
End the ‘national embarrassment' of wildlife smuggling via KLIA
Around the world, Malaysia has gained infamy as a good source of illegal wildlife products, which raises the question: how serious are we in stopping the smuggling of wildlife via KLIA?
More importantly, how effective is the government at stopping the removal of animals from their habitats?
Hunting, poaching, trophy hunting and indiscriminate killing has placed many species on the endangered list. The tiger and rhino are hunted for specific body parts in the lucrative traditional medicine trade.
Animals traded
According to Kanitha Krishnasamy, the director for Traffic in Southeast Asia, the last quarter of 2024 saw around 10,000 live tortoises and turtles, endangered primates such as siamangs and agile gibbons, bats, iguanas and bearded dragons illicitly trafficked via flights departing Malaysia, and later seized at airports in India.
Traffic, a wildlife watchdog, claimed that Malaysian authorities seized over 74,000 animals and 194 tonnes of wildlife parts from 2014 to 2023.
The Consumers Association of Penang had also described the illegal smuggling as a 'national embarrassment', after two smugglers boarded a Malaysia Airlines flight to Chennai with wildlife concealed in a suitcase.
They passed undetected through KLIA with their haul of eight exotic species, among them endangered eastern grey gibbons, marbled polecats, a silvery lutung and a Sumatran white-bearded palm civet. When they were caught on arrival in Chennai, three baby siamang gibbons had died mid-flight.
Smugglers have no concern for the wellbeing and health of the animals. Babies forcibly removed from their mothers may die. Even adults can be traumatised by the ordeal of the flight. The animals are tied-up tightly, taped and concealed in their suitcases, without water and adequate ventilation.
Many years ago, when Ismail Sabri Yaakob was the rural and regional development minister, he revealed that he was not aware of laws to protect turtles. If the minister was ignorant of the law, what about others lower down the chain of authority in Malaysia?
Commitment of ministers
Fortunately, today's ministers are more responsible. The current environment minister, Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad, and transport minister Loke Siew Fook have both acknowledged the severity of the smuggling activities, and intensified efforts to curb wildlife smuggling via air travel.
Now that Nik Nazmi has resigned, will his successor be as committed?
The nation has strived to protect many species such as the Malayan tiger, Sumatran rhino, Borneo pygmy elephant, orangutan, hawksbill and green turtles.
When large tracts of land are converted to plantations or other developments, and humans encroach on traditional hunting and breeding grounds of many animal species, the animals' chances of survival are limited.
Can the incoming minister and his peers work towards an equitable solution to maintain or protect the habitat of these animals? How committed is the government to gazetting more areas for animals to roam freely, without being hunted or killed by humans?
Tigers need a good forest home, with plentiful food, like wild boar and deer to live on. Destroying forests will destroy the vegetation which separates the tiger's prey.
Is our punishment a sufficient enough deterrent to wild-life smugglers? Is the law strictly enforced?
Case of the Lizard King
In 2010, wild-life trafficker and Penangite Anson Wong, aka 'the Lizard King', was caught in KLIA attempting to smuggle 95 endangered boa constrictors to Indonesia. He served only 17 months of his jail term.
Wong's case showed our lack of commitment to tackle this illegal trade. With the wildlife trade having an estimated value of several billion US dollars a year, it is inevitable that key people can easily be silenced or asked to look the other way.
Wong's international network traded in albino pythons, radiated tortoises (the second most endangered species in Madagascar), snow leopards and other protected species. His fee increased, depending on the animal's rarity.
Despite Wong's imprisonment in both the US and Mexico, as well as an embargo on his company, his wife Cheah Bing Shee continued to export wildlife to America, simply by trading under a new company name.
Malaysia is a haven for illegal activities, in which animals are hunted to the point of extinction and the environment scarred till it is barren and polluted beyond repair.
We cannot fail the animals who depend on us for their survival.
The views expressed are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of FMT.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Malay Mail
6 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Four 13-year-olds released on bail after alleged attack on classmate at Kajang mall
KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 2 — Four 13-year-old students detained over the alleged assault of a classmate at a shopping mall in Kajang have been released on police bail today. Kajang district police chief ACP Naazron Abdul Yusof said the remand for the suspects, which was initially extended until tomorrow, was concluded earlier following the completion of documentation and investigative procedures. 'To date, police have recorded statements from nine individuals, including the four students,' he said in a statement. Preliminary investigations suggest the incident was triggered by dissatisfaction among the suspects with the victim's manner of communication and interaction. On July 30, the Form One student lodged a police report alleging classmates beat him at about 11 am at the mall. He later received medical treatment and was confirmed to have sustained minor facial injuries. The case is being investigated under Sections 323 and 506 of the Penal Code for voluntarily causing hurt and criminal intimidation, as well as Section 14 of the Minor Offences Act 1955. — Bernama


Malay Mail
6 hours ago
- Malay Mail
IGP: Don't derail Zara Qairina probe with 3R speculation
KOTA KINABALU, Aug 2 — All negative comments regarding the student bullying case in Sabah that could cause anxiety and touch on 3R (Race, Religion, Royalty) issues should cease immediately. Inspector-General of Police (IGP) Tan Sri Mohd Khalid Ismail stated that sufficient space must be given to the police to complete their investigation fully. 'I call upon all parties to give space to the police to continue the investigation,' he said. 'Negative comments and public perceptions linking this to 3R issues sometimes make it difficult for us to resolve the investigation and so on.' 'Therefore, I call on the relevant parties to refrain from making negative comments, comments that could create a bad atmosphere or anxiety by linking certain parties, politics, and also the palace to this issue, which I feel should be stopped,' he stressed. Commenting further on the bullying case involving the death of a student from Sipitang, the late Zara Qairina Mahathir, 13, on July 17, Mohd Khalid informed that so far, statements have been recorded from 60 witnesses, including students, staff and teachers. 'So, we have obtained many things, much information, and the investigation papers have been completed and submitted to the Criminal Investigation Department at Bukit Aman. We will then bring them to the Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) for further action,' he explained. Mohd Khalid, who was met by the media after paying a courtesy call on the Yang di-Pertua Negeri of Sabah Tun Musa Aman on Saturday, said the visit aimed to discuss security and stability issues in Sabah. 'We discussed security and stability issues in the state of Sabah.' 'The Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM) is always open to ensuring the political stability and security of Sabah remain peaceful for all its people.' 'The Sabah Police Commissioner is also always giving his best to ensure Sabah's security, not only concerning domestic issues but also international issues, especially our waters shared with neighbouring states, the Philippines, and also claims by China and other countries. 'So far, we are in a win-win situation, discussing well and thoroughly so that everything can be resolved amicably,' he revealed. Accompanying him at Istana Seri Kinabalu was Sabah Police Commissioner Datuk Jauteh Dikun. This visit coincided with his maiden trip to Sabah since being appointed as the Inspector-General of Police on June 23. — The Borneo Post


Malay Mail
6 hours ago
- Malay Mail
When will Parliament act over concerns regarding arrest and remand of children? — Hafiz Hassan
AUGUST 2 — To arrest a person is to deprive him of his liberty by some lawful authority. (Osborn's Concise Law Dictionary) It is one of the initial steps taken in the criminal process which may lead to eventual prosecution of the arrested person. The main statute governing criminal process in Malaysia is the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC), which is also the general statute on criminal procedure and processes. Now, when an arrested person is a child, the child is governed by the Child Act 2001(CA). The CA is a specific statute governing matters relating to children, including criminal procedure applicable to children. Under Section 2(1) of CA, a child is a person under the age of 18 years. In relation to criminal proceedings, a child is a person who has attained the age of criminal responsibility as prescribed in Section 82 of the Penal Code. In the absence of a specific provision in the CA concerning any criminal procedure, the provisions of the CPC apply. Part X of CA contains provisions on criminal procedure in the Court for Children. It starts with Section 83 which stipulates that a child shall not be arrested and detained except in compliance with the CA. Part X now includes provisions on arrest following amendments in 2016. These are contained in the new Section 83A which states as follows: (1) A child who is arrested shall not be handcuffed unless - (a) the offence with which he is arrested for is a grave crime; or (b) the child forcibly resists the endeavour to arrest him or attempts to evade the arrest. (2) When a child is arrested, he shall be informed of his grounds of arrest, and a police officer shall, as soon as may be, before commencing any form of questioning or recording of any statement from the child, communicate to the parent or guardian, or relative of the child and a probation officer to inform - (a) the child's whereabouts; (b) the grounds of the child's arrest; and (c) the right to consult with a counsel of the child's choice. (3) A police officer may allow the probation officer and the parent or guardian of a child to be present at the place where the child is being detained after arrest to ensure the child's welfare. (4) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to affect the powers of a police officer to deal with a child arrested in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code. The writer argues it's time for Parliament to act on a 20-year-old legal gap: Malaysia's Child Act still lacks clear provisions on the arrest and remand of minors, leaving vulnerable children subject to general criminal procedures. — Reuters pic But apart from the above, there are no other provisions in the CA relating to the arrest of children. One may say that the CA is not comprehensive on a matter that deprives a child of his liberty. Arguably, the arrest of children should be guided by special criteria and procedures, considering who and how vulnerable they are. They have the right to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of their best interest and their sense of dignity and worth. Critical as well, the CA makes no provisions on remand of an arrested child for the purpose of investigation. As the Court of Appeal (COA) in the case of PP v N (A Child) said, the CA '[does] not provide for the detention of a child for the purpose of investigations'. Accordingly, Section 117 of CPC applies. The COA further said that 'if Parliament had intended to categorically prohibit a child from being detained for investigations for more than 24 hours, it would have said so precisely.' The consequence is an arrested child is subject to the general law on criminal procedure and processes. The case was decided in 2004. It's been more than 20 years now. Aminuddin Mustaffa and Norshamimi Mohd Mazlan of Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA) have argued that the law in the country '[does] not comply with international standards because it does not provide separate principles governing arrest and detention of children. The absence of clear and specific procedure of arrest of children appears to be inconsistent with the international standards set by the international instruments which require' that arrest of a child must be 'a measure of last resort and for the least reasonable period of time, in order for an arrest to be legally justifiable.' The writers have recommended that the law on arrest and remand of children be reviewed and reformed. [See Mustaffa, A., & Mazlan, N. (2022). 'Investigation process of children under Malaysian juvenile justice: To arrest or not to arrest?' Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 25(S2), 1-8] When will Parliament act? * This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.