logo
X is once again selling checkmarks to US sanctioned groups, report says

X is once again selling checkmarks to US sanctioned groups, report says

Engadget15-05-2025

X has once again been accepting payments from people associated with terrorist groups and other entities subject to US sanctions, according to a new report from the Tech Transparency Project (TTP). According to the report, X has not only accepted payments in exchange for its premium service, but in some cases has provided an "ID verified" badge.
The report once again questions whether X is complying with US sanctions that restrict companies' ability to do business with individuals and entities that have been deemed a security threat. Last year, the TTP published a similar report that identified more than two dozen verified accounts that were affiliated with sanctioned groups, including leaders of Hezbollah and accounts associated with Houthis in Yemen. Many of those checkmarks were subsequently revoked, with X promising to "maintain a safe, secure and compliant platform."
But some of those accounts simply "resubscribed" to X's premium service or created fresh accounts, according to the report, which is based on research between November 2024 and April 2025. "TTP's new investigation found an array of blue checkmark accounts for U.S.-sanctioned individuals and organizations, including several that appeared to simply re-subscribe to premium service or create new accounts after their old ones were restricted or removed by X," the report says. "Moreover, some of the accounts were 'ID verified,' meaning X conducted an additional review to confirm their identity."
The report once again highlights verified accounts associated with members of Hezbollah, including one of its founders, as well as Houthi officials who "are making heavy use of X for messaging and propaganda." The son of Libyan dictator Muammar Gadhafi, whose account was previously suspended, also currently has a blue check , as does Raghad Saddam Hussein al-Tikriti, one of Saddam Hussein's daughters. Both have been under sanctions for more than a decade.
X didn't respond to a request for comment on the report. In response to last year's report, the company said it would "take action if necessary." However, it's unclear if the company changed any of its practices regarding who can pay for premium subscriptions.
'If a small team can use X's public facing search tools to identify these accounts, it's unclear why a multi-billion-dollar company cannot do the same,' Michelle Kuppersmith, the executive director for Campaign for Accountability, the watchdog group that runs TTP said in a statement. 'It's one thing to allow terrorists to have a voice on the platform; it's another entirely to allow them to pay for a more effective megaphone.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Warren asks if X violating sanctions with ‘blue checks'
Warren asks if X violating sanctions with ‘blue checks'

Yahoo

time19 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Warren asks if X violating sanctions with ‘blue checks'

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) raised concerns Wednesday about whether Elon Musk's social platform X is violating sanctions by reportedly allowing members of terrorist organizations to obtain 'blue checks.' In a letter to Treasury Department Secretary Scott Bessent and national security adviser Marco Rubio, Warren pointed to a recent report finding that sanctioned individuals from al Qaeda, Hezbollah and the Houthis had been allowed to obtain the check marks and the benefits that come with them. 'Although X's official policies state that its premium services are off limits for those subject to U.S. sanctions, in practice, X nevertheless appears to have facilitated payments for terrorists and other sanctioned individuals,' Warren wrote. The Massachusetts Democrats underscored that X Premium users receive other advantages beyond the blue check, including revenue-generating features that allow users to 'transfer cash or cryptocurrency to sanctioned individuals.' 'In essence, X allowed its platform to be transformed into a sanctions-evasion service for individuals that threaten the safety of Americans on a daily basis,' Warren said in Wednesday's letter. 'These revelations raise serious questions about whether X is breaking the law and endangering the safety of Americans — and about whether the Treasury Department is prepared for the deluge of illicit, sanctions-evading transactions that will occur if platforms like X are able to create their own stablecoins, as proposed by the GENIUS Act,' she added. Warren has been a fierce opponent of the GENIUS Act, a bill that would create a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins. She has argued that the legislation doesn't go far enough to prevent Big Tech firms, like X, from launching their own stablecoins and lacks restrictions blocking President Trump and his family from profiting off the industry. The bill cleared a key early hurdle on the Senate floor last month, garnering support from more than a dozen Democrats. However, many have indicated they want to see changes to the GENIUS Act before voting for final passage. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) has vowed a return to so-called regular order, allowing for an open amendment process on the floor that would permit more tweaks to the legislation but threatens to slow its progress. A key point of contention has become the Credit Card Competition Act, which Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) has offered up as an amendment to the GENIUS Act. The bill, which is co-sponsored by Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), would require large financial institutions to provide an option other than Visa or Mastercard to process credit card transactions. The legislation has been aggressively opposed by the credit card industry, which argues it would enrich major retailers and force credit card companies to do away with popular rewards programs. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Warren asks if X violating sanctions with ‘blue checks'
Warren asks if X violating sanctions with ‘blue checks'

The Hill

time21 hours ago

  • The Hill

Warren asks if X violating sanctions with ‘blue checks'

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) raised concerns Wednesday about whether Elon Musk's X is violating sanctions by reportedly allowing members of terrorist organizations to obtain 'blue checks.' In a letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and national security adviser Marco Rubio, Warren pointed to a recent report finding that sanctioned individuals from al-Qaeda, Hezbollah and the Houthis had been allowed to obtain the checkmarks and the benefits that come with them. 'Although X's official policies state that its premium services are off limits for those subject to U.S. sanctions, in practice, X nevertheless appears to have facilitated payments for terrorists and other sanctioned individuals,' Warren wrote. The Massachusetts Democrats underscored that X Premium users receive other advantages beyond the blue check, including revenue-generating features that allow users to 'transfer cash or cryptocurrency to sanctioned individuals.' 'In essence, X allowed its platform to be transformed into a sanctions-evasion service for individuals that threaten the safety of Americans on a daily basis,' Warren said in Wednesday's letter. 'These revelations raise serious questions about whether X is breaking the law and endangering the safety of Americans – and about whether the Treasury Department is prepared for the deluge of illicit, sanctions-evading transactions that will occur if platforms like X are able to create their own stablecoins, as proposed by the GENIUS Act,' she added. Warren has been a fierce opponent of the GENIUS Act, a bill that would create a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins. She has argued that the legislation doesn't go far enough to prevent Big Tech firms, like X, from launching their own stablecoins and lacks restrictions blocking President Trump and his family from profiting off the industry. The bill cleared a key early hurdle on the Senate floor last month, garnering support from more than a dozen Democrats. However, many have indicated they want to see changes to the GENIUS Act before voting for final passage. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) has vowed a return to so-called 'regular order,' allowing for an open amendment process on the floor that would permit more tweaks to the legislation but threatens to slow its progress. A key point of contention has become the Credit Card Competition Act, which Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) has offered up as an amendment to the GENIUS Act. The bill, which is co-sponsored by Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), would require large financial institutions to provide an option other than Visa or Mastercard to process credit card transactions. The legislation has been aggressively opposed by the credit card industry, which argues it would enrich major retailers and force credit card companies to do away with popular rewards programs.

German foreign minister backs down on review of Israeli arms exports
German foreign minister backs down on review of Israeli arms exports

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

German foreign minister backs down on review of Israeli arms exports

German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul has promised Israel further arms deliveries ahead of a visit by his Israeli counterpart Gideon Saar, despite growing international calls for a weapons embargo amid the ongoing war in Gaza. "Germany will continue to support the state of Israel, including with arms deliveries," Wadephul told lawmakers in parliament on Wednesday. He argued that providing weapons to Israel was necessary in view of the terror waged by the Islamist group Hamas as well as the ongoing attacks by Yemen's Iran-backed Houthi militia. Wadephul's latest comments seem to contradict recent remarks he made to the Süddeutsche Zeitung newspaper, suggesting further shipments to Israel were dependent on a government review of whether Israeli actions in Gaza comply with international humanitarian law. The statements caused a stir among Wadephul's conservative colleagues, who agreed with him on Monday that criticism of Israel should be voiced, but that arms embargos and sanctions were not on the agenda, according to senior lawmaker Steffen Bilger. In response to a question from the Greens in parliament on Wednesday, Wadephul stressed that the coalition stands united by Israel's side. However, the fact that German policy is also oriented towards international humanitarian law "applies to all policy areas, including, of course, the area of arms deliveries," he added. When asked what impact this would have on arms export policy, the minister once again referred to the Federal Security Council, which meets in secret and decides on arms deliveries. Wadephul is due to receive his Israeli counterpart in Berlin on Thursday, with both ministers set to visit the Holocaust memorial in the German capital.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store