logo
Prince Harry punched Prince Andrew over Meghan Markle remark, new book claims

Prince Harry punched Prince Andrew over Meghan Markle remark, new book claims

India Today16 hours ago
An exchange of words erupted on Saturday after shocking claims surfaced alleging that Prince Harry once punched Prince Andrew so hard it left him with a bloody nose. The confrontation reportedly originated from Andrew allegedly calling Meghan Markle an 'opportunist.'These explosive allegations come from Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York, a new book by historian Andrew Lownie, who is known for his investigative royal biographies.advertisementSUSSEX TEAM DISMISSES CLAIMS
Initially responding with a 'no comment' to The Daily Beast, Prince Harry's representatives later issued a firm denial. 'I can confirm Prince Harry and Prince Andrew have never had a physical fight, nor did Prince Andrew ever make those comments about the Duchess of Sussex to Prince Harry,' a spokesperson said.Despite the denial, Lownie rechecked on his claims, stating, 'I stand by my source, who has proved reliable and was close to Andrew. They had no reason to make this up and gave me lots of detail.'Lownie also admitted he did not reach out to the Sussex team for comment prior to publication, explaining that his publishers didn't require it.CLAIMS DEEPEN ONGOING ROYAL RIFT The claims add to the already fractious relationship between Prince Harry and the British press, especially the Daily Mail, where the story first ran. Prince Harry is currently involved in a lawsuit against the publication, accusing it of unlawful information gathering.Further details from the book delve into Prince Andrew's controversial past, with disturbing new allegations linked to Jeffrey Epstein. According to Lownie, Epstein once said Andrew was 'more obsessed with women than me.' Other sources cited in the book claim Andrew has slept with over 1,000 women and describe his 'serial sex addiction.'Prince Andrew was stripped of his royal patronages in 2022 following sexual abuse allegations by Virginia Giuffre, who accused him of abusing her when she was 17. Though the case was settled out of court, it led to his public fall from grace.- EndsMust Watch
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

5 true crime podcasts that reveal the failures of justice systems
5 true crime podcasts that reveal the failures of justice systems

Economic Times

time3 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

5 true crime podcasts that reveal the failures of justice systems

Synopsis These five investigative podcasts explore how justice can go disastrously wrong, focusing on wrongful convictions, systemic failures, and deep-rooted issues like racism, classism, and institutional negligence. Through gripping storytelling and firsthand accounts, they reveal how flawed legal systems in both the U.S. and U.K. have devastated lives—often with little accountability. NYT News Service **EMBARGO: No electronic distribution, Web posting or street sales before SUNDAY 5:01 A.M. ET JULY 27, 2025. No exceptions for any reasons. EMBARGO set by source.** A variety of podcasts show how a stew of racism, law enforcement misconduct and bureaucratic incompetence led to wrongful convictions on both sides of the Atlantic. (Irene Rinaldi/The New York Times) -- FOR EDITORIAL USE ONLY WITH NYT STORY INVESTIGATIVE PODCASTS BY EMMA DIBDIN FOR JULY 27, 2025. ALL OTHER USE PROHIBITED. -- True crime has remained a cornerstone of the industry ever since the first season of "Serial" in 2014 ushered podcasts into the media mainstream, and the expansion of audio reporting has allowed numerous cold cases and wrongful convictions to be reexamined. These five investigative podcasts document failures within justice systems on both sides of the Atlantic, caused by a combination of factors, including racism, classism, law enforcement misconduct and bureaucratic incompetence. 1. 'The Great Post Office Trial' The British postal service may not sound like an obvious setting for a real-life horror story, but that's exactly what unfolds in this gripping BBC investigative series. Beginning in the early 2000s, a number of post offices across Britain began recording major, unexplained shortfalls in cash that often snowballed into thousands of pounds. Sub-postmasters in charge of the affected offices, most of them relatively small, were held personally responsible for the losses, forced to take on devastating debts to pay them back and prosecuted for financial fraud. It took a long time for the truth to emerge -- the shortfalls were nonexistent, invented by a faulty new computer system -- and by then, hundreds of lives had been destroyed. Over 21 episodes, Nick Wallis chronicles what the country's Criminal Case Review Commission called the "biggest single series of wrongful convictions in British legal history." The Kafkaesque stories, told largely by the victims, describe being swept up in an inexplicable, seemingly bottomless, spiral of debt toward false accusations on the part of a system too clunky to recognize its own flaws. On the way, each time they sought help or explanations, they were met with gaslighting. Although a public inquiry has now led to overturned convictions and millions of pounds in compensation, the nightmarish toll of this 20-year scandal (13 lives were lost to suicide) feels too vast to fully repair. Starter episode: "The Imaginary Heist" 2. '13 Alibis' This absorbing series, which debuted in 2019, was the first podcast launched by "Dateline," the long-running television newsmagazine on NBC. Hosted and produced by Dan Slepian, an NBC News journalist, "13 Alibis" explores the 1996 killing of a teenager in New York City, and the conviction of a local man, Richard Rosario, despite Rosario having 13 witnesses placing him in another state at the time of the murder. The series is an ideal binge listen; episodes are typically just 15 to 20 minutes long. But it doesn't feel lightweight, packed as it is with interviews with Rosario, legal experts and detectives that help explain how so much exculpatory evidence was dismissed. There are also insights into systemic failures -- the prosecution case leaned heavily on a witness who identified Rosario in a police lineup, a method that has come under intense scrutiny in recent years thanks to the potential for false positives. Starter episode: "Behind Bars" 3. 'Bone Valley' The phrase "it's always the husband" has become a mantra among true crime fans, referring to the fact that women are statistically most likely to be killed by a current or former partner. But this kind of confirmation bias can have devastating consequences if it's given too much sway in a criminal investigation, as this immersive and moving podcast demonstrates. In 1987, Leo Schofield was charged with murder in the stabbing death of his wife, Michelle, 18, whose body was found in a drainage canal in Central Florida. Despite a lack of physical evidence, he was convicted and spent 36 years in prison. Even after Jeremy Scott repeatedly confessed to the crime, and his fingerprints were matched to a set found in Michelle's abandoned car, Schofield remained behind bars, and now, although he's out on parole, his conviction remains intact. The two seasons of "Bone Valley," however, are more about forgiveness and redemption than anger, exploring not just Schofield's tireless fight to prove his innocence, but his startlingly nuanced relationship with Scott. Starter episode: "God Help Us" 4. 'Wrongly Accused: The Annette Hewins Story' Many podcasts about wrongful convictions offer some comfort: The wrongly accused person actually gets a voice in the narrative (literally), and in the best-case scenario receives justice (if belatedly). That's not the case in this emotionally charged series from BBC Sounds, in which the accused in the title lost her life to a wrongful conviction. In 1995, Annette Hewins, then 31, was convicted of setting a fire that killed a mother and her two daughters in Wales. By the time her conviction was thrown out four years later, the damage had been done. "Wrongly Accused" is movingly narrated by Hewins' now adult daughter Nicole, who recounts the extensive trauma inflicted on their family, Annette's descent into substance use and mental illness after her trial, and the ways in which class dynamics and systemic failures contributed to a tragically mishandled investigation. Starter episode: "Her Story Must Be Heard" 5. 'In The Dark: Season 2' The first season of this American Public Media podcast, which delved into the haunting story of the 1989 disappearance of 11-year-old Jacob Wetterling, was a tough act to follow -- not least because its release coincided with the case finally being solved. Madeleine Baran, an investigative journalist, and her team wisely veered away from another cold case in the second season, instead delving into the equally disturbing story of Curtis Flowers, a Black man put on trial six times by a Mississippi prosecutor for the same quadruple homicide. Baran unpacks how such a wildly flawed case was repeatedly retried, even after numerous mistrials and overturned convictions. Starter episode: "July 16, 1996" This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

Prince Harry slams ‘defamatory' claims of fight with Prince Andrew over Meghan Markle
Prince Harry slams ‘defamatory' claims of fight with Prince Andrew over Meghan Markle

Mint

time35 minutes ago

  • Mint

Prince Harry slams ‘defamatory' claims of fight with Prince Andrew over Meghan Markle

Prince Harry has strongly denied claims that he physically attacked his uncle, Prince Andrew, during a heated confrontation over alleged comments made about Meghan Markle more than a decade ago. 'I can confirm Prince Harry and Prince Andrew have never had a physical fight, nor did Prince Andrew ever make the comments he is alleged to have made about the Duchess of Sussex to Prince Harry,' a spokesperson for the Duke of Sussex told The New York Post. The representative as per the report described the allegations as 'gross inaccuracies, damaging and defamatory remarks.' The denial comes in response to claims made in royal author Andrew Lownie's upcoming book, Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York, obtained by the Daily Mail. According to the book, Prince Harry allegedly punched Prince Andrew during a 'heated argument' after the latter reportedly referred to Meghan Markle as an 'opportunist' behind Harry's back. Lownie's book claims the confrontation left Andrew with a 'bloody nose' after 'punches were thrown.' The alleged incident is said to have occurred more than a decade ago, well before Harry and Meghan's 2018 wedding. At that time, Meghan Markle was still an actress best known for her role in the television series Suits. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have been estranged from the royal family for more than five years, following their decision to step back from royal duties and move to Montecito, California. They now live there with their two children, Archie, 6, and Lilibet, 4. The couple's strained relationship with the monarchy has remained the subject of ongoing public and media interest, with frequent scrutiny of their interactions—or lack thereof—with other members of the royal family.

F1 A 'Healthy' Space Without Disgraced Red Bull Boss Christian Horner, Says McLaren's Zak Brown
F1 A 'Healthy' Space Without Disgraced Red Bull Boss Christian Horner, Says McLaren's Zak Brown

News18

time44 minutes ago

  • News18

F1 A 'Healthy' Space Without Disgraced Red Bull Boss Christian Horner, Says McLaren's Zak Brown

Last Updated: McLaren CEO Zak Brown believes F1 is healthier after Christian Horner's exit as Red Bull team principal. Brown welcomed Laurent Mekies, hoping for a more constructive atmosphere. Formula One is in a better place following Christian Horner's exit as Red Bull team principal, according to McLaren CEO Zak Brown. Speaking after Sunday's Hungarian Grand Prix, Brown welcomed Horner's replacement, Laurent Mekies, and expressed optimism that the change would usher in a more constructive atmosphere across the paddock. 'I just left having a chat with Laurent. I'm happy he's in the role he's in," Brown told reporters in Budapest. 'I like Laurent, and I think that'll be healthy, and maybe we can get back to focusing on competition on the track." Brown's endorsement of Mekies—a well-respected figure in F1 with experience at Toro Rosso and Ferrari—comes after what he described as an increasingly 'unhealthy" dynamic at Red Bull under Horner's leadership. 'There's always going to be some political aspects to the sport," Brown added. 'I think it's going to be healthier with Laurent. I'm a fan of Laurent, I've known him for a long time, and I think it'll be good to go racing against him." Brown and Horner shared a long history—one that began during their days racing in British Formula Three and evolved into a sharp-edged rivalry as team principals. Their clashes were frequent and public, especially after Red Bull's cost cap breach in 2021, which McLaren saw as a serious sporting infraction. In 2022, Brown accused Red Bull of cheating when the FIA ruled that they had exceeded the $145 million spending limit. Horner fired back, calling Brown's comments 'tremendously disappointing." The tension often spilled into the media and was amplified in Netflix's Drive to Survive, where Horner was frequently portrayed as the sport's 'pantomime villain." While Max Verstappen continued to dominate the drivers' standings—winning his fourth consecutive title in 2024—McLaren ended Red Bull's run of constructor dominance last season. The competition on track was fierce, but Brown believes that Red Bull's internal culture under Horner had become toxic. Departure Under a Cloud Red Bull announced Horner's dismissal on July 9. Though no official reason was given, his departure followed a turbulent year in which he faced and denied allegations of misconduct made by a female Red Bull employee. He was ultimately cleared after an internal investigation, and he has not commented publicly since leaving the team. Brown did not directly reference those allegations, but he alluded to the broader dysfunction: 'It didn't seem like a healthy environment," he said of Red Bull under Horner. Brown emphasized his desire to return to a more respectful brand of competition—where fierce rivalry can coexist with mutual admiration and professionalism. 'From a fan's point of view, the drama of the villain stuff, I think, works," he said. 'But I also think the celebratory 'fight it out on track and photobomb each other'—I think that's a more fun way to go racing." He noted that Horner's approach often pushed the limits, particularly when it came to technical accusations such as McLaren's alleged use of 'flexi-wings.' 'When you start getting into frivolous allegations, I think that's just going too far," Brown said. 'If I look up and down the pit lane now, I see us fighting each other hard politically—but there being a line that's not crossed." 'That line got crossed before," he added. 'So I think we'll see a little bit of a change for the better." News18 Sports brings you the latest updates, live commentary, and highlights from cricket, football, tennis, badmintion, wwe and more. Catch breaking news, live scores, and in-depth coverage. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : Christian Horner F1 F1 2025 f1 news hungarian gp McLaren F1 red bull racing Zak Brown view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: August 03, 2025, 19:40 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store