Macron admits France's repressive violence in Cameroon's war for independence
It is France's first official acknowledgment of its repression of Cameroon's independence movement as a war.
The letter sent last month to Cameroonian President Paul Biya , follows a report released in January by a French-Cameroonian commission of historians. The report revealed that France carried out mass forced displacements, detained hundreds of thousands of Cameroonians in internment camps, and backed brutal militias to suppress the country's fight for independence and sovereignty between 1945 and 1971.
The commission was established by Macron during a 2022 visit to the capital Yaoundé. It examined France's role leading up to Cameroon's independence on Jan. 1, 1960, and in the years that followed.
'At the end of their work, the historians of the Commission clearly highlighted that a war had taken place in Cameroon, during which the colonial authorities and the French army carried out multiple forms of repressive violence in certain regions of the country — a war that continued beyond 1960 with France's support for actions carried out by the independent Cameroonian authorities,' the letter from Macron read.
Macron also acknowledged France's role in the deaths of independence leaders Ruben Um Nyobè, Paul Momo, Isaac Nyobè Pandjock and Jérémie Ndéléné, who were killed between 1958 and 1960 in military operations under French command.
Cameroon was a German colony until the end of World War I, when it was divided between Britain and France. The French-administered territory gained independence in 1960, and the southern British Cameroons joined in a federation the next year.
The independence war began in the 1950s when the nationalist UPC launched an armed struggle for full sovereignty and reunification. Even after independence, the French-backed government continued to fight the UPC for years,
The letter follows earlier moves by Macron to address France's colonial past, including his recognition of French responsibility in the 1994 Rwandan genocide and the massacre of Senegalese riflemen after World War II .
However, the French president has so far ruled out an official apology for torture and other abuses committed by French troops in Algeria.
The letter comes at a time when France's presence in its former colonies in Africa has become increasingly contested , particularly in the Sahel region.
___
Associated Press writer Sylvie Corbet in Paris contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
2 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
‘To Lose a War' Review: Back Again in Kabul
Afghanistan was an American national nightmare for two decades. It began with a war launched there in late 2001, after the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, and ended in a Vietnam-like military withdrawal under President Biden in August 2021—an ignominious pullout that was set in motion by President Trump the year before. Some 2,500 U.S. troops were killed during those two decades, and the cost to the American taxpayer of this fundamentally honorable, frequently naive and always brutal entanglement has been put at $2.3 trillion—all spent 'To Lose a War,' as Jon Lee Anderson titles his book on Afghanistan. The book's subtitle, 'The Fall and Rise of the Taliban,' is depressingly apt. Shortly after the war began, the U.S. and its allies defeated the Taliban—a cadre of austere and radical Islamist warriors who had established a Shariah-state in Afghanistan in 1996—only to see the same benighted group return to power in 2021. They had waited 20 years for their own restoration. ('You have the watches, but we have the time,' goes an adage attributed to the Taliban.) Now ensconced in power, the Taliban is ripping out all the modernity—however superficial—that had been brought to Afghanistan in their absence. Mr. Anderson is a long-serving war correspondent and staff writer for the New Yorker magazine. He first reported on Afghanistan in the late 1980s when the occupying Soviets were driven out by the mujahideen, an alliance of Afghan nationalists, tribal warlords and Islamist guerrillas who enacted their own defiant chapter in a long tradition of hostility to outsiders. 'Afghanistan has always been more of a battleground of history than it has been a nation,' writes Mr. Anderson, and the Soviets were the latest in a long line of foreign armies sent packing by 'the hardy Afghans.' 'To Lose a War' is a compilation of Mr. Anderson's previously published essays on Afghanistan (with a sprinkling of unpublished material). This is his second such collection, his first being 'The Lion's Grave' (2002). The latter, a concise book, was 'a chronicle of the first year of the American presence in Afghanistan.' Mr. Anderson had returned to the country in the wake of 9/11 and wrote an insightful series of dispatches at a time when Americans were thirsting for knowledge of a cryptic foe in an unfamiliar land. The last of these pieces was an investigation into who killed Ahmad Shah Massoud, the legendary mujahideen leader, on Sept. 9, 2001—two days before the al Qaeda attacks on U.S. soil. An admirable feat of reportage done at great personal risk, it was published in June 2002.
Washington Post
2 hours ago
- Washington Post
Eggs, tomatoes, sandwiches: The history of food as protest projectiles
The Roman Emperor Vespasian might not be as well-known as his predecessors Nero and Caligula, but when he died in A.D. 79, he left behind a legacy that included stabilizing the empire, beginning construction of the structure that would become known as the Colosseum — and being the first politician recorded to have been pelted with flying produce. During a visit to Africa, Vespasian was hit by rioters with turnips, according to the Roman historian Suetonius. Suetonius didn't note precisely what had angered the people or how the emperor reacted, but one thing is clear: They were onto something, and some 2,000 years later, the tradition of hurling food in political protest endures. Throughout the centuries, protesters have flung all manner of foods — eggs, pies, tomatoes, even fully composed sandwiches — at the targets of their ire. The latest incident occurred Sunday, when a man turned his Subway sandwich into a projectile and tossed it at a federal law enforcement officer, who was on the streets one day before President Donald Trump announced he would take over D.C. police 'to rescue our nation's capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse.' The man has now been fired from his Justice Department job, Attorney General Pam Bondi said, and is facing felony assault charges. Trump has been clear about his concerns over fruits and vegetables flying in his direction. In a 2022 videotaped testimony, Trump said, 'I think that [his guards] have to be aggressive in stopping that from happening,' according to a transcript in a lawsuit that accused Trump's security detail of assaulting protesters who allegedly planned to toss foodstuffs at a 2015 campaign rally. 'Because if that happens, you can be killed if that happens. … To stop somebody from throwing pineapples, tomatoes, bananas, stuff like that, yeah, it's dangerous stuff.' There are no prominent accounts of politicians being assassinated, or even maimed, by flying food. And pineapples? The bulky tropical treats would make terrible projectiles — and how many of them would one need to lug around, anyway, to ensure a successful attack? Bananas, too, are an unlikely missile. On tomatoes, though, Trump does have a point. Just hours after the news of Trump's fruit fears emerged in 2022, then-newly reelected French President Emmanuel Macron was pelted with a hail of cherry tomatoes when he appeared at an open-air market in a Parisian suburb. Macron, however, survived the onslaught, thanks in part to an umbrella someone nearby hoisted to shield him. Here's a rundown of foods that protesters have aimed at politicians and others: On Sunday, FBI agents were already on the ground in Washington, helping local law enforcement deal with crime, but Trump had not yet taken control of the city's police force or sent in the National Guard. Still, the presence of federal officers on the U Street NW corridor was enough to allegedly set off Sean Charles Dunn, who according to a federal court filing yelled obscenities at Metro Transit Police and U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers. He allegedly called them fascists, too. Then came the sandwich toss seen 'round the city: Dunn allegedly turned his Subway sandwich into an overhand fastball, aimed directly at an officer's chest. He fled on foot, only to be arrested sometime later. Jeanine Pirro, U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, announced Wednesday that Dunn was being charged with felony assault. At a Thursday news briefing, Bondi said Dunn, a Justice Department employee, had been fired. The charge drew immediate ridicule on a subreddit for D.C., where commenters suggested Pirro could have accused Dunn of 'assault with a deli weapon' or 'assault with a breadly weapon.' Dunn became an instant hero to some: His protest was quickly turned into graffiti art, ready to share on social media. 'The gyro we deserve,' noted one commenter. Rotten produce, particularly tomatoes, has historically been associated with theatrical performances more than political ones. (The popular movie-reviewing site Rotten Tomatoes plays on the trope.) A bon mot that is often attributed to playwright Oscar Wilde — that when a rotten cabbage fell at his feet onstage, he apocryphally addressed its sender, quipping 'every time I smell it, I shall be reminded of you' — was perhaps inspired by an actual event from 1895. The angry father of Wilde's lover arrived at a performance of his hit play 'The Importance of Being Ernest' with a bouquet of vegetables he meant to throw, although he was turned away by police. And an actor in a New York Times story from a dozen years earlier was described as being 'demoralized by tomatoes' during a lackluster performance. It's unlikely, however, that tomatoes were thrown at Shakespeare's Globe Theatre, as is sometimes described, since tomatoes weren't introduced in Europe until much later. Plenty of politicians, too, have been targeted by tomatoes (which are technically a fruit, not a vegetable, something the lawyers in the Trump deposition actually discussed in a very enjoyable aside.) Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin was spared from a splat during a book signing at the Mall of America when the man lobbing the fruit at her from a balcony in 2009 missed; in 2012, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's motorcade in Egypt was hit. And while Trump's fear of lethal tomatoes (maybe he's been watching too many B movies?) is overestimated, they can hurt — particularly if you're whacked with a hard, unripe specimen. One of the rules of La Tomatina — the festival in Bunol, Spain, where participants sling tomatoes at one another in celebration — is that you smash the tomatoes before throwing them at another person, to lessen the impact (and maximize the squish?). Egging is a long-standing tradition, carried on by middle-schoolers and political activists alike. As with tomatoes, the rotten variety has more impact (i.e. stench). In 2022, a trucker convoy protesting outside the home of a Democratic state lawmaker in Oakland, California, was met with a volley of eggs, many tossed by kids annoyed by the intrusion of the big rigs. The origins of the practice go back centuries. In the 1871 novel 'Middlemarch,' a man's ill-fated run for Parliament includes a scene in which a mocking crowd pelts his image — and him — with eggs. Over the years, prominent U.S. politicians have taken shellings: Eggs were lobbed at Vice President Richard M. Nixon at several stops on his 1960 presidential campaign; Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Massachusetts) was similarly greeted on the presidential trail in 1980. President Bill Clinton took an incoming oeuf in 2001 during a trip to Poland. And California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger should probably win the title for most-agreeable target for his reaction to getting hit in the (considerable) shoulders during his 2003 campaign. He defended the egging as part of free speech and joked that the perpetrator 'owes me bacon now.' A pie to the face is a quintessential comedic stunt, and it's all the more primally satisfying when the object is a person of importance. The visual gag was popularized in vaudeville and in silent movies, and on-screen pieing became a cinematic staple, with practitioners such as Charlie Chaplin, Laurel and Hardy, and the Three Stooges. Many a political mug has been mashed into a pie, some the work of collectives such as the Biotic Baking Brigade and Pie Kill, which targeted the rich and powerful with pastry. The pie-to-the face roll call includes San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown, New York Mayor Abraham Beame, Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D-New York), Agriculture Secretary Dan Glickman and Watergate plumber G. Gordon Liddy. A 2004 book by the Biotic Baking Brigade called 'Pie Any Means Necessary' offered practical advice for aspiring piers (selecting the right variety, aim and the like) as well as history and ruminations on the deeper meanings behind the prank, which it deemed a 'creative tool in the toolbox of resistance.' 'Pie-throwing utilizes carnival humor,' according to an essay in the book, 'unsettling the authority and control that those in power try to project.' 'Milkshaking' is a relatively more recent innovation. That could be because the milkshake itself has a shorter history than other commonly employed protest foods. It became a phenomenon employed against right-wing figures in the United Kingdom as Britain considered leaving the European Union. One protester tossed a banana-and-salted-caramel milkshake at Brexit leader Nigel Farage. Other targets included anti-Islam activist Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, known as Tommy Robinson, and anti-feminist political commentator Carl Benjamin, who was hit by a creamy treat on at least four occasions. A point against the practice is the cost, relative to, say, the moldy, leftover contents of one's produce drawer. But it has the advantage of being visually appealing — the sight of a suit-wearing stiff coated in sticky, drippy dairy is quite photogenic. And as The Washington Post reported at the time, 'attackers sipping shakes are far less conspicuous than bystanders clutching eggs.' The tossing of ribbons of pasta is more specific to a part of the world that's very much in the news now. In Russia and Ukraine, the expressions 'hang noodles over your ears' reportedly is akin to 'pulling one's leg' or deceiving them. In the midst of the 2014 Ukrainian crisis, in which the country's pro-Kremlin president was ousted, protesters threw piles of spaghetti at the Russian consulate in Odesa, essentially accusing the Russian media of inaccurate coverage.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump Left Fuming After World Leaders Gang Up on Him Over Putin
The world stage is not happy with Donald Trump. European leaders reportedly torched the U.S. president during a virtual call ahead of Russian President Vladimir Putin's Friday trip to Alaska, two sources familiar with the call told Axios. Trump downplayed the historic contact between the two superpowers as a 'feel-out' meeting, though the Europeans disagreed, claiming in the Wednesday call that Trump was leveraging his time with Putin to coordinate a ceasefire arrangement in Ukraine without that country's leader, President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, at the negotiating table. The call lasted for more than an hour and featured several snipes at Trump from French President Emmanuel Macron, who took a 'very tough' position on the meeting, according to a source on the call that spoke with Axios. Macron emphasized that 'a meeting is a very big thing to give to Putin.' But Trump 'didn't like that,' the source said. Zelenskiy offered his own blunt warning to Trump, underscoring to the U.S. leader that 'Putin cannot be trusted.' Polish President Karol Nawrocki 'reminded Trump of the Battle of Warsaw, exactly 105 years ago, when Poland fought together with Ukrainians against the Bolsheviks in Russia,' reported Axios. Putin's visit will be the first time that the Russian leader has stepped foot on U.S. soil in more than a decade—but what sort of new ground Trump will be able to gain is not clear. Putin has remained adamant that any peace deal would require 'international legal recognition' of Russia's 2014 annexation of Crimea, an internationally recognized portion of Ukraine, along with four regions it has claimed in the three years since it first invaded Ukraine. After the call with Trump, Zelenskiy appeared alongside German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, telling reporters in Berlin that the world needed to put more 'pressure' on Russia. Zelenskiy said that he believed Russia was bluffing about the regional economic impact of more international sanctions. At the same press conference, Merz claimed that Trump had 'largely agreed' that Russia could not be granted legal recognition of the territories it had claimed during the war. When pressed by reporters during a press conference later Wednesday as to whether he believed that he could use the meeting to convince Putin to stop targeting civilians in Ukraine, Trump responded in the negative. 'I guess the answer to that is no,' he said, 'because I've had this conversation [with Putin].'
