Chicago's Trump Tower to pay $5m for killing countless fish as it pulled water from river for years to cool its building
A federal judge previously ruled the Trump International Hotel and Tower in downtown Chicago was a public nuisance and an environmental hazard. It was pulling in 20 million gallons of water a day from the Chicago River, the plaintiffs said.
Now the First Family 's Chicago holding must cough up after violating federal and state law in the years-long lawsuit brought by Friends of the Chicago River, the Sierra Club and the Illinois Attorney General.
'Trump Tower is one of the largest users of water from the Chicago River for cooling, and failing to follow federal requirements resulted in the death of thousands of fish and other aquatic organisms which were sucked into the building cooling system by the intake structure or trapped against its screens,' the organizations said.
The multi-million-dollar settlement includes paying $3 million toward a Supplemental Environmental Project to fund a fish habitat restoration program in the Chicago River.
The settlement appears to be the largest Clean Water Act-related resolution in Illinois state court history, according to the organizations.
'Friends of the Chicago River is extremely pleased that much of the money to be realized with this settlement can be used to create and restore habitat in downtown Chicago for fish and other aquatic wildlife,' said Margaret Frisbie, executive director of Friends of the Chicago River. 'Friends will work closely with the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency and the City of Chicago to assure the benefits of the settlement are brought home and the healing process can begin.'
Jack Darin of the Sierra Club Illinois chapter said the suit was an important step in 'holding polluters accountable.'
' This vigilant defense of our water, air, and land is more important now than ever, as our federal government's ability to crack down on polluters is disappearing before our very eyes,' he said.
Trump Tower must also pay $1.5 million in penalty fees to Illinois and $300,000 in attorneys' fees.
The suit also said that Trump Tower failed to accurately compute and report the rate at which the skyscraper's cooling system withdraws water by approximately 44 percent for more than 10 years.
The tower sits at 401 N. Wabash Avenue and opened in 2009. It was operating without a proper state water permit and did not accurately report water discharge levels, the lawsuit said.
Cook County circuit court Judge Thaddeus L. Wilson previously ruled that the Trump Tower could not even genuinely dispute that it violated the applicable laws.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Real Housewives of New York star demands $10 MILLION from ex-fiancée over bombshell claims
Real Housewives of New York star Racquel Chevremont is accusing her ex-fiancée, famed artist Mickalene Thomas of harassment, financial betrayal and years of unpaid work. The Bronx-born art curator and model is seeking a minimum of $10 million from Thomas over these explosive allegations. In a court paper, obtained by Chevremont says she worked as Thomas's strategist and dealmaker from 2012 to 2022, brokering multimillion-dollar sales and acting as her liaison in the art world. In a summons and notice filed in New York State Supreme Court on August 8, the reality star declared her hope to 'redress for years of exploitation, nonpayment and unlawful conduct.' 'From 2012 to 2022, Ms. Chevremont, who is also Ms. Thomas' former fiancée, contributed immeasurably to Ms. Thomas' artistic and commercial success, acting as a strategic advisor, and liaison to galleries, collectors, and institutions,' the filing states. 'Despite these work-related contributions, Ms. Chevremont was paid improperly for more than a decade, both as an employee and under a written agreement effective January 1, 2021, as well as for compensation prior to 2021 and for multimillion-dollar deals she negotiated on Ms. Thomas' behalf.' Chevremont also claims Thomas, whose work hangs in MoMA and Jay-Z's office, subjected her to a 'hostile and abusive work environment as well as quid pro quo harassment.' 'While Ms. Chevremont ended their personal relationship in 2020, Ms. Chevremont and Ms. Thomas continued to work together. During this time, Ms. Thomas repeatedly and improperly pressured Ms. Chevremont to resume their romantic relationship, and ultimately terminated Ms. Chevremont's employment, in violation of New York State and New York City Human Rights Laws, when she made it clear that this would never happen,' Chevremont claimed in the filing. She also alleges Thomas promised her 20 percent commissions — then 'illegally diverted' the money into her own company. has reached out to Thomas' representatives, but have not heard back. Neither Thomas nor Chevremont's teams have publicly commented on the matter. Chevremont and Thomas first met in 2002, but did not begin dating until 2011. They got engaged in 2019 on New Year's Eve. They split just one year later. Chevremont has since moved on with her current fiancée, Mel Corpus. 'Mel and I, we've been friends for over 12 years,' Chevremont said in her first RHONY episode. 'We were very single when we got together, but there was a bit of a scandal. There were a few people that were not all that happy.' Alicia Keys previously called Thomas 'a mastermind at conveying poignant messages through striking visuals.' 'Mickalene herself is walking art,' the singer wrote for Time magazine's 100 most influential people of 2025. 'She has such a distinct presence and aura that it's impossible not to feel inspired by her. The art and the artist both are bold, fearless, and fierce.' According to GLAAD, Chevremont 'was discovered by photographer and model scout Steve Landis for Elite models in 1993.' Over the years, she has landed campaigns for Benetton, Bobbi Brown Cosmetics, Fila, L'Oréal and Nivea. She's also worked in the art world for more than two decades, and, even, joined the acquisition committees of the Studio Museum in Harlem and the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum back in 2003. Chevremont is also the founder of The Josie Club, a space dedicated to honoring queer Black women's lives and achievements. She previously admitted that she struggled with her queerness and publicly coming out. 'I'm what you'd call a later in life lesbian and when I first came out I lost a lot of people,' she said. 'I believe that because of my age and my accomplishments I didn't care what anyone had to say, I didn't feel the need to prove anything to anyone.' She added: 'I had spent my entire adult life in the fashion and art worlds so while my personal life might have suffered my professional life didn't really skip a beat due to my queerness. I was lucky to be a part of two industries where queerness is embraced.'
The Independent
19 minutes ago
- The Independent
US appeals court blocks New Mexico's 7-day waiting period on gun purchases
A panel of federal appellate judges ruled Tuesday that New Mexico's seven-day waiting period on gun purchases likely infringes on citizens' Second Amendment rights, putting the law on hold pending a legal challenge. The ruling by the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sends the case back to a lower court. New Mexico's waiting period went into effect in May 2024, and does hold an exception for concealed permit holders. 'Cooling-off periods do not fit into any historically grounded exceptions to the right to keep and bear arms, and burden conduct within the Second Amendment's scope,' wrote Judge Timothy Tymkovich in the split 2-1 ruling. 'We conclude that New Mexico's Waiting Period Act is likely an unconstitutional burden on the Second Amendment rights of its citizens. In a dissenting opinion, Judge Scott Matheson said New Mexico's waiting period 'establishes a condition or qualification on the commercial sale of arms that does not serve abusive ends.' The National Rifle Association and Mountain States Legal Foundation, an advocacy group for gun rights, filed the lawsuit on behalf of two New Mexico residents, citing concerns about delayed access to weapons for victims of domestic violence and others. Democratic state lawmakers had enacted the restrictions in hopes of ensuring more time for the completion of federal background checks on gun buyers. In a statement, Democratic Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham expressed 'deep disappointment' and said Tuesday's ruling was likely to cost lives. 'New Mexico's waiting period law was carefully crafted to minimize gun violence while respecting Second Amendment rights,' said Lujan Grisham, highlighting additional exceptions for gun purchases by law enforcement officers and transactions between immediate family members. 'Waiting periods prevent impulsive acts of violence and suicide, giving people time to step back and reassess their emotions during moments of crisis.' It was unclear whether the governor and legislators would request a broader review by a majority of judges on the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals. Only California, Hawaii and Washington, along with the District of Columbia — have longer waiting periods than New Mexico that range up to 14 days, according to the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. Rhode Island also has a seven-day wait. Michael McCoy, director of the Mountain States Legal Foundation's Center to Keep and Bear Arms, applauded the ruling. The group is also challenging Colorado's minimum three-day waiting period for gun purchases, enacted in 2023. 'The court found that there was no analogous law from that era that would support the modern day law that's at issue,' McCoy said. 'For now, it means New Mexicans can go buy their firearms without an arbitrary delay imposed.' —-
The Independent
19 minutes ago
- The Independent
Oregon city at heart of Supreme Court homelessness ruling to ensure camping spaces under settlement
The Oregon city at the heart of a major U.S. Supreme Court homelessness ruling has agreed to ensure camping spaces for at least 150 people as part of a settlement reached with a disability rights group that sued the city over its camping rules. Disability Rights Oregon, which sued Grants Pass in January, said Friday that it had reached a settlement agreement. The advocacy group accused the city of discriminating against people with disabilities and violating a state law requiring cities' camping regulations to be 'objectively reasonable.' 'This settlement represents a significant step forward in ensuring people with disabilities experiencing homelessness have places to rest, basic necessities like drinking water, and real opportunity to stabilize their lives,' Jake Cornett, executive director and CEO of Disability Rights Oregon, said in a statement. Grants Pass Mayor Clint Scherf said in an email Tuesday that the city appreciates having reached an agreement and will "continue to work toward effective measures to benefit all members of our community.' A copy of the settlement agreement showed the city signed off on it earlier this month. Josephine County Circuit Court Judge Sarah McGlaughlin issued a preliminary injunction in March blocking the city from enforcing its camping rules unless it increased capacity at city-approved sites for camping and ensured they are physically accessible to people with disabilities. City ordinances prohibit sleeping or leaving personal property in a park overnight in most cases. Those found in violation can be fined up to $50. The city said Friday on Facebook that law enforcement 'will begin noticing the parks, and occupants will have 72 hours to remove their belongings.' The city's website shows three 'designated resting locations' in the downtown area, near City Hall and the police station, where people can stay for four days before having to relocate. The time limit can be enforced unless disability accommodations are necessary, the city said on Facebook. At resting sites, individuals are limited to spaces that are 8 feet by 8 feet (2.4 meters by 2.4 meters), with buffers of 3 feet (0.9 meters) between spaces, as outlined in city code. Under the settlement, Grants Pass must ensure that at least 150 camping spaces are available in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act for the next 12 months. Drinking water and hand washing stations must be available on-site. The city must also provide $60,000 in grant funding to a nonprofit for homeless services. Grants Pass, a small city of about 40,000 along the Rogue River in the mountains of southern Oregon, has struggled for years to address the homelessness crisis and become emblematic of the national debate over how to deal with it. Its parks in particular became a flashpoint, with many of them becoming the site of encampments blighted by drug use and litter. Last June, in a case brought by the city, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that communities can ban sleeping outside and fine people for doing so, even when there are not enough shelter beds. After the high court ruling, Grants Pass banned camping on all city property except locations designated by the City Council, which established sites for the town's hundreds of homeless people in a bid to move them from the parks. Upon taking office in January, the new mayor and new council members moved to close the larger of the two sites, which housed roughly 120 tents, according to Disability Rights Oregon's complaint, which said the sites were frequently crowded with poor conditions and inaccessible to people with disabilities because of loose gravel. After the lawsuit was filed, the city reopened a second, smaller site. McGlaughin's order in March said the city had to increase capacity to what it had been before the larger site was closed. Homelessness increased 18% last year nationwide, driven mostly by a lack of affordable housing as well as devastating natural disasters and an increase in migrants in some areas.
