
How a city came together to rewrite its future in the age of climate change
Complaining about government inaction is practically a national hobby for South Africans – and I get it. Taxes are paid, yet services go undelivered and infrastructure crumbles. But by law, it's the government's job, not ours, to protect the most vulnerable – to ensure safe housing, emergency relief and basic services, especially when disaster strikes.
But what happens when ordinary citizens decide waiting isn't good enough? What happens when communities, academics, activists and city officials gather, in churches, libraries, and community halls (wherever they can find a free room) to build the system they wish already existed?
In April 2022, catastrophic floods devastated KwaZulu-Natal, causing landslides, collapsing apartment blocks, sweeping away informal settlements and leaving about 489 people dead and more than 40,000 displaced. It is widely considered one of the deadliest storms of this generation in South Africa.
A year later, the City of eThekwini's 2023 Integrated Development Plan (IDP) came out, and the 1,000-page document was widely criticised as a copy-and-paste job.
It reused outdated content from previous integrated development plans (2002 and 2015) and failed to meaningfully address climate adaptation or disaster risk in human settlements. Despite a promised R1-billion flood relief fund from the National Treasury, the money had still not been accessed by the province.
'We didn't want them to fix the city back to the way it was, which was very unequal,' said Kira Erwin of the environmental justice group groundWork, and part of the Durban Coalition's leadership. 'It needed to be fixed in a way that also addressed inequality.'
After the floods, groundWork, along with civil society, academics and residents, grew increasingly concerned that eThekwini wasn't adapting to climate risks.
'The question was, what do we need to do to become better prepared the next time a disaster like this comes?' said Professor Rajen Naidoo, the head of Occupational and Environmental Health at the University of KwaZulu-Natal. ' Because the disaster is going to come.'
International scientists from the World Weather Attribution group found that human-induced climate change had made the type of extreme rainfall that hit KZN in April 2022 at least twice as likely, and 4-8% more intense.
'We were not seeing a substantive shift in the municipality that recognised how we were going to adapt our infrastructure and keep people safe,' said Erwin.
'It was a very difficult time,' recalled Thapelo Mohapi, general secretary of grassroots movement Abahlali baseMjondolo (meaning 'Residents of the Shacks' in isiZulu). 'The government was nowhere to be found.'
Nicole Williams from Springfield said that after the floods flattened formal housing in her area and claimed three lives, residents began waking up. 'It's our constitutional right to expect decent living conditions and proper infrastructure,' she said. 'But if we don't hold them accountable, no one will.'
'We decided civil society could drive such a process … we really started to think through what it would take to keep ourselves safe,' said Erwin.
And so at the end of 2023, the Durban Coalition was formed. For 18 months, people from informal settlements to suburban neighbourhoods came together with urban planners, grassroots groups, academics and officials to imagine a just, climate-resilient city built from the ground up.
In community centres, boardrooms and libraries, they debated, listened, and co-drafted a bottom-up alternative to conventional planning.
The result was a living document, the People's Plan for the Right to Housing in an Age of Climate Change: a 20-page blueprint for the city, built like an integrated development plan, but one that is concise, readable, (published in both English and isiZulu) and puts human rights, climate resilience and social justice at its core.
Vusi Zweli, chairperson of Ubunye Bama Hostela, a community group of hostel dwellers in Durban and part of the coalition, said the People's Plan helped residents understand why they were 'always fighting a losing battle' – because key issues weren't included in the city's integrated development plan, and therefore had no budget.
'Many councillors don't understand what's inside the IDP themselves,' he said. 'So you can't expect them to explain it to people on the ground.'
With the People's Plan translated into isiZulu and discussed in hostel meetings and workshops, Zweli said residents could finally understand what to expect from government planning.
'We call it the People's Plan – it may sound like we're tossing in a populist term, but I think that phrase captures the process into the final document,' said Naidoo.
'This was written by the people, for the people. It's not a politician telling us what they think is best – it's what we've lived through, and know what we need,' said Williams from Springfield.
The People's Plan is built on five key pillars:
Human rights-centred housing: The plan recommends that the revised housing strategy, as part of eThekwini's Integrated Development Plan and Housing Sector Plan, must be grounded in human rights principles. That means planning and service delivery should prioritise safety, health and inclusivity. Basic services — water, sanitation, waste removal — must be prioritised and maintained.
Inclusive governance: The plan proposes creating a municipal climate change high-level working group, including civil society, business and academia, to coordinate resilience planning. It also calls for a formal multi-stakeholder forum for integrated human settlements.
Climate resilience in human settlements: Housing must account for climate risks like heat and flooding. The plan calls for vulnerability mapping, early warning systems and updating strategies like Durban's Resilience Strategy with current research.
Support for displaced and vulnerable groups: Targeted responses are required for displaced people, refugees, and residents of informal settlements. The plan recommends tenure security, access to affordable, well-located housing, and support for inner-city social rentals. It calls for inclusive, community-driven rental housing solutions.
Implementation and accountability: For the plan to succeed, municipal capacity must be strengthened, which includes increasing capital and operational budgets for housing, filling critical municipal posts and fostering a culture of innovation and responsiveness. Civil society and academia should monitor progress and share knowledge.
Unlike many policy documents, the People's Plan is designed with clear institutional reforms and practical steps. It proposes high-level structures, budget allocations and performance indicators tied to measurable outcomes. And it insists on partnerships for monitoring and adapting over time.
'The floods are because of climate change, but the consequences are because of poor management and poor planning,' said Naidoo, whose decades-long experience in occupational and environmental health was crucial in helping communities after the 2022 floods and in creating this document.
Vulnerable groups – children, the elderly, pregnant women – bear the brunt, he explained. 'If government doesn't have the skills, then we bring in technical experts. That's the role we want to play as civil society.'
For Naidoo, the plan's launch was historic: 'I think for the first time we had representation in a single room from communities across eThekwini. It may not have been like the Freedom Charter, but it followed the same consultative route.'
But getting the city to take the plan seriously wasn't straightforward. Initially, things looked hopeful – officials participated in workshops throughout the plan's creation and attended the launch in November 2024, indicating it would inform the next integrated development plan.
However, when the draft 2025/2026 integrated development plan came out, the coalition was disappointed. Though improved in structure, it still lacked meaningful climate action. The People's Plan was pushed to an appendix – meaning no budget, no department ownership and no power.
Still, the coalition kept on working with the municipality – with Durban coalition members, including GroundWork, sending in official comments during the official public comment period calling for the proper implementation of their plan.
In late May 2025, after sustained advocacy, city officials reportedly agreed to formally reference the People's Plan in the integrated development plan and to advocate for its implementation in partnership with civil society.
Then, on Thursday, 29 May, while I was speaking to Erwin about the plan's significance, she interrupted excitedly: 'Julia, you're not going to believe this – I just got an email saying the 25/26 IDP was adopted by council today.'
Bongumusa Zondo, the chief strategy officer for the eThekwini municipality, whose office oversees the integrated development plan processes, confirmed this, and told Daily Maveric k that, 'the People's Plan is aligned with the Municipality Resilience Strategy, Durban Climate Change Strategy and Action Plan.'
While those municipal strategies exist, Erwin noted that implementation had lagged. What made the People's Plan different, she explained, was its integrated approach to housing and climate – a shift from siloed thinking. It promotes community-led disaster preparedness and envisions local systems – water, food, energy – that can function independently in crises.
Zondo added that the city had included a performance indicator in its 2025/26 Service Delivery and Budget Implementation Plan, reporting on projects aimed at improving municipal resilience. He said the municipality was strengthening partnerships with civil society to improve neighbourhood-level disaster planning and response.
United by similarities
'There's a long history of tension between ratepayers' associations and informal settlement organisations in South Africa, especially in Durban,' said Mohapi.
Formal residents often see shack-building as a threat to property values and services, while shack dwellers build near jobs and transport.
'It's always been survival of the fittest,' Mohapi said, 'with the ratepayers feeling they are subsidising the poor when the government isn't doing enough. But in the coalition, we've come to see that we are all victims.'
He described how powerful it was to engage with people 'who had never seen us as human beings… to have that audience for the first time was great'.
He said it was also important to be heard by academics, 'and write what we are saying and put that in a form of research and then of course put it in a plan that is going to be handed over to government'.
The coalition, he said, allowed honest exchange. 'We shared our pain and they shared their views.
'Today, we're friends. No one is undermined because they come from an affluent area. We discuss issues as equals.'
Mohapi called the ratepayers' group in the coalition progressive 'because they managed to sit with us, listen to us, and they actually now realise that we are the same and we have the same issues'.
Nicole Daniels, founder of Springfield Disaster Management and a former ratepayers' association member, agreed.
Though she had long empathised with informal settlements, she said the coalition made shared realities clearer. 'The process opened up space for people from all walks of life to realise we're facing the same problems in eThekwini,' Daniels said. 'Whether you live in formal or informal housing, the challenges – poor infrastructure, unresponsive government – are the same.'
In April 2022, mudslides killed three people in Springfield. Though the area has formal housing, it's on a floodplain. Poor maintenance and extreme weather lead to damage, sewage spills, power cuts and water outages.
Daniels recalled how their councillor, who comes from an informal settlement, was shocked. 'He said, 'I had no idea people in formal housing have the same problems as us.' '
Zondo from eThekwini municipality said that, 'the People's Plan is very important because it demonstrates the bottom-up approach, organised society taking responsibility to work with their government to address local governance matters for the benefit of all. '
Mohapi, as well as the other collaborators, are happy that their document is finally in the process of being implemented into real policy.
'And I think it's very important to realise that even though we are poor, we can think for ourselves and we can come up with solutions,' said Mohapi.
'And it is only the people who are affected directly by the problem of disaster that can come up with solutions on how to get out of that problem. And the People's Plan is just about that.' DM
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
44 minutes ago
- IOL News
Marikana resembles ANC's shameful legacy
The National Prosecuting Authority is set to reinstate charges against the police officers who were acquitted for the Marikana Massacre. Image: Leon Sadiki / Independent Newspapers Archives SATURDAY marked the 13th anniversary of the Marikana massacre, a commemoration that carries no significance for the ANC and its current President Cyril Ramaphosa. It's no wonder that South Africans no longer trust the party with the responsibility of leading this country. It cannot own up to the tragedy that befell the miners at the time they were demanding fair pay and improved working conditions, issues upon which the ANC's foundation was built. This year's commemoration came a day after Ramaphosa addressed the opening of the so-called National Dialogue in Pretoria on Friday. Among the important questions he said need to be answered is why were the majority of the black population still trapped in abject poverty. One assumes the president knows the answer to this question, but was just playing to the gallery. Perhaps the families of the slain Marikana miners would have all the answers to that question. Only if he had visited them and apologised for the massacre, as any caring government should have long done. They would have told him that their fathers, brothers, sons and husbands embarked on strike precisely because of the poverty they were subjected to despite the long hours underground. They would have also informed him that their children were robbed of their breadwinners by the very state that was supposed to protect them. They would have painted a picture of struggles they are confronted with to make ends meet in an economy that is characterised by the alarming cost of living. But these are the answers that Ramaphosa and his current ANC are not prepared for. They are the enablers of these struggles, directly or indirectly. That is why the Marikana massacre has become a taboo topic in the former liberation movement. Ramaphosa confirmed what many have long believed; that the ANC he leads is so detached from the realities confronting poor South Africans. If it was not, it would not waste millions from the public purse debating issues that all of us are aware of. Instead, that money could have been spent towards the education of the children of the miners the government killed in Marikana.


Daily Maverick
10 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Scores of South Africans retrenched by NGO processing Trump's Afrikaner ‘refugees'
The organisation that aims to bring Kenyan workers to South Africa to process Afrikaner 'refugees' bound for the US laid off more than 100 South Africans last year. Church World Service (CWS), the organisation tasked by the US State Department with processing Afrikaner 'refugees' for resettlement in the USA, retrenched about 100 workers in Pretoria in June last year. CWS is now applying for 'volunteer' visas from the Department of Home Affairs for about 30 Kenyan workers to come to South Africa to work on the Afrikaner resettlement project — raising the question of why it is not attempting instead to re-employ the locals it made redundant last year. Daily Maverick understands that the staffers, most of whom were South Africans, were retrenched when CWS closed its Resettlement Support Centre sub-office in Pretoria at the end of June 2024. CWS did not respond to Daily Maverick's repeated requests for comment. Office was in place from 2015 to 2024 'A new office in Pretoria, South Africa, enhances refugee support and programs to cover eight countries,' stated the CWS annual report in 2015. 'Working with the U.S. Department of State, we continue to increase the number of refugee cases in process each year, serving more than 40 countries in sub-Saharan Africa.' An old job ad confirmed that the office was based in Pretoria, and stated that it was tasked with 'the preparation of refugee case files for adjudication by US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) officers, as well as the out-processing and cultural orientation of all approved cases'. The office's address was listed elsewhere as occupying premises on Fehrsen Street in Brooklyn, Pretoria. Daily Maverick understands that staff were informed midway through last year that the volumes of refugees being processed from sub-Saharan Africa were no longer high enough to warrant a permanent office presence in South Africa. That was, of course, when President Donald Trump's Afrikaner 'refugee' plan was not yet even a glimmer on the horizon. Tens of thousands of Afrikaners to be brought over Now, CWS finds itself in need of staff numbers to process the Afrikaner 'refugees' to be resettled — and a Reuters exclusive from last week makes it clear why it would need as many as 30 workers for the task. Reuters, through interviews with US officials, has determined that the Trump administration ultimately aims to bring potentially 30,000 Afrikaners for resettlement in the US. As far as is publicly known, only two groups of Afrikaner 'refugees' have thus far left for the US, with numbers probably not totalling more than 100. This means that the scale of the task ahead for CWS is considerable. Reuters also reported that the Trump administration looked set to admit only 40,000 refugees in total for the year ahead — meaning that fully 75% of the available US refugee spots would be reserved for Afrikaners. This news comes at a time when the US State Department has announced a stop to all visitor visas for individuals from Gaza — which had previously been used for emergency purposes to treat injured children — on the grounds that they could be used by Palestinian refugees. Afrikaner 'refugees' facing difficulties As Daily Maverick has reported, the Afrikaner 'refugees' in the first two resettlement groups have not always found the grass on the other side to be as green as they may have hoped. The Reuters exclusive fleshed out the picture, pointing out that after taking office, Trump slashed refugee benefits. Refugees had been eligible for cash and healthcare assistance for one year, but under Trump this has been reduced to four months. Reuters reported on an email sent by one Afrikaner family to the Department of Health and Human Services, which is responsible for the refugee programme on US soil. The family said they had found it impossible to secure a job without being issued a social security number, and that they had already spent $4,000 (more than R70,000) on food, transport and communications. Adults expected to take low-level menial jobs US public broadcaster NPR previously had sight of the documents given to the Afrikaner 'refugees' upon arrival. In it, they were told: 'You are expected to support yourself quickly in finding work.' It continued: 'Adults are expected to accept entry level employment in fields like warehousing, manufacturing, and customer service. You can work toward higher level employment over time.' DM


Daily Maverick
10 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Between symbolism and superficiality — why the National Convention fell short on path to SA's political centre
Last week South Africa hosted its inaugural National Convention, as part of the National Dialogue process. For those of us who have long argued for a citizen-led process to rethink and renew our democratic compact, the mere fact of its convening was a modest triumph. The symbolism of President Cyril Ramaphosa's presence lent the event a measure of legitimacy. The head of state's endorsement is no small matter in a political environment where similar civil society and faith-based initiatives have often withered due to a lack of coordination and resourcing. Yet, the real test of democratic renewal is not in symbolic gestures. It is in the design, execution and follow-through of such processes. On those fronts, the convention fell short, for now. The promise of dialogue At its core, the idea of a national dialogue is to bring together diverse voices across society to deliberate on our shared challenges and chart a way forward. Last week's event managed to gather an impressive range of participants – civil society leaders, business figures, political representatives and ordinary citizens. South Africans showed that there is still an appetite for a collective conversation about the future of the country. But dialogue is not mere talking. It requires a carefully crafted architecture, a seriousness of content and a level of facilitation that rises above the pedestrian. Here, the gathering faltered. Delays and disruptions plagued the programme, the facilitation often lacked the professionalism demanded by the moment, and the choice of speakers and facilitators seemed more about superficial political choreography than intellectual and technocratic depth. What should have been a laboratory of visionary ideas resembled a pageant of miniature personal speeches. Why design matters If one overlays this experience onto the model below, of participative democracy (see diagram), the weaknesses become clear. At present, our political process remains trapped in the top-down, centralised quadrant – dominated by state institutions, government authority and legal frameworks. This is necessary, but not sufficient. Such institutions provide order and continuity, but they are vulnerable to capture and vested interests, as South Africans know all too well. The national dialogue is meant to be a centre-out process: an effort to radiate participation beyond government, enabling citizens to reclaim agency. Yet the execution left participants oscillating between symbolism and superficiality. Without moving deliberately through the four quadrants of participatory democracy, the President's broad-tent risks replicating the same narrow, precarious forms of legitimacy that are already failing us. Moving through the quadrants To construct enduring political legitimacy, South Africa must do the hard work of traversing all four domains of democratic life, in their rightful order: Institutions of community and social networks (bottom-up, decentralised): Local organisations, cooperatives, faith networks and digital communities are where legitimacy begins. These groups carry the lived experience of citizens. Unless they are systematically included, dialogue remains elite-driven and exclusionary; Institutions of collective organisation (bottom-up, centralised): Political parties, unions, media and civil society forums aggregate citizen voices into national platforms. This is where local grievances become national issues, and where social contracts begin to take shape; Institutions of belonging (top-down, decentralised): Simultaneously, traditional authorities and professional associations, though often hierarchical, give communities identity and voice. Ignoring them creates blind spots in representation; and Institutions of command (top-down, centralised): In the end, and only then, the state, judiciary and security services must anchor whatever compact emerges. They hold the instruments of law and enforcement that can translate consensus into binding outcomes. A national dialogue that fails to move between and across these quadrants will remain lopsided – either a state-driven project lacking legitimacy, or a citizen-driven project lacking authority. The centre as destination The purpose of this exercise is not dialogue for its own sake. It is to arrive at the political centre – that fragile space where legitimacy is forged through the balance of bottom-up energy, decentralised networks and centralised organisation, to arrive at top-down authority as an expression of the public will, not narrow and vested interests. In this centre lies the possibility of an actionable social compact: a binding agreement among South Africans about the priorities we must pursue and the responsibilities each sector must shoulder. Nelson Mandela called for a 'RDP of the heart'. What we now need is a social compact of the heart and hands, not driven by the state of government, but anchored in the activation of citizens, who hold their state and government officials accountable. This week's inaugural dialogue showed both the possibilities and pitfalls of the journey. The presence of the President and the gathering of diverse actors demonstrated potential. But the shallow facilitation, the delays and the lack of robust content revealed how easily such processes can slip into hollow and preformist ritual. If we are serious about democratic renewal, we must now treat design as destiny. That means professional facilitation, credible agenda-setting and a disciplined commitment to inclusivity. It means moving deliberately through the quadrants of participatory democracy, ensuring that no voice is excluded and no sector is dominant. And it means recognising that legitimacy is not gifted by the head of state alone – legitimacy must be earned through a process that is transparent, citizen-led and action-oriented. A drum beat South Africa does not lack dialogue. We lack effective dialogue that can deliver actionable outcomes. The inaugural National Convention has given us a starting point. The task now is to create a drum beat of engagement that can turn that starting point into a national renewal project. Legitimacy in a participative democracy is not found at the extremes of command or protest. It is found at the centre – painstakingly constructed through engagement, inclusion and shared sacrifice. Our challenge, and our opportunity, is to make this inaugural step the first movement in a dance that takes us towards that centre. DM