logo
‘The Slip' is a sweaty masterpiece

‘The Slip' is a sweaty masterpiece

Washington Post30-05-2025
And in this corner, weighing in at 487 pages, fighting out of Austin, against books far above its weight class — a novel making a worldwide debut: 'The Slip,' by Lucas Schaefer.
(Pause for wild cheering.)
Here's a novel so pumped up and shredded it can't possibly sit still on a shelf. Long before its official release on June 3, 'The Slip' was already bouncing down the ramp with both fists punching the air. I spent most of the week not just reading this story but cheering it on in a state of unhinged excitement.
Although ostensibly centered on boxing, the ring isn't the circumference of the plot. Indeed, so much is packed in that 'The Slip' feels more like a three-ring circus than a 12-round match. If you like your fiction neat and ruminative, stay away from this sweaty, outrageous book.
At the starting bell, a brief newspaper clipping announces that Nathaniel Rothstein is still missing after 10 years.
Jump back to 1998: A troubled 16-year-old Jewish kid from a Boston suburb arrives in Austin to spend the summer with his Uncle Bob, a history professor at the University of Texas. Nathaniel had gotten into a brutal altercation at school, and his mom hopes a change of venue might be good for him. Uncle Bob thinks the boy — 'a schlemiel of the first order' — needs structure and a place to blow off some steam. Fortunately, he knows a guy, David, one of his buddies from Terry Tucker's Boxing Gym, where everybody is welcome to work out and hang out. David can show Nathaniel the ropes at the gym and give him a volunteer gig at the nursing home where he's director of hospitality. Best scenario: By the end of the summer, Nathaniel will have put on a little muscle, gained some confidence and developed a better work ethic.
Things don't go as planned — though Schaefer clearly has a plan, which must look something like Carrie Mathison's mad wall of clues in 'Homeland.' Try to keep up.
The problem with Nathaniel — though it doesn't seem like a problem at first — is that he's fascinated by David. This charismatic Black man from 'the baddest shanty in all of Haiti' is everything the White teenager isn't but suddenly wants to be: fit, confident and (he claims) wildly experienced with the ladies. Nathaniel — pale and out of shape, a 'serial P.E. evader' — has absolutely no aptitude for boxing, but if he concentrates and puts in the time at Terry Tucker's Boxing Gym, who knows, maybe he could be as potent as David and feel a little more comfortable in his skin. And speaking of skin, it surely wouldn't hurt if he got a little more tan. Pretty soon, nobody particularly notices that 'the boy had begun to walk like David, smell like David, even dress like David.'
Nathaniel doesn't know anything about racial appropriation, but he vaguely senses that his hero worship might be infected with creepy racist overtones. At the very least, he suspects he shouldn't be searching the internet for ''makeup' + 'white to black.'' But David feels delighted to have such a dedicated boxing student, and if Nathaniel fetishizes his mentor, well, who's to know and what's the harm? David is used to taking young men under his strong wings and dispensing his libidinous wisdom, but 'no one had ever shown much interest.'
In Schaefer's narration, these shenanigans are wildly, transgressively hilarious, reminiscent of the brash sexual comedy of Philip Roth's early novels. But 'The Slip' is also exploring larger themes about the confounding nature of race in America and the human urge to slide into another identity. In fact, during what Schaefer calls 'the darkening of Nathaniel Rothstein,' the novel is just warming up.
A few miles away, an alienated 16-year-old high school student named Charles Rex Markham is beginning to realize he's not the boy everyone assumes he is. Changing his name to X seems like a good start toward realigning something essential about his gender presentation.
'X had always assumed his outside self was his self, his inside self the fantasy,' Schaefer writes, but what if it's the opposite? Trouble is, even in Weird Austin, X doesn't know any trans people, doesn't have access to stories of anyone going through what he's going through. But Schaefer does, and in moments like this, the breadth of his affection feels as wide as the depth of his comedy. In an era when racial and sexual identities have become fluid matters of who belongs and who doesn't, who lives and who dies, 'The Slip' stamps right into our most pressing debates. I won't tell you how Nathaniel and X's storylines eventually collide, but it's a plot that dares to be just as bizarre and unbelievable as real life — or what the narrator calls 'the vast peculiarities of this world.'
Despite its contemporary pulse and structural intricacy, Schaefer's novel plays off older stories, too. He's channeling the irrepressible energy of Henry Fielding. One outlandish strand of the plot has its roots in Shakespearean comedy. And Terry Tucker's Boxing Gym presents the high stakes of Hemingway's bullring, an existential arena where pretense and fakery are violently exposed.
Honestly, I haven't felt quite like this about a book since I was dazzled by Jonathan Franzen's 'The Corrections' almost 25 years ago. But despite his equally capacious reach, Schaefer is no Franzen wannabe. If anything, he's looser, confident enough to be sweet, and despite his richly comic voice, this satiric tongue never develops fangs.
Is 'The Slip' messy? Often. As the narrator admits, 'Stories that start as one thing sometimes become another.' But I'll forgive almost anything in a book this ambitious. And it has that essential quality of all great novels: It's easy to imagine how someone could hate it.
Like a new contender trying to make a name for himself, Schaefer never turns down a match — no matter where it takes him. That reflexive willingness to travel anywhere anytime provides 'The Slip' with some shaggy-dog side trips to Kenya and Haiti, plus crazy explorations of phone sex, illegal immigration, crooked police officers and the pursuit of clues down rabbit holes that run off down their own rabbit holes because — it's easy to forget amid all the antics — this is at its heart a mystery novel. And in these pages, the maxim of every high school drama teacher comes true: There are no small parts.
That sprawl will drive some readers crazy, but I could hang around Terry Tucker's for a long time, which if you'd told me last month, I'd have thought you were crazy. 'We are not static. This world is not static,' Schaefer writes. 'People don't go to boxing gyms to stay the same.'
People don't read great novels to stay the same either. Lace up — get in there.
Ron Charles reviews books and writes the Book Club newsletter for The Washington Post. He is the book critic for 'CBS Sunday Morning.'
By Lucas Schaefer.
Simon & Schuster. 487 pp. $29.99
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Intel CEO to meet with Trump at White House, WSJ reports
Intel CEO to meet with Trump at White House, WSJ reports

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Intel CEO to meet with Trump at White House, WSJ reports

After President Trump called for his resignation last week, Intel (INTC) CEO Lip-Bu Tan is set to meet with Trump at the White House Monday, according to a report from the Wall Street Journal. Yahoo Finance Tech Editor Dan Howley discusses the latest. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Morning Brief. But Dan, I do want to follow up and ask you about what's going on with Intel and its CEO Lip-Bu-Tan, who is reportedly going to be meeting with Trump today on a very different issue. Yeah, this is basically Trump trying to oust him. Uh he said that he had to leave the company, uh that he was, you know, quote unquote very conflicted. And this kind of goes back to his days with Cadence. Uh Cadence just settled a uh a suit with the government basically saying that they had provided some materials to a university that the government believes has links to the Chinese military. And so, you know, they settled, uh and then Senator Tom Cotton has come forward and said, look, you know, this is this is a big deal. Uh someone should, you know, look deeper into this. Uh Lip-Bu-Tan has some investments in Chinese companies. He is a US citizen. Uh and so, you know, there's this kind of back and forth as to, you know, does does do his prior uh, you know, uh kind of instances of investing in Chinese companies make him uh good for being Intel CEO or not. Related Videos Russia deal will be 'a canary for the markets' on US–China talks Trump's Nvidia, AMD China deal: National security risks persist Trump Says 'Not Up to Me' to Make a Deal With Putin Trump to Take Control of DC Police Department, Deploy National Guard Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Attorney for Hopewell vice mayor says lawsuit based on 'political disagreement,' not misconduct
Attorney for Hopewell vice mayor says lawsuit based on 'political disagreement,' not misconduct

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Attorney for Hopewell vice mayor says lawsuit based on 'political disagreement,' not misconduct

Calling it 'political disagreement, not actionable misconduct,' the attorney for Hopewell Vice Mayor Rita Joyner has asked a federal court to throw out former Hopewell City Manager Concetta Manker's almost $7 million wrongful termination lawsuit against Joyner. The paperwork was filed Aug. 8 in U.S. District Court in Richmond at the same time that the city of Hopewell filed its own motions to dismiss the suit. Manker, who was fired May 1 along with City Clerk Brittani Williams, filed the suit July 7 and is asking for a total of $6.85 million in damages, including punitive damages against Joyner, Mayor Johnny Partin Jr., and councilors Ronnie Ellis of Ward 4 and Susan Daye of Ward 5. Manker accuses Joyner of racism, citing several examples where the vice mayor reportedly said that Manker, who is Black, was 'Blacking up the city' by hiring people of color as major department heads. She also claims Joyner defamed her by calling her 'incompetent' in a 2024 email and stating that she hoped to get enough votes from the results of that November's election to have Manker fired. All four councilors who voted to fire Manker are White. Because Joyner was singled out for more than the others, she had to hire her own attorney and file a separate response. Joyner is represented by Virginia Beach-based attorney Anne Lahren. More: Judge continues Hopewell treasurer's case after her attorney asks to withdraw Vice mayor acted within 'authority' In the lawsuit, Manker cited Joyner for racism, defamation and blocking due process. In her response, Joyner's attorney said the vice mayor was acting totally within her authority as a Hopewell elected official and as one of seven people to whom the city manager is directly accountable. 'Joyner exercised her authority as an elected official to criticize Plaintiff's performance and advocate for a change in leadership consistent with the will of the voters,' the response stated. 'Plaintiff repeatedly characterizes Joyner's conduct as 'thwarting' her initiatives, opposing her policies, and expressing negative views about her job performance. These allegations, even if true, reflect political disagreement, not actionable misconduct.' None of Manker's allegations are 'a matter of law,' the response said. "The Complaint fails to allege facts sufficient to establish racial animus, deprivation of a protected property or liberty interest, or actionable defamatory statements,' it read. 'Moreover, Joyner's actions as an elected official – expressing criticism, participating in governance decisions, and communicating with constituents and the press about matters of public concern – are fully protected under both constitutional and state law doctrines, including qualified immunity and the First Amendment.' Because Manker's allegations represent 'disagreement with the political and policy choices of the City's duly elected leadership, rather than any legally cognizable wrongdoing,' the suit should be dismissed, according to the response. More: 'Sad and difficult case': First of 3 suspects in Hopewell child's shooting death sentenced Mirrors Hopewell's response Joyner's response jibes with the official position of Hopewell in the case. That response, filed by City Attorney Anthony Bessette, calls the allegations 'nothing more than legal conclusions, or where the allegations permit a court to infer no more than a possibility of misconduct. It stated that Manker was terminated because she 'was not performing at a level that met the City's legitimate expectations.' As for the claims of racism, the city's response called them 'flimsy. 'The race of the decision makers does not give rise to an inference of discrimination,' it read. 'This is particularly true where the same four councilors who voted to terminate Dr. Manker's employment voted to hire Michael Rogers, an African American male, to be the Interim City Manager. Because Dr. Manker was not replaced by someone outside of her protected class, there is no inference of race discrimination.' While the lawsuit alleges that Ellis blew 'a racist dog whistle' when he circulated campaign flyers saying it was time 'to take back our city,' it also claimed he improperly made the motion to reconsider a February vote to terminate Manker because he walked out of the meeting. Ellis is a battalion chief with the Hopewell Fire Department, and in that position, Manker claimed he directly reported to her; therefore, his motion was a violation of conflict-of-interest. Hopewell claims that Manker's termination was permissible because her contract was not originally in violation of the act. Virginia's Conflict-of-Interest Act [COIA] states that only contracts and purchases that run afoul of COIA can only be voided, and it is silent on any other legal transactions. 'The termination of Dr. Manker's contract is neither a contract nor a purchase made in violation of COIA,' the city's response said. 'Therefore, even if the vote violated COIA, the vote is not void or voidable.' No dates have been set for preliminary hearings on the lawsuit. Bill Atkinson (he/him/his) is an award-winning journalist who covers breaking news, government and politics. Reach him at batkinson@ or on X (formerly known as Twitter) at @BAtkinson_PI. This article originally appeared on The Progress-Index: Hopewell officials respond to former city manager's federal lawsuit Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store