Etiquette expert reveals the one time you should avoid reclining your plane seat
Etiquette expert Diane Gottsman says there are some simple steps that travellers can take to avoid inconveniencing others when reclining their plane seats.
Ms Gottsman suggests informing the person behind before reclining.
Reclining is generally acceptable on overnight flights but should be avoided during meal or drink service, she says.
Passengers can decline a request from the person in front of them to recline, but should be prepared for varied reactions.
While reclining is a passenger's right, Ms Gottsman emphasises considerate use of the feature.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
34 minutes ago
- Telegraph
British holidaymakers to miss out on compensation after EU rule change
Britons will miss out on compensation for delayed flights after Brussels adopted a rule change following complaints from airlines. Payouts that were previously triggered by delays exceeding three hours will now only be made after four hours of holdups, European transport ministers agreed. The new regulation, hammered out following a decade of discussions and bargaining over passenger compensation, will apply to all services from EU countries to the UK. For the time being, travellers headed from Britain to the Continent will still qualify for a refund when flight delays hit the three-hour mark, unless they are flying with an EU-registered airline. While raising the compensation threshold, ministers also agreed to increase the minimum level of payment from €250 (£210) to €300 for shorter journeys and to €500 for those above 3,500km (2,175 miles). The original regulation, known as EU261, was passed in 2004 with the aim of ensuring that passengers received money and assistance in the event of flights being cancelled at short notice. Following Brexit, the UK adopted it into law so that the rights of travellers remained unchanged. However, the Government will now have to decide whether to adopt the amendments for outbound flights or stick with the original version. Taking no action might be welcomed by consumer groups but would have consequences for UK airlines, which would be at a disadvantage to their European rivals. It could also affect fares, with Ryanair having claimed that EU261 costs passengers £7 per ticket. Airlines for Europe, an industry group, had pressed for a higher compensation threshold, arguing that extending it to five hours – as originally proposed by the European Commission – would allow 70pc of flights that are cancelled to be rescued. It argued said that airlines inevitably scrapped flights once compensation was triggered, especially since the payouts involved were often higher than the ticket prices charged. It said a five-hour threshold would have made it more practical for carriers to fly in replacement aircraft so that more flights would get away, potentially benefiting 10m passengers a year. A spokesman said: 'Getting to their destination is the primary concern of passengers, even if it means getting to bed or arriving at their holiday resort late. But with a low cancellation threshold it makes more sense to call off the flight and take that hit.' Airlines have also railed against the fact that the compensation applies whether delays are caused by a crew shortage or technical issue that might be laid at their door, or by severe weather or air traffic control issues beyond their control. A number of extraordinary circumstances are expected to be added as part of revisions to 31 different air passenger rights. The revisions must still clear the European Parliament but are expected to become law in the bloc by the end of the year. The Department for Transport said the UK did not have to amend its legislation in line with any changes from the EU, and that any potential future reforms would require careful consideration on their merits, and be subject to public consultation.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Philippines offers Indian nationals visa-free travel to boost tourism
MANILA, June 7 (Reuters) - The Philippines said on Saturday that Indian nationals will be allowed to enter the country without a visa for tourism purposes beginning June 8. The visa-free arrangement is aimed at boosting tourism arrivals from India, which rose 12% in 2024 to nearly 80,000, according to data from the Department of Tourism. Despite the growth, Indian arrivals to the Philippines remain a small portion of the over five million who travelled to Southeast Asia last year. Under the visa-free policy, Indian nationals can enter the Philippines without a visa for up to 14 days. Those holding valid visas or residence permits from the United States, Australia, Canada, Schengen countries, Singapore, or the United Kingdom can stay in the Philippines visa-free for up to 30 days.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
British tourists are issued warning over new EU rules that will reduce compensation for delayed flights
British tourists have been warned that new EU rules may reduce compensation offered for delayed flights. Revised rules would see fewer protections for holiday-makers after EU transport ministers have agreed that the new rules would cut the compensation due for flight delays and increase the length of the delay before compensation applies. The new rules, agreed on earlier this week, will affect short and medium haul flights under 3,500km Travel Weekly reports. Proposals include reducing compensation for delays from €400 to €300 for flights up to 3,500 km, and from €600 to €500 for longer flights. Compensation can also now only be granted if the delay is six or more hours, up from from just four hours. Airlines can only deny claims for 'extraordinary and unavoidable circumstances' if they make every effort to mitigate a delay or cancellation. The changes come after airlines lobbied for compensation on short-haul, European flights to only apply for delays of five hours or more and for nine hours for long-haul flights. They argued that airlines were cancelling more flights than they would otherwise in response to delays because of traffic or technical problems. New rules would also see passengers re-routed in the event of delays or cancellations and passengers could be asked to travel with other airlines or via a suitable alternative mode of transport to reach their destination. If re-routing is not provided within three hours, passengers can then make their own arrangements and claim a refund up to the value of 400 per cent of the original ticket price. The rule changes would also see clarifications on passengers's right to assistance with greater transparency on help available, what they are entitled to including food, drink and accommodation as well as being allowed to disembark during long delays even if they have already boarded. Ourania Georgoutsakou, managing director of Brussels-based Airlines for Europe (A4E) which represents Europe's major carriers, said: 'Europe has been waiting for transparent and workable passenger rights for 12 years and member states have fallen at the final hurdle. 'Rather than providing delay thresholds of five and nine hours that would save up to 70% of rescuable cancelled flights, member states have diluted the EC's original proposal and introduced even more complexity.' The changes would be the first to EU Regulation 261 since its introduction in 2004 and follow 12 years of stalled negotiations on revisions first introduced in 2013, according to the publication. A statement on behalf of the Council of ministers following the agreement said: 'The revision answers a need for simpler and clearer rules while aiming at striking a better balance between a high level of protection for passengers and preserving connectivity and a level playing field for the aviation sector. 'The new rules aim to strengthen and clarify several existing air passenger rights, together with the introduction of some new rights. 'Key rights that were strengthened include the rights to be rerouted, the right to assistance and the right to information.'
