
Europe Steps Up Presence at Middle East Energy 2025
Representatives from various European pavilions have lauded the event's strategic importance, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) aiming to enter the Gulf, African, and Asian markets. With a shared focus on forging partnerships and exploring the latest in energy technology, European delegations are using the platform to strengthen their global footprint.
Germany leads this year's European presence with its largest delegation to date. 'We have 85 companies here, covering everything from cabling and electrical insulation to renewables and precision electronics,'
said Heike Schöttler, Director of Global Trade Fairs at AUMA. She noted that while some companies target the UAE and GCC, others see Dubai as a launchpad into Africa and India.
Italy's delegation, coordinated by ANIE Federazione, includes 37 companies within its pavilion, alongside several independent participants. 'We're here to support SMEs and to facilitate networking, knowledge sharing, and trend analysis—not just commercial deals,'
said Alice Bertazzoli, Senior Professional at ANIE.
Austria and the Czech Republic have also reinforced their participation. Austria is represented by 10 companies, continuing a longstanding presence at the event. 'Our goal is to connect with current clients and discover new partners,'
said Christian Kien, Project Manager.
Meanwhile, Czech companies are showcasing advanced solar, connectivity, and energy solutions. 'Middle East Energy is a key gateway for our firms to expand regionally,'
said Marcela Klinekova from the Czech Ministry of Industry and Trade.
The surge in European participation underscores Dubai's growing stature in the global energy landscape.
News Source: Emirates News Agency
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Gulf Today
7 hours ago
- Gulf Today
India, China to resume direct flights in sign of closer ties
India and China are set to resume direct flight connections as soon as next month, people familiar with the negotiations said, as the world's two most populous countries seek to reset their political ties. Airlines in India have been asked by the government to prepare flights to China at short notice, with a possible official announcement as soon as the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit at the end of August in China, said the people, asking not to be identified because the negotiations are ongoing. Passenger flights between India and China were suspended after the Covid-19 pandemic, forcing travelers from the two neighboring countries to pass through hubs like through Hong Kong or Singapore. The renewed push to rebuild a direct link comes at a time when India's relations with the US have come under considerable strain, after US President Donald Trump doubled tariffs on Indian goods to 50% as a penalty for its purchases of Russian oil. On Monday, Air India announced it would suspend its direct link to Washington, DC, next month, citing 'operational factors' as the reason. The carrier still flies to New York and San Francisco. Diplomatic ties between the two Asian heavyweights hit a low point in 2020, when border clashes left 20 Indian fighters and an unknown number of Chinese soldiers dead. India recently allowed tourist visas for Chinese nationals after years of curbs. Prime Minister Narendra Modi will attend the SCO summit in Tianjin starting Aug. 31, where he may meet Chinese President Xi Jinping. India's aviation ministry, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation, and the country's press information bureau did not respond to requests for comment. The exact timing of any flight resumption remains fluid, and talks might still hit a snag, the people cautioned. Before the suspension, Indian carriers including Air India and IndiGo, as well as Chinese airlines such as Air China, China Southern and China Eastern ran services between key cities of the two countries. A resumption is likely to see both Air India and IndiGo restarting flights to China, the people said. Air India and IndiGo did not respond to emails seeking comment. India and China had first agreed in January to resume direct flights, before relations between the two countries cooled again amid India's limited war with Pakistan. The two countries then announced a takeup of direct connections once more in June, though without any visible progress. Plans to rebuild direct links only gained pace in the past two weeks, and the airlines involved have also been informed about the proposal, the people said. The number of direct flights between the US and China has dwindled by nearly three-quarters since 2019 to a scheduled 9,726 this year, based on data from Cirium. Airlines plan to offer just more than 3 million seats on such flights in 2025, up 15% from 2024 levels. In July, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said that Beijing and New Delhi should work towards mutual trust and "win-win" cooperation, after talks with his Indian counterpart Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, state news agency Xinhua reported. China and India should "adhere to the direction of good-neighborliness and friendship" and "find a way for mutual respect and trust, peaceful coexistence, common development and win-win cooperation", Wang said, according to Xinhua. The two foreign ministers met in Beijing as the two rivals seek to repair ties following a 2020 clash on their border. The world's two most populous nations are intense rivals competing for strategic influence across South Asia, and their 3,500-kilometre (2,200-mile) frontier has been a perennial source of tension. India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi and China's President Xi Jinping met for the first time in five years later that month, agreeing to work on improving relations. New Delhi is concerned over Beijing's increasing presence in the Indian Ocean, seeing the region as firmly within its sphere of influence. Another source of tension is the Dalai Lama, the Tibetan spiritual leader India has hosted since he and thousands of other Tibetans fled Chinese troops who crushed an uprising in their capital Lhasa in 1959. The 90-year-old Dalai Lama says only his India-based organisation has the right to identify his eventual successor. China insists that it would have final say on who succeeds the Tibetan spiritual leader. Agencies


Zawya
16 hours ago
- Zawya
Are African countries aware of their own mineral wealth?
Imagine running a business for over a century without knowing what's in your warehouse. That's essentially what many African countries are doing with their mineral wealth. Governments across the continent still have very little knowledge of what lies beneath their soil. Between the 18th and 20th centuries, European colonial powers exploited African mineral wealth for their industrialisation. Post-independence, many African nations nationalised their mining sectors. International pressure led to privatisation in the 1980s. This weakened the motivation and capacity of governments to develop long-term strategies. They have more incentive to export minerals for foreign exchange in the short term. As political economists, we have been researching the governance of Ghana's and Rwanda's minerals sectors for over a decade. We conducted research into why some African nations are investing more than others in geological investigations. These are studies that examine where minerals can be found and what their economic potential is. We focused on Ghana and Rwanda because of their different levels of commitment to investing in geological investigations. We found that intense political competition forces Ghanaian governments to have short-term priorities. This makes geological investigations (a long-term, risky venture) unappealing to ruling elites. In contrast, the Rwandan Patriotic Front government has invested in geological surveys over the last decade. Beyond economic and technical costs, context-specific political dynamics – interests, ideas and power relations – shape the decision to invest in geological mapping. A mixed searchGhana is rich in several minerals and is Africa's largest producer of gold, which is its highest export earner. Minerals generated US$11 billion in revenue in 2024. The country is also rich in diamonds, manganese and bauxite. It recently discovered lithium in commercial quantities. Lithium is a 'critical mineral' for the energy transition and this discovery will be of interest to investors. Rwanda is a producer of tin, tantalum and tungsten. It also has commercial deposits of gemstones, silica sands, kaolin, vermiculite, diatomite, clays, limestone and gold. Policy experts and international organisations often encourage governments to invest in geological mapping of their minerals. This is to enhance greater investment in the sector and boost the country's gains from its resources. But these investigations are costly and lucrative findings aren't guaranteed. Some African governments have limited commitment to investing in geological mapping. Others, such as Uganda, Morocco, Botswana and South Africa, have put resources into it. For example, the Ugandan government announced its intention to expand national geological mapping coverage from 50 to 100 percent. Ghana's lack of geological knowledgeThe roots of the knowledge gap stretch back to colonialism. European powers meticulously mapped African minerals, but kept the data for themselves. Today, the British Geological Survey holds over 300,000 geological reports and maps from other countries. Much of it is gathering dust in archives rather than helping African governments understand their own resources. Even basic geological knowledge often sits in London, Paris or Brussels rather than in Accra, Kigali or Nairobi. Take Ghana, which has been mining gold for over a century yet still lacks comprehensive geological surveys. We found that the country's competitive political system, where power alternates between two main parties almost every eight years, stands in the way of long-term planning. Successive Ghanaian governments have relied on private mining companies to conduct geological investigations. There is limited monitoring of whether investigations are carried out before extracting minerals. This approach has obvious flaws. Firstly, companies may not share all their findings. Secondly, the government doesn't have control over information about its own resources. We also found evidence of a darker political calculation. Through licensing, political elites are able to maintain lucrative relationships with mining companies. Comprehensive geological mapping might force more transparent, competitive bidding processes that could disrupt these arrangements. This includes vested political interests extending into the small scale and artisanal mining space. Rwanda's different pathRwanda tells a different story. Since 1994, the governing Rwandan Patriotic Front has increasingly taken control of all aspects of the society. As part of this drive it has developed longer-term ambitions in relation to its development strategies. The country has chosen to know more about what lies beneath its land and has taken steps to improve its capabilities. Firstly, it revised its mining law. The Rwandan government had initially invited foreign mining companies to obtain permits on a first come, first served basis. Though permit holders were required to invest in geological investigations before extraction, there was limited monitoring of what firms were doing. This is similar to what was taking place in Ghana. Secondly, the Rwandan government even established its own mining company, Ngali Mining, to invest directly in exploration. Thirdly, it has attracted investment in geological surveys, with some support from donors. In this way, it directly employs geological investigation firms rather than relying on mining firms to invest in investigations themselves. The results are impressive: between 2012 and 2016, the government attracted four different sets of North American and European firms to conduct extensive mapping studies. Fourth, as a result of these surveys, the government re-categorised existing mining areas into 52 separate areas for mineral exploration. As a result, the Rwandan government now attracts investment to these areas because there is more understanding of which minerals exist there. It's important to note that Rwanda imports many of its minerals from neighbouring Democratic Republic of Congo and then re-exports them. Importing and re-exporting DRC minerals earns Rwanda immediate foreign exchange earnings. This is particularly evident in rising Rwandan gold exports in recent years. Thus, even where governments may be keen to invest in geological investigations, when other short-term priorities exist it is less easy to sustain long-horizon goals in domestic mining sectors. Breaking the knowledge barrierThe global demand for minerals is soaring. This has made developing comprehensive knowledge of underground resources more urgent for African countries. However, our research suggests that simply throwing more money at geological surveys won't reorganise domestic minerals sectors if political incentives favour short-term interests. Understanding the political dynamics is the first step towards unlocking Africa's mineral potential. Only by learning more about the power structures that shape these decisions can countries begin to map their way to more sustainable mineral wealth. © Copyright 2022 Nation Media Group. All Rights Reserved. Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (


Dubai Eye
16 hours ago
- Dubai Eye
US, China extend tariff truce by 90 days, staving off surge in duties
The United States and China have extended a tariff truce for another 90 days, staving off triple-digit duties on each other's goods as US retailers get ready to ramp up inventories ahead of the critical end-of-year holiday season. US President Donald Trump announced on his Truth Social platform on Monday that he had signed an executive order suspending the imposition of higher tariffs until 12:01 am EST (0501 GMT) on November 10, with all other elements of the truce to remain in place. China's Commerce Ministry issued a parallel pause on extra tariffs early on Tuesday, also postponing for 90 days the addition of US firms it had targeted in April to trade and investment restriction lists. "The United States continues to have discussions with the PRC to address the lack of trade reciprocity in our economic relationship and our resulting national and economic security concerns," Trump's executive order stated, using the acronym for China. The tariff truce between Beijing and Washington had been due to expire on Tuesday at 12:01 am EDT (0401 GMT). The extension until early November buys crucial time for the seasonal autumn surge of imports for the Christmas season, including electronics, apparel and toys at lower tariff rates. The new order prevents US tariffs on Chinese goods from shooting up to 145 per cent%, while Chinese tariffs on US goods were set to hit 125 per cent - rates that would have resulted in a virtual trade embargo between the two countries. It locks in place - at least for now - a 30 per cent tariff on Chinese imports, with Chinese duties on US imports at 10 per cent. There was relief on the streets of China's capital, where officials are grappling with the challenge Trump's trade policy poses to the economy's long-standing, export-oriented growth model. Markets showed optimism for a breakthrough between the two superpowers, with Asian stocks rising and currencies mostly steady, after treading water for weeks. Trump told CNBC last week that the US and China were getting very close to a trade agreement and he would meet Xi before the end of the year if a deal was struck. TRADE 'DETENTE' CONTINUED The two sides announced a truce in their trade dispute in May after talks in Geneva, Switzerland, agreeing to a 90-day period to allow further talks. They met again in Stockholm, Sweden, in late July, and US negotiators returned to Washington with a recommendation that Trump extend the deadline. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said repeatedly that the triple-digit import duties both sides slapped on each other's goods in the spring were untenable and had essentially imposed a trade embargo between the world's two largest economies. "It wouldn't be a Trump-style negotiation if it didn't go right down to the wire," said Kelly Ann Shaw, a senior White House trade official during Trump's first term and now with law firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld. She said Trump had likely pressed China for further concessions before agreeing to the extension. Trump pushed for additional concessions on Sunday, urging China to quadruple its soybean purchases, although analysts questioned the feasibility of any such deal. Trump did not repeat the demand on Monday. China's exports to the US fell an annual 21.7 per cent last month, according to the country's latest trade data, while shipments to Southeast Asia rose 16.6 per cent over the same period as manufacturers sought to pivot to new markets and capitalise on a separate reprieve that allowed trans-shipment to the US. Separate US data released last week showed the trade deficit with China shrank to its lowest in more than 21 years in June. Still, analysts expect the world's two largest economies to reach an agreement before long, as their deep interdependence makes pursuing alternative markets unattractive over the long term. Washington has also been pressing Beijing to stop buying Russian oil to pressure Moscow over its war in Ukraine, with Trump threatening to impose secondary tariffs on China.