Pittsburg leaders push for progress at Kansas capitol
PITTSBURG, Kan. — From southeast Kansas to Topeka — Pittsburg leaders are hoping to tackle new goals in 2025.
Chamber of Commerce representatives met with state lawmakers at the state capitol this week.
They're hoping to bring attention to things like construction on Highway-69 — expanded childcare capacity — and improvements at Pittsburg State.
Pittsburg leaders push for progress at Kansas capitol
Pittsburg State alum among finalists for Kansas Court of Appeals
Pittsburg teachers receive grant funding through foundation
Pittsburg School District notifies parents about ICE protocols
Albers Marine 19th Annual Fishing & Hunting Show held in Southeast Kansas
Chamber President Blake Benson told us today that connecting in-person is even more important than ever in 2025.
'The session in Kansas is quite a bit shorter. The legislature is trying to get it done in 90 days. And in the past it can drag out over four or five months. So they're being very aggressive with their timeline. So it's even more important that we're there as often as we can,' said Benson.
Leaders at the Pittsburg chamber would also like to see the legislature tackle Medicaid expansion this session.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Look to Wisconsin for Medicaid reform
Medicaid was created to help people living in poverty have access to health care. Under ObamaCare, it was expanded to include able-bodied, working-age adults without children. That was wrong. When I was governor of Wisconsin, we opted not to take the expansion. First, we could create our own plan for covering everyone living in poverty. We did — and it worked. My predecessor had raised the income requirements for Medicaid, but did not fund the gap. That left many impoverished people on a waiting list. Once I was in office, we restored the limits to cover those living in poverty and eliminated the waiting list. Today, my state is the only one in the nation to have no gap in insurance coverage despite not having taken the expansion. Second, I did not want to put more people on government assistance. For those who are able, public assistance should be more like a trampoline than a hammock. True freedom and prosperity do not come from the clumsy hand of the government. They come from empowering people to control their own destiny through the dignity of work. When I first took office, the Cabinet member who oversaw labor issues asked what my priorities were for the agency. He told me that the prior administration said their goal was to bring in as much federal assistance as possible to the state. I told him my goal was the opposite. I wanted to receive less federal funding because more people were working. During my tenure as governor, we pushed for work requirements for those who were able. We funded worker training and addiction recovery programs to get people into the workforce. It was a success. More people were employed during my years in office than had been at any point in our past. Third, I was concerned the federal government would not be able to sustain its commitments to the states. Unlike Wisconsin, which had a budget surplus each year I was in office, the federal government continues to have massive deficits and debt issues. Things have only grown worse since my early warnings. Initially, opposition to expanding Medicaid under ObamaCare was strong. Over the years, however, the appeal of 'easy money' from the federal government became too tempting for many state leaders — saddling private payers with higher costs as well. Thankfully, Republican lawmakers in Wisconsin remembered my concerns. With federal cuts increasingly likely, the Badger State will be one of the few not facing a major budget crisis. One of the proposals being circulated by congressional leaders is a plan to cut the rate of reimbursement to the states for the Medicaid expansion population from 90 percent to less than 60 percent. States that looked to the federal government to balance their budgets in the past will now experience significant shortfalls due to these reductions in federal funds. The reduced reimbursement rate being considered by Congress would have cost Wisconsin taxpayers an additional $154 million each year had the state taken the expansion funds according to a recent study by the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty. This is for a program that already represents about 30 percent of the state budget. Overall, Medicaid is a program that should provide assistance for children, families and seniors living in poverty. It should not be a barrier to able-bodied, working-age adults entering the workforce. These reforms will help provide true savings while ensuring the program serves the population it was intended to serve when it was established 60 years ago. Looking ahead, officials in the federal government as well as states would be wise to look at the Wisconsin model as they consider reforms to Medicaid. We showed that conservative reforms work. Scott Walker was governor of Wisconsin from 2011 to 2019. He is currently president of Young America's Foundation.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Letters: SNAP cuts are nothing to be proud of; Fair, transparent redistricting process needed
Recently, Congressman Glenn Thompson wrote the following about the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP): 'Revitalizing Rural America: This week, the House Agriculture Committee passed its portion of the House's reconciliation budget bill. It restores integrity to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, provides relief to farmers, and invests in the future of rural America. ... As Chairman of the House Agriculture Committee, I was proud to lead this legislation that strengthens the agricultural supply chain and puts rural America back at the center of our policy agenda ...' Let's set the record straight. This bill does not restore integrity of SNAP; it guts the program by cutting $300 billion in federal funding. This bill will hurt farmers and especially rural communities. SNAP recipients spend their benefits in local grocery stores, so SNAP dollars support jobs involved in producing, transporting, and marketing food. Food security means access by all people at all times to enough food for an active, healthy life. Without food security, children are at greater risk of poor health and development (Economic Research Service, USDA, 2013). Along with cuts to Medicaid, the plight of low-income families will be worse, as families face both higher health care costs and less money for food. U.S. Department of Agriculture research shows that expanding SNAP benefits in times of recession reduces food insecurity. (Economic Research Service, USDA, 2011, 2013). Congressman Thompson: What is there to be 'proud about' in taking food from low-income children and families to lower taxes for the wealthy? Lucia Kaiser, State College As a member of Generation Z, I grew up in an era defined by extreme partisanship. Unwillingness to cooperate across political parties has eroded trust in democracy. Legislation in the Pennsylvania House and Senate State Government Committees offers hope for meaningful reform by reducing polarization and legislative gridlock through a fair and transparent redistricting process for future generations. House Bill 31 and Senate Bill 131 would amend the Pennsylvania Constitution by establishing an independent redistricting commission. The bills' numbering reminds us that districts will be redrawn in 2031. Currently, political parties control the redistricting process. Majority and minority leaders draw district lines not based on population but on what would be most likely to maintain their power. HB31 and SB131 reduce partisanship by establishing an independent commission of citizens, which will now include previously excluded independent voters. The current redistricting process also lacks rules regarding transparency. Committee chairs can hold hearings for congressional districts but are not required to do so. HB31 and SB131 mandate that all information be publicly shared and available for public comment. So far this year, the Pennsylvania General Assembly has enacted only two bills, but June is their most active month with at least 14 days in session. As chair of the State Government committee, Senator Cris Dush determines whether SB 131 will be put to a committee vote. To learn more about the bills, check out or stop by Fair Districts tables at Pride, Juneteenth, and/or Arts Fest. Noah Bradford Demo, State College It is ironic that draft dodger Trump, who has repeatedly defamed our country's military, is insisting on having a military parade that will undoubtedly bring more attention to his failures. Moreover, it is outrageous that millions of dollars will be spent on such an event, especially after the draft dodger withdrew funding for life-saving veteran health care services including mental health and addiction treatment, the Veterans Crisis hot line, and other services designed to help veterans who lost a limb while serving our country in harm's way. Even more alarming is the fact that the draft dodger and his sycophants are trashing the Constitution and the rule of law while Republican members of Congress sit idly by as they watch the dismantling of our governmental agencies. As indicated by retired Major General Paul Eaton, every patriotic American should be scared of the grave threat that the draft dodger poses to our democracy. Americans who cherish our democracy must stand up and join forces with those of us who will resist the draft dodger and his billionaire oligarchs. There are many ways to resist the draft dodger including speaking out to your state and congressional representatives, voting in primaries and elections for better representatives, and providing financial support to organizations that file federal lawsuits against the draft dodger. Kevin Alloway, Port Matilda
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Biggest Boondoggles in Trump's Big Beautiful Bill
The House reconciliation bill — officially known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act — is extraordinary in how much it robs from the poor to boost the rich. Its tax cuts for the wealthy are financed by cuts to health care coverage (both in Medicaid and Obamacare) that will help Republicans swell the ranks of the uninsured by 16 million, according to the Congressional Budget Office. But the Big Beautiful Bill is not just an ugly tax bill where society's less fortunate are made to sacrifice for the benefit of the wealthiest. It's also a spending bill that steers hundreds of billions of dollars into new pet projects. This is financed with debt. All in, the BBB will spike deficits by $2.4 trillion over 10 years, according to CBO, likely increasing the national debt by $3 billion when interest payments are included. The bill's spending has angered budget hawks in the Senate like Rand Paul (R.-Ky.). It has been part of the public split between Donald Trump and Elon Musk, who calls the bill a 'disgusting abomination' that will squander any supposed savings imposed by DOGE, the so-called Department of Government Efficiency. Conservative budget analysts are sounding the alarm: 'This inability to set priorities is going to bring a debt crisis,' Jessica Riedl, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute tells Rolling Stone. In fact, the bill would create so much new debt that it risks triggering a mechanism called 'sequestration,' which would impose deep, mandatory cuts to Medicare. These cuts to the health care of America's seniors would start next year, and rise to half-a-trillion dollars over ten years. The BBB's spending provisions have received far less scrutiny than the tax cuts and safety-net slashes. But the bill lards new funds on a range of already-fat-cats — from the military-industrial complex and Big Tech to private prisons and construction concerns. Below we survey the biggest boondoggles of the Big Beautiful Bill: The BBB proposes spending nearly $50 billion for construction of Trump's border wall with Mexico. Sen. Paul, in an appearance on Face the Nation last week, accused the administration of waste. He cited an existing Customs and Border Patrol estimate that wall construction should cost only about $6.5 billion over 1,000 miles: 'They have inflated the cost of the wall eightfold,' said Paul. (After his TV hit, CPB appears to have scrubbed the construction cost estimate Paul quoted from its website.) Paul even questioned the need for more wall, at all, given his view that Trump has 'essentially stopped the border flow without new money and without new legislation.' Offering just a small taste of the anticipated building bonanza, the Trump administration awarded a $70 million, 7-mile wall-construction contract to California-based Granite Construction in March. The bill includes $45 billion for 'Adult Alien Detention Capacity' and 'Family Residential Centers.' This funding would enable the administration to ramp up its mass deportation program for undocumented immigrants. As the nation has seen from recent high-profile Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids at restaurants, this involves ripping productive members out of society and making them wards of the state, at great public cost, until they can be deported. The money would be a boon to private prison contractors and construction firms. For a taste of where this is headed, consider that the administration has already inked a 15-year, $1 billion deal with GEO Group to house ICE detainees at Delaney Hall, a 1,000 bed facility in Newark, New Jersey. The mayor of the city was arrested by ICE amid a recent protest at the facility. The private prison company is well connected to the Trump administration. As Rolling Stone has reported, Attorney General Pam Bondi is a former lobbyist for GEO Group, which also made a $500,000 donation to the Trump inaugural committee. A GEO subsidiary donated $1.3 million to a Super PAC that backed Trump's 2024 election. The BBB puts up nearly $25 billion for the Golden Dome. The satellite-based missile defense project builds off the branding of Israel's 'Iron Dome,' a ground-based defensive system that can intercept rockets and missiles launched from local militants or state actors like Iran. 'To the extent we match Iron Dome technology, we will be well protected from a missile attack from Canada or Mexico,' says Riedl of the Manhattan Institute, sarcastically. 'But not necessarily from Russia, North Korea or China.' In reality the Golden Dome appears to be Trump's revival of the Ronald Reagan era Strategic Defense Initiative, or SDI — a hugely expensive, largely ineffective space-based missile-defense system derided in the 1980s as 'Star Wars.' 'Ultimately this is $25 billion more for SDI' says Rieidl. 'This is a noble idea — but a lot of spending up until now hasn't brought a lot of success.' Trump envisions the BBB as a downpayment on a total investment of $175 million. The Golden Dome promises to be a golden goose for defense contractors. SpaceX, the rocket company founded by Trump's billionaire benefactor Elon Musk, who's currently feuding with Trump, is reportedly vying for a contract. So are the Peter Thiel-linked tech firm Palantir and longtime military-industrial heavyweights like Raytheon and Lockheed Martin. Including the Golden Dome, the Big Beautiful Bill increases America's Pentagon spending by a colossal $150 billion. 'This is a bill from the military-industrial complex advocates who are padding the military budget,' according to Paul, who has long criticized the Defense Department for failing to pass every audit to which it's been subjected. Budgets are moral documents. And metaphorically people often speak of the tradeoff between 'guns and butter' — or programs that defend the public and those that keep the public out of misery. The guns side of the Big Beautiful Bill is financed entirely by cuts to butter. The bill strips $128 billion in funding to the states for the SNAP food assistance program that keeps American families from going hungry. It also aims to avoid another $92 billion in spending by knocking people out of the program with red tape and work requirements, including for parents of argues that the Pentagon should be forced to achieve cost efficiencies before it receives any new federal dollars. 'One of DOGE's great failures was essentially ignoring the enormous waste and cost overruns inside the Pentagon. There is a reason the Defense Department cannot pass an audit. There is so much waste. It has significant cost overruns — particularly in government contracts and procurement — that absolutely must be addressed before we further increase defense spending,' says the Manhattan institute fellow. The House bill steers new money to more than a dozen weapons systems, including many dogged by cost overruns, construction delays, performance issues, and questions of combat capability. On the airplane side, this list includes: $4.5 billion for the B-21 Raider, the Air Force's newest long-range stealth bomber, which cost nearly $700 million per aircraft to produce. The two-person Northrup Gruman-built plane may be poorly suited to modern warfighting, where swarms of unmanned drones are becoming the dominant air threat. $3.2 billion for the Boeing-built F-15EX. The planes cost $90 million a pop, making them more expensive than the notoriously costly F-35A. Unlike that fighter, the F-15EX is not a stealth aircraft. And production has been snarled by manufacturing problems. A recent federal assessment put it bluntly: 'Boeing has experienced increased quality deficiencies.' Ships include: $4.6 billion for Virginia Class submarines. The nuclear submarine program has a reported cost overrun of $17 billion and has delivered boats massively behind schedule. The contractors are General Dynamics Electric Boat and Huntington Ingalls Industries. The Pentagon already has 23 of these submarines. $2.1 billion for San Antonio Class 'amphibious transport docks.' This ship was put on production pause in 2023 because of massive cost overruns. The boats are supposed to land Marines into onshore combat, but have been found by DOD testers to only be suitable 'in a benign environment' because the ship is 'not effective, suitable and not survivable in a combat situation.' Huntington Ingalls Industries is the contractor. The Pentagon already has 13 of these boats. More from Rolling Stone Donald Trump Is Destroying the Economy and Waging War on the Poor Trump Moves to Deploy National Guard to L.A. Over ICE Protests 'Dejected' Trump Says Relationship With Musk Is Over; Calls Him a 'Big-Time Drug Addict': Report Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
