
Rachel Reeves to announce billions in regional spending after Treasury rule changes
Rachel Reeves is preparing to announce billions of pounds' worth of extra spending for areas outside south-east England at next month's spending review, after rewriting Treasury investment rules.
The chancellor will unveil the extra capital spending after a review of the Treasury's 'green book', which determines how officials calculate the costs and benefits of a scheme.
Critics say the rules are biased in favour of more economically productive areas of the country, and Reeves has promised a review to be published on the same day as the spending review.
The announcement, which was first revealed by the Times, comes as ministers look for ways to combat the threat of Reform UK in the 'red wall' of seats in the north and Midlands, which were won by the Conservatives in 2019 and taken by Labour last year. Those areas are likely to be hit by reduced departmental spending, which Reeves will also lay out at the spending review.
Reeves said in January: 'As the metro mayor of Liverpool, Steve Rotheram, has called for, we will review the green book and how it is being used to provide objective, transparent advice on public investment across the country, including outside London, and the south-east.
'This means that investment in all regions is given a fair hearing by the Treasury that I lead.'
Rotheram previously called the green book review 'one of the wonkiest and most technical changes possible' but also 'one of the most impactful and most transformative changes possible'.
Officials confirmed on Friday there would be billions of pounds of extra investment spending on schemes such as energy projects, roads and rails outside London and the south-east.
Keir Starmer has said that Reform poses the biggest electoral threat to Labour, having picked up significant support in northern former industrial areas since last year's election.
The prime minister gave a speech on Thursday in which he argued the Tories were 'sliding into the abyss', leaving Reform as his party's main political opponents.
Speaking at a glass factory in St Helen's, Starmer attempted to puncture the appeal of the Reform leader, Nigel Farage, in similar areas of the country. 'Unlike Nigel Farage, I know what it's like growing up in a cost of living crisis. I know what it's like when your family can't pay the bills, when you fear the postman, the bills that may be brought.'
Reeves is not the first chancellor to change the green book rules. Five years ago, Rishi Sunak did the same thing, also with a view to making sure investment was better spread out across the UK.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
That review ordered officials to take account of the government's social and environmental policies when deciding whether to approve projects. The review also instructed them to pay attention to how a scheme might interact with others in the local area, in an attempt to increase spending in more poorly resourced parts of the country.
Despite these changes however, both Sunak and Reeves have been accused of continuing to favour the south-east with their spending plans.
When Sunak scrapped part of the HS2 rail line in 2023 for example, he replaced it with a series of transport schemes which were badged as 'Network North' but included hundreds of millions of pounds for London and the south-east.
When Reeves announced a series of measures earlier this year designed to boost economic growth, she put at its heart plans to expand Heathrow airport and improve transport links between Oxford and Cambridge.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Belfast Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Belfast Telegraph
Why Spending Review offers Stormont a huge opportunity to bring about reforms
A three-year settlement from the Chancellor provides a chance for the Executive to take longer-term look at what it funds and how Westminster's imminent Spending Review will set the social and economic tone for the whole of the UK. Its implications for Northern Ireland will be significant, as will the Executive's decisions about the funding it receives. Chancellor Rachel Reeves' announcement on Wednesday, June 11, will signal the Labour Government's priorities for the rest of this mandate and set funding allocations for the next three years. This settlement is intended to give stability to Government departments and provide time and space to plan spending, investment and reform.


The Independent
40 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘Fundamental reset' needed for UK's water industry
The water sector in England and Wales needs a 'fundamental reset' after being plagued with 'deep-rooted, systemic' failures, according to a new report. In an interim report published on Tuesday, the Independent Water Commission calls for a 'fundamental strengthening and rebalancing' of Ofwat's regulatory role, calling for the watchdog to adopt a more supervisory approach to its oversight of water firms. This could include benchmarking companies against one another to justify customer bills and assess efficiency. It also urges the Government to provide clearer direction, proposes greater regional decision-making around local water systems and emphasises the need for a greater focus on long-term, responsible investment and ownership within the industry. Independent Water Commission chairman Sir Jon Cunliffe said he had heard a 'strong and powerful consensus' that the system was not working for everyone. 'There is no simple, single change, no matter how radical, that will deliver the fundamental reset that is needed for the water sector,' he said. 'We have heard of deep-rooted, systemic and interlocking failures over the years – failure in Government's strategy and planning for the future, failure in regulation to protect both the billpayer and the environment and failure by some water companies and their owners to act in the public, as well as their private, interest. 'My view is that all of these issues need to be tackled to rebuild public trust and make the system fit for the future. We anticipate that this will require new legislation.' New national infrastructure and resilience standards are also under consideration, requiring companies to regularly report on the health of their assets. 'This means companies do not just fix failures when they fail, but responsibly plan for the long-term condition and resilience of these critical assets,' the report said. The report also highlighted the need for the sector to 'attract and retain' long-term investors but acknowledged this would require restoring investor confidence in both the sector and its regulators. 'I believe that ambitious reforms across these complex and connected set of issues are sorely needed,' Sir John said. Legislation around water was 'complex' and 'inconsistent in places', according to the interim report which said the legislation has evolved in a 'piecemeal fashion over a long period of time', with 'currently around 80 pieces of legislation covering the sector'. 'The commission is considering options to move from the complex planning process we have now to a regional 'systems planning' approach in England,' the report said. 'It means bringing decisions on water systems, such as where new infrastructure is built or how pollution from different sources should be tackled, closer to the communities who depend on them.' More than 50,000 responses from the public, campaigners, industry and the regulators were sent in to the commission's call for evidence which ran between February and April. The commission's full conclusions and detailed recommendations will be published later in the summer.


North Wales Chronicle
41 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Vital routes to be protected as part of buses overhaul
Councils in England will put strict requirements in place before 'socially necessary' routes can be changed or cancelled, the department said. This is aimed at services to locations such as hospitals and schools. The measure is part of the Government's Bus Services Bill, which reached its second reading in the House of Commons on Monday. This will lead to an overhaul of buses, such as by giving all local transport authorities new powers to run their own services. The Government will also reduce some of the red tape involved in bus franchising, including reducing the minimum period between local areas taking control of services and being allowed to start operations. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said: 'We're committed to giving local leaders the power to shape the bus services their communities rely on. 'Our Bus Services Bill is a big step forward, protecting vital services that people depend on to get to work, school or essential appointments. 'We have taken a decisive step towards better buses, building on our £1 billion investment to improve and maintain bus services, keeping people connected, driving up living standards and growing the economy.' Ben Plowden, of lobby group the Campaign for Better Transport, said: 'Buses are the most-used form of public transport. 'Preserving vital bus services has long been central to our campaigning, so the new protections in the Bus Services Bill are very welcome indeed. 'Protecting existing services, and identifying and filling gaps in the network, is the way to ensure everyone can access opportunities and stay connected.' Conservative shadow transport secretary Gareth Bacon attacked the Bus Services Bill as 'an ideological move that threatens essential services'. He said: 'They scrapped the £2 fare cap, slashed support for routes, and now want to strip away safeguards so councils can seize control of networks they aren't capable of operating. 'This is about Labour clinging to a fantasy of municipal socialism, whatever the cost to those who rely on local transport. Without the requirement to prove any benefit to passengers, Labour-run councils will be free to run yet another public service into the ground. 'We're not opposed to local decision-making. But this Bill offers no real investment, no credible delivery model, and no route to better services.'