Royal College of Physicians adds voice of concern on assisted dying Bill
The Royal College of Physicians (RCP) said it believes there are 'concerning deficiencies' with the proposed legislation as it stands.
Its statement follows one earlier this week from the Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych), which said it has 'serious concerns' and cannot support the Bill in its current form.
That statement was branded by one opponent of the Bill as a 'blow to its foundations'.
The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, which relates to England and Wales, returns to the House of Commons on Friday for the first time since a historic yes vote in November.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, who voted for the Bill last year, has indicated he remains supportive of the proposed legislation.
Reports speculating on the numbers of MPs who had supported the Bill last year but are now considering voting against it have been dismissed by the Bill's backers who reject the idea the proposed legislation is at risk of collapse.
But the RCPsych statement prompted MPs, some with medical and clinical backgrounds, who back the Bill, to urge their colleagues in Parliament to support it.
A statement, signed by supportive MPs including doctors Neil Shastri-Hurst, Simon Opher and Peter Prinsley, insisted 'most healthcare professionals understand that the current law is not working', that it 'criminalises compassion', places clinicians 'in an impossible position' and cannot be tolerated or defended.
In their position statement on Thursday, the RCP said despite changes to the Bill in recent months which supporters argue have strengthened it, the college believes 'there currently remain deficiencies that would need addressing to achieve adequate protection of patients and professionals'.
It said there are 'key factors' which must be in place should assisted dying be legalised.
These include decisions around a patient's prognosis to be informed by 'expert clinical professionals including those who know the patient', decisions on capacity, and safeguards around coercion to be informed by face-to-face assessments of 'relevant and appropriately skilled health and care professionals', regulations of medicines and a guarantee resources will not be diverted from other end-of-life care.
Their concerns follow those from RCPsych which said it has 'unanswered questions' about the safeguarding of people with mental illness, and warned of a shortage of consultant psychiatrists to meet the demands of the Bill.
Both colleges said they remain neutral on the principle of assisted dying.
The RCP's clinical vice president, Dr John Dean, said: 'The ultimate decision on assisted dying rests with society through Parliament, but professional and clinical issues are integral to legislation, regulation, guidance and safe and effective implementation.
'Our members and fellows who we represent have a wide range of views on assisted dying. While the RCP neither supports or opposes a change in the law on this matter, the Bill in its current form has concerning deficiencies.
'Notably, the proposed mechanisms of decision making are not in line with good clinical and professional practice. Further statutory guidance is also required to ensure effective regulation of drugs, providers, and the involvement of clinicians.
'Parliament must address these critical issues in the legislation or risk failing to protect vulnerable patients and uphold the integrity of clinical practice.'
The chair of the Royal College of GPs also told the BBC this week that doctors have 'real concerns about the practical and legal implications of a change in the law on assisted dying', which she said 'must be acknowledged and addressed, so that any legislation is watertight'.
Speaking during a visit to Albania, Sir Keir was asked if his views on assisted dying had changed during the passage of the Bill.
He told broadcasters: 'I do understand there are different views, strongly held views on both sides that have to be respected.'
Pressed for his current opinion, Sir Keir said: 'My views have been consistent throughout.'
Dozens of amendments have been tabled and many could be debated and voted on during a five-hour sitting in the Commons on Friday.
It is not yet clear whether time will allow for a third reading vote, with the possibility that the report stage could instead run into a second day next month because of the large number of further amendments proposed.
As it stands, the Bill would allow only terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death – subject to approval by two doctors and the three-member expert panel featuring a psychiatrist, social worker and senior legal figure.
Kim Leadbeater, the Labour MP behind the Bill, defended the scrapping of the High Court judge safeguard which has been replaced by the expert panel.
She told LBC Radio this was a 'more holistic approach, a more patient-centred approach' and is 'much, much stronger' as a result.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
Labour councillor ‘horrified' by ‘cutting throats' comment at rally, jury told
A Labour councillor who called for far-right activists' throats to be cut at an anti-racism rally has told a jury he felt 'horrified' after realising what he had said. Ricky Jones, 58, described far-right activists as 'disgusting Nazi fascists', his trial at Snaresbrook Crown Court heard. The comments were made in the wake of rioting after the Southport murders last summer. He told jurors on Wednesday that his comment did not refer to far-right protesters involved in the riots at the time, but to those who had reportedly left National Front stickers on a train with razor blades hidden behind them. A video showing Jones addressing the crowd in Walthamstow, east London, on August 7 last year, went viral on social media after the protest. Wearing a black polo top and surrounded by cheering supporters, the councillor said: 'You've got women and children using these trains during the summer holidays. 'They don't give a shit about who they hurt. 'They are disgusting Nazi fascists. We need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all.' He also drew his finger across his throat as he spoke to the crowd. Jones, who at the time worked as an official for the Transport Salaried Staff's Association (TSSA) union, later sent an edited version of his speech video to union members, the court heard. Asked by his defence barrister, Hossein Zahir KC, why he edited the video, Jones replied: 'When I had time to view the footage after the demonstration, I was shocked at what I had actually said. 'I was horrified. 'Under no circumstances did I want to portray that to anybody, so I edited that last bit out.' The unedited video was eventually posted on social media platform X, formerly Twitter, where it attracted millions of views, the trial heard. Jones told jurors he felt 'very emotional and very upset' after receiving pictures, the day before the rally, of National Front stickers that had been left on a train, which had razor blades hidden behind them – supposedly so that people who tried to remove the stickers would injure themselves. He had also received reports from union members that more razor blades had been found stuck between seats, Jones added. 'I was very concerned about what had happened on the train. 'I was thinking, this (the speech) is a good opportunity to raise what happened.' The father-of-four and grandfather described the mood in the crowd at the time as 'happy and joyful', adding: 'There clearly wasn't any upset or anger from any people in that scene, because they clearly knew it was about what happened on the train.' Prosecutor Ben Holt, cross-examining, told the defendant: 'Your words about slitting people's throats were not cheerful or happy.' Jones replied: 'I totally agree, I'm ashamed.' The defendant however denied intending to encourage violence towards far-right protesters. 'What violence could have anyone caused to those people in the train?' Jones said. 'It was nonsensical – I didn't believe there was a risk.' Jones, who has been a borough councillor in Dartford, Kent, since 2019, was suspended by the Labour Party the day after the alleged incident. He was arrested on August 8 last year and interviewed at Brixton Police Station that night. The demonstration had been organised in response to plans for a far-right march outside Waltham Forest Immigration Bureau. It followed the disorder in parts of the UK last summer after the Southport murders. Jones, of Dartford, denies one count of encouraging violent disorder. The trial continues.
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
Tory police chief faces backlash over telling public to stop shoplifters
A policing chief is facing criticism over his 'dangerous' comments telling the public to stop shoplifters and not just rely on police officers to curb thefts. Matthew Barber, the Conservative Police and Crime Commissioner for Thames Valley, branded people who do not do anything in the face of shoplifting as 'part of the problem'. Joshua Reynolds, the Liberal Democrat MP for Maidenhead, which is in the Thames Valley Police area, launched a strong criticism of Mr Barber's remarks, telling The Independent they were 'dangerous' and 'irresponsible'. And following Mr Barber's claims, policing minister Dame Diana Johnson warned members of the public against confronting shoplifters. The backlash comes as the number of shoplifting offences recorded by police in England and Wales climbed to another record high in 2024-25, up 20 per cent from 2023-24. Last month, home secretary Yvette Cooper announced a new crime 'blitz' to crack down on crime, featuring more visible policing and stronger enforcement in a bid to restore confidence in policing. But as The Independent revealed recently, shopkeepers are struggling against the wave of shoplifting offences. In response to the crisis, The Telegraph reported Mr Barber said: 'If you're not even going to challenge people, you're not going to try and stop them, then people will get away with it. That's not just about policing. That's a bigger problem with society, people who [don't do anything] – you're part of the problem.' He told a meeting of the Thames Valley police and crime panel in June that he 'wouldn't for a moment' want to suggest people should feel 'obliged to take it upon themselves to rugby tackle every perceived criminal to the ground'. But he added: 'We should all be responsible citizens in our community. 'If you've got someone in your store now stealing from you, call 999. Also, ideally, try and stop them leaving, don't just stand there and watch, which a lot of people do, which frustrates me.' Retailers, meanwhile, have accused police of not doing enough to tackle shoplifting. A new survey revealed almost nine in 10 (88 per cent) of pharmacies have experienced a surge in shoplifting incidents in the last year. Some 87 per cent also reported an increase in aggressive or intimidating behaviour towards pharmacy teams, while 22 per cent said they had witnessed physical assaults on staff. But of those who reported these instances to police, almost three-quarters (73 per cent) said they felt the response was insufficient. The National Pharmacy Association (NPA) – which conducted the poll of 476 pharmacies in England, and represents more than 6,000 independent community pharmacies – called the findings 'unacceptable'. In response to the commissioner's comments, Mr Reynolds said: 'With all due respect to the police and crime commissioner, asking shop staff or bystanders to 'challenge' criminals is not only irresponsible, it's dangerous. "Having previously worked in supermarkets, I have personally experienced the threat of violence from shoplifters. It is wholly unreasonable – and frankly irresponsible – to imply that any individual should put themselves at risk in such circumstances. "The job of tackling crime on our high streets should not fall to shopworkers or people doing their weekly shop – it falls to the police. And if they're not there in sufficient numbers, that's something for the commissioner to fix, not deflect. "The public has every right to expect safety in their communities. That safety comes from visible, proactive policing and not from moral lectures aimed at shop workers and citizens who are just trying to go about their daily lives. "If the commissioner wants to see more people stepping in, then he needs to start by showing that the police will be there to back them up – not by putting them in harm's way' And speaking on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Ms Johnson said: 'I would not advise people to tackle an individual who was stealing. 'I came across someone stealing in a store in Hull. I went straight to the assistant to tell them what was happening. I felt that was the best thing to do. 'Obviously, it is a judgment for individuals to take, but I am worried about people feeling they need to have a go. I don't think that is appropriate.' But Mr Barber told The Telegraph he stood by his remarks, adding: 'The idea that this is just a job for the police, citizens have no responsibility, put your head down, carry on, don't get involved, I think that makes for a very poor society.' However, he stressed that he was not implying the public should 'step in where the police are not', as he emphasised the clear role police had in tackling crime. He added: 'But surely the alternative to intervening if a crime is happening in society, is you put your head down, get on with your life, ignore it, is that right?'
The Guardian
15 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Scottish Greens must broaden appeal beyond middle-class urbanites, says leadership candidate
The Scottish Greens have to broaden their appeal beyond middle-class urbanites by talking to voters in industrial towns facing wholesale job losses, a Green leadership candidate has said. Gillian Mackay is one of four Scottish Greens bidding to win two co-leader posts after Patrick Harvie, the UK's longest-serving party leader, quit as co-convener earlier this year. The pro-independence Scottish Greens are currently Holyrood's fourth largest party, with seven MSPs, and could play a key role in the devolved parliament after next year's elections. The Greens prop up the Scottish National party government in Edinburgh, which does not have a majority at Holyrood and is expected to form a minority administration again next year. Recent polls place the Greens as high as 15%, suggesting they could win several more seats. Mackay said her area around Falkirk had been devastated by industrial decline, including the closure of Grangemouth oil refinery earlier this year, yet the Scottish Greens historically had failed to connect with local voters. The Scottish and UK governments knew Grangemouth would close, affecting several thousand jobs in the region, but had failed to put in place an industrial strategy to guarantee green jobs, she said. Two factories owned by Alexander Dennis making electric buses were also expected to close within weeks and their jobs to shift to Nottinghamshire. Farmers and workers dependent on the oil industry around Aberdeen also felt excluded. That meant the just transition from fossil fuel industries to sustainable jobs had failed, Mackay said. 'The Green narrative of green jobs and green industry actually needs to have teeth,' she said. The party was very good at the 'high-level' policy but poor at making it meaningful to people directly affected. 'What matters to our voters is what they see, feel and hear in their communities and I don't think we're quite cutting through at that level.' Voting for the two co-convener posts opened on Wednesday, with about 7,500 party members eligible to vote before a result is declared on Friday 29 August. Alongside Mackay, the candidates are Lorna Slater, Harvie's current co-convener, who had a torrid time as a Scottish government minister in the Greens' power-sharing deal with the SNP, Ross Greer, a backbencher, and Dominic Ashmole, a party activist in the Scottish Borders who is vying to become a councillor for the first time. Unlike Green party elections in England and Wales, Scottish rules make it harder for two candidates to run on joint tickets, because their names cannot appear on the ballot paper as joint candidates. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion And for the first time, the Scottish Greens have also dropped a rule that requires the party to elect at least one woman as co-leader, after legal advice partly influenced by the UK supreme court ruling on the Equality Act's definition of a woman. Greer, who has called for free travel on all of Scotland's buses, is widely seen as a favourite to win one of the two posts. With Ashmole considered a rank outsider, the contest for the second post is between Slater and Mackay. Given her almost three years as a junior minister, Slater is presenting herself as the most experienced continuity candidate, who has told party members she believes co-conveners are their delegates and are not in overall control. Her critics point to the intense controversy surrounding her failed bid to introduce a wide-ranging deposit return scheme for drinks containers in Scotland before the rest of the UK. Greer, an architect of the Bute House power-sharing agreement with the SNP, believes the party needs stronger political leadership and has to be much clearer on its core policies, on poverty, climate and nature. 'We need to nail down which voters we're trying to speak to and what we're trying to achieve,' he said.
