logo
What Karnataka's move to exempt small plots from Occupancy Certificates means for Bengaluru's real estate market

What Karnataka's move to exempt small plots from Occupancy Certificates means for Bengaluru's real estate market

Hindustan Times25-07-2025
In a move that could reshape building compliance norms across Karnataka, the state's Urban Development Department (UDD) has proposed exempting residential buildings constructed on plots measuring up to 1,200 square feet from the mandatory requirement of obtaining Occupancy Certificates (OCs). In a move that could reshape building compliance norms across Karnataka, the state's Urban Development Department (UDD) has proposed exempting residential buildings constructed on plots measuring up to 1,200 square feet from the mandatory requirement of obtaining OCs. (Representational Image)(Souptik Datta )
"Buildings up to ground + 2 floors or stilt + 3 floors on plots exceeding 1200 sq ft may be exempted from obtaining occupancy certificate (OC)," the proposal signed by Tushar Giri Nath, additional chief secretary at UDD and accessed by HT.com, showed.
The meeting, chaired by Giri Nath, recommended amendments to key legislations, including the Greater Bengaluru Governance Act, 2024, the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976, and the model building regulations under the Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department.
The proposal to waive OCs for buildings under 1,200 sq ft has sparked a mix of relief and concern among builders, homeowners, and urban planners. While the exemption could ease regulatory burdens on thousands of small property owners, especially in Bengaluru's dense and unplanned neighbourhood, experts fear it may open the floodgates to unsafe, unregulated construction and further strain the city's fragile infrastructure.
Also Read: Karnataka Cabinet approves regularisation of B-Khata properties in Bengaluru. Here's what it means for property owners
What the proposed exemption means
Occupancy Certificates are currently required to ensure a completed building adheres to approved plans, municipal by-laws, and safety norms. Without an OC, a property is technically unfit for occupation and is ineligible for utilities such as water and electricity from government agencies. However, many smaller buildings in Bengaluru and other urban areas are constructed informally, often without OCs, Dhananjaya Padmanabhachar, director of the Karnataka Home Buyers Forum, pointed out.
If approved, the exemption would essentially legalise properties, at least those on plots under 1,200 sq ft, offering relief to homeowners who struggle with compliance or whose builders failed to secure the necessary approvals. The move could also reduce red tape for first-time homebuyers or those constructing budget homes, experts say.
Also Read: Good news for tenants: Rents may stabilise in 2025 as new supply and infra improve connectivity to peripheral locations
Bengaluru needs better real estate regulation, say experts
'If you go to any locality in Bengaluru today, you will find that most buildings have some form of violation; they've deviated from the sanctioned plan in one way or another,' said Padmanabhachar, an expert familiar with the matter. 'As per the Supreme Court's directives, it is the responsibility of the city corporation to regulate and take action against such violations. But under the new amendment, individuals will be allowed to construct on plots below 1,200 sq ft without an occupancy certificate, and the corporation will no longer be held accountable for any deviations.'
He cautioned that this could open the door to widespread misuse. 'Instead of enforcing stricter zoning regulations and ensuring planned development, this move may actually encourage more illegal constructions,' he said, pointing out that builders may exploit the exemption to erect ground-plus-two floor structures without adhering to any formal approval norms.
'This move will almost certainly lead to a rise in illegal constructions,' said Vittal BR, an advocate at the Karnataka High Court. 'People will get one sanctioned plan on paper and construct something entirely different in reality, knowing that no occupancy certificate will be required to validate it later.'
He said that the exemption could trigger a rush of new construction in smaller plots across the city. 'More and more people will start building on small sites because there's no OC needed. It becomes extremely difficult for authorities to monitor or control these developments, especially when deviations from the approved plan go unchecked. In the long run, it might impact the city's planning and safety standards.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BBMP e-khata glitch triggers unfair tax notices to Bengaluru homeowners over parking space: Report
BBMP e-khata glitch triggers unfair tax notices to Bengaluru homeowners over parking space: Report

Hindustan Times

time43 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

BBMP e-khata glitch triggers unfair tax notices to Bengaluru homeowners over parking space: Report

A technical glitch in Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike's (BBMP) e-Khata system has upset many property owners, as hundreds received show-cause notices unexpectedly. E-Khata is an online property certificate that records ownership details and has been mandatory since July 1, 2025. Residents frustrated by BBMP's e-Khata system errors, demand intervention from Karnataka DCM over wrongful tax assessments in Bengaluru.(Pixabay) What happened? Homeowners in Bengaluru were notified for not including their car parking area when reporting the carpet size of their properties. Rajat Rao, a resident of Richmond Town, said BBMP demanded tax on his parking space but determined its size without verifying any documents or visiting the property, a report published by the Mint said. BBMP officials explained that the problem arose due to a recent software check in their system called Kauvery, which flagged any difference in property size data between e-Khata and another property database, EPID. Homeowners' response Residents, especially from the Shantinagar area where e-Khata was first introduced, are frustrated and want Karnataka DCM DK Shivakumar, who also holds the Bengaluru development portfolio, to intervene. READ | 'I should've stretched my budget', Bengaluru homebuyer regrets choosing a Grade B project with subpar construction They criticized the officials for causing unnecessary trouble and questioned why they are forced to prove facts when the system itself is flawed. A resident from Yelahanka said he was told to appeal in BBMP's e-court for an issue he did not cause. Another resident also complained about the unfair treatment of honest taxpayers while some politicians and officials avoid paying taxes without any penalties. BBMP's stance A senior BBMP official defended the system, saying it automatically identifies errors and that parking spaces are taxable even if not separately listed in sale deeds. READ | Low flower prices dampen spirits ahead of Varamahalakshmi festival in Bengaluru: Report Munish Moudgil, BBMP's special commissioner for revenue, clarified that notices were meant to be sent only when the property size difference exceeded 5 per cent. However, due to a technical error, many notices went out wrongly. He assured that affected residents can appeal and their issues will be resolved quickly.

Rustomjee Group to foray into Pune market, eyes 100 acres for township projects: CMD Boman Irani
Rustomjee Group to foray into Pune market, eyes 100 acres for township projects: CMD Boman Irani

Hindustan Times

time3 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Rustomjee Group to foray into Pune market, eyes 100 acres for township projects: CMD Boman Irani

Mumbai-based listed real estate developer, Keystone Realtors Ltd, also known as Rustomjee Group, plans to foray into the Pune real estate market. The company is currently exploring two potential land parcels of around 100 acres for a township project in the Pune real estate market, Boman Irani, CMD of Rustomjee Group, told We are currently exploring projects for Pune, and any new entry in a new city will not happen immediately but only by next year. We have announced a project in the Nagpur real estate market, and we will soon announce the launch of that first and later get into Pune, Boman Irani, CMD of Rustromjee Group, said.(HT Files) This will be the third city for the company to enter after it announced its foray into the Nagpur real estate market around three months ago. "We are studying two proposals right now in a joint development (JD) model for the Pune real estate market, and I can say they are for a size of around 100 acres. We want to do township, and that is what we have done in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR). I am not saying we did 100 acres in MMR, but large projects," Irani said. "We are exploring projects for Pune currently, and any new entry in a new city will not happen immediately, but only by next year. We have announced a project in the Nagpur real estate market, and we will soon announce the launch of that first and later get into Pune. However, it goes without saying our major focus remains to be MMR and redevelopment of old buildings in MMR," Irani said. Also Read: Rustomjee Group plans to launch senior living and plotted development projects: Boman Irani Are sales softening in the Mumbai real estate market? According to Irani, in certain pockets the interest is very high, and in certain pockets the interest is not that great. 'I have already said this before, and also, we need to see that affordable housing is not doing that great. I feel that what I experience is the mid mass and aspirational segment in ₹1 crore to ₹7 crore, the demand is high, and the supply is not adequate. And whenever you say for Mumbai, when you hit the sweetspot of ₹3.5 crore to ₹5 crore, we find a good amount of interest.' "When we look at MMR, there are eight to nine markets in one, and there are various sizes, price points, and requirements, which makes MMR more interesting. Amid all this, when you are able to gauge where your product will work, you are able to sell over time. My big bet is the ₹5 crore sweetspot, which I see as a continuously growing market for Mumbai city, and ₹1 crore to ₹3 crore will always be the darling," Irani said. Also Read: Mumbai real estate: Redevelopment is here to stay for more than 20 years, says Boman Irani of Keystone Realtors Focus on redevelopment The company announced three redevelopment projects for its Mumbai portfolio during the first quarter of FY26. These include GTB Nagar, Lokhandwala Cluster, and Swarganga CHSL, adding 3.25 million sq ft of saleable area with an estimated GDV of ₹7,727 crore. In total, the company has around 18 ongoing projects in MMR measuring around 8.61 million sq ft and has 26 projects upcoming of around 23.79 million sq ft. 16 out of these 26 projects are in the price range of ₹1 crore to ₹7 crore. Also Read: Rustomjee Group adds three redevelopment projects worth ₹7,727 crore to its Mumbai portfolio Q1FY26 results On August 5, Rustomjee Group reported its highest-ever quarterly pre-sales of ₹1,068 crore in Q1FY26, up 75% year-on-year. However, its consolidated net profit fell 44% to ₹14.51 crore from ₹25.82 crore in the same quarter last year. Total income dropped to ₹288.64 crore in Q1FY26 from ₹437.20 crore a year ago.

Karnataka revises setback rules for buildings in Bengaluru; introduces new stilt parking rule
Karnataka revises setback rules for buildings in Bengaluru; introduces new stilt parking rule

The Hindu

time19 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Karnataka revises setback rules for buildings in Bengaluru; introduces new stilt parking rule

The Karnataka government has notified amendments to the Zonal Regulations of the Revised Master Plan (RMP), 2015 for Bengaluru's Local Planning Area (LPA), rationalising all-round building setback requirements. In addition, the notification revises permissible stilt height, earlier referred to as 'less than 2.4m,' to 'up to 3m.' Similarly, the maximum permissible height for certain building components where the stilt height was set at 11.5m has been revised to 12m. The revised regulations, issued on August 1, by the Urban Development Department, are now in effect. The amendment introduces a calibrated setback system for buildings above 12m in height. The minimum required front, rear, and side setbacks will now be determined based on both building height and plot size. For buildings between 12m and 15m high, constructed on plots up to 4,000 sq. m with stilt parking, the required setbacks can now be 1m to 1.5m. For buildings in plot sizes above 4,000 sq. m, the setbacks are benchmarked at 5m. For buildings above 12m up to 15m where stilt parking is not constructed, the setback is set at 5m. As the height of a building increases, so do the minimum setback requirements, scaling up to 16m for buildings taller than 50m. The setback requirements for different slabs, categorised based on building heights. Alongside the setback revisions, the amendment ensures the use of stilt floors exclusively for vehicle parking. The stilt floor, now clearly defined as being up to 3m in height, will not be counted towards the total height of the building. In addition, strict enforcement clauses have been introduced to prevent misuse. The use of stilt floors for commercial, storage, or habitable purposes is expressly prohibited. Such violations will result in denial of power and water connections by BESCOM and BWSSB. In the case of non-residential buildings or office spaces, misuse could also lead to the cancellation or withholding of trade licences. The amendment not only optimises land use but also helps maintain essential standards of fire safety and curb issues such as rampant roadside parking in residential areas. The notification, published under Section 13-E of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961, follows the release of a draft on June 12, which invited public objections.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store