Manipulated report falsely claims S.Korea and US presidents did not speak
"How embarrassing," reads the Korean-language caption of an image shared on Facebook on June 7, 2025.
The image appears to be a screenshot of a report from South Korean wire service News1 headlined, "[Breaking] White House spokesperson denies Trump spoke to South Korean President Lee Jae-myung". The report carries the byline of correspondent Ryu Jeong-min.
The post circulated shortly after South Korea's presidential office announced that Lee had held his first phone call with Trump on the evening of June 6 -- his following his victory in a snap election (archived here and here).
The two leaders discussed efforts toward concluding a tariff deal, and Trump also invited Lee to Washington, according to the South Korean presidential office.
South Korean media noted the call -- three days after the election -- came later than it had for Lee's predecessors, and speculated about a change in the relationship between Seoul and Washington (archived link).
Image
Screenshot of the false Facebook post, captured on June 9, 2025
The screenshot of the purported News1 report was also some commenters accusing Lee of fabricating the call and damaging South Korea's international standing.
"They're openly making up lies, how will Lee ever be able to talk to Trump now?" read a comment on one of the posts.
Another said: "South Korea has immediately become a pariah on the world stage."
While neither Trump nor the White House have issued a public statement about the call, the report circulating online has been altered.
'Obviously manipulated'
A keyword search using the name of the reporter in the doctored article found he wrote a breaking news report on June 6 titled "[Breaking] Trump held phone call with South Korean President Lee Jae-myung" (archived link).
The article was filed from Washington and cites the confirming via a White House official that the call did occur (archived link).
Image
Screenshot comparison of the manipulated report shared on social media (left) and the original News1 report published June 6 (right)
over email on June 9 that the report about a supposed denial from the White House was "obviously manipulated" and that his actual report confirmed the call had taken place.
For example, there was no White House statement about phone calls between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping on June 6 or with Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba on May 22 (archived here and here).
As of June 10, there have been no official reports contradicting South Korea's announcement of the call between Lee and Trump.
AFP previously debunked a digitally altered photo shared online claiming to show Trump's response to South Korea's presidential election.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
21 minutes ago
- Euronews
LA imposes downtown curfew as Newsom criticises Trump
A ten-hour curfew for downtown Los Angeles took effect on Tuesday as officials attempted to stop vandalism and looting during protests over US President Donald Trump's immigration raids. The city's mayor Karen Bass said the curfew would run from 8 pm on Tuesday to 6 am on Wednesday local time, as she declared a local emergency. 'We reached a tipping point' after 23 businesses were looted, Bass said. The curfew will be in place in an area covering a just over 2.5 square kilometre section of downtown, including the area where protests have been raging since Friday. The city of Los Angeles encompasses roughly 2,295 square kilometres. The curfew doesn't apply to residents who live in the designated area, those who are homeless, credentialed media or public safety and emergency officials, according to Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell. McDonnell said 'unlawful and dangerous behaviour' has been escalating since Saturday, prompting the need to impose the curfew. 'The curfew is a necessary measure to protect lives and safeguard property following several consecutive days of growing unrest throughout the city,' said McDonnell. Meanwhile, California's Governor Gavin Newsom accused Trump of 'pulling a military dragnet' across Los Angeles, after the leader ordered the deployment of 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines despite Newsom's objections. Troops were deployed to protect federal buildings but are now also protecting immigration agents as they carry out arrests. The US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) said in a statement that the troops were providing security at federal facilities and protecting federal officers 'who are out on daily enforcement operations.' Newsom says Trump's immigration crackdown has gone far beyond simply arresting criminals and that 'dishwashers, gardeners, day labourers and seamstresses" are among those being detained. He said Trump's decision to deploy the California National Guard without his support should serve as a warning to other states as to the kind of disregard to federal laws the incumbent administration is willing to engage in. 'California may be first — but it clearly won't end here,' warned Newsom. Earlier on Tuesday, Newsom had asked a federal court to block the Trump administration from using the National Guard and Marines to assist in ICE raids across Los Angeles. The California Governor argued that this would only cause tensions to soar further and trigger further civil unrest. The Trump administration said Newsom was seeking an unprecedented and dangerous order that would interfere with its ability to carry out enforcement operations. A judge set a hearing for Thursday. Trump left open the possibility of utilising the Insurrection Act, which authorises the president to deploy military forces inside the US to suppress rebellion and domestic violence or to enforce the law in certain situations. It's one of the most extreme emergency powers available to a US president. 'If there's an insurrection, I would certainly invoke it. We'll see,' Trump told reporters at the Oval Office. He later called protesters 'animals' and 'a foreign enemy' in a speech at the Fort Bragg army installation in North Carolina, where he marked the 250th anniversary of the US Army. Trump has described the unfolding chaos in Los Angeles in dire terms that Bass and Newsom say are nowhere close to the truth. The US president has also pledged to 'liberate' the city. 'We will liberate Los Angeles and make it free, clean and safe again,' Trump said. Trump has been under fire after the Pentagon revealed that his National Guard and Marine deployment cost $134 million (€117.4 million). Critics have slammed him for reckless government spending, after his administration had vowed to eliminate wasteful expenditure with the creation of agencies such as the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). But, the 47th US president argues that the deployment was absolutely necessary, saying that Los Angeles would have been 'completely obliterated' had he not ordered the deployment. Democratic members of California's congressional delegation accused Trump of creating a 'manufactured crisis' to advance his personal agenda. A federal appeals court agreed on Tuesday to allow the White House to continue collecting the extensive import taxes imposed by US President Donald Trump, as challenges to his prominent trade policy remain under appeal. The ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit builds upon a comparable decision it issued following another federal court's annulment of the tariffs on 28 May, which indicated that Trump had exceeded his presidential authority. Acknowledging that the disputes regarding Trump's tariffs present "issues of exceptional importance," the appeals court announced it would accelerate the proceedings and conduct hearings on 31 July. The case involves the 10% tariffs which Trump imposed in April on nearly all nations, as well as the bigger tariffs that he implemented and subsequently paused on countries with which the United States has trade deficits with. It also includes tariffs that Trump levied on imports from China, Canada, and Mexico in an effort to compel these nations to take further action against the unlawful influx of immigrants and synthetic opioids across the US border. In implementing the tariffs, Trump had invoked emergency powers under a 1977 law. But a three-judge panel at the US Court of International Trade ruled he had exceeded his power. The tariffs upended global trade, paralysed businesses and spooked financial markets.
France 24
44 minutes ago
- France 24
ECB's Lagarde slams 'coercive trade policies' in Beijing visit
Lagarde, one of the world's most influential central bankers, is visiting Beijing this week for talks with local counterparts on the Chinese economy and expanding cooperation. Her visit came as high-level China-US talks in London ended with an agreement to lower tensions after US President Donald Trump launched his tariff blitz in April. In a speech at the People's Bank of China -- the country's central bank -- she urged all parties to find solutions "even in the face of geopolitical differences". Lagarde urged countries to protect the "multilateral framework" of international trade, which she said "so greatly benefited our economies". "Coercive trade policies are far more likely to provoke retaliation and lead to outcomes that are mutually damaging," she added. "All countries should examine how their structural and fiscal policies can be adjusted to reduce their own role in fuelling trade tensions," she said, calling for an end to "mutually damaging escalation of tensions". She warned that protectionism risked "eroding the foundations of global prosperity". Beijing and Brussels' trade policies have been slammed by Trump, who last month threatened to escalate tariffs on the European Union if it did not negotiate a swift deal. China, meanwhile, has sought to improve shaky relations with the bloc as a counterpoint to Trump. China and the European Union will host a summit next month marking 50 years since they established diplomatic ties. The two sides will discuss setting minimum prices for Chinese electric vehicles in Europe and opening a "green channel" for rare earth exports to the 27-nation bloc, according to official statements.
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
Rare earths: China's trump card in trade war with US
Used in electric vehicles, hard drives, wind turbines and missiles, rare earth elements are essential to the modern economy and national defence. AFP takes a look at how rare earths have become a key sticking point in talks between the US and China. Mining boom "The Middle East has oil. China has rare earths," Deng Xiaoping, the late Chinese leader whose pro-market reforms set the country on its path to becoming an economic powerhouse, said in 1992. Since then, Beijing's heavy investment in state-owned mining firms and lax environmental regulations compared to other industry players have turned China into the world's top supplier. The country now accounts for 92 percent of global refined output, according to the International Energy Agency. But the flow of rare earths from China to manufacturers around the world has slowed after Beijing in early April began requiring domestic exporters to apply for a licence -- widely seen as a response to US tariffs. Under the new requirements -- which industry groups have said are complex and slow-moving -- seven key elements and related magnets require Beijing's approval to be shipped to foreign buyers. Deep impact Ensuring access to the vital elements has become a top priority for US officials in talks with Chinese counterparts, with the two sides meeting this week in London. "The rare earth issue has clearly... overpowered the other parts of the trade negotiations because of stoppages at plants in the United States," said Paul Triolo, a technology expert at the Asia Society Policy Institute's Center for China Analysis, in an online seminar on Monday. That disruption, which forced US car giant Ford to temporarily halt production of its Explorer SUV, "really got the attention of the White House", said Triolo. Officials from the two countries said Tuesday that they had agreed on a "framework" for moving forward on trade -- with US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick expressing optimism that concerns over access to rare earths "will be resolved" eventually. Rare earth advantage The slowing of licence issuance has raised fears that more automakers will be forced to halt production while they await shipments. China's commerce ministry said over the weekend that as a "responsible major country" it had approved a certain number of export applications, adding that it was willing to strengthen related dialogue with "relevant countries". But that bottleneck has highlighted Washington's reliance on Chinese rare earths for producing its defence equipment even as trade and geopolitical tensions deepen. An F-35 fighter jet contains over 900 pounds (more than 400 kilograms) of rare earth elements, noted a recent analysis by Gracelin Baskaran and Meredith Schwartz of the Critical Minerals Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "Developing mining and processing capabilities requires a long-term effort, meaning the United States will be on the back foot for the foreseeable future," they wrote. Playing catch up The recent export control measures are not the first time China has leveraged its dominance of rare earths supply chains. After a 2010 maritime collision between a Chinese trawler and Japanese coast guard boats in disputed waters, Beijing briefly halted shipments of its rare earths to Tokyo. The episode spurred Japan to invest in alternative sources and improve stockpiling of the vital elements -- with limited success. That is "a good illustration of the difficulty of actually reducing dependence on China", said Triolo, noting that in the 15 years since the incident, Japan has achieved only "marginal gains". The Pentagon is trying to catch up, with its "mine-to-magnet" strategy aiming to ensure an all-domestic supply chain for the key components by 2027. The challenge facing Washington to compete with Beijing in rare earths is compounded by sheer luck: China sits on the world's largest reserves. "Mineable concentrations are less common than for most other mineral commodities, making extraction more costly," wrote Rico Luman and Ewa Manthey of ING in an analysis published Tuesday. "It is this complex and costly extraction and processing that make rare earths strategically significant," they wrote.
