
Experts, politicians divided on how to get B.C. back on track for climate goals
B.C. Energy Minister Adrian Dix says increasing electrical capacity and renewable projects would be a "significant" step for clean energy and climate goals, but not everyone agrees.
The call for new projects comes in the wake of B.C.'s latest climate accountability report that shows the province is not on track to meet its emissions reduction goals for 2030.
The 2024 Climate Change Accountability Report, released last week, reveals that, under current policies and programs, B.C. is expected to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by just 20 per cent from 2007 levels by 2030 — falling short by half of its emissions reduction targets.
Critics of B.C.'s efforts to reach its ambitious climate goals say the province can't expect to achieve them while continuing to pursue new LNG projects, because they will add to the province's emissions.
Marc Lee, a senior economist for the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, is among those critics.
"The key reason why B.C. is struggling to meet its targets is because we've committed to developing an LNG export industry," Lee said.
"What's not in the report is that in just a couple months time, LNG Canada will open up in Kitimat and will increase our emissions by four to eight million tons per year."
Dix did not respond directly when asked if B.C. would refrain from pursuing future LNG projects in the interest of meeting its climate goals. He instead said that transportation made up the biggest increase in emissions in 2022, which is the most recent available data provided by the province.
Dix said B.C.'s second call for power to boost electrical capacity and attract more renewable energy projects to the province is a critical step toward closing the gap to achieve future emissions targets.
"This is the most really significant action we've seen on new renewable electricity since the 60s," he said.
"It's good news for the planet, it's good news for the economy, and it's good news for CleanBC targets."
However, some First Nations groups are worried these projects are being fast tracked at the expense of the environment.
"When we hear fast tracking we immediately think that they're going to do it without consultation," said Robert Philips of the First Nations Summit Political Executive, though he added that the premier has assured him that wouldn't happen.
WATCH | B.C.'s premier and energy minister are putting out a new call for electricity:
B.C. moves to speed up energy projects amid growing demand and environmental concerns
14 hours ago
Duration 2:09
B.C.'s premier and energy minister are putting out a new call for electricity. The move comes as BC Hydro tries to boost its capacity to help build and power massive new projects. But as Katie DeRosa reports, critics are worried the energy projects could be fast-tracked despite potential concerns from First Nations and environmental groups.
Road to meeting future climate goals uncertain
Kathryn Harrison, a professor of political science at the University of British Columbia, said she was encouraged to see increased transparency in this year's report, including a more realistic picture of which policies will lead to reduced emissions.
She sees some policies working at moving the province closer to its goal and praised the call for new clean energy projects, but said B.C. needs to decarbonize "all aspects of our economy" to achieve future emissions targets.
The climate accountability report lays out several CleanBC measures expected to begin around 2030 and contribute to future emissions targets, such as the zero-carbon building code.
Harrison said this would make a difference when planning on how to meet future goals and thinks the province should also implement a zero-emission vehicle mandate for medium- and heavy-duty vehicles, as well as move forward on an oil-and-gas emissions cap.
"Time is really running out to get a 40 per cent reduction by 2030 — I think the key thing from my perspective is how soon will we get to 40 per cent, if not by 2030, can we do it in 2032?" she said.
Harrison also noted that new LNG projects are likely to drive up emissions even more, pushing B.C. further away from its emissions targets.
Jeremy Valeriote, interim leader of the B.C. Green Party, said he has been happy to see investments in transit and building retrofits. However, he added that he would like to see the province transition away from LNG and focus on renewable energy.
"I don't think we should pursue the ones (LNG projects) that we have, I don't think they'll work out for us," he said. "But at the very least, the three that have been permitted, we should draw the line there — we certainly don't support any further projects."
One challenge to accountability, Lee said, is that there is currently reduced attention on climate action in Canada and other countries, as tariffs and affordability concerns dominate political conversations. He feels this will need to change in order for the province to take more substantial action – and for it to make a difference for curbing the climate crisis.
"If no one else is acting, then it doesn't matter what B.C. does … I think there's a bit of a collective action problem," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Globe and Mail
30 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Bill Ackman's Bold Bet: Why Uber Is His Top Holding
When a high-profile investor like Bill Ackman makes a bold portfolio move, it's worth paying attention. And in 2025, Ackman did exactly that: Earlier this year, he revealed a massive stake in Uber Technologies (NYSE: UBER), a move that made the rideshare platform his largest holding. Uber has long been a controversial stock, burning cash in its early years, dogged by regulatory battles, and constantly trying to prove its business model was sustainable. But that narrative is quickly changing. With strong free cash flow, a growing delivery business, and upside from autonomous vehicle partnerships, Uber looks like a very different company today. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » Ackman's conviction is clear. As of this spring, Uber accounted for nearly 19% of Pershing Square's equity portfolio. And based on how the business is performing, he may be right to go big. A transformed cash cow Uber's first-quarter 2025 results showed the company firing on all cylinders. Revenue rose 14% year over year to $11.5 billion, and adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) climbed 35% to $1.9 billion. Further, Uber's net income was a substantial $1.8 billion. This profitability, which is in stark contrast to the billions of dollars the company was losing per year as recently as 2020, isn't a one-off. Over the trailing 12 months, Uber has generated nearly $8 billion in free cash flow. It ended the quarter with $6.0 billion in cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments. For a business that was once known for burning capital and endless losses, this robust profitability marks a massive turnaround. Importantly, Uber's business benefits from two significant growth drivers: mobility (ride-hailing) and delivery (services primarily booked through the company's Uber Eats app). Both of these segments are performing well, and both are nearly equal in size, with first-quarter revenue from mobility at $21.2 billion and revenue from delivery at $20.4 billion. Measured in constant currency, mobility and delivery gross bookings during Q1 rose 20% and 18% year over year, respectively. Ackman's $2 billion vote of confidence Bill Ackman didn't just buy a little Uber stock -- he loaded up. According to Pershing Square's latest portfolio update, Uber represents 18.5% of his investment firm's U.S.-traded equity assets. He bought 30.3 million shares, worth around $2 billion. "We believe that Uber is one of the best managed and highest quality businesses in the world," Ackman said in a post on X in February. A look at Uber's strong fundamentals helps show why the investor is so upbeat about the stock. Business momentum like this, when combined with the stock's cheap valuation, is rare. Self-driving ambitions without the heavy lifting While Uber previously attempted to build its own autonomous vehicle unit, it has since pivoted to a more capital-efficient strategy. Instead of owning the technology outright, Uber has partnered with leaders in the autonomous vehicle space like Waymo and Aurora to bring robotaxis onto its platform. This partnership model reduces costs and risk, while still allowing Uber to tap into what could be a multi-billion-dollar market. Waymo's autonomous vehicles are already live on Uber's platform in select markets, and the company expects this coverage to expand throughout 2025 and beyond. As self-driving tech matures, Uber's platform-first model could prove to be a key competitive advantage. It doesn't need to win the autonomous vehicle hardware race -- it just needs to be the go-to place for consumers to hail those vehicles. Uber has come a long way from its pre-IPO days of deep losses and uncertain economics. Today, it's a profitable, growing business with a defensible market position and exciting upside in autonomous transportation. Ackman's $2 billion stake signals confidence not just in where Uber is, but where it's going. For long-term investors looking for a durable compounder, Uber may finally be ready for the spotlight. Sure, the stock has already surged more than 200% over the last three years. But there may be more room to run. While there's always risk of technological disruption as well-capitalized competitors Tesla and Alphabet eye the space, the stock's low price-to-earnings ratio of under 15 at the time of this writing suggests that investors have arguably already priced these risks in. While there's no guarantee that Uber is able to overcome what will likely be an intensely competitive market in the coming years, it has already proven to investors it can face challenges head-on and come out stronger. It can likely do it again. Should you invest $1,000 in Uber Technologies right now? Before you buy stock in Uber Technologies, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Uber Technologies wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $656,825!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $865,550!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Daniel Sparks and/or his clients have positions in Tesla. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Tesla, and Uber Technologies. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Vancouver Sun
36 minutes ago
- Vancouver Sun
After former Leafs and Blue Jays players, CRA now goes after ex-Raptors star Norman Powell
OTTAWA — On Feb. 4, 2022, former Toronto Raptors star guard Norman Powell received two pieces of news that would have a major impact on his life. The first was from his agent telling him that he was part of a blockbuster trade that sent him from the Portland Trail Blazers to the Los Angeles Clippers. The second was from the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) claiming over $1.2 million in additional income tax on 'inducements' paid by the Raptors in 2019 and 2020 to attract the star two-way guard to the surging Toronto team. Powell, who was part of the Raptors' 2019 championship team, is now appealing the CRA's decision in the Tax Court of Canada. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Powell's faceoff with the tax agency is over the same issue as ex-Toronto Maple Leafs Patrick Marleau and John Tavares , namely that his nearly $7 million in signing inducements should be taxed at only 15 per cent and not at the top income tax bracket (over 50 per cent). A key question for the court to determine is if the inducement offered by the Raptors Powell's contract to entice him to Toronto fits the definition of an 'inducement' under the U.S.-Canada treaty that sets the tax rate at 15 per cent. Powell says yes, but the CRA says no. The case, like Marleau and Tavares', could have a significant impact on how Canadian professional sports teams use signing bonuses or salary inducements as a tax incentive to attract foreign athletes to Canada instead of lower-taxed American organizations. Powell's lawsuit argues that the millions in inducements he signed with the Raptors to attract him to Toronto are covered by provisions of a Canada-U.S. tax treaty which set the tax rate for an 'inducement to sign an agreement' at 15 per cent. 'The Toronto Raptors and the Appellant (Powell) both understood that the Inducement was a key component of the Appellant's decision to sign' with the Canadian team, reads the appeal. But, per Powell, the CRA disagreed. On Feb. 4, 2022, the agency issued notices of assessment to him for 2019 and 2020 that taxed his inducement payments at the ordinary federal and provincial income tax rates (likely over 50 per cent) instead of 15 per cent. 'The Toronto Raptors agreed to pay the Inducement to entice the Appellant 'to sign an agreement relating to the performance of' his services as an 'athlete',' Powell wrote, saying that CRA's arguing otherwise is 'to distort the legal and economic reality' of his contract with the Raptors. Powell objected to the CRA, which he says accepted his objections 'in full' on March 1, 2024. But then to Powell's surprise, six days later the CRA issued a reassessment that once again considered his inducements to be taxable at the full federal and provincial tax rates instead of 15 per cent. Even more confusing is that one year later, the CRA 'admitted and agreed' that the $7 million paid by the Raptors to Powell in 2019 and 2020 were in fact 'an inducement… to choose the Toronto Raptors' under the terms of his NBA contract, his lawsuit states. 'The CRA has admitted that the Inducement was paid to the Appellant as an inducement for him to choose the Toronto Raptors. This should conclude the analysis,' reads his appeal. In his lawsuit, Powell says the CRA made essentially the exact same arguments as they did in Tavares' and Marleau's cases without considering the differences between an NBA and NHL contract. His appeal suggests that CRA copied its findings in the Tavares and Marleau cases and applied them to Powell, who plays a different sport in a different league with different player contracts. 'The position adopted by the (CRA) has been shaped following an audit conducted on an NHL player who received an inducement as per the terms outlined in his employment agreement. Subsequently, the (CRA) improperly extended the conclusions drawn from this particular NHL case to the Appellant' without considering the specificities of his NBA contract, Powell argued. Both the CRA and Powell's counsel, Marie-France Dompierre, declined to comment as the case is ongoing. The tax agency has not filed a statement of defence in court. National Post has published a series of reports since 2024 detailing tax battles between former star players of Toronto's three largest professional sports teams and the CRA. Other than its fights with Powell, Tavares and Marleau, the CRA also battled ex-Maple Leaf Jake Muzzin over the tax rate imposed on his signing bonus in 2020. The CRA also launched battles in 2023 with ex-Toronto Blue Jays all-stars José Bautista, Josh Donaldson and Russell Martin over multimillion tax bills. Late last year, the Tax Court ruled in favour of Donaldson and Martin, arguing that the CRA's calculation of their income tax owing was 'faulty.' cnardi@ National Post Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what's really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here . Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .


Calgary Herald
38 minutes ago
- Calgary Herald
After former Leafs and Blue Jays players, CRA now goes after ex-Raptors star Norman Powell
OTTAWA — On Feb. 4, 2022, former Toronto Raptors star guard Norman Powell received two pieces of news that would have a major impact on his life. Article content The first was from his agent telling him that he was part of a blockbuster trade that sent him from the Portland Trail Blazers to the Los Angeles Clippers. Article content Article content The second was from the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) claiming over $1.2 million in additional income tax on 'inducements' paid by the Raptors in 2019 and 2020 to attract the star two-way guard to the surging Toronto team. Article content Article content Powell, who was part of the Raptors' 2019 championship team, is now appealing the CRA's decision in the Tax Court of Canada. Article content Article content Powell's faceoff with the tax agency is over the same issue as ex-Toronto Maple Leafs Patrick Marleau and John Tavares, namely that his nearly $7 million in signing inducements should be taxed at only 15 per cent and not at the top income tax bracket (over 50 per cent). Article content A key question for the court to determine is if the inducement offered by the Raptors Powell's contract to entice him to Toronto fits the definition of an 'inducement' under the U.S.-Canada treaty that sets the tax rate at 15 per cent. Article content The case, like Marleau and Tavares', could have a significant impact on how Canadian professional sports teams use signing bonuses or salary inducements as a tax incentive to attract foreign athletes to Canada instead of lower-taxed American organizations. Article content Article content Powell's lawsuit argues that the millions in inducements he signed with the Raptors to attract him to Toronto are covered by provisions of a Canada-U.S. tax treaty which set the tax rate for an 'inducement to sign an agreement' at 15 per cent. Article content Article content 'The Toronto Raptors and the Appellant (Powell) both understood that the Inducement was a key component of the Appellant's decision to sign' with the Canadian team, reads the appeal. Article content But, per Powell, the CRA disagreed. On Feb. 4, 2022, the agency issued notices of assessment to him for 2019 and 2020 that taxed his inducement payments at the ordinary federal and provincial income tax rates (likely over 50 per cent) instead of 15 per cent. Article content 'The Toronto Raptors agreed to pay the Inducement to entice the Appellant 'to sign an agreement relating to the performance of' his services as an 'athlete',' Powell wrote, saying that CRA's arguing otherwise is 'to distort the legal and economic reality' of his contract with the Raptors.