOP) is a mortgage lender and mortgage servicer based in Coppell, Texas. Its five year return: 684%. It's the largest mortgage servicer in the U.S., and that's significant because income from servicing is steadier than that from mortgage origination.
The company had a major breach in 2023. Hackers stole personal information on some 15 million customers, including Social Security numbers and bank account numbers. Litigation stemming from the breach is still in progress. Nonetheless, six of the eight analysts who follow the stock recommend it.
Abercrombie & Fitch
Up 632% in the past five years is Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (NYSE:ANF), which sells clothing to teens and young adults. It's shown a profit in 14 of the past 15 years (the exception being pandemic-scarred fiscal 2021). Revenue and earnings growth has accelerated lately.
Profit margins have usually been slender (as is typical of clothing retailers) but have improved lately. I like the stock, and have recommended it in this column several times.
Riley Exploration
The smallest stock I'll discuss today is Riley Exploration Permian Inc. (REPX). As its name suggests, it produces oil and gas in west Texas and eastern New Mexico, home of the Permian Basin. It has very little revenue until 2021, but now is up to $407 million revenue in the past four quarters.
The stock chart shows a jagged pattern, with a five-year return of 512%. I'd consider the stock speculative. But I like the valuation, which is six times recent earnings and less than five times estimated earnings for 2025.
Disclosure: I currently have no positions in the stocks discussed today, personally or for clients.
John Dorfman is chairman of Dorfman Value Investments in Boston, Massachusetts. His firm or clients may own or trade the stocks discussed here. He can be reached at jdorfman@dorfmanvalue.com.
This article first appeared on GuruFocus.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Myrtle Beach area is losing a 27-hole golf facility to a housing development
Myrtle Beach area is losing a 27-hole golf facility to a housing development

USA Today

time4 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Myrtle Beach area is losing a 27-hole golf facility to a housing development

Myrtle Beach area is losing a 27-hole golf facility to a housing development Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, is known for its wide selection of golf courses, but there will be one fewer facility for golfers in the near future. River Oaks Golf Club is set to be closed for good and replaced by single-family housing units, according to a story on The report details how the redevelopment calls for 590 housing lots to be built after the course permanently closes at the end of October. Originally opened in 1987, River Oaks Golf Club was a 27-hole facility with three nines: the Bear, the Fox and the Otter. The story says that Chris Manning Communities bought the Bear nine in 2021 for $3 million and later sold that piece of land to Mungo Homes for $9.5 million. In February 2024, Chris Manning Communities bought the remaining 18 holes. The golf course is zoned as single and mixed residential land, and thus, any development for homes on it doesn't require rezoning approval by the county.

Baird Upgrades Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN) on Nuuly Growth
Baird Upgrades Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN) on Nuuly Growth

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Baird Upgrades Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN) on Nuuly Growth

Urban Outfitters, Inc. (NASDAQ:URBN) is among the 10 Best Growth Stocks Under $100 to Buy Now. Mark Altschwager, an analyst at Baird, raised the price target for Urban Outfitters, Inc. (NASDAQ:URBN) to $90 from $75, while elevating the rating from 'Neutral' to 'Outperform'. This price appreciation of 20% underscores the company's position for a turnaround. The company recently reported strong first-quarter results, with a 74% increase in net income stemming from margin improvement. The investors are closely monitoring the giant's subscription/rental business, Nuuly, which is anticipated to grow 43% to $540m this year. A frontline retail worker organizing apparel products in a store. To sum it up, Urban Outfitters, Inc. (NASDAQ:URBN) is a unique 'growth at a reasonable price' stock that is witnessing strong comp sales growth in each of its brands, and with even more room to grow via both price hikes and traffic increases. As long as the company is able to capitalize on Nuuly, we can expect it to show sustained momentum. Urban Outfitters, Inc. (NASDAQ:URBN) is a Pennsylvania-based fashion business that operates through three segments: Retail, Wholesale, and Subscription. Incepted in 1970, the company serves its customers directly through websites and retail stores, as well as social media and external sources. While the broader market delivered nearly 100% return in five years, URBN has exhibited a return of 295%. While we acknowledge the potential of URBN as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Famed analysts and investors have been putting their names on ETFs. Here's what it takes for a fund to succeed.
Famed analysts and investors have been putting their names on ETFs. Here's what it takes for a fund to succeed.

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Famed analysts and investors have been putting their names on ETFs. Here's what it takes for a fund to succeed.

ETF launches continue to surge, with some popular market voices putting their names on funds. Starting an ETF involves significant expenses, including SEC filing and listing fees. Funds need strong performance and substantial assets under management to remain viable. A string of widely followed strategists, economists, and investors have launched exchange-traded funds in recent years. There's famed NYU professor Nouriel Roubini — known colloquially as "Dr. Doom" — and his Atlas America Fund (USAF). Then there's Dan Ives — the tech and AI permabull who can often be found on CNBC wearing fluorescent blazers — who has parlayed his bold analyst calls into the Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES). And let's not forget Fundstrat's Tom Lee — former chief equity strategist at JPMorgan — and his Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF (GRNY). They've stepped into a crowded market with thousands of funds competing for investors' money. A record 723 ETFs came to market in 2024 alone. And they're using their own high-profile personal brands to stand out in a crowded marketplace. But starting a fund is an entirely different beast than keeping one afloat for any sustained amount of time. Yes, strong performance is crucial. But running a fund is expensive, and it takes much more than good returns to ensure success. To start, the cost to launch a fund is hefty. Firms are looking at a $50,000-to-$100,000 filing fee with the SEC, according to Zachary Evans, analyst for passive strategies at Morningstar. puts that number between $100,000 and $500,000. Depending on the type of fund, there also may be an initial listing fee with NYSE or Nasdaq. But the bills don't stop there. Listing fees with the exchange come due every year. With Nasdaq, for example, it's a $4,000 annual fee. Then there's a long list of costs associated with running the fund itself, Evans said. Paying the staff who execute the trades. Paying compliance and a risk-management team. Paying sales and advertising teams to market the fund. Paying rent for your office space. And so on. It all adds up, and it means funds need to amass significant assets under management. ETF providers make money through the annual fees, or expense ratios, they charge investors. So the more money they manage, the more money they're bringing in. Performance also plays a role here — if a fund's value rises by 20% in a year, the fees it extracts will be 20% higher. "This can vary quite a bit, but a baseline number we've heard is that it should cost around $200,000 a year to run an ETF," Evans told BI. "More complicated strategies will cost more, simpler strategies will cost less, or if it's from a large firm that has economies of scale, it might cost less as well." He added: "Say an ETF charges 50 basis points with annual expenses of $200,000 a year. You need $40 million AUM in order to break even on that product." For some funds, there's also pressure associated with seed money. When an ETF launches, Evans said it might have some investors who promise to keep their capital locked up in the fund for a set period of time — say two or three years. Once that period ends, if the investors pull their money, it can be an existential threat to a fund if they haven't pulled in enough money from elsewhere. "Once that seed money dries up, in order for them to endure, they need to make sure they have enough investor interest, enough assets to sustain them," Evans said. Fund closures are increasingly common. Evans said a little more than 200 closed in 2023 — a record — and just under 200 closed in 2024. "As more companies are launching their products, more companies are closing down their products — the vast majority of which have really failed to catch on with investors," Evans said. "They've failed to generate either the performance or, in effect, the asset level to support these products." Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store