
Book Box: How to cope with AI anxiety
Dear Reader, Empire of AI ticks all the boxes.
These days, I see AI writing everywhere—on LinkedIn, in text messages from colleagues, and even in substack newsletters. There's something about these polished pieces of prose, glib and formulaic, with their idiosyncratic sentence structures and excessive dashes, that end up depressing me.
Many of my writer friends won't touch AI. 'We can write just fine without it,' they say.
But I can't stay away. I face my AI anxiety by finding out what this new beast is. As a teacher of management, and as someone who has pivoted careers three times already, I feel compelled to keep up with the times. AI making all writers redundant
I sign up for 'Prompt Engineering 101 for Journalists' conducted by the non-profit Knight Centre. It teaches me how to prompt AI to 'red-team' my writing—to critique flaws rather than default to dishing out praise. And to watch out for AI 'hallucinations' like made-up names of books and fake quotations falsely attributed to real people.
I stay conflicted: is it okay to use large language models that ride on the backs of writers and artists, that have learned by scraping creative works with no regard for privacy or copyright? And what about the environmental toll—the depredations on water and energy that the data centres inflict, especially in developing countries?
I look for my answers in books about AI. Supremacy: AI, ChatGPT and the Race That Will Change the World is a 2024 book by Parmy Olson that won the Financial Times Business Book of the Year. It takes me close to AI stars like Sam Altman of OpenAI and Dennis Hassabis of DeepMind, as well as to the dangers of decision-making being left to a tiny elite. But it leaves me wanting more.
A friend recommends The Worlds I See: Curiosity, Exploration, and Discovery at the Dawn of AI, a memoir by Chinese-American scientist Dr. Fei-Fei Li. It begins with an exciting chapter, with Fei-Fei traveling from her West Coast Google office to Washington, D.C., to testify to a US Senate committee on the direction of AI research. For many pages I am enraptured, reading Fei-Fei's family history, how she helped her parents run their dry cleaning store while studying at Princeton and then working at Stanford. Li has been a pioneer in AI image recognition with her ImageNet project, and this makes for fascinating reading. The book veers between scientific excitement, and apprehension at where AI research is going, and confirms my unease over the economic and existential implications of this new technology.
Then I discover Empire of AI by Karen Hao. From the very first page, I am highlighting lines, drawn in by Hao's historical analysis of AI research over the years, everything from the 'AI winter' to the dispute between two schools of AI research—the symbolists and the connectionists.
Empire of AI ticks all the boxes. It is rich in history and human detail, demystifying core concepts like deep learning and neural networks. Hao gives us the stars like Geoffrey Hinton, Ilya Sutskever, Greg Brockman—and also the workers, the data labelers and content moderators like Mophat Okinyi, Oskarina Fuentes Anaya, and shows the havoc that AI jobs have brought to their lives, as they are forced to deal with explicit sexual content and violent images and to perform AI training tasks for a pittance.
For me, the most moving part is the story of Sam Altman's sister Annie Altman, who turned to sex work, having suffered huge health challenges and trapped in severe financial duress, against Sam's lifestyle featuring multimillion-dollar homes and luxury cars. 'Annie's story also complicates the grand narrative that Sam and other OpenAI executives have painted of AI ushering in a world of abundance. Altman has said that he expects AI to end poverty... And yet, against the reality of the lives of the workers in Kenya, activists in Chile, and Altman's own sister's experience bearing the brunt of all of these problems, those dreams ring hollow', says Hao.
I put aside Empire of AI to go back to my day. I know it's ironic and it feels very meta, but after writing this, I ask Deepseek to design a brief depicting a writer dealing with the good and bad sides of AI, and then I use that output to ask Gemini to design the illustrations for me. AI, the perfect productivity tool ?
That evening as I walk down towards the market to buy a AI-recommended geyser, I find myself grateful for Karen Hao's book. Because if AI's future is being written by the Altmans and the Musks of the world, excluding large sections of the world, there are things we can do to participate. Reading books like Hao's pushes us to pay attention—to the workers behind the algorithms, to the biases in the data, to the futures we're building one query at a time.
Books like these arm us to fight back - to push for policy changes, demand transparency in training data, and support ethical AI movements.
So yes, I will use AI. But I'll also keep reading and buying subscriptions to real writers and real news outlets, because the best defence against a dystopian future is to dream of a better one, and then to fight for it.
What about you, dear Reader? Do you find AI more anxiety-inducing or enabling? Or a complex mix of both? And can you suggest any other such books on AI that we can add to this vital reading list?
(Sonya Dutta Choudhury is a Mumbai-based journalist and the founder of Sonya's Book Box, a bespoke book service. Each week, she brings you specially curated books to give you an immersive understanding of people and places. If you have any reading recommendations or reading dilemmas, write to her at sonyasbookbox@gmail.com)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Has ChatGPT evolved beyond being a 'Google replacement'? OpenAI CEO Sam Altman says it is already doing much more
If you've ever found yourself asking ChatGPT for vacation ideas, SEO strategies, or even emotional advice, you're not alone. More than 400 million users now rely on ChatGPT every week, making it the fifth most visited website globally, according to OpenAI CEO Sam Altman . But while it's become a near-constant presence in digital life, the real question is: has ChatGPT evolved beyond its early reputation as a Google alternative? Altman certainly thinks so. In recent remarks at Y Combinator, the OpenAI chief clarified that while ChatGPT may have started as a more conversational search engine, its trajectory has shifted dramatically. 'For a long time, ChatGPT was like a Google replacement… it still felt like a more advanced version of search,' Altman said. 'But now, it's like a very junior employee that can work on something for a short period of time.' Not Just a Search Engine Anymore According to a report by Search Engine Journal, Altman emphasized that ChatGPT's goal is no longer limited to retrieving information. It's about doing things—completing tasks, automating workflows, and even proactively assisting users. Features like memory, reasoning, and integration with business tools are pushing ChatGPT toward becoming a true assistant. 'Memory is the first time where people can sort of see that coming,' Altman said, referring to ChatGPT's new ability to remember preferences and previous conversations. This shift supports OpenAI's broader vision of AI not just as a knowledge engine, but as a platform that connects to user data and performs tasks independently. New model releases like GPT-4o and O3 are tailored for deeper reasoning and complex workflows. 'The technology is moving faster than most businesses can adapt to it,' Altman noted, suggesting that the current capabilities are ahead of widespread use cases. You Might Also Like: Losing jobs to AI was just the start, Gen Z is outsourcing emotions too. New reports warn of a looming crisis The Google Comparison Still Lingers Despite its advanced features, ChatGPT hasn't completely escaped comparisons with Google—and with good reason. According to TechRadar, many users now type questions into ChatGPT that they previously might've asked Google. But the two platforms serve fundamentally different roles. Rohan Sarin, a former product lead at both Google and Microsoft, argues that ChatGPT and Google 'solve fundamentally different information problems.' If you know what you want—like a specific website or actor's name—Google still reigns. It provides direct links and a wealth of unfiltered data. ChatGPT, on the other hand, shines when you're unsure of your needs and want help exploring ideas or synthesizing concepts. Put simply, Google connects you to the internet. ChatGPT helps you make sense of it. Sarin adds that users often prefer convenience over precision. 'Most users don't particularly care about source verification or getting the exact right answer—they just want something that works,' he said. ChatGPT, free of ads and clutter, wins big on convenience. — the_dhakshu_ (@the_dhakshu_) You Might Also Like: Does ChatGPT suffer from hallucinations? OpenAI CEO Sam Altman admits surprise over users' blind trust in AI A Future of Complementary Tools Still, Google isn't going anywhere. SEO experts like Eric M. Hoover of Jellyfish believe Google's massive infrastructure, default integrations with browsers, and AI investments (such as Gemini and AI Overviews) ensure its continued dominance in search. Rather than replacing Google, ChatGPT appears to be redefining the expectations we have from AI. It's no longer just about retrieving facts; it's about applying them. As Altman puts it, users can now assign tasks to ChatGPT—whether it's writing proposals, coding snippets, or analyzing data—and return to see a draft or solution, just like they would with a junior team member. In this new landscape, the smartest users won't choose between Google and ChatGPT. They'll use both, strategically—turning to Google when they need direct answers and to ChatGPT when they need a guide, a partner, or a second brain. Because in the evolving AI ecosystem, the real revolution isn't in replacing search. It's in augmenting human capability. You Might Also Like: Is ChatGPT making us dumb? MIT brain scans reveal alarming truth about AI's impact on the human mind


Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Has ChatGPT evolved beyond being a 'Google replacement'? OpenAI CEO Sam Altman says it is already doing much more
While ChatGPT's popularity surges globally, experts agree it won't replace Google. Instead, it complements search by helping users explore ideas and synthesize information. As AI tools become more integrated and assistive, ChatGPT is shaping a future where it doesn't just answer questions—it helps users think, create, and complete tasks more efficiently across work and life. ChatGPT has moved far beyond being just a Google rival. According to OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, it now functions like a junior assistant—handling tasks, remembering preferences, and automating workflows. (Image: iStock) Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Not Just a Search Engine Anymore Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Google Comparison Still Lingers A Future of Complementary Tools If you've ever found yourself asking ChatGPT for vacation ideas, SEO strategies, or even emotional advice, you're not alone. More than 400 million users now rely on ChatGPT every week, making it the fifth most visited website globally, according to OpenAI CEO Sam Altman . But while it's become a near-constant presence in digital life, the real question is: has ChatGPT evolved beyond its early reputation as a Google alternative?Altman certainly thinks so. In recent remarks at Y Combinator, the OpenAI chief clarified that while ChatGPT may have started as a more conversational search engine, its trajectory has shifted dramatically. 'For a long time, ChatGPT was like a Google replacement… it still felt like a more advanced version of search,' Altman said. 'But now, it's like a very junior employee that can work on something for a short period of time.'According to a report by Search Engine Journal, Altman emphasized that ChatGPT's goal is no longer limited to retrieving information. It's about doing things—completing tasks, automating workflows, and even proactively assisting users. Features like memory, reasoning, and integration with business tools are pushing ChatGPT toward becoming a true assistant.'Memory is the first time where people can sort of see that coming,' Altman said, referring to ChatGPT's new ability to remember preferences and previous conversations. This shift supports OpenAI's broader vision of AI not just as a knowledge engine, but as a platform that connects to user data and performs tasks model releases like GPT-4o and O3 are tailored for deeper reasoning and complex workflows. 'The technology is moving faster than most businesses can adapt to it,' Altman noted, suggesting that the current capabilities are ahead of widespread use its advanced features, ChatGPT hasn't completely escaped comparisons with Google—and with good reason. According to TechRadar, many users now type questions into ChatGPT that they previously might've asked Google. But the two platforms serve fundamentally different Sarin, a former product lead at both Google and Microsoft, argues that ChatGPT and Google 'solve fundamentally different information problems.' If you know what you want—like a specific website or actor's name—Google still reigns. It provides direct links and a wealth of unfiltered data. ChatGPT, on the other hand, shines when you're unsure of your needs and want help exploring ideas or synthesizing simply, Google connects you to the internet. ChatGPT helps you make sense of adds that users often prefer convenience over precision. 'Most users don't particularly care about source verification or getting the exact right answer—they just want something that works,' he said. ChatGPT, free of ads and clutter, wins big on Google isn't going anywhere. SEO experts like Eric M. Hoover of Jellyfish believe Google's massive infrastructure, default integrations with browsers, and AI investments (such as Gemini and AI Overviews) ensure its continued dominance in than replacing Google, ChatGPT appears to be redefining the expectations we have from AI. It's no longer just about retrieving facts; it's about applying them. As Altman puts it, users can now assign tasks to ChatGPT—whether it's writing proposals, coding snippets, or analyzing data—and return to see a draft or solution, just like they would with a junior team this new landscape, the smartest users won't choose between Google and ChatGPT. They'll use both, strategically—turning to Google when they need direct answers and to ChatGPT when they need a guide, a partner, or a second in the evolving AI ecosystem, the real revolution isn't in replacing search. It's in augmenting human capability.


Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
MrBeast shares 15-hour-a-day filming schedule, Bryan Johnson offers cryptic warning: ‘Jimmy, you'll…'
YouTube star MrBeast received some health advice from anti-ageing enthusiast Bryan Johnson after he revealed the toll his content production is taking on his body. Jimmy Donaldson, popularly known as MrBeast, posted on X that he's been pushing his limits harder than ever in pursuit of creating what he believes is his best work yet. Jimmy Donaldson, popularly known as MrBeast, posted on X that he's been pushing his limits harder than ever. 'I'm probably averaging 15 hours a day of filming this month and getting less sleep than I ever have in my life (I didn't even get to go to bed last night), but my god, these videos are the greatest content I've ever filmed,' he wrote. The post quickly gained over four million views, with many of his fans praising him for his dedication, while others raised concerns about his well-being. Bryan Johnson, the 46-year-old biotech founder who has been trying to reverse his biological age, also shared a cautionary tale. 'Jimmy, in time, you'll transition into making content battling the ideas of society. Be sure to properly nourish yourself now so that you're sufficiently vibrant and durable then," he wrote. Take a look at the post here: Recently, a US-based CEO shared that he got rid of his health monitoring devices and muted Johnson for better sleep and less stress. Alex Finn, CEO of the AI content tool Creator Buddy, said that he believed tracking and monitoring every aspect of life has had a negative impact on his health. "Got rid of my Apple Watch. Got rid of my Whop. Got rid of my Oura ring. Muted Bryan Johnson. No more sleep scores. No more recovery scores. Optimizing every part of my life caused more stress than it solved. Ironically I've never slept better in my entire life," he said. (Also read: Tech CEO ditches Apple Watch, mutes Bryan Johnson for better sleep: 'Caused more stress than it solved')