Bitcoin Captures Nearly 65% Of The Market — Highest Level In 4 Years
17h05 ▪
3
min read ▪ by
Eddy S.
Bitcoin strikes hard: with a price flirting with $97,000 and a market dominance of 64.89%, the crypto queen reaches its highest level since 2021! Driven by distrust towards altcoins and a tense macro environment, BTC crushes the competition and attracts capital.
Bitcoin: Market dominance reaches a 4-year peak
In a few months, Bitcoin's dominance has risen from 57.90% in December 2024 to nearly 65% this Saturday, its highest peak in 4 years. While BTC trades around $97,000, this progression marks a strong comeback of the king asset in a crypto market undergoing upheaval.
Two key factors explain this spectacular rise: An uncertain macroeconomic context: investors fleeing traditional assets like U.S. Treasury bonds have strengthened Bitcoin's appeal, considered a more resilient store of value amid global economic tensions.
Trump's tariff policy: the imposition of higher tariffs by the U.S. administration has created an unstable climate, cooling appetite for more speculative altcoins. Conversely, Bitcoin stands out, benefiting from its safe-haven image and proven infrastructure. A unique resilience in an uncertain market
David Morrison, senior analyst at Trade Nation, explains that bitcoin benefits from a first-mover advantage, more favorable regulation, and a strictly limited supply, which attracts both institutional and retail investors.
Even during bearish periods, bitcoin shows an impressive ability to rebound, unlike many altcoins that are still struggling.
While the Bitcoin ETF has attracted 4 billion dollars more than the gold ETF this week, institutional confidence seems to be strengthening. This could propel BTC beyond 70% dominance if this trend continues. Read More Bitcoin As A Notarization Layer For Political Agreements
As bitcoin establishes its supremacy in the crypto market, its breakthrough worries some regulators. The Bank of Italy warns about the systemic risks of integrating BTC into national reserves. A rise in power that fascinates… but could also reshuffle the cards of global stability.
Maximize your Cointribune experience with our 'Read to Earn' program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.
The world is evolving and adaptation is the best weapon to survive in this undulating universe. Originally a crypto community manager, I am interested in anything that is directly or indirectly related to blockchain and its derivatives. To share my experience and promote a field that I am passionate about, nothing is better than writing informative and relaxed articles.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fox Host Says Trump Is ‘Furious' With Elon Behind the Scenes
President Donald Trump is reportedly seething over Elon Musk's public trashing of his 'Big Beautiful Bill' but knows it's better to keep his mouth shut on the subject for now. The former 'First Buddy' dramatically turned on the president in an unhinged late-night posting spree on Tuesday, labelling his spending plans a 'disgusting abomination' which would 'burden American citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.' Reacting to the meltdown on Wednesday morning's Fox & Friends, host Brian Kilmeade said: 'I think the Elon Musk thing really caught the president by surprise. And I hear he is furious!' The Fox host frequently has the ear of the president, and his response is a solid indicator of how Trump may respond to Musk's betrayal over the coming days. 'I think he's so smart to keep his powder dry,' Kilmeade added. 'Because it just plays into what critics would have to say, 'The right can't get out of their own way.' 'Instead, you have a goal: Pass it. Elon Musk is not in the Senate or the House. Don't worry about it.' Kilmeade's co-host Lawrence Jones attempted to spin Musk's criticism by suggesting he was still on the president's side, despite his blistering criticisms on Tuesday night. 'I don't think Elon is anti-MAGA now, or anti-the president now,' Jones said. 'He worked so hard, put a lot of stuff on the line to get a lot wasteful stuff cut, and it doesn't sound like Congress is showing that same willingness.' Ainsley Earhardt responded by saying: 'I thought Elon was very respectful in some of the original interviews, saying 'look, we have differences and I don't agree with him on everything.' 'But this latest comment about calling the big, beautiful bill a disgusting abomination, I was shocked to hear him say that I can understand why the president would not be happy about that—this is someone who worked on his team.' Musk's comments have garnered a mixed reception amongst conservative circles. Speaker Mike Johnson rebuked the billionaire and said his comments were 'terribly wrong,' while Sen. Eric Schmitt said: 'We need spending reductions, no doubt. But we're going to work through it.' The former DOGE chief found himself an ally in Rand Paul however, with the Kentucky senator tweeting: 'I agree with Elon. We have both seen the massive waste in government spending and we know another $5 trillion in debt is a huge mistake. We can and must do better.'
Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
Treasury Yields Rise on Stable Employment Ahead of CPI
1600 ET – U.S. job creation slows less than expected, reducing odds of a dovish Fed. Bond markets react with a selloff that boosts yields. May's job creation slows less than forecast and unemployment remains at 4.2%. CME data show diminishing odds of a rate cut before September. Two or more cuts this year still represent the highest odds, but bets on only one or no cut rise. Wells Fargo foresees May's 12-month core CPI, due Wednesday, accelerating to 3.3% from April's 2.8%. The 10-year gains 0.089 percentage point this week, including 0.155 p.p. today, to 4.507%. The two-year rises 0.125 p.p. in the week and 0.115 p.p. today, to 4.039%. ( @ptrevisani) 0846 ET – U.S. job creation didn't slow as much as expected in May, spurring a bonds selloff that takes Treasury yields higher. May payrolls slowed to 139,000 from a downwardly revised 147,000. Economists surveyed by WSJ forecast 125,000. Unemployment was unchanged at 4.2%, as expected. The data likely supports expectations of a Fed hold. Yields were already rising ahead of payrolls, as markets watched the Trump-Musk break up. They rose faster after the data, particularly in longer maturities. The 10-year trades at 4.452%% and the two-year at 3.985%. ( @ptrevisani)
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts
4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts Show Caption Hide Caption Biden criticizes Trump administration's handling of Social Security Social Security overhaul sparks criticism from Biden over service disruptions, layoffs and automation as Trump defends changes as efficiency. Straight Arrow News Social Security is an important source of income for millions of Americans, but the program has a serious financial problem. Costs have increased faster than revenues in recent years because the aging population is growing more quickly than the working population. As a result, the trust fund, the financial account that pays benefits, is on track to be depleted within a decade. Specifically, the Congressional Budget Office estimates the trust fund will be exhausted in 2034. That would eliminate one source of revenue (i.e., interest earned on trust fund reserves), and the remaining tax revenues would only cover 77% of scheduled payments. That means a 23% benefit cut would be necessary in 2035. Fortunately, the lawmakers in Washington have several years to find a better solution. Here are four Social Security changes that could prevent deep, across-the-board benefit cuts. 1. Apply the Social Security payroll tax to income above $400,000 Social Security is primarily funded by a dedicated payroll tax, which takes 6.2% of wages from workers and employers. But some income is exempt from the payroll tax. Specifically, the maximum taxable earnings limit is $176,100 in 2025. Income above that threshold is not taxed by Social Security. Importantly, the Social Security program is projected to run a $23 trillion deficit over the next 75 years as it's strained by shifting demographics. But the deficit could be slashed by applying the payroll tax to more income. For instance, including income above $400,000 would eliminate 60% of the 75-year funding shortfall, says the University of Maryland. 2. Gradually increase the Social Security payroll tax rate to 6.5% over six years Under current law, the Social Security payroll tax rate is 6.2% for workers and their employers. But gradually raising that figure would eliminate a portion of the long-term deficit. For example, increasing thetax rate by 0.05% annually over a six-year period would eliminate 15% of the 75-year funding shortfall, according to the University of Maryland. Now that I've discussed two possible changes, let's step back and look at the big picture. There are basically three ways to resolve Social Security's financial problems: (1) increase revenue, (2) reduce costs or (3) some combination of the first two options. The changes discussed so far would increase revenue, but the next two changes would cut benefits. However, they are more subtle cuts than the 23% across-the-board reduction that would follow trust fund depletion. 3. Gradually increase full retirement age to 68 by 2033 Workers are eligible for retirement benefits at age 62, but they are not entitled to their full benefit — also called the primary insurance amount (PIA) — until full retirement age (FRA). Anyone that claims before full retirement age receives a smaller payout, meaning they get less than 100% of their PIA. FRA is currently defined as 67 years old for workers born in 1960 or later, but raising the figure would reduce the long-term deficit. For instance, increasing FRA to 68 years old by 2033, meaning it would apply to workers born in 1965 or later, would eliminate 15% of the 75-year funding shortfall, according to the University of Maryland. 4. Reduce benefits for retired workers with income in the top 20% Social Security benefits are determined as percentages of two bend points. Specifically, income from the 35 highest-paid years of work is adjusted for inflation and converted to a monthly figure called the average indexed monthly earnings (AIME) amount. The AIME is then run through a formula that uses two bend points to determine the PIA for each worker. Modifying the second (highest) bend point would eliminate a portion of the long-term deficit by reducing benefits for high earners. For instance, the University of Maryland estimates that reducing benefits for individuals with income in the top 20% could reduce the 75-year funding deficit by 11%. Here's the big picture: The four changes I've discussed would eliminate 101% of Social Security's $23 trillion funding shortfall, which would prevent across-the-board benefit cuts in 2035. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook Offer from the Motley Fool: If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets"could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. JoinStock Advisorto learn more about these strategies. View the "Social Security secrets" »
