
How Netanyahu factors into Trump's ultimate goal: brokering peace in the Middle East
The difference underscores Trump's parallel approaches to his Israeli counterpart. Even as he pulls Netanyahu close, joining Israel's war on Iran and calling for Netanyahu's corruption trial to be canceled, he is applying pressure on the prime minister to do something for him: end the war in Gaza.
For Trump, a deal ending the 21-month conflict in Gaza would be another data point in both his effort to win a Nobel Peace Prize and his long-running and highly difficult quest to cement peace in the Middle East as part of his legacy. He clearly sees Netanyahu as a critical ally in that goal, though the president has occasionally lashed out at the Israeli leader when he appeared to become an obstacle instead. Now, Trump needs both Hamas and Netanyahu to agree to terms each has previously rejected, namely language about whether the ceasefire will end the war altogether.
After months of halting progress, there does appear to be new momentum toward a deal. Trump simply needs to ensure, potentially by exerting additional pressure on Netanyahu during the White House visit, that it doesn't fall apart.
'The president could put pressure on the prime minister, but can also give enticements, the carrots, if you will,' said Michael Oren, the former Israeli ambassador to the United States. 'One of them would be keeping a military option on the table vis-a-vis Iran, if Iran tries to rebuild some of those destroyed or obliterated nuclear facilities – a very difficult decision given the depth of American opposition, of the public, to further American military involvement in Iran.'
Negotiators from Israel and Hamas were in Qatar hammering out details of a 60-day truce that would include phased release of hostages and allow new aid to flow into the besieged enclave. Trump's foreign envoy Steve Witkoff plans to join the talks later this week, the White House said Monday, an indication that progress was still being made in the talks.
Qatar put forward the latest proposal early last week, and it was quickly accepted by Israel. The plan attempted to address one of Hamas' key demands that any ceasefire agreement would lead to a comprehensive end to the war.
On Friday, Hamas said they had responded positively to the proposal, but that they had also requested adjustments. Despite saying these changes were 'unacceptable,' Israel also announced it would send a team to take part in proximity talks, one of the last stages in the process before a final deal.
In the past, ceasefire deals have seemed close, only to vaporize over intractable disagreements. But the shifting dynamics in the region, prompted by the 12-day war between Israel and Iran, seemed to generate greater optimism that a deal could be at hand.
'The prime minister's coming to this meeting now much strengthened by Israel's military victory over Iran. The president is coming into this meeting much strengthened by America's victory over Iran,' Oren said. 'Both leaders can show a certain amount of flexibility. Clearly, the president wants this deal.'
If an agreement is struck, Trump appears poised to take credit, with help from Netanyahu. The prime minister said as he was departing Israel to come to Washington that his meeting with Trump 'can certainly help advance these results,' and it was clear Trump was hoping the meeting would result in progress.
'I think there's a good chance we have a deal with Hamas during the week, during the coming week, pertaining to quite a few of the hostages,' Trump told reporters in New Jersey on Sunday as he was preparing to return to Washington.
In Trump's mind, ending the war in Gaza could be a critical step toward his larger goals for the region, including the biggest prize: normalizing relations between Saudi Arabia and Israel as part of the Abraham Accords that he brokered during his first term. Having Riyadh join the accords could prompt other Arab or Muslim countries to come along as well.
Saudi leaders — including the powerful Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman — have said normalization can't happen while the war in Gaza is ongoing, making a ceasefire deal critical to Trump's broader ambitions.
Also critical to Trump's wider goals: a discussion about what happens in Gaza after the war ends. Israel has insisted Gaza cannot govern the enclave. It remains unclear what role the Palestinian Authority would play; it could be critical to securing support from Gulf nations in helping rebuild Gaza.
One option rarely discussed is Trump's proposal — first raised during Netanyahu's visit to the White House in February — to seize control of the strip, remove its Palestinian residents and develop the area as a 'Riviera of the Middle East.'
The plan caused an uproar when Trump first raised the idea alongside Netanyahu during an East Room press conference. But it's mostly been put aside, at least in public discussions of the president's Middle East plans.
On Monday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the war needed to end, and the hostages returned, before any rebuilding can begin – walking back the 'take over' language that Trump had once used to describe those plans.
'This has become an uninhabitable place for human beings. And the president has a big heart, he wants this to be a prosperous, safe part of the region where people and families can thrive. And there will be a need for a real rebuilding effort when the time comes,' she said. 'But right now, we need to end this war and we need to bring all of the hostages home.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
DOGE sprouts in red states, as governors embrace the cost-cutter brand and make it their own
HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — The brash and chaotic first days of President Donald Trump 's Department of Government Efficiency, once led by the world's richest man Elon Musk, spawned state-level DOGE mimicry as Republican governors and lawmakers aim to show they are in step with their party's leader. Governors have always made political hay out of slashing waste or taming bureaucracy, but DOGE has, in some ways, raised the stakes for them to show that they are zealously committed to cutting costs. Many drive home the point that they have always been focused on cutting government, even if they're not conducting mass layoffs. 'I like to say we were doing DOGE before DOGE was a thing,' Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds said in announcing her own task force in January. Critics agree that some of these initiatives are nothing new and suggest they are wasteful, essentially duplicating built-in processes that are normally the domain of legislative committees or independent state auditors. At the same time, some governors are using their DOGE vehicles to take aim at GOP targets of the moment, such as welfare programs or diversity, equity and inclusion programs. And some governors who might be eyeing a White House run in 2028 are rebranding their cost-cutting initiatives as DOGE, perhaps eager to claim the mantle of the most DOGE of them all. No chainsaws in the states At least 26 states have initiated DOGE-style efforts of varying kinds, according to the Economic Policy Institute based in Washington, D.C. Most DOGE efforts were carried out through a governor's order — including by governors in Florida, Iowa, Louisiana, Montana, New Hampshire and Oklahoma — or by lawmakers introducing legislation or creating a legislative committee. The state initiatives have a markedly different character than Trump's slash-and-burn approach, symbolized by Musk's chainsaw-brandishing appearance at a Conservative Political Action Committee appearance in February. Governors are tending to entrust their DOGE bureaus to loyalists, rather than independent auditors, and are often employing what could be yearslong processes to consolidate procurement, modernize information technology systems, introduce AI tools, repeal regulations or reduce car fleets, office leases or worker headcounts through attrition. Steve Slivinski, a senior fellow at the libertarian Cato Institute who researches state government regulatory structures, said that a lot of what he has seen from state-level DOGE initiatives are the 'same stuff you do on a pretty regular basis anyway' in state governments. States typically have routine auditing procedures and the ways states have of saving money are 'relatively unsexy," Slivinski said. And while the state-level DOGE vehicles might be useful over time in finding marginal improvements, "branding it DOGE is more of a press op rather than anything new or substantially different than what they usually do,' Slivinski said. Analysts at the pro-labor Economic Policy Institute say that governors and lawmakers, primarily in the South and Midwest, are using DOGE to breathe new life into long-term agendas to consolidate power away from state agencies and civil servants, dismantle public services and benefit insiders and privatization advocates. 'It's not actually about cutting costs because of some fiscal responsibility,' EPI analyst Nina Mast said. Governors promoting spending cuts Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry rebranded his 'Fiscal Responsibility Program' as Louisiana DOGE, and promoted it as the first to team up with the federal government to scrub illegitimate enrollees from welfare programs. It has already netted $70 million in savings in the Medicaid program in an 'unprecedented' coordination, Landry said in June. In Oklahoma, Gov. Kevin Stitt — who says in a blurb on the Oklahoma DOGE website that 'I've been DOGE-ing in Oklahoma since before it was cool" — made a DOGE splash with the first report by his Division of Government Efficiency by declaring that the state would refuse some $157 million in federal public health grants. The biggest chunk of that was $132 million intended to support epidemiology and laboratory capacity to control infectious disease outbreaks. The Stitt administration said that funding — about one-third of the total over an eight-year period — exceeded the amount needed. The left-leaning Oklahoma Policy Institute questioned the wisdom of that, pointing to rising numbers of measles and whooping cough cases and the rocky transition under Stitt of the state's public health lab from Oklahoma City to Stillwater. Oklahoma Democrats issued rebukes, citing Oklahoma's lousy public health rankings. 'This isn't leadership,' state Sen. Carri Hicks said. 'It's negligence." Stitt's Oklahoma DOGE has otherwise recommended changes in federal law to save money, opened up the suggestion box to state employees and members of the general public and posted a spreadsheet online with cost savings initiatives in his administration. Those include things as mundane as agencies going paperless, refinancing bonds, buying automated lawn mowers for the Capitol grounds or eliminating a fax machine line in the State Board of Licensure for Professional Engineers and Surveyors. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed an executive order in February creating a task force of DOGE teams in each state agency. In the order, DeSantis recited 10 points on what he described as his and Florida's 'history of prudent fiscal management' even before DOGE. Among other things, DeSantis vowed to scrutinize spending by state universities and municipal and county governments — including on DEI initiatives — at a time when DeSantis is pushing to abolish the property taxes that predominantly fund local governments. His administration has since issued letters to universities and governments requesting reams of information and received a blessing from lawmakers, who passed legislation authorizing the inquiry and imposing fines for entities that don't respond. After the June 30 signing ceremony, DeSantis declared on social media: 'We now have full authority to DOGE local governments.' In Arkansas, Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders launched her cost-cutting Arkansas Forward last year, before DOGE, and later said the state had done the 'same thing' as DOGE. Her administration spent much of 2024 compiling a 97-page report that listed hundreds of ways to possibly save $300 million inside a $6.5 billion budget. Achieving that savings — largely by standardizing information technology and purchasing — would sometimes require up-front spending and take years to realize savings. ___ Follow Marc Levy on X at:
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dr. Anosh Ahmed Foundation, Donates to Texas Flood Victims and Launches Relief Initiative
CHICAGO, July 12, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Dr. Anosh Ahmed, a respected Republican figure and founder of the Anosh Supports America First Foundation, has pledged immediate aid to families affected by the devastating floods across Texas. Demonstrating his deep commitment to American values and conservative leadership, Dr. Anosh Ahmed Foundation has announced plans to donate to relief efforts, support grieving families, and help rebuild homes for uninsured victims. Standing with Texas As rising waters displace thousands across the state, Dr. Anosh Ahmed has activated his foundation's emergency response team to work with local authorities and communities hardest hit by the disaster. His support will focus on: Direct financial assistance to families who have lost loved ones Shelter and essential supplies for displaced residents Home rebuilding assistance for uninsured families Collaboration with churches, community organizations, and first responders to ensure effective outreach 'When Americans suffer, we don't wait — we act,' said Dr. Anosh Ahmed. 'This is not just about recovery. It's about restoring dignity and security for our fellow citizens.' America First in Action Founded earlier this year, the Anosh Supports America First Foundation was created to uphold and support the pillars of American strength — the military, law enforcement including members of Department of Justice and ex-FBI agents and their families, first responders, and patriotic communities. Dr. Anosh Ahmed's latest move expands that mission into disaster relief, reinforcing his belief that helping those in need is one of the most American acts of all. 'Being a proud Republican and believer in America First means stepping up when our people need help — not just with words, but with real action,' he added. Rebuilding Lives, Not Just Structures Dr. Anosh Ahmed's Texas relief plan includes long-term support beyond the initial recovery. His foundation will: Fund home reconstruction for uninsured families Provide mental health and grief counseling resources Support first responders and veterans affected by the disaster Launch community rebuilding initiatives focused on resilience and preparedness A special 'Texas Strong: America First Gala' will be hosted by the foundation in Dallas to raise additional funds and awareness. Supporting Those Who Serve Dr. Ahmed emphasized that veterans, police officers, and military families will be given priority in the foundation's housing and aid programs. His long-standing appreciation for America's protectors is at the heart of every initiative he undertakes. 'Our heroes in uniform deserve more than just our thanks—they deserve action. This relief effort will ensure they are not left behind,' Dr. Anosh Ahmed stated. About Dr. Anosh Ahmed Dr. Anosh Ahmed is a physician, entrepreneur, and Republican philanthropist dedicated to the principles of service, patriotism, and community. Through his Anosh Supports America First Foundation, he works to uplift those who serve and strengthen American communities in times of need. #anoshAhmed #dranoshahmed #anoshahmedMD #dranoshahmedchicago #anoshahmedofficial #anoshIncfoundation #anoshahmedleadership #anoshahmedbook Media Contact: Sandra Gomez Dr. Anosh Ahmed Foundation+1 (346) 768 7004 legal@ A photo accompanying this announcement is available at in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' is affecting his approval ratings: See recent polls
President Donald Trump's second term continues to spark emotions - most recently with the approval of his controversial "One, Big, Beautiful Bill" just ahead of America's Independence Day weekend. The massive tax and spending bill was signed into law on July 4 at a White House ceremony. The plan makes permanent the 2017 tax cuts from Trump's first term. It reduces some taxes, but raises others - including substantially cutting Medicaid and other safety net programs - and changes spending amounts. Here's a snapshot of the President's approval ratings across the U.S.: The Economist Trump approval rating, according to the latest from The Economist (July 7, 2025): Favorable: 42% Unfavorable: 54% Not sure: 5% The report shows that voters believe the top three most important issues Americans are facing are inflation/prices, jobs and the economy, followed by health care. This ranking has remained steady in the past few months. Silver Bulletin Trump approval rating according to Pollster Nate Silver's 'Silver Bulletin' newsletter (July 6, 2025): Favorable: 45% Unfavorable: 52% New York Times Trump approval rating, according to the latest New York Times poll (July 6, 2025): Favorable: 45% Unfavorable: 52% Rasmussen Trump approval rating, according to the latest Rasmussen poll (July 4, 2025): Favorable: 49% Unfavorable: 48% The latest figures include 36% of U.S. voters who "strongly approve" of the job Trump is doing as president as well as 41% of voters who "strongly disapprove," according to the report. Navigator Research Trump approval rating, specifically regarding the public's perception of President Trump, according to the latest Navigator Research poll (July 3, 2025): Favorable: 47% Unfavorable: 52% The economy continues to lead as the top overall issue, with 41% identifying either 'inflation and the cost of living' or 'jobs and the economy' as a priority, according to the report. Also noted, 61% of Americans polled said the economy is doing 'not so good' or 'poor," and 45% of those polled "believe the economy will be worse a year from now." Real Clear Politics Trump approval rating, according to the latest Real Clear Politics poll (July 2, 2025): Favorable: 47% Unfavorable: 50% Quantus Insights Trump approval rating, according to the latest from Quantus Insights poll (July 2, 2025): Favorable: 47% Unfavorable: 49% Not sure: 4% The report also asked how people felt about American pride, with 77% responding they are proud to be American and 23% said not proud. Those polled were also asked what American values they hold most dear; the top three responses were freedom of speech, equality under the law and democracy/voting rights. Morning Consult Trump approval rating, according to the latest Morning Consult poll (June 30, 2025): Favorable: 47% Unfavorable: 50% Quinnipiac University Trump approval rating, according to the latest Quinnipiac University poll (June 26, 2025): Favorable: 41% Unfavorable: 54% Reuters/Ipsos Trump approval rating, according to the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll (June 21-23, 2025): Favorable: 41% Unfavorable: 57% Gallup Trump approval rating, according to the latest Gallup poll (June 1-19, 2025): Favorable: 40% Unfavorable: 57% No opinion: 3% Cygnal Trump approval rating, which has "barely budged since May," according to the latest Cygnal poll (June 10, 2025): Favorable: 46% Unfavorable: 51% Note: Polls are constantly changing and different pollsters ask different varieties of the population. These numbers were reflected as of Monday, July 7, 2025, at 6:30 a.m. A president's approval rating reflects the percentage of Americans polled who approve of the president's performance. Anything can impact a president's rating, such as legislation passed, actions and elections. According to ABC News, an approval rating doesn't just represent how well the administration is faring for the general public but could factor into the outcome of an upcoming election or how much they accomplish while in office. Presidential approval ratings were first conducted by the founder of the American Institute of Public Opinion, George Gallup, around 1935 to gauge public support for the president of the United States during their term. While Gallup has tracked presidential approval for 70 years, other organizations also conduct and release their own polls. Among them, Ipsos and Morning Consult. A historical analysis by Gallup shows Trump's approval ratings in June of his first years in office − both as the 45th and 47th presidents − are lower than any other modern president at the same time in their administrations. The average is 52%, according to the report. In the poll - conducted from June 2-19 - 40% approved of Trump's job performance. Here is how that compares to other presidents in June of their first year of their term, according to Gallup: Joe Biden (June 2021) - 56% approve Donald Trump (June 2017) - 38% approve Barack Obama (June 2009) - 61% approve George W. Bush (June 2001) - 54% approve Bill Clinton (June 1993) - 41% approve George H.W. Bush (June 1989) - 70% approve Ronald Reagan (June 1981) - 59% approve Jimmy Carter (June 1977) - 63% approve Richard Nixon (June 1969) - 63% approve John F. Kennedy (June 1961) - 73% approve Contributing USA Today network This article originally appeared on Rockland/Westchester Journal News: Donald Trump approval ratings after controversial bill: See polls