Bihar Voter List Trimmed By 52 Lakh By Election Commission
The controversial electoral roll revision in Bihar has weeded out 52 lakh voters who are dead or migrated, the Election Commission said today, assuring that "all eligible electors are included in the draft electoral roll to be published on August 1". Of the 52 lakh names removed, 18 lakh are reported dead, 26 lakh voters have shifted to different constituencies, and 7 lakh are enrolled at two places, the Commission said two days before the draft lists are expected.
Amid Opposition concerns about a chunk of voters being left out -- that led to a massive row and a court case -- the poll body has assured that there will be time to tweak the lists to include anyone who need to be included.
"As per the SIR order dated 24.06.2025, from August 1 to September 1, 2025, a full one-month will be available to any member of the public to file objections for any additions, deletions and rectification in Draft Electoral Rolls," the Commission said in a statement today.
The Commission has said each voter who submitted the enumeration form with or without documents will be included in the draft roll that would be published on August 1. If any voter has been unable to submit his enumeration forms, they can be included in the final rolls once they submit a claim in the prescribed form along with the declaration.
After the completion of the entire process, the final roll will be published on September 30, it added. And even after the publication, new voters can be enrolled up to the last date of nominations, the Commission has said.
"The entire election machinery, including nearly 1 lakh BLOs, 4 lakh volunteers and 1.5 lakh BLAs appointed by the District Presidents of all the 12 major political parties in Bihar are working together to search those electors who are yet to submit their Enumeration Forms (EFs) or have not been found at their addresses," read a statement from the poll body today.
The poll body has claimed that the Special Intensive Revision or SIR being conducted ahead of the assembly elections in Bihar, is its constitutional duty. In court, where the matter is pending, the Commission has argued that the entire process is being conducted in a consistent and jurisdictional manner, citing the powers conferred under Article 324 of the Constitution.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
22 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Bihar Voter List Revision 2025: Final Day to Submit Forms, Check Your Name Now
Bihar is undergoing its first major voter list revision in over two decades, and today—July 25—is the final day for voters to submit their forms as part of the Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision (SIR). This large-scale clean-up aims to verify who remains eligible to vote and remove outdated or duplicate entries. With over 7.89 crore registered voters in the state, the scale of this effort is unprecedented. As of July 24, nearly 15 lakh forms were still pending, 20 lakh voters were found deceased, 28 lakh had permanently moved away, and 7 lakh were registered in more than one location. About 1 lakh couldn't be traced at all. Booth Level Officers (BLOs) have visited homes with pre-filled forms for verification. Those unavailable could also submit via WhatsApp or online. However, missing today's deadline means your name might not be on the draft list published August 1—and if you're not on the list, you can't vote. The revision has sparked controversy, with opposition parties warning that legitimate voters—especially migrants, the poor, or those without formal documents—may be excluded. Aadhaar, though widely used, is not accepted as sole proof of eligibility. From August 1 to September 1, voters can file claims or objections before the final list is released ahead of Bihar's Assembly elections. This process is not just about cleaning up the list—it's about ensuring a transparent and fair electoral system. But as the deadline hits, the question remains: will it include everyone it should? Presentation: Aniket Singh Chauhan Script: Shikha Kumari A. Video: Tayyab Hussain Editing: Zeeshan Akhtar
NDTV
32 minutes ago
- NDTV
Impeachment Move Against 2 High Court Judges Amid 33% Vacancy Crisis
New Delhi: The government and the opposition are both pursuing the impeachment of two judges from the Allahabad High Court. The competing push to sack the senior judges has been seen as building each side's 'anti-corruption' credentials ahead of a critical election in Bihar this year. But it also comes amid a staffing crisis. A third of all High Court judges' seats are vacant. Two Judges, Two Controversies The government (and the opposition) have called for the impeachment of Justice Yashwant Varma, then a Delhi High Court judge. after piles of burnt cash were found at his residence. A motion to impeach was tabled in the Lok Sabha on Monday, but the judge has moved the Supreme Court challenging the judiciary's in-house report that recommended he be sacked. Impeachment proceedings have also been demanded against Justice Shekhar Yadav after controversial comments at an event by right-wing group Vishwa Hindu Parishad. A group of 55 MPs wrote to the Rajya Sabha in December asking he be fired. 33 Per Cent High Court Posts Vacant However, while impeachments make headlines, the judiciary must sort out its numbers problem. The Law Ministry, in response to a query by Congress boss Mallikarjun Kharge, told the Rajya that 371 High Court judge posts - 33 per cent of the total - are vacant. There are 1,122 High Court judge positions in total. Of these only 751 are currently occupied. Proposals to fill 178 of the empty seats are being processed by government and the Supreme Court Collegium. Recommendations for 193 are still pending from High Court collegiums. Why The Delay? The delay is reportedly because of a complicated appointment process as laid down by Articles 217 and 224 of the Constitution. The entire process involves several steps - a shortlist is drawn up, after consultation with the state government, by the two senior-most judges of a High Court. The recommendations are sent to the Supreme Court Collegium for approval. However, despite guidelines stating High Courts should submit these recommendations six months before any vacancy arises, the Law Ministry has said the timeline is not followed. It has stressed the appointment process is "continuously integrated and collaborative exercise" between the executive and judiciary, making it hard to determine a timeline for filling vacancies.
NDTV
36 minutes ago
- NDTV
Top Court Allows Kerala To Withdraw Pleas Against Governor Over Assent To Bills
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday allowed the Kerala government to withdraw its pleas against the Governor over the delay in approving bills passed by the state assembly. A bench of Justices P S Narasimha and A S Chandurkar passed the order after senior advocate K K Venugopal, appearing for the Kerala government, sought withdrawal of the plea and said the issue had turned infructuous in view of the recent judgment passed in the Tamil Nadu Governor case. Attorney General R Venkataramani and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta opposed the submission and urged the court to await the top court's decision on the reference of the President under Article 143 of the Constitution over the grant of assent to bills. On April 22, the top court said it would examine whether the recent judgment on a plea of Tamil Nadu, fixing timelines for the grant of assent to bills, covered the issues raised by the Kerala government in its pleas. Acting on a plea of the Tamil Nadu government, a top court bench on April 8 set aside the reservation of the 10 bills for the President's consideration in the second round, holding it as illegal, erroneous in law. The bench, for the first time, also prescribed a time limit for the President to decide on the bills reserved for her consideration by the Governor. It set a three-month timeframe from the date on which such a reference was received. Kerala sought similar directions in its petition. In 2023, the top court expressed displeasure over then Kerala Governor Arif Mohammed Khan "sitting" for two years on bills passed by the state legislature. Khan is currently the Governor of Bihar. The top court, on July 26, last year, agreed to consider the plea of opposition-ruled Kerala alleging the denial of assent to bills passed by the legislative assembly. The Kerala government alleged that Khan referred certain bills to President Droupadi Murmu, and those were yet to be cleared. Taking note of the pleas, the top court issued notices to the Union Ministry of Home Affairs and the secretaries of the Kerala Governor. The state said its plea related to the acts of the Governor in reserving seven bills, which he was required to deal with himself, to the President. Not one of the seven bills had anything to do with Centre-state relations, it argued. The bills were pending with the Governor for as long as two years, and his action "subverted" the functioning of the state legislature, rendering its very existence "ineffective and otiose", the state added. "The bills include public interest bills that are for the public good, and even these have been rendered ineffective by the Governor not dealing with each one of them 'as soon as possible', as required by the proviso to Article 200," the plea said. The state government had said the home ministry informed it that President had withheld assent to four of the seven bills -- University Laws (Amendment) (No. 2) Bill, 2021; Kerala Co-operative Societies (Amendment) Bill, 2022; University Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2022; and University Laws (Amendment) (No. 3) Bill, 2022. The Constitution is silent on how much time the President can take in granting assent to a bill passed by a state legislature and referred to the Rashtrapati Bhavan for presidential consideration or for denying consent. Article 361 of the Constitution says the President, or Governor of a state, shall not be answerable to any court for the exercise and performance of the powers and duties of his office or for any act done or purporting to be done by him in the exercise and performance of those powers and duties.
