Weever fish warning after people stung on North East coast
The RNLI lifeguard service confirmed it had "seen an increase in the number of incidents involving weever fish this summer" along the North East."The dorsal fin contained three spines of venom, which protects the weever fish from any potential threats," Ms Manson said."Being stung by a weever can be painful, but it is generally nothing to worry about as it does not cause any significant damage."The creatures, which measure about 7in (18cm) long, burrow into the sand where they hide.
'Very painful'
Hartlepool Borough Council has reported "an increase in number of weever fish" and Tynemouth Volunteer Life Brigade has warned visitors of "reports of a large number" of the venomous fish.Beachgoers have been advised to wear sandals or shoes when paddling and to shuffle feet in the sand rather than stamping.A Tynemouth Volunteer Life Brigade said: "Be extra cautious in shallow, sandy areas. "If stung, soak the affected area in hot (not scalding) water to help relieve pain, ensure the spines are not stuck in the foot and seek medical advice if required."A spokesperson for Hartlepool Council said: "In common with other areas along the coastline, we have seen an increase in the number of weever fish due to the recent warm weather."The fish lie under the sand on the shoreline and have venomous spines on their dorsal fins which when stood on puncture the skin on the foot – sometimes leaving the spine in the wound - causing a very painful sting."
Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘Motor neurone disease robbed me of my voice – now I can finally speak again thanks to AI and an old videotape'
A woman who lost the ability to speak after she developed motor neurone disease (MND) 25 years ago has finally regained her voice with the help of AI and an old videotape. Sarah Ezekiel was left unable to talk or use her hands due to the neurological condition that affects the brain and spinal cord, just months after becoming a mum for the second time in 2000, aged just 34. Her children Aviva and Eric had only ever heard her speak through a machine, which had an emotionless, robotic tone. Now, two decades later, her voice has been recreated using artificial intelligence from an eight-second snippet of her real voice taken from a scratchy VHS tape. 'After such a long time, I couldn't really remember my voice. When I first heard it again, I felt like crying. It's a kind of miracle,' she told the BBC, using eye-gaze technology which allows her to type by tracking her eye movements across a screen. Ms Ezekiel got her AI voice when Bristol-based assistive technology company, Smartbox, asked for an hour's worth of audio to recreate it. But because she had lost her ability to speak before the creation of smartphones, all she had was a mumbled eight-second clip of her speaking on a videotape. However, the clip was just enough. Simon Poole from Smartbox recalled his heart sinking when he received the short clip. But he played around with it and looped it through the latest AI-voice technology that uses thousands of voices. It was able to fill in the gaps and predict where a voice, like Ms Ezekiel's, might go with its intonation. Ms Ezekiel was a Londoner who had worked as a personal assistant. She was married with a toddler and expecting her second child when her speech started to slow and she started to feel weakness in her left arm. She was diagnosed with MND - a degenerative condition which causes muscle weakness, with about 1,000 people diagnosed in the UK every year. The condition can be life-shortening, and according to the NHS, most of those affected will lose the ability to speak. Her marriage ended soon after her diagnosis, leaving her to rely on 24-hour care for her and her children. The mother of two battled feelings of isolation because she was unable to communicate. Eventually, after five years of living with the condition, she was able to use eye-gaze technology to type and speak with a synthetic voice, like the physicist Stephen Hawking. But with the help of AI, she now has her accent back - which she said is better than sounding like a robot. Ms Ezekiel joked: 'I was very posh and people didn't know I was [really a] cockney with a slight lisp.' Her son Eric said his mother's new AI voice has made the family closer as she can now express emotions and show when she is happy, sad or angry. Her daughter Aviva explained that hearing her mother's voice was 'amazing' and said she can now feel who she is as a person. "Mum isn't just a disabled person in the corner with a robot that doesn't relate to her,' she said.
The Guardian
11 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Women with Alzheimer's have unusually low omega fatty acid levels, study finds
Women should ensure they are getting enough omega fatty acids in their diets according to researchers, who found unusually low levels of the compounds in female patients with Alzheimer's disease. The advice follows an analysis of blood samples from Alzheimer's patients and healthy individuals, which revealed levels of unsaturated fats, such as those containing omega fatty acids, were up to 20% lower in women with the disease. The low levels were not seen in men with Alzheimer's, suggesting there may be sex differences in how the disease takes hold and affects a person's physiology. 'The difference between the sexes was the most shocking and unexpected finding,' said Dr Cristina Legido-Quigley, a senior author on the study at King's College London published in the Alzheimer's & Dementia journal. 'There's an indication that having less of these compounds could be causal in Alzheimer's, but we need a clinical trial to confirm that.' Alzheimer's disease is twice as common in women as in men. Factors including women's longer average lifespan, differences in hormones, immune responses and educational opportunities can all play a role in the development of the disease. In the latest study, researchers analysed the levels of lipids, which are fatty compounds, in the blood of 306 people with Alzheimer's, 165 people with mild cognitive impairment and 370 people who were cognitively healthy controls. Lipids can be saturated or unsaturated, with the former considered unhealthy and the latter broadly healthy. Women with Alzheimer's disease had higher levels of saturated lipids and lower levels of unsaturated lipids than cognitively healthy women, a pattern not seen in men. Legido-Quigley said that if changes in the liver or metabolism were responsible, less omega fatty acids would probably be reaching women's brains. 'And these lipids feed the brain,' she added. Diets rich in omega-3 fatty acids, such as the Mediterranean diet, have long been linked to health benefits for the heart, brain and other organs. One study from 2022 found that middle-aged people with higher blood levels of omega-3 fatty acids had better cognitive function than others. Several trials have found that giving older people omega-3 supplements did not improve their cognitive function or boost mental capacity in those already diagnosed with dementia. Legido-Quigley wants to see a clinical trial established to test whether supplements can delay Alzheimer's disease specifically in women with low levels of unsaturated fatty acids, adding that the drop may start to appear when women are in their 50s. In the meantime, she said women should ensure they are getting omega fatty acids in their diets. There are three essential omega-3 fatty acids, known as ALA, DHA and EPA. ALA is found in plant-based foods such as chia seeds, flaxseed and walnuts. DHA and EPA primarily come from fish. The NHS recommends eating two 140g servings of fish a week, with one being an oily fish, to get enough DHA and EPA. Dr Julia Dudley at Alzheimer's Research UK, which co-funded the study, said more work was needed to unpick the mechanisms behind the sex difference and discover whether lifestyle changes, including diet, could have a role in preventing the disease. 'Understanding how the disease works differently in women could help doctors tailor future treatments and health advice,' she added.
Daily Mail
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Epileptic prison officer wins £440,000 payout after being dismissed over fears he would drop keys for inmates to snatch
An epileptic prison officer has won a payout of more than £440,000 after he was dismissed for fears he would drop the keys, which inmates could snatch Andrew Mullinger was placed on restricted duties at HMP Holme House, Stockton-on-Tees, County Durham, after telling bosses about his condition, which meant he could not supervise inmates or carry keys. Managers claimed the restrictions made it impossible for him to deliver 'good and effective service' and dismissed him months later. But a tribunal ruled the Ministry of Justice had discriminated against him by failing to consider alternatives before sacking him. The Middlesbrough hearing heard he has now been awarded £445,000 in damages. Mr Mullinger, who joined the category B prison in March 2019, was diagnosed in early 2023 after suffering a seizure while on annual leave. At the time, the prison was seeing 'very high levels' of sickness absence and a lot of staff were working on restricted duties whilst the governor was 'under pressure' to reduce those numbers. When Mr Mullinger told his line manager about his epilepsy, she told him he should be placed on restricted duties, which meant he should not have prisoner-facing duties or access to keys, and should not work alone or at night. An occupational health report advised that adjustments should remain in place until Mr Mullinger had been seizure-free for six months. A second medical professional added that, if this milestone was reached, he could potentially return to his prison officer duties within two years. In March, Mr Mullinger was absent for two days due to migraine and dizziness, an absence the tribunal noted was linked to his disability. Later that month, he was asked to attend a meeting to 'discuss the prognosis for a return to full duties.' Mr Mullinger's case had previously been raised in discussions with the prison governor, given his record of multiple absences. During the March meeting, the governor remarked that Mr Mullinger had a 'high sick record' and voiced concerns, including the fact he was unable to 'draw keys and work alone.' The governor dismissed Mr Mullinger and told him: 'Your sickness absence is very high and there are a high level of days on restricted duties. It doesn't demonstrate good and effective service.' The prison officer was later handed a letter of dismissal which 'referred to concerns about lone working, flexible working hours, and not being able to carry keys'. The panel said Mr Mullinger's two-day absence from work due to a migraine had 'influenced' the decision to sack him. Mr Mullinger appealed his dismissal and said reasonable adjustments had not been fully explored before suggesting he had been treated differently from other staff. His appeal was dismissed, but he took the matter to the tribunal. Employment Judge Adele Aspden said that Mr Mullinger accepts that he could not work in a role that involved him carrying keys. 'That is not in dispute,' the judge said, 'Until [Mr Mullinger] was on an appropriate dose of medication, there was a risk that he would have a seizure. 'If he lost consciousness, there was a risk his keys could be taken from him by a prisoner (or a visitor, if he was in an area where visitors were present).' But, the panel said that steps could have been taken to enable Mr Mullinger to perform an admin role, which he could have done without having to carry keys. The judge said the impact of dismissal on Mr Mullinger was 'very significant' as he lost his career in the prison service and his claims of discrimination and unfair dismissal were upheld by the panel. Employment Judge Aspden said: 'We have found that the [Ministry of Justice] failed to comply with its duty to make reasonable adjustments. 'Had it complied with that duty, [they] would not have dismissed the claimant on 14 March 2023. 'Even if we had not reached that conclusion, the [Ministry of Justice] has not shown why it could not have accommodated [Mr Mullinger] on medical suspension or sick leave instead of dismissing him at that time while seeking clarity as to when his medical condition was likely to be settled. 'The [Ministry of Justice] has not persuaded us that dismissal was a proportionate means of achieving its legitimate aims.'
