Proposed cleaning levy sparks legal challenge in Tshwane
AfriForum is challenging Tshwane's proposed R200 city cleaning levy, calling it unconstitutional and unfair.
Tshwane Deputy Mayor Eugene Modise poses for a photograph at Tshwane House, 20 November 2024, following an interview with The Citizen. Picture: Michel Bega/The Citizen
AfriForum has started legal action against the City of Tshwane to obtain clarification on the implementation of the proposed environmental, or city cleaning levy announced in the budget speech.
Last week, the deputy mayor, MMC of finance Eugene Modise, announced the city's plans to implement the levy of approximately R200 per month from 1 July for all properties without a municipal waste account.
AfriForum's local government affairs advisor Deidré Steffens said they submitted a request to obtain clarification on the city's plans regarding the levy in April, but received no reply.
AfriForum submit to request clarification on levy plan
'On 24 April, AfriForum submitted its comments on the city's draft medium-term revenue and expenditure framework (MTREF) in which the levy was announced.
'Our legal team has made it clear that the draft MTREF containing details of the proposed levy contains material contradictions and gives excessive discretionary power to the municipal manager in the application of the levy. This creates unacceptable scope for abuse and arbitrary application,' she said.
ALSO READ: Tshwane's R54.6bn budget draws mixed reactions
According to Steffens, the implementation of the proposed levy would be contrary to Section 74(2) of the Local Government Municipal Systems Act, which requires that tariffs reflect the actual use of services and be applied fairly.
Steffens said although the constitution required municipalities to promote the social and economic development of communities in their budgeting processes, this was not the case with the implementation of the levy.
'A non-revenue-generating service, such as a cleansing levy, is traditionally financed by property rates and if the city were to proceed with the proposed implementation of this levy, it would amount to double taxation.
Cleansing levy traditionally financed by property rates
'It is unacceptable that a service that should be funded by property taxes is now being repackaged as a new levy, presumably to cover the metro's budget deficits.
'This is a blatant attempt to milk more revenue from already overtaxed residents,' she said.
ALSO READ: Millions needed to fix Tshwane sinkholes
AfriForum was prepared to approach the court if the city failed to provide the information by the deadline, Steffens said.
Republican Conference of Tshwane councillor Lex Middelberg said the levy was a reintroduction of a similar city cleaning levy that was introduced in the 2017-8 MTREF but then abandoned.
'This cleaning levy is unconstitutional. The city conceded this and abandoned the cleaning levy in later MTREFs after the issue was raised by the Tshwane Money Matters Caucus in November 2017 with your predecessor in office at the time, with the minister of finance, the AGSA and the MEC for local government,' he said.
Not a tariff for services rendered
Middelberg said the cleaning levy was not a tariff for services rendered, but by its own definition an arbitrary tax raised on persons who do not consume the service.
'The cleaning levy is not raised to render a service, but to bulk up the city's coffers with additional revenue to be applied for other purposes than to clean the city,' he said.
ALSO READ: Tshwane mayor faces outrage for Weskoppies Hospital power cut
Tshwane's DA spokesperson for finance Jacqui Uys said they were also against the levies.
Uys said the current waste collection in the city could cost residents up to 10% of their salaries.
'Instead of assisting poor households who cannot afford almost R500 per month for waste removal, the ANC-led City of Tshwane has opted to introduce a punitive tax of almost R200 on these households if they choose not to use the city's services,' she said.
DA raises concerns
'The DA has also raised concerns about the newly introduced waste levy in the draft budget.'
Uys said the intention of the new levy was not to ensure a cleaner city, but rather the introduction of yet another tax to use the residents of Tshwane as a stopgap to improve the city's financial position.
NOW READ: Tshwane mayor under fire for downplaying pothole crisis
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
5 hours ago
- IOL News
AfriForum and the Criminalisation of Black Memory
After losing its hatespeech bid to silence the liberation song Dubul' iBhunu, AfriForum has recast itself as a victim on a Washington roadshow—proof that South Africa's culture wars now trade on transAtlantic markets. Image: IOL The legal campaign by AfriForum against Julius Malema for singing Dubul' iBhunu exposes a deeper problem in post-apartheid South Africa: the refusal to recognise Black historical expression as legitimate political speech. The case becomes a proxy for a wider battle—over how trauma is voiced, who owns remembrance, and whose narrative the law protects. Even though the Constitutional Court ruled in March 2025 that the chant does not constitute hate speech and refused AfriForum's final appeal, the group continues to push a cultural logic that seeks to erase African memory and symbolic resistance. In the wake of that defeat the organisation's leadership flew to Washington, DC, courting White-House-aligned conservatives and evangelical pressure groups. There they resurrected the discredited 'white genocide' myth, recasting their legal loss as a global human-rights emergency and lobbying for US intervention. Through laundering a local culture war into trans-Atlantic respectability AfriForum weaponises the language of victimhood to criminalise Black grief on an international stage. The chant in question gained prominence through the ANC Youth League in the 1980s, where it boosted morale, unified activists, and encoded a shared narrative of resistance. It resurfaced during Rhodes Must Fall and Fees Must Fall, accompanying toppled statues, confrontations with institutional power, and the mobilisation of a generation unafraid to connect past to present. Framing it as a Malema issue ignores the collective histories it carries. Struggle songs such as Dubul' iBhunu emerge from moments of crisis, mourning, and confrontation. They are ritual expressions forged in the crucible of generational trauma. The word dubula is not a literal instruction. It channels defiance, spiritual rage, and unresolved loss. Bhunu became a cipher for the apartheid state's armed wing—those who brutalised, detained, and executed under racial law. AfriForum chooses a narrow, decontextualised reading. Its interpretation deletes the cultural logic of African expression and dismisses the long tradition of symbolic resistance found across pre-colonial societies. Among the Xhosa and other Nguni peoples—including Zulu, Swazi, and Ndebele—war dance was political dramaturgy, signalling readiness without declaring bloodshed. Choreographed movement, chanting, and regalia combined into displays of spiritual authority and communal strength. These traditions preserved dignity, summoned ancestral guidance, and often prevented violence through symbolic confrontation. The Khoekhoe and ǀXam (San) held equally intricate cosmologies of performance and protest. For the ǀXam, trance dance was healing. It was also social memory and boundary. Khoekhoe resistance rituals used song and oral invocation tied to land custodianship and lineage, later suppressed by missionaries and colonial administrators who labelled them chaotic or threatening. Under settler rule, performance was criminalised; suspicion replaced meaning. Similar traditions surface worldwide. The Māori haka projects strength, summons ancestors, and faces power, often in peacetime assertion rather than wartime aggression. Indigenous nations across the Americas and Australia use ritual chant and dance as spiritual-political speech—warning, remembering, dignifying in the face of settler encroachment. Colonial authorities never grasped this. Ritual was 'primitive'. Song was 'subversive'. Expression itself became a crime. That legacy lingers in how courts treat African performance today. While Dubul' iBhunu is condemned and policed, Die Stem remains sacrosanct—its lyrics celebrating settler conquest and Christian dominion. Its presence in the national anthem shows how power still accommodates the spoils of conquest while rejecting the memory of the conquered. Settler symbols are validated by law; Black resistance is sanitised or prosecuted. The demand is reconciliation without responsibility, visibility without history. The aftermath tells its own tale. On Human Rights Day (21 March 2025) EFF supporters sang Dubul' iBhunu in Sharpeville; AfriForum threatened contempt but had no legal foothold. Two months later the lobby group turned to new litigation, filing papers in the Gauteng High Court to strike down the 2025 Expropriation Act as 'part of a genocidal land-grab'. Simultaneously, Washington rewarded AfriForum's alarmism: a special refugee track has begun admitting small Afrikaner cohorts, and an executive order now withholds USAID funds until Pretoria tackles so-called 'farm murders'. President Ramaphosa has condemned the campaign as 'disinformation diplomacy' and lodged a protest note with the US State Department—but the propaganda has already taken flight. The unresolved question is whether the National Prosecuting Authority has the mettle to deem AfriForum's trans-Atlantic lobbying an act of treason against the republic.
The Citizen
6 hours ago
- The Citizen
‘No justification for tampering with the constitution': MK party and DA slug it out over no-confidence motion limits
Have motions of no confidence become political weapons? The uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) party has rejected a proposal by the Democratic Alliance (DA) to amend the Constitution of South Africa, making it difficult to bring numerous motions of no confidence against the executive in all three spheres of government. The DA believes that over the years, motions of no confidence have been used for political point scoring, destabilising the work of governance and threatening the consistency of service delivery. The City of Johannesburg has been a victim of such motions of no confidence abuses. While not all mayors in this City were removed through motions of confidence, the city has elected more than eight mayors since 2016. How many motions of no confidence are enough? On Wednesday, MK party spokesperson Nhlamulo Ndhlela said that the amendment would make it difficult to hold the executive accountable. This proposal constitutes a direct challenge to parliamentary oversight and represents a desperate attempt to shield the executive from scrutiny and accountability. 'It is a reactionary and democratic manoeuvre disguised as reform. Under the guise of creating stability, the amendment would tie parliament's hands for 12 months at a time, even in the face of ethical collapse, public outrage, or constitutional violations. 'This effectively grants political immunity to underperforming or compromised leaders,' he said. DA not prepared to withdraw Ndhlela said there are existing parliamentary rules that already allow the speaker of the National Assembly or presiding officers to reject frivolous or repetitive motions. He said there is 'no justification for tampering with the constitution' to solve 'a problem that doesn't exist'. 'The MK party rejects this amendment in its entirety. It is redundant, regressive, dishonest, unnecessary and dangerous. 'Parliament's power to hold the executive accountable must be expanded, not neutered. We call on the DA to withdraw this embarrassing and authoritarian stunt before further damaging what remains of its credibility,' he said. Speaking to The Citizen, DA spokesperson Willie Aucamp said the party is proposing two bills related to this matter. 'We cannot allow the kind of instability that we have seen in municipalities,' he said. Aucamp said the party will not withdraw the proposed bills. ALSO READ: Zuma point man touted to replace Shivambu as MK party SG Analyst weighs in Meanwhile, Theo Neethling, a political analyst from the University of the Free State (UFS), told The Citizen that limiting motions of no confidence in legislatures would reduce political grandstanding and make the submission of a motion of no confidence more meaningful. 'Personally, I would support restrictions on these motions only once every 12 months to the date of the last motion. The reason is that this could help reduce political grandstanding and reduce institutional instability,' he said. However, Neethling said he was not sure if other parties would support the DA's proposal. Former Minister of Co-operative Governance Thembi Nkadimeng had proposed a set of reforms aimed at stabilising coalition government while she was in office. This included introducing a cooling-off period after a motion of no confidence vote in councils. NOW READ: Did Duduzile Zuma-Sambudla's faction dribble Shivambu out of power?
The Citizen
8 hours ago
- The Citizen
Action promised on poor services
During a special council meeting, Rand West City Local Municipality adopted its annual budget, promising efficient service delivery and development going forward. • Also read: Residents voice fury over water issues Recently, the municipality held a meeting to adopt its Annual Midterm Revenue and Expenditure Framework (MTREF) or commonly known as the annual budget. The meeting saw key municipal leaders, including Executive Mayor William Matsheke, council Speaker Selina Moumakwe, Deputy Mayor Nontombi Molatlhegi and Chief Whip Mkhuseli Jokazi. According to municipal spokesperson Phillip Montshiwa, the MTREF was described as balanced, credible and fully funded. He added that it reflected good financial planning and responsible governance. 'The annual budget was adopted unanimously by all councillors and shared commitment to development and the well-being of residents. The adoption marks a key milestone in the budgeting cycle and lays a solid foundation for efficient service delivery and developmental projects in the upcoming financial period,' he concluded. Have your say by emailing the Randfontein Herald at randfonteinherald@ At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
